User talk:67.71.61.142

November 2019

• It is almost never suitable to copy content from another web site to Wikipedia, for more than one reason, the most important being copyright. When you post anything to Wikipedia you release it for anyone in the world to reuse it, either unchanged or modified in any way whatever, subject to attribution to Wikipedia. It is very rare that the owner of a web site licenses content for such very free reuse, and in those few occasions when they do so, we require proof of the fact. We don't assume that content is freely licensed on the unsubstantiated say so of just anyone who comes along and creates a Wikipedia account.
• There have also been other problems with your editing, such as the fact that sometimes your attempts to write English sentences have not entirely succeeded, the fact that you have never provided sources for the content you have posted, and the fact that often what yo have written has not been on the topic you have said that it is on. (For example, "etymology" does not mean what you seem to think it means.) JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 17:29, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. That includes editing to promote a nationalist point of view. JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 17:50, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

---