User talk:A Flaneur

Welcome!

Hello, A Flaneur, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:A Flaneur/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
How to write a great article
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:20, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:A Flaneur/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:A Flaneur/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:20, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Randall Lee Goodden (March 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

For a living person we have a high standard of referencing. Every substantive fact you assert, especially one that is susceptible to potential challenge, requires a citation with a reference that is about them, and is independent of them, and is in WP:RS, and is significant coverage. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact cited, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make this draft a clear acceptance (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the person is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today. Please read and apply WP:REFB and WP:CITE

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Randall Lee Goodden and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Randall Lee Goodden, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 20:01, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, A Flaneur! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle Faddle 20:01, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Randall Lee Goodden (March 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please have a look at WP:YFA, of help might also Help:Referencing for beginners and WP:MINREF , a biography needs inline citations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Randall Lee Goodden and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Randall Lee Goodden, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:01, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Randall Lee Goodden has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Randall Lee Goodden. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 20:11, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Autobiography information

Please read Wikipedia:Autobiography Fiddle Faddle 21:41, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Timtrent

Hello, A Flaneur. You have new messages at Timtrent's talk page.
Message added 22:20, 23 March 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

As a new user you may not have seen the notification that I have replied to you. This note is a courtesy to you Fiddle Faddle 22:20, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Randall Lee Goodden

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Randall Lee Goodden, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 01:22, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have an obvious conflict of interest, please don't write about yourself and read the guidance below:

When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls. You had no in-text references at all, and the collection of links at the bottom seem mainly to be pages associated with or promoting you, and not independent third-party sources
You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews. Your whole text consisted of unverified claims
There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections, especially when they are links to your own speeches
You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. I see that your claim to have taken the images yourself has been challenged, and does seem improbable that these images could be selfies! The whole of your text was created in a single edit with not a single wikilink or reference, and these three facts are a pretty good indicator that you have just dumped text from elsewhere.

You have obviously not read any of our guidance about writiing article, and have basically just dumped your CV on us.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:53, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle 11:45, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Randall Goodden.PNG

Thanks for uploading File:Randall Goodden.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 11:45, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Randall Goodden.PNG

A tag has been placed on File:Randall Goodden.PNG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://rlgoodden.tripod.com/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 12:40, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying you may be blocked from editing. This declaration is not optional. You have stated that you are Randall Lee Goodden elsewhere, and you must make a formal declaration before making any other edits of any description in order to comply. Fiddle Faddle 14:41, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For the record I am not the above person nor am I a paid writer. As both seemed to be in question let me pass along that I once attended a business seminar chaired by Mr Goodden and was able to establish a professional relationship with him. I'm now retired but think creating a Wikipedia page would be fitting for someone fairly well known in his field.A Flaneur (talk) 20:31, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the unequivocal declaration Fiddle Faddle 20:33, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Fiddle Faddle 20:04, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Randall Lee Goodden 2 (April 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Randall Lee Goodden 2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Randall Lee Goodden 2, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:43, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Goodden teaching seminars in China at the request of the Chinese Government.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Goodden teaching seminars in China at the request of the Chinese Government.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 01:45, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Speaking at the U.S. State Dept.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Speaking at the U.S. State Dept.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 01:45, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Quality Expo International.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Quality Expo International.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 02:00, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Randall Goodden Image.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Randall Goodden Image.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://rlgoodden.tripod.com/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 18:02, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Randall Goodden.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Randall Goodden.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:46, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Randall Goodden.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Randall Goodden.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://rlgoodden.tripod.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fiddle Faddle 20:00, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Goodden's Book Set.jpg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:Goodden's Book Set.jpg, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

It is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles. (See section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then you should do two things. First, please state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to the image itself, the page which uses it, and the page which contains the license conditions. Second, please add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fiddle Faddle 20:03, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Randall Goodden Image.jpg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:Randall Goodden Image.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://rlgoodden.tripod.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fiddle Faddle 20:03, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Teaching at Oxford.pdf

Thanks for uploading File:Teaching at Oxford.pdf. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle 20:09, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Teaching at Oxford University.pdf

Thanks for uploading File:Teaching at Oxford University.pdf. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle 20:10, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A major inconsistency

Please see this message thread where you introduce yourself as Randall Goodden just prior to your signature, and compare it with this message thread where you state that you are not Goodden.

Either you are Goodden (your first statement) or you are not Goodden (your second statement). Please state:

Why you signed yourself as Goodden if you are not Goodden?
Why you state that you are not Goodden if you are Goodden?

