Jump to content

User talk:98.51.228.103

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2024

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. ~Sıgehelmus♗(Tøk) 12:31, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The Godfather Part II, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 01:12, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How does a reference to "Corloene, Sicily" in any way contradict that it was part of a kingdom? It's irrelevant to the plot, Sigehelmus's only reason for adding it is to plug his personal interpretation of the film, and he has refused to engage on the talk page for over a month now. I expect that his conduct will furrow some brows. 98.51.228.103 (talk) 01:20, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I never insinuated it was my "only reason", or even a major one, and your vendetta is against WP:AGF. ~Sıgehelmus♗(Tøk) 02:24, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring notice

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Godfather Part II. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 01:29, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sighelmus is the one shunning discussion. Why don't you go slap a template on his talk page? 98.51.228.103 (talk) 01:31, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You were reverted by two people. Please get consensus before undoing. See wp:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle (BRD). BTW: Done. They may not 'hear' you unless you use help:notifications. You need to sign with four tildes to make it work. Editing an existing post may not generate the notification. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 01:45, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]