User talk:49TL/Archive/December 2005

This is a talk page archive for Xy7. Please do not edit this page. To leave a message, please see the current talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Chart you requested

Done. See Image:FireFox-edits.png. Your use of edit summaries is 85% overall, 97.4% over last 500 edits. Your average # of edits per day is 40.48. If you stopped using Wikipedia, I estimate it would take 8.3 days for the uncontrollable urges and tremors to go away, assuming appropriate treatment. Without treatment, you're likely to end up being a homeless bag man sitting just outside the property line of your local Wal-Mart with a sign that reads "will code xhtml for food". --Durin 20:37, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RFA

Thanks! Tedernst | Talk 22:23, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

How to make this template?

File:Infobox television black.JPG

I want to make template looks like this->. Named Infobox television black, a black version of Infobox television

"vandalism" by me

Sorry it was honestly an accident >_< if you look at this link, near the bottom, you'll see I actually added new content as well as deleting the rest -What I actually did was click to edit one section.... but i have no idea why it deleted everything BUT that section :/ browser problem i guess...

again please see http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=List_of_Batman_comics&diff=prev&oldid=30110008 and think of WP good faith as you can see my edit was actualyl constructive near the bottom :/ --65.98.21.69 19:36, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

anon vandal

There is one who uses at least 3 IPs until now. 81.182.104.136 & 81.182.195.63 & 81.182.20.159. He is just a vandal who promotes fascism. -- Bonaparte talk & contribs 20:46, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Moe Epsilon

Hi there FireFox, it's Moe Epsilon. I hope you didn't take anything personally on the Esperanza talk page earlier today when we were talking about the Stressbusters and everything. Sorry if you did. — Moe ε 02:57, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

Thanks for removing vandalism from my user page. --A dam1213 Talk + 05:24, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

2 (times) --A dam1213 Talk + 05:41, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm an admin now!!

Thanks a ton for your support on my rfa, the final tally was 50-0-0; I'll try and live up to the expectations of others and do my best in maintaining the integrity of Wikipedia. btw, your signature is really cool. --Gurubrahma 14:34, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

BD2412's RFA

Thank you, FireFox, for your support in my RfA - I'll do my best as an admin to make the reality of Wikipedia rise to the level of the dream. BD2412 T 02:12, 8 December 2005 (UTC) ^{<--note new "admin gold" sig :-D}[reply]

My RfA

FireFox, thanks for your support on my RfA. The final count was 46/0/0. I hope I'll live up to your faith in me in my use of the mop and bucket. Please accept this wikithanks as a token of my gratitude ;) Kudos on all those worthy projects you're involved in. --bainer (talk) 23:52, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My failed RFA :)

Dear FireFox,

I would like to thank you for supporting me on my RfA. Even though it failed with a with the final tally of 55/22/6, I want to thank you anyways. I don't want to be one a admin anymore until I reach 10,000 edits now that it's over with. Thanks --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 03:06, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yet Another RFA Thank You Note to clutter up your talk page...

FireFox:

Just writing a quick note to thank you for your support in my recent RFA. My goal as an admin is to never give you a reason to regret supporting my RFA. And thanks for the compliment on my sig. I think it's pretty spiffy myself. =)

All the best.
→ Ξxtreme Unction {^yakł_blah} 15:06, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Pathoschild's successful RfA

Thanks. ^_^ (I do intend on giving better support thanks, but since I dislike copy-and-paste messages it'll take me a while to get down to your page.) On a related note, my tally should be 23/0/0 since Izehar voted twice. ;) // Pathoschild 08:14, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it didn't actually take all that long. ;) Thanks a lot for your support on my request for adminship; it passed with 23/0/0 (plus one duplicate support and an oppose from a vandal IP). I'll do my best to exceed your full expectations. // Pathoschild 09:02, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking vandals

Hello, FireFox. Thanks for your help with the blocking. Things seem to be working okay now. -- PFHLai 10:49, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Humanism

I've been trying to clear out the issues with npov from humanism for a few days now and there is some resistance in the form of one person. why have you intervened on behalf of the only person? if you follow his edit trail, you'll come to see that although that several of us, 3 people, have agreed that we need to be inclusive of Catholic humanists, and other forms of humanism. there is a long discussion of the changes and their justification in the talk section. I need an accurate and neutral article on humanism for my class to read in the spring, and currently, the article isn't accurate. --Buridan 13:15, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

ok, it isn't my fault, but it does appear as if two administrators just jumped into the fray and reverted my edits, bleh, appearances can be deceiving. --Buridan 13:25, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Light or lighthouse

As the Coast Guard lists them as lights rather than lighthouses, and most other articles on the subject use light rather than lighthouse, I was trying to keep things consistent. If there is a consensus on always using lighthouse, please point me to it. Otherwise, I would appreciate it if you did not move articles I have just created without checking with me. -- Dalbury^(Talk) 13:31, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Barbara Roberts Article

I don't quite understand why you reverted my changes. I actually spent a great deal of time rewriting the article. I'm trying to improve many of the article related to Oregon Politicans. Please explain why you reverted. Davidpdx 14:06, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine..I would caution you against reverting article when they are being worked on however. I was in the process of fixing my own error. It certainly wasn't vandalism, but a legitimate edit. There was also another editor working on it at the same time. Between the three of it, there was lots of confusion. Davidpdx 14:15, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

How do you become and administrator?