You do not appear to be here to build an encyclopaedia. Instead you appear to be here to promote Goodden, whether you are him or not. Fiddle Faddle 20:58, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do Wikipedia the courtesy of answering this question. I note that you have edited Wikipedia since this question was left for you Fiddle Faddle 08:31, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An answer has been given to me on my talk page in this diff and I have made a reply there. I am deeply concerned that thsi account has been used allegedly by two different people, Randall Goodden and 'his brother'. This behaviour must cease at once. See WP:NOSHARING Fiddle Faddle 15:49, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Goodden interval with Reuters.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Goodden interval with Reuters.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fiddle Faddle 07:56, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Reuters News Interview.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Reuters News Interview.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fiddle Faddle 07:57, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Speaking at the U.S. State Dept.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Speaking at the U.S. State Dept.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fiddle Faddle 07:58, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Randall Lee Goodden has a new comment (2)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Randall Lee Goodden. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 19:04, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tim This relates to the whole copyright question and China, from the gov copyright website - "There is no such thing as an “international copyright” that will automatically protect an author’s writings throughout the world. Protection against unauthorized use in a particular country depends on the national laws of that country"

and "whoever takes the picture owns the U.S. copyright" doesn't apply when it's a Chinese National who took the picture with my camera in China. The U.S. isn't going to award him "The Copyright".

Did my article get posted somewhere so I can see the comments and suggestions from other Editors? If so, where? If not, why?

Randy A Flaneur (talk) 23:39, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but that's incorrect. Whoever takes the photo is the copyright holder, regardless of who owns the camera. And since China is a signatory to the Berne Convention, the photo enjoys copyright protection that is similar (but not identical) to what it would be in the United States. Please see Copyright rules by territory/China for an overview of Chinese copyright law. — Diannaa (talk) 20:36, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have completely lost track of which draft is which. Why you have chosen to create so many is beyond me. Special:Contributions/A_Flaneur will locate all of your contributions. As far as I can tell you have:

Draft:Randall Lee Goodden - not submitted for review
Draft:Randall Lee Goodden 2 - now redirects to 1, above, but this permlink shows a prior version, broadly identical to 1, above.
Draft:Randall Goodden - rejected by Robert McClenon and will thus not proceed further, and I am not surprised. It is a mess. I am concerned that you did not even consider to check your work prior to submission.

You would do well to listen to and understand what Diannaa tells you. They have a wealth of expertise in the area of copyright issues, and they absolutely know the topic inside out. It really does not matter how much you insist that you must be correct, you are mistaken.

I did research to see if I could find sourcing to consider writing an article, mostly as an academic challenge. I found some old TV shows, very much of their day, but no sources that pass this shorthand description of what is required. I have concluded that, while you are most assuredly notable to those who love you and whom you love, your notability as far as Wikipedia is concerned is below the threshold required to write an article. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^{Talk to me} 20:59, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa I just made a small correction to your link to the copyright rules of China. One too few "Commons"in the link. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^{Talk to me} 21:11, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Speaking at the U.S. State Dept.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Speaking at the U.S. State Dept.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle 06:28, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reuters News Interview.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Reuters News Interview.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle 06:29, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read up on copyright ownership

The two files above cannot be your copyright even if you held the camera because they are photographs of copyright material. Thus the copyright is vested in the person or corporation whose video you have taken a photograph of.

Taking a photograph of it and claiming it is your copyright is like photocopying something that you do not own the copyright of and claiming that you now own the copyright of the material. It just is not so.

It is particularly surprising that a person whose business has been the creation of intellectual property is continuing to seek to drive a coach and horses through copyright law by uploading here and to Commons files to which you cannot and do not own the copyright, and that you have not sought to gain and prove permissions to upload them here or to Commons.

Read, please Wikipedia:Copyrights and when you have digested that please concern yourself with providing necessary permissions to Wikipedia:Volunteer Response Team. Only by provision of such permissions will files you do not and can not own the copyright to be allowed to remain.

Concerning a file showing an image you you that can only be here uploaded by the copyright owner or with permission from them. Please read this rationale for pictures of you:

"No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright)."

Just re-uploading files willy nilly and hoping no-one will notice will get your editing privileges removed.

If you have any questions on copyright you should ask at Wikipedia:Help desk or at Wikipedia:Teahouse but not on both. Fiddle Faddle 07:57, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am asking one of our copyright experts (by pinging them), @Diannaa, to ask if they will be willing to offer you advice. I know this is an important project for you and they may be able to help you in a manner so that you can achieve your objectives with the photographs you wish to upload Fiddle Faddle 08:56, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have much to add but I can sum up as follows:

The person who takes a photograph owns the copyright, even if they took it with your camera at your direction.
Taking a photo or screenshot of something from the Internet or TV does not transfer the copyright of that content to you. The original copyright holder still holds full rights. It's not okay for you to use their work or claim it as your own. This applies to File:Speaking at the U.S. State Dept.jpg and file:Reuters News Interview.jpg.
There's a simplified version of Wikipedia's copyright rules at Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright.
Repeatedly violating Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing.— Diannaa (talk) 10:33, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have just uploaded two pictures that contravene this: "No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright)."

