User talk:Aashutoshsaini98

April 2024

Hello, I'm Declangi. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Ziziphus mauritiana have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Declangi (talk) 20:22, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ziziphus mauritiana. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ziziphus mauritiana was changed by Aashutoshsaini98 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.917947 on 2024-05-01T04:30:29+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Ziziphus mauritiana. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Llacb47 (talk) 04:45, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Naturescaping, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. Squeakachu (talk) 05:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm RodRabelo7. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Site plan have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. RodRabelo7 (talk) 05:51, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Ziziphus mauritiana, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. RodRabelo7 (talk) 05:59, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:19, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]