Hello FireFox. I do not know whether this is the kind of question I should be asking, but what kind of things do you have to do to become an administrator? I have been told that administrator privileges can be very useful to an active CVU member, like me (and you). Please reply -- The Neokid 19:35, 13 December 2005 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks for the advice.

Response to your message on User talk:Theneokid: Thanks for the advice FireFox. I am sure it will be useful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theneokid (talk • contribs)

Barnstar!

I have been looking at what you have done on Wikipedia and have decided to award you this Barnstar for your great effort!

Its nearly Christmas...

..not Easter! Thanks for the birthday greetings. All the best Ban e s 21:15, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative Metal

This is mainly concerning your edits. Im not bitching at you, snarling, being aggressive or cold, but the edits your making to Alternative Metal are leading me, and several others watching them, further down the path of believing the article needs to be merged. Might i recommend to you, that even though you have been here a long time, that you not let your passion for the article take over your sense of writing. Many of the edits your making are filling out the history. Thats good, really good, except its the history of Nu Metal in general. Also, many of the edits are coming off as unencylopedic, or POV. Things such as 'metallish alternativish bands' over 'sungenre'? That some what says unecnyclopedic and POV.

I do seriously think you could make this article better. In the mean time, i suggest you chalk up a temp page and make revisions there, or, do it on a word document before you save anything direct to the article, so things like this can be discussed and a consensus reached.

Otherwise, go for it, but seriously, you need to start correcting the problems with the article, as at the minute, you seem to be furthering them. Leyasu 08:11, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think you got the wrong person. If you look at the edit history of Alternative Metal, you will see that I do not appear in it. I think the user you want is AJ Ramirez (talk · contribs). The only association I have with that user is that I weclomed him back in September. Please make sure you get the right person next time, you got me worried! All the best, Fir e Fox 09:35, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies. I chased the link his profile gave to his supposed User Talk page. It came here so i assumed AJ Ramierz was a seperate profile. Please dont take what i said to heart. Apologies for the inaccuracy and i hope this has caused no animosity between us. Leyasu 11:49, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Balloons!

You have been awarded these balloons for no apperant reason. --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 20:23, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wow thanks!!! Fir e Fox 20:29, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I decided to exterminate the balloons. Have a nice and safe day, Dr. Freeman. --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 09:38, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

News from Esperanza

Hello, fellow Esperanzians! This is just a friendly reminder that elections for Administrator General and two advisory council positions have just begun. Voting will last until Friday, December 30, so make sure you exercise your right to vote! Also, I'm pleased to announce the creation of the Esperanza mailing list. I urge all members to join; see Wikipedia:Esperanza/Contact for more information. All you need to do is email me and I will activate your account. This will be a great way to relax, stay in touch, and hear important announcements. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?)

This message was delivered to all Esperanza members by our acting messenger, Redvers. If you do not wish to receive further messages, please list yourself at WP:ESP/S. Thanks.

Help

I ask your help Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#User:Doom127_accusing_me_to_be_a_Sock_puppet Thanks. --Quackshot 22:58, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism to User:Celestianpower

This message is regarding the page User:Celestianpower. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Cel e stianpower ^háblame 15:20, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This message is regarding the page User:Celestianpower. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --Cel e stianpower ^háblame 15:23, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This message is regarding the page User:Celestianpower. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Cel e stianpower ^háblame 15:24, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the page User:Celestianpower: this is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Cel e stianpower ^háblame 15:26, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What can I get for a Barnstar?

Gee. Thanks. Now that I have a Barnstar, can I ask a little favor? Could you ask User:Geni to unlock the User:Amorrow page? I am Andrew Morrow. The Elizabeth Morgan article, which I wrote, was a very upsetting thing to create and in late July it was hijacked and butchered and I wrote the some message I should not have.

When I was boy in Boy Scouts, I once left my tag on the board at the lake at Boy Scout camp. You know, the one to show that you are swimming there. Of course, they started to search the lake and the camp, looking for me. When they found me, the punishment was several hours of cleaning seaweed out of the roped off swimming area. I had to do my punishment in public, but once punishment was over, that was it.

My ex-wife, a physician, took my only child, my daughter, away from me when she was only three weeks old. Needless to say, that kind of punishment never really ends. That is part of the reason why I care so much about the Elizabeth Morgan story. I was hoping it would only take up one page, but I now see that it is better that it take up the full three pages at Wikipedia that it deserves. Of course, nobody involved in the July indicent thought that way: they just butchered the article of all of its references, and then I got upset and wrote a bad thing. Also, my daughter's name is also A. Morrow and I would like to think that if she ever Google'd "amorrow", that Geni's narrow characterization of me would not be the first thing she sees.