You have stated explicitly that they are taken by your camera. It is patently obvious that you did not take them so you do not own the copyright.

You have once again tried to drive a coach and horses through copyright law. I asked @Diannaa to advise you and they have. Their advice was almost precisely the same as mine with additional resources. Fiddle Faddle 15:43, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Reuters News Interview.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Reuters News Interview.jpg, which you've attributed to screen shot of copyright content. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 10:26, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This also applies to File:Speaking at the U.S. State Dept.jpg.— Diannaa (talk) 10:33, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Goodden Speaking2.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Goodden Speaking2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle 15:30, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The picture was taken by a friend at my request that was sitting in the front row using my camera. I inserted a number of pictures prior to this one trying to get one that was the right size. Randy A Flaneur (talk) 18:34, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The person who took the photo is the copyright holder, regardless of who owns the camera. I explained this to you yesterday. I ahve deleted this file as it is a duplicate of File:Goodden Speaking.jpg.— Diannaa (talk) 18:48, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Goodden Speaking.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Goodden Speaking.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle 15:30, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted both of these new uploads. Please stop uploading other people's work without evidence of permission, or you will be blocked from editing.— Diannaa (talk) 19:00, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded a number of pictures only because I was trying to find one that was thee right size, and I did all this in Sandbox so I don't know why it was being reviewed. I didn't submit it for review until 3 hours ago, once I found something that fit. These Goodden Speaking jpgs were taken by a Chinese friend of mine, in China, more than 10 years ago, using my camera at my request. He's not from the U.S., has never been in the U.S., and would have nothing to do with U.S. copyright law, nor would U.S. copyright law have anything to do with him. This is all being blown out of the water for no practical reason.

Randy A Flaneur (talk) 20:20, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read again the wording under the "Publish" button: "you agree to our Terms of Use and agree to irrevocably release your text under the CC BY-SA 3.0 License and GFDL."

This wording holds true whether you upload a file, work in a sandbox, work on a talk page or any area on Wikipedia.

The rules apply to you in the same manner that they apply to our founder, Jimmy Wales. There is no arguing or special pleading your way around them. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^{Talk to me} 20:26, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral observer here. Flaneur, you keep saying "He's not from the U.S., has never been in the U.S., and would have nothing to do with U.S. copyright law, nor would U.S. copyright law have anything to do with him." It has been explained that China is a signatory to the Berne convention on copyrights -- so the person who took the picture is absolutely affected by this convention. You keep repeating that it was your camera -- but Diannaa, who knows much more than most about copyright, says it does not matter who owns the camera. It sounds like you are refusing to accept what you are being told. 73.127.147.187 (talk) 06:12, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Randall Goodden (April 17)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: undefined The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft or substantial portions of this draft are duplicated. They were probably entered more than once when editing the draft. The duplication must be corrected before resubmitting this draft. Duplication of a draft or portions of a draft are often indicative of sloppiness in the development of the draft, so extra attention should be used in editing this draft before it is resubmitted. If this draft is resubmitted without correcting the errors, it may be Rejected, and may be nominated for deletion.

You may ask for advice about editing this draft at the Teahouse.

This page appears to have been written to praise its subject rather than to describe the subject neutrally. Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view.

If this draft is resubmitted without being reworked, it may be nominated for deletion. You may ask for advice about the tone of articles at the Teahouse.

Please do not submit multiple copies of drafts. It does not increase the likelihood that one of them will be accepted into article space, and annoys the reviewers. It is likely to be seen as an effort to game the system, and may result in the drafts being nominated for deletion.

I have not reviewed this draft in detail, but there is no need to review it in detail when I can see that the submitter has not even reviewed their own draft adequately, and so is submitting two nearly complete copies of this draft in one.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:54, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Do you have any reason for editing Wikipedia other than to promote yourself? If you are only here to promote yourself, it would be a good idea not to call unfavorable attention to your account by arguing with reviewers and administrators, because then you could wind up with an administrator concluding that you are not here to contribute to the encyclopedia. (The administrator might request a block review after the fact at WP:AN. If a block review is requested by a blocking administrator at WP:AN and no one objects, it becomes a de facto ban.) So, if you are not here to contribute to the encyclopedia other than about yourself, keep a very low profile in promoting yourself, or you might push some administrators too far. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:35, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Randall Goodden

Draft:Randall Goodden, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Randall Goodden and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Randall Goodden during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^{Talk to me} 08:05, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]