User talk:5shot
5shot (talk) 02:23, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Reason for reversion of your edits
[edit]- You are taking this quite the wrong way, and melodrama like "Things are not now as they were then, but suppression is still suppression" is quite unnecessary.
- Your edits were not removed due to some strange cabal of Sight Shooters who are out to suppress proper life-saving training. Your edits were removed because you did not conform your writing style to what is used on Wikipedia. To draw a parallel, it's as though you had a magazine ask you for "an 800-word article written in the first person in layman's terms at a 10th grade reading level, with a few anecdotes about people you know who've survived gunfights using point-shooting" and instead you sent them something that looks like a page from military FM with dry impersonal verbiage and 1700 words long with multiple charts and graphs.
- You can take a glance at most any decent Wikipedia article, and none of them are discursive personal essays such as you wrote. This is an encyclopedia, so the focus is briefly and concisely putting out basic facts based on published consensus, not musing on the issue at lenght. Note, for example, Rex Applegate. It gives the basic facts of his life, theories he was known for, and publications.
- In summary, your edits were removed due to not being written in a usable way, not because of any dispute over content. If you'd like advice from volunteer mentors on how to better conform your contributions to the standard style, please visit the Tearoom. MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:26, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
|
Hello! 5shot,
you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:26, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
|
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aimed Point Shooting or P&S, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 14:16, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aimed Point Shooting or P&S, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aimed Point Shooting or P&S, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:02, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aimed Point Shooting or P&S
[edit]
Hello 5shot. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Aimed Point Shooting or P&S".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aimed Point Shooting or P&S}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 08:40, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Just visited the page 6/10/15 and think the current version is very good. Thanks to the contributors whose work with some oversight I am sure, came up with an easy reading and well written and presented text. John Veit Visit www.pointshooting.com for info and articles and FBI statistics and papers on handgun effectiveness. If you are interested in this subject area, visit the site and copy whatever info you are interested in. You and others are welcome to use/share it as you see fit. I am going to be 80 and as such, my life and the life of the site may be short lived. Thanks again for a balanced approach to the subject matter.
Also, I am not schooled in making edits, or the ins and outs of how wiki editing works, so this my be not correct.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
May 2016
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Point shooting. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:12, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
The file File:Smljan06.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
The file File:Gg3a1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
The file File:Patpic.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