I would like User:Amorrow page unlocked. Not the account, just the user page. -- Fplay 17:56, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The page does not appeared locked to you because you are an admin now. Try using a non-admin account or log out and try anonymously. -- Fplay 18:09, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Congratulations!!! You've earned yourself a barnstar! Fir e Fox 17:48, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Whats the occasion? :) --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 18:00, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It's your birthday :-D Fir e Fox 18:02, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

(*^_^*) --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 18:04, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

lol. Well, you gave me balloons, and then you popped them. So I've taken your barnstar away =D. Fir e Fox 18:16, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Only joking. It was funny though. Fir e Fox 18:25, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

^-^'--Cool Cat^Talk|@ 18:40, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Gee thanks! In 1.5 years of daily edits this is the first.No reason needed, just nice to be recognized. Positive way to start off my new blank talk page also. --Stbalbach 18:00, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Robert_roach

Can you delete this article? It was created by Smigger1989, a new user who probably didn't realize what it was doing. --ViolinGirl^♪ 20:07, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!--ViolinGirl^♪ 20:10, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to bother you again: Is User:Alwaysmiggy88 trying to be another User:Smigger1989?--ViolinGirl^♪ 20:31, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will...thanks. I promise I won't bother you again for a while today...I've got to finish writing my Christmas letters! Thanks again...--ViolinGirl^♪ 20:38, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Apparently your user page has been vandalised 42 times. That is a very large number! Is it the wikipedia record? J.J.Sagnella 20:08, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

YOU are being impersonated - Please read.

http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMistress_Selina_Kyle&diff=31892234&oldid=31892067 - I recently received this edit from User:Automnial - my talk page history - I think it may be a "sockpuppet" of User:Kiand and would like you to check this out or get someone to check please if possible?

Thank you for any help. The message left was "blocked indefinitely because it is either inappropriate or too similar to an existing username" with a fake "signed" by yourself.

Do you think I should maybe bring this up with the administrators as a group on the special board thing or can you handle this yourself? I'm not sure on the procedures - This didn't fool me but I am angry that people are doing this kind of thing.. --Mistress Selina Kyle 22:11, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Could you check if this is User:Kiand?

Something that's EXTREMELY suspect is although I only mentioned that he is likely to be User:Automnial on your and Linuxbeak's talk pages yet almost immediately he made a message on my talk page saying to "cease baseless accusations of me having a vandalous sockpuppet" or some tripe....

Any help would be appreciated, thanks.. seems I may already have a wiki-stalker -_- --Mistress Selina Kyle 22:17, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You also mentioned it in the edit summary you used. If you want to make baseless allegantions against me, go ahead, but you're going to be proved entirely wrong if a sockcheck is done. And I'm adding this to the list of personal attacks you've done so far. Apologies to FireFox for posting this hear, but I can't let utter lies stand. --Kiand 22:27, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Do you get paid by wikipedia?

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.114.77.175 (talk • contribs)

oi

I've had enough of your threats mr. Sort yourself out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.86.125.153 (talk • contribs)

and no of course it doesn't work, anyone can just use a proxy to evade the ban, your a fcking dumbass. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.86.125.153 (talk • contribs)

Lol that ban was real effective. Get a life you jackass. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.211.141.65 (talk • contribs)

Help!

PLEASE HELP: User talk:193.123.228.22 --Wikicrusader 14:28, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

thank you Wikicrusader 14:35, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Here is another guy 209.236.158.250 Wikicrusader 14:54, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking user

You may want to block User:Burps2006...he obviously [1] doesn't like you, either. I told another administrator because I thought they would get to it sooner, but they didn't, so here you are. --ViolinGirl^♪ 16:26, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

holy bejeezus....

I made a mistake at the admin intervention page, and noticed immediately. To my surprise, you happened to notice faster than I did, and fixed it even faster.

Are you Superman? ;-) Kareeser|^Talk! 16:45, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Fir e Fox 17:33, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the United Federation of Planets 28px --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 17:31, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the United Federation of Christmas! Fir e Fox 17:33, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the Cardassian Union --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 17:37, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from Maidstone. Fir e Fox 17:40, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the Ferengi Alliance --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 17:37, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the Grotto. Fir e Fox 18:12, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the Klingon Empire --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 18:17, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the Daleks. Fir e Fox 18:18, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the Doctor. --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 18:38, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the Cybermen. Fir e Fox 18:40, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the Wikipedia Cabal 20px --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 18:43, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from K9. Fir e Fox 18:45, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the Counter Vandalism Unit 30px --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 19:04, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from Clown. Fir e Fox 19:09, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the Romulan Star Empire --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 19:13, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings for when I post so many messages it screws up your pages format. Fir e Fox 19:15, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the Goddess Relief Office 34px --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 19:38, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from irc. Fir e Fox 19:40, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the Universe – ABCD ^e? 19:43, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the Milky way. Fir e Fox 19:56, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the Maverick Hunters. MegamanZero|Talk 19:58, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the Galactic Terran Vasudan Alliance --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 20:14, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mua ha ha ha ha .... Fir e Fox 20:16, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the Starfleet Command 40px --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 20:22, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from Wikipedia 40px Fir e Fox 20:24, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from 40px --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 21:27, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the Queen Vic. 50px Fir e Fox 22:33, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the Central Intelligence Agency 40px --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 22:48, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the 40px. PWNED!!! Fir e Fox 22:51, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from an Urinal 30px --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 23:02, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

insanityyyy --Mistress Selina Kyle 18:21, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Angelina Jolie

Since Angelina has claimed to be an atheist, I've included her under that category. For reasons unknown, you've seen fit to reverse my edit and to accuse me of vandalism. http://www.nndb.com/people/493/000023424/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.2.15.23 (talk • contribs)

Vandalism

No problem, you're a popular guy tonight. ;-) Leithp (talk) 21:27, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Seen reference about your....

