User talk:89.240.226.91

August 2024

Hello, I'm REDACTED403. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to 2024 Southport stabbing—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. -REDACTED403 (talk) 12:17, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:25, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

89.240.226.91 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Orange Sticker and NotQualified being upset about someone opposing their propaganda, does not justify a ban. 89.240.226.91 (talk) 01:24, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See WP:NOTTHEM. If this were an account, it would be blocked as WP:NOTHERE. You seem to only be here to criticize the far right and label people as Nazis. This isn't the forum in which to do that. 331dot (talk) 09:33, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

89.240.226.91 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My apologies for the misunderstanding, I am not here to criticize the far-right. I am here to dehumanize whites, particularly subhuman gammons, nor am I here to call people names. I am here to incite hatred and violence against what the British government deems, acceptable targets. Those being whites and Christians. Anyone who is against this, ask yourself, do you really want to risk getting Wikipedia banned in the UK for misinformation by protecting an ethnic group that reliable sources agree doesn't actually exist? 89.240.226.91 (talk) 14:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Yes, well. Not sure what to say really. I don't think Wikipedia is the right place for you. I have revoked talk page access. PhilKnight (talk) 15:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

89.240.226.91 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I suspect the claim of hate speech may be a claim of racism, despite the lack of derogatory language used to describe Black and indigenous people of color. Additionally, there may be frivolous claims made about me inciting genocide against a particular ethnic group. This would be ignoring a vast amount of evidence to the contrary which proves such a claim impossible. 89.240.226.91 (talk) 23:15, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The disgusting comments clearly show this block is necessary to prevent disruption. I also see no need for talk page access. 331dot (talk) 09:12, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block reasoning

Going to require specific examples to justify a year long block. 89.240.226.91 (talk) 23:04, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Diff/1244676913. It's evident from today that nothing has changed. Have you tried Twitter instead? -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 23:15, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Twitter is full of sexist, racist, homophobic, islamophobic, misogynistic, ablist, transphobic, xenophobic, far-right, white supremacist propaganda.

Now, which edit featured derisive language towards women, people of color, LGBTQAIP+ folx, Muslims, disabled people or indigenous people? The claim was that I had used hate speech. 89.240.226.91 (talk) 22:34, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure Twitter has a place for people talking about "white scum", vermin, subhumans, and those other things. If not there's probably other venues. Wikipedia isn't one of them. So, if you want to appeal, you know how it goes, instructions above and as before. Bye. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 23:00, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.