User talk:71.227.188.49

DS alert (climate change)

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Climate change, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 23:47, 15 June 2015 (UTC

THANKS FOR THE WIKICENSORSHIP! It's what you people do. My point that you censored stands, though: You people cannot handle controversy, period. And now you can't handle criticism. Not that I'm one bit surprised. 71.227.188.49 (talk) 00:01, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Actually, I like criticism that follows our rules about being

• civil,
• assuming good faith, and
• are based on what Wikipedia defines as a reliable source.

If you are intersted in making constructive critique without causing disruption, then please study and abide by the talk page guidelines and WP:ARBCC#Principles. We try not to WP:BITE newcomers, but there's a low tolerance for studious disdain of our basic standards once they're called to your attention. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 00:40, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

You got it wrong. Wikipedia has a "low tolerance" for anyone and everyone. You have many rules and "basic standards," any and all of which you will ignore at your choosing. This is why NO ONE respects Wikipedia for ANYTHING that has the slightest controversy involved. You are laughed at everywhere, and banned from use as a tool in EVERY UNIVERSITY IN THE WORLD because of your LACK of "basic standards." What you especially HATE is anyone who tells you this, no matter how obviously true it is. 71.227.188.49 (talk) 17:17, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

---