Seen your reference about your sig. having problems. I have found a bug that does indeed mess up your sig., causing people to be falsely accused of being sockpuppets, and have reported this matter. Cheers.Martial Law 01:40, 20 December 2005 (UTC) :)[reply]

I have found some kind of glitch that can mess up your online signature, causing someone to be falsely declared to be a sockpuppet. This has been posted on WP:AN as well. Other people has also reported the existance of this bug. This is the glitch: You sign on as Martial Law, the sig looks like this:123.233.567.45. Have been told that this is a known bug. You enable Cookies, clean out your browser caches, which I've done, and yet this bug still exists.Martial Law 22:02, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Is this the problem you're experiencing ?Martial Law 22:21, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

Thank you!

Hi FireFox, thanks for your support on my recent RFA. Although I did not make admin, I'm very happy you decided to support me. I hope that I'll live up to your expectations in the future as well. — Moe ε 04:25, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Rajput

any administrators who are involved in the dispute must not edit this page whilst it is protected

um, yes? you realize that I stepped in as an admin, just like you, and protected the article a few days ago? And that I have no opinion on facts about Rajputs? My involvement is confined to the attempt to teach the troll faction some basic WP rules. I am glad for your intervention, please keep watching the page, I was beginning to feel a little burnt out and in need of backup. dab (ᛏ) 11:27, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Reminds me of you...

This user avoids insults for vandalism, moving straight to actual bodily harm

Benon 14:57, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Rahahaha!!!

Eeeeehehehehe, here I am vandalizing FireFox's talk page! What a wicked, wicked fool I am! Eeeehehehehe!!!!! Search 4 Lancer 17:14, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Pff yeah you wish it was removed or reverted... Why you gotta be like that? Search 4 Lancer

17:20, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletes

You deleted Kung hei fat choi simply because someone put a speedy tag on it without looking at the discussions around it. The criteria for speedy deletes on redirects [2] didn't apply to that article. Please verify speedy deletes. SchmuckyTheCat 20:08, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Talky talky

Yeah so someone already told this to me... I'm just a dumb slashdotter trying out the Wikipedia. Didn't realize it was so territorial what with y'all peeing all over my carpet. Don't get your skirt out of whack, settle down, have a beer. We're just here from Slashdot to look around. Judging by the number of hilarious edits on the page in question... I'd say my comment ain't far off the mark.

What does rvs mean? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.42.7.170 (talk • contribs)

So are you saying you think my dialog with you is Strawberries?

That seems awfully rude. I thought you weren't supposed to "bite the n00bs"?

I asked a legitmate question, your rules and regulations don't permit you to just ignore me as such, or revert my comments. How am I supposed to learn the ropes if y'all revert me instead of talk to me?

Geez

I guess this means n00bs aren't welcome on Wikipedia.

Speedy deletion of Boppers Cafe under CSD A7?

While I care nothing for the article Boppers Cafe and it would have been deleted in any case, I see nothing in WP:CSD justifying its speedy deletion. CSD A7 (non-notable individuals or groups) does not cover instututions, corporations, businesses, buildings, or the like. Please be careful not to assume A7 covers more than it does. —Matthew Brown (T:C) 01:06, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Why did you remove Ashida Kim's photo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Felbeast (talk • contribs)

Rajput

soo, Firefox, what are your plans for Rajput? We cannot wait for peace to break out in South Asia before unprotecting. My take on the situation is that we have several users prepared for civil debate, viz. Taaoo (talk · contribs), ImpuMozhi (talk · contribs), AMbroodEY (talk · contribs), Wisesabre (talk · contribs), with varying grasp of civility, but they represent both camps and I think they could work together. The only users showing complete obstinance are DPSingh (talk · contribs), Ss india (talk · contribs), Shivraj Singh (talk · contribs) plus their assorted IPs. SS and DP are hopeless cases, but Shivraj has his light moments, and he could possibly reform if the environment was better. If we can agree on a zero tolerance policy for trolling, PA and removal of sourced statements (immediate blocks), I do think the users mentioned could get some work done. You would, however, have to babysit the article, and take the abuse from the trolls you block. dab (ᛏ) 09:52, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

why do you think I am involved with the article? The trolls claim I have a "muslim pov", but they're trolls. I do not pretend to have knowledge on the topic, let alone a pov. I am involved as an admin, with getting the discussion back on track, just like you are. You'll find the trolls will claim you are "involved" soon enough, if you dare insist that Muslims should be allowed to edit Wikipedia just like Hindus. dab (ᛏ) 12:58, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted for purely technical reasons, removal ("blanking") of the npov tags and of references. I implored them to add their material, but they didn't listen. I repeatedly stated that I consider it possible that their points are valid, but their edits are in violation of policy (sources, removals). I am thus only involved as far as policy is concerned. This has gone on for too long now, and I do think deliberate trolling should be met with blocks for disruption now. However, as long as you are watching the article, I will leave it to you, and I'll take a well-deserved break from this sad mess. dab (ᛏ) 13:25, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I note that you have blocked wisesabre for 24 hrs -- certainly deserved; but is nothing to be said about Those Others who revert the page a dozen times a day without self-declaring those actions to be reverts?? Your promptness in acting on that complaint will only reinforce their apparent belief of you being their comrade-in-arms. In this connection, may I bring to your attention the following message, which I had left on some other admin's page a few days ago? No action then ensued, but I am hoping for some further promptness from you. Perhaps I should also clarify, given the state of matters here, that I am actually of the same broad "identity group" as Bachmann's opponents, but cannot abide them....here is my message, dealing with your recent correspondent:

Could you take a view on this, this and the Talk:Rajput page in general? That user's discourse is in general informed by this orientation; the futility of engaging with him is arguably indicated by this, this and other such. I am anxious to see something done, since I hold the views expressed by him in the second paragraph here!! The said gentleman (sic), whose ascertainable contributions to WP began on 08/Dec/05, has filed a complaint alleging bias and incivility by Dbachmann (talk · contribs); do you think you could express a view on that complaint page? In that connection, reference to the contribution records of Shivraj Singh (talk · contribs) and Ss india (talk · contribs) may be useful. Regards, ImpuMozhi 05:32, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, I will call your attention to this, addressed to a lady editor -- that user, another of the same group, was banned permanently; however, his edits continue under 210.187.49.65 (talk · contribs). Regards, ImpuMozhi 15:00, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jeet Kune Do

I managed to add and correct some of the styles on the list of styles incorporated into Jeet Kune DO but Only 20 of the 26+4 styles are given,please can you help me find the remaining styles.

Thanks, Felbeast

JKD

Sorry man,I keep confusing you with Firestar WHY do admins keep such similar names???

You guy are crazy???? Felbeast 11:17, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ashida Kim Photo.gif

Ashida Kim

Ashida Kim page is constantly vandalised by someone named John PEterson Lloyd who keeps changing IP addresses he claimed that the image was copyright removed on 14:32, 18 December 2005 by 220.247.231.218 (Image is copyright) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Felbeast (talk • contribs)

I Like Anime

Greetings:

I just noticed, through a coincidental circumstance, that you deleted I Like Anime as a speedy delete, and cited A7 as your criteria.

Thing is, A7 only applies to biographical articles about individual people (or, now, quasi-biographical articles about bands and clubs). Even with the new expansion of its scope, it still does not cover "things". And as near as I can figure I Like Anime was an article about a "thing" rather than a person or a group of persons.

You may wish to restore the article and list it on AfD. There is a group of folks out there who seek any erroneous speedy deletion as a justification to cry for the complete dismantling of the speedy deletion process. AfD is generally the safer route.

All the best.
→ Ξxtreme Unction|_{yakkity yak} 13:55, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

BXML

User:Jan123 remade the article BXML again. Can you please have a look? -- Perfecto 15:31, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Is this username allowed

This is a sockpuppet I just created

Is the username allowed? If not I will simply not log on it again

I☺☻♠♣☻♣♦likeicecream 20:46, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Augustine Sheehan

Re-instated previous page deletion (nn-bio). Notable author, another editor and myself have done substantial work in creating a viable article. Dunno who the anon editor is, but the work is excellent & verifiable. Just FYI - Ali-oops ^✍ 00:14, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note! Appreciate it. Happy Christmas, BTW! :-) - Ali-oops ^✍ 16:24, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

For both removing and readding my name! ε γκυκλοπαίδεια* 18:41, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Blocks

Thanks for the note. I think I've figured out what I was doing wrong; I was putting the username in the User box at the block log, which doesn't show anything (versus the Title box). Crazy stuff, eh? Anyway, thanks again for setting me straight (and for not being too harsh about it). Happy edits! Deltabeignet 20:48, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

SORRY QUESTION!!!!!!!!

I HAVE QUESTION!!!! IF WIKI IS IN THE NOW THEN WHAT WHEN IF NEVER?? I MEAN ARE WE IN THE ARTICLE OF THE EDIT OR DO WE JUST TAKE A TROUBLE IN??? I DON'T GET THE SCREEN WITH ERASE IF...BUT YES, NO???? PLEASE GIVE ME SOME ADVICE THX!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 172.139.71.52 21:54, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If you are unsure of something, search for it on Wikipedia's help section. Wikipedia is also in other languages, so maybe contributing to the Wikipedia in your native language would be the most helpfull of you. Leyasu 01:17, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my user page. Macintosh User 16:27, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?

Hi. Can you explain why you used your admin rollback tools on this edit? If you can avoid using admin tools except for fighting vandalism, that would be appreciated. Cheers, [[Sam Korn]] 20:42, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Think about it like this: protection powers are on account of being an admin, deletion powers are on account of being an admin, blocking powers are on account of being an admin. Rollback powers are also on account of being an admin. You would not expect to use any of the other tools except due to vandalism (3RR and ArbCom blocks being the obvious exceptions), so there's no reason that rollback powers are anything different. On top of that, it's a matter of courtesy: you can explain why the revert was needed in the edit summary. It wasn't obvious exactly why you were reverting on that page, so an edit summary would have been helpful. Cheers, [[Sam Korn]] 20:57, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I do see your point, but all the same it would be more polite and courteous to use useful edit summaries wherever possible. [[Sam Korn]] 21:10, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

And to you! Good luck with your GCSE btw - I was doing mine only eight months ago! [[Sam Korn]] 21:15, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I got 7 A*'s and 3 A's (in physics, biology and Greek). I keep getting people telling me I sound old: clearly I'm too pompous! [[Sam Korn]] 21:23, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's not generally a good idea to put that you're younger than 18 on a userpage. You get talked down to and insulted on account of it. It used to be there, till I pruned my page extensively a month ago. I just assume everyone to be male unless told otherwise, and still sometimes I forget then... Cheers, [[Sam Korn]] 22:18, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Template_talk:Reli-bio-stub is the worst example of it for me. Since then I've resolved to a policy of boldness and anonymity! [[Sam Korn]] 22:28, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for quickly reverting the vandalism over at TV.com. I noticed on your user page that you live near Maidstone. Well, I live in Ashford and so I will just mention that you are probably the nearest Wikipedian to me and near the same age. --Thorpe 22:17, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

(reply) I was just contributing over at Requests for adminship and have seen some good people up for nomination, one I know from another project. I think back in spring or summer I nominated myself for adminship but I was turned down mainly for not putting in edit summaries. I usually put them in now so hopefully people will see I have improved. I wouldn't mind becoming an administrator since that'll be a great achievement for me ever here. I have been joined since January and you in July? So, you are newer here and are already an admin. Do you think I have the potential to be one then? --Thorpe 22:34, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I just realised you left another message on my talk page which I just mentioned here. If I get put up for nomination you'll support me then? --Thorpe 22:36, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

(reply) Thanks. I don't think I'll nominate myself because I did that last time. You are welcome to nominate me if you want. You will definitely get my respect and friendship. --Thorpe 22:42, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to add me to MSN Messenger. That's why I have the e-mail address on my user page so anyone can chat to me about Wikipedia and other stuff. --Thorpe 22:48, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. I'll be going onto MSN Messenger shortly. I'll start to make notes on my nomination for tommorrow. --Thorpe 22:55, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays!

File:CandyCane.JPG

A candy cane for you!

Hi, FireFox! I hope you have an enjoyable and relaxing winter break. :) Take care, Sango 123 (talk) 00:11, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

userbox: gemini

It seems to have an extraneous white line in it. What happened? Doovinator 04:39, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR#User:Wisesabre

--DPSingh 11:42, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!!

MERRY CHRISTMAS, 49TL/Archive/December 2005! Hope it's a wonderful one! (happy New Year, too!)--ViolinGirl^♪ 15:23, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

And a pressy --Santa on Sleigh 21:53, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wow I must be special! I was the first person you visited! ;) Fir e Fox 11:33, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas from Thorpe

--Thorpe | talk 11:49, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wishes

I wish you and your family a Merry Christmas and a happy New Year. --Bhadani 17:00, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Rajput

regarding the unrelated junk (anons chanting Sanskrit battle hymns and the like), may I suggest you run a tight ship and roll it back? It is impossible have a discussion in this hubbub. Thank you for looking after the page, in any case. dab (ᛏ) 14:59, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User:On_wheels?

Sorry about adding an already blocked user to Administrator Intervention against Vandalism. I'll be sure to check the user's block log from now on; I was simply thrown off because the Willy on Wheels template hadn't been added to the user page, nor had the name been added to the list at Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Willy on Wheels. I've since done both of these things. Let me know if I should post such suspected sockpuppets somewhere else next time, and thanks for your diligent watching of the Admin. intervention page. EWS23 | (Leave me a message!) 17:44, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Rajput

The name that Raja called Suryabandhu was an abuse, so is what DPS has called Raja in his recent post. DPS' addition can easily be deleted, but what would you do with Raja's comments which is repeated more than once. Tintin 17:53, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Supersaiyan (talk · contribs) is signing as "Raja". I try to filter out all the shouting and pick out the actual contributions (viz., citations), so I have not followed the namecalling. dab (ᛏ) 18:11, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

re the 1 week block, DPS is of course a troll, and a 1 week block is justified based on his recent behaviour, taken together; blocking just for a personal attack otoh is difficult to justify, especially without warning, and especially seeing that he was reacting to another, weaker, PA which went unpunished. I would suggest you review your precise blocking reasons (or maybe consider issuing another, shorter, block to the other party), and/or post the block on AN/I for review; otherwise, I have little doubt that you will be counted as a "jihadist" soon, just like me :) dab (ᛏ) 19:53, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The other person attacked Suryabandhu more than once which led to DPS' comments. Tintin 19:57, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand. Suryabandhu was called "bandar" i.e a monkey couple of times and nobody warned/blocked User:Supersaiyan. And Digivjay did ask you specifically Firefox what are you going to do about it. Since you did not do anything he replied back. Either ban both for similar terms or unban both. Same yardstick has to be applied. Shivraj Singh 20:34, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Provide me with direct evidence and I will deal with it, I promise. Fir e Fox 20:37, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I dont have pride in any of your ancestors suryabhandar, I have it in mine. The Hindu and Muslim ones, because both fought stubborn oppressors everytime and won effectively. But I dont think youre very happy about your ancestors being colonialised by the Mughals and then the British leige lords. If you are then that's a strange pride ;) - Raja

From http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Talk:Rajput/Archive17

Shivraj Singh 20:46, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Interestingly, this phrase first appeared in this addition by an IP editor. What happens next ? Tintin 20:56, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

[Here is the diff of what Raja said].

[Suryabandhu's response].

Suryabandhu seems to be his pseudonym though it could be his real name. Since DPS was provoked I think his punishment should be smaller then Raja's.

dab u show ur bias again by saying Raja made a weak PA.

Shivraj Singh 21:34, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The words used by DPS translate to "son of a swine"; when offered to a muslim, the insult is especially grievous. I can affirm that "monkey" has no cultural flavour beyond what is understood in English -- its approximates to 'clown' rather than 'SOB'. ImpuMozhi 19:03, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Firefox these comments have right attribution. You can leave a comment for User:Supersaiyan and I am sure he will accept it that he made those comments. Please do not let this drop thru the cracks. Shivraj Singh 21:57, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

FireFox, We are all watching what action do you take againt user Raja. Also, trolls are vandalizing DPS talk page; even making fun of him now that he can't defend himself. I still have faith in you, but watching warily. -- sisodia 211.226.231.244 21:53, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Tch tch, my vulpine friend, how rapidly you have fallen in the esteem of the primeval Troop! Well, as consolation, perhaps I could likewise ('warily' and gratuitously) make you an offer -- you may return to civil society if, like a worthy admin, you recognize trolls when they dance on your page and with warrior-like bravery take rectificatory action. ImpuMozhi 19:03, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Esperanza Elections

Since I can't vote, can I at least ask questions to the possible canidates? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikizach (talk • contribs) 12:56, 27 December 2005

Hi

Hey just dropping by to say hi... its really great work you are doing on the Rajput article. So you live at Maidstone.. i've lived at Rochester. Best luck for your GCSEs man! अमेय आरयन AMbroodEY 18:11, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

irc bot

just to let you know the irc bot computer2 has gone belly up ;-)Benon 19:13, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

eh? --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 19:26, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

i.e. It's disappeared. Also please can you send me a version of your bot if possible. Fir e Fox 20:06, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Only possible on friday as I cannot do anything. Net con the bot runs on is unstable due to a variety of problems ranging from power faliures to god knows what. We should campaign so that the bot runs on a wikipedia server :P --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 20:16, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you are ignoring me. Fir e Fox 20:13, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No I am not ignoring you, I only cannot respond the instant you post, geez patience! :P --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 20:16, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I can. Fir e Fox 20:16, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I can too normaly but often I do attention demanding tasks such as modifying the Template:Oh My Goddess Infobox-Generic which is tedious work as one error (such as an extra line) will break over 60 pages. --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 20:20, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Is there any way you can send me your bot then? Fir e Fox 20:22, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No but I am attempting a remote dekstop which I so far havent been successfull. It sometimes works some time does not depends how much the computer I am using the one the bots running and all the ones inbetween feel like. --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 20:30, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Where can I find your bot then to download a copy or something? By the way Computer2's disappeared again. Fir e Fox 20:31, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ill email it to you and I see the bot in the chanel please visit an optician. --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 20:55, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Test

this is a test --Doc ^ask? 21:08, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No, this is a test - {{test}}. --GraemeL ^(talk) 21:10, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

Hey, you're an admin I know :) There's a big and nasty backlog at WP:RM, do you think you could find an admin to take care of it? Ashibaka tock 21:49, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

For the reminder of my birth anniversary. ℬastique▼^parℓer♥^voir♑ 15:36, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not redundant

On Wikipedia:WikiProject Userboxes/Delete requests you listed a couple of entries as "Not redundant". Although their "What links here" did show one or two entries, they were actually already fixed. The "What links here" is a little dodgey, to get rid of the entries they needed a blank save (null edit, where you save a page without changing it). --Commander Keane 22:39, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Balloons!

You have been awarded these balloons for no apperant reason. --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 13:41, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I can see you're bored... I wonder what comes next... Something about Dr. Freeman? Fir e Fox 13:44, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Awww...--Cool Cat^Talk|@ 13:47, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wha...? Did I ruin it for you? Fir e Fox 13:48, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No not really. --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 13:52, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Did you forget that you'd already done the "I've decided to exterminate the balloons" thing then? Fir e Fox 13:53, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No, not really. --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 14:12, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What was the Awwww... for then? Fir e Fox 14:17, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Awwww is the clue. You are to solve the puzzle. --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 15:38, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

HINT HINT!!! Fir e Fox 15:40, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

--Cool Cat^Talk|@ 15:50, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Aww pwease! Pwetty pwease! Fir e Fox 15:55, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You are hereby awarded these wings as it represents your character best. Now you dont need the balloons, EXTERMINATE!?? --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 16:27, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Too late, I gave the balloons away to Essjay anyway. BURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRP. Fir e Fox 16:29, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thats good. Now you get to keep the wings. --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 16:41, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Previous Account?

I have researched and edited before on Wikipedia not using a username. I have had a lot of expierence with computers, and that helps with these kinds of programs. I also get this stuff much faster than many others. So my awnser is no, but I have used this site many times before.

Wikizach 16:14, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Voting on FAC

When voting on WP:FAC and supporting articles please remember to include a reason for your vote. Just saying 'Support' will probably mean your vote will be discounted or ignored when the final decision is made on wether an article becomes featured or not. Thanks! — Wackymacs 16:27, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry you got to be exposed to that bundle of joy

Thats what we all get for me trying to be friendly and warning people about 3rr instead of just reporting it. :( --Syrthiss 19:38, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. I owe you one. JHMM13 (T | C) 21:11, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Rajput

Dear Sir,

This page is about the Rajput people - the valiant people of the region which today is called Rajasthan, who gained their popularity and respect, because of their bravery, opposition to invaders and upholding of Dharma. The discussion on whether only these people are Kshatriyas or whether the space can be shared with other fighter communities of Hindu fold like Yadavs, Jats, Gurjars etc. is of religious domain. Here, we should consider only Hindu Rajput community, as commonly understood, and leave out other people.

Discussion of Rajputs as a 'race' or 'tribe' etc. is futile. There is no scholarly agreed view on the descent of the these people. It is assumed that they were feudatories of Gurjara-Prathihara kingdom, and started on their own upon the disintegration of the kingdom. Their great saga begins only in mid-late first millenium CE and their military accomplishments have been covered in detail.

I understand that there might be some Mohamedans today, who were once Rajput, but post-conversion they are just Mohamedans. They've lost their caste on account of their failure to defend the dharma and capitulating in front of the enemy (Sufi conversion and other tales, notwithstanding). Even if we skip the religious angle, the argument of Muslim Rajput does not have any credibility from practical POV also. The children born to converts were not known as Rajputs but as Muslims. People who insist on putting Mohamedans in this space should provide reference of some great king, feudatory etc. who went about as Rajput even after conversion. Going by the slippery logic, even Jehangir would be Rajput, since he was born to Rajput mother. But, History as told by Mughal chroniclers, records him as only Turk (or Tork, as it goes in Persian).

My request to you is not to allow this page to be vandalized by these people. Especially, when now there is a Wiki page on Muslim Rajputs (http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Muslim_Rajputs). People are welcome to post their blinkered History there.

Hoping for justice :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Indologist (talk • contribs)

Hi Firefox

Dear Firefox,

Thanks for your encouraging welcome message and kind words! I'm still new to the forum, still finding my way around :-) I would like to apologise for the oversight of not signing my name, will take care next time. I just saw the arbitration issue and jumped to the conclusion that there is a jury oput there to decide the Historicity of Muslim claims to Rajputhood, and more importantly, whether such claims will be entertained on the page. I believe, you are looking at the dispute in some other capacity, so please ignore my earlier comment. I have no intention of influencing you, one way or the other :-)

Anyways, nice interacting with you. Take care!

indologist 11:53, 30 December 2005 (UTC) Indologist[reply]

RVs

Dont' RV User Talk pages, it is against the rules. Battlefield 16:41, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like they will make any Tom, Dick or Firefox an admin these days....Read the rulez Holmes!

Wikipedia:Deletion guidelines for administrators

Battlefield 17:58, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Jiggler

Hi FireFox. I was just going to ask if you could block:

The_Jiggler (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

for me as he is a sockpuppet of a vandal that has been vandalizing all day and yesterday at my talk page and Chadbryant's user page. — Moe ε 17:10, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

He just created another: Dropping_My_Drawers (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Could you do the honors? — Moe ε 17:16, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

List of social networking sites

THANKS! for semi-protecting the list. -- getcrunk juice ^contribs 19:56, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Advisory Council meeting

First, let me congratulate you on becaoming a member of the new Advisory Council. I would like to arrange a meeting with the Advisory Council in IRC either on Saturday or Sunday and wondered when it would be possible (taking time zones into account). Please could you respond on my talk page as soon as possible. Thank you. --Cel e stianpower ^háblame 20:59, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats!

Congratulations, FireFox! :D Best wishes, Sango 123 (talk) 21:27, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Big congratulations on winning the Esperanza council election.--Dakota ~ ε 22:02, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Esperanza election

Thank you for your support in the Esperanza Election. I was unsuccessful in the end of the election but I would like to thank you for having confidence in me to be a future admin general/ advisory council member. — Moe ε 23:09, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Analysis

Here you go:

Main (articles): 1975

Article talk: 137

User: 1144

User talk: 2917

Project: 640

Project talk: 42

Image: 13

Image talk: 1

MediaWiki talk: 3

Template: 20

Help: 5

Category: 129

Portal: 1

Overall statistics: Total edits: 7032

Minor edits: 2184

Percentage of minor edits: 31%

Tito xd^{(?!? - help us)} 23:41, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Esperanza elections

Thanks for voting for me in the Esperanza elections. I've been appointed to the Advisory Committee, thanks to your show of confidence in me. I'll do my best to make you proud, but please feel free to ask me for help at any time or to give me tips as to what you would like to do. Thanks for being an active member of Esperanza! I'll see you around. Tito xd^{(?!? - help us)} 00:35, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

MERRY CHRISTMAS

                   _...
             o_.-"`    `\
      .--.  _ `'-._.-'""-;     _
    .'    \`_\_  {_.-a"a-}  _ / \
  _/     .-'  '. {c-._o_.){\|`  |
 (@`-._ /       \{    ^  } \\ _/
  `~\  '-._      /'.     }  \}  .-.
    |>:<   '-.__/   '._,} \_/  / ())  
    |     >:<   `'---. ____'-.|(`"`
    \            >:<  \\_\\_\ | ;
     \                 \\-{}-\/  \
      \                 '._\\'   /)
       '.                       /(
         `-._ _____ _ _____ __.'\ \
           / \     / \     / \   \ \ 
      _.'/^\'._.'/^\'._.'/^\'.__) \
    ,=='  `---`   '---'   '---'      )
    ` S a n t a   o n   S l e i g h `
       ` " " " " " " " " " "  " " `

--Santa on Sleigh II 00:35, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Esperanza Elections

I look forward to working with you on the advisory council! karmafist 00:48, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hello 49TL/Archive/December 2005,

I wish to thank you for your vote on my RfA. It has passed with a final tally of 59/0/0. If I can ever help with anything or if you have any comments about my actions as an admin, please let me know! KnowledgeOf Self | talk 04:07, 31 December 2005 (UTC) [reply]

Another vandal

uhh sorry to disturbe you again FireFox but could you block another....

StefanDam (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

— Moe ε 06:48, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!!

Esperanza

Congratulations, and you're very welcome! I'm sure you'll do a fine job. --King of All the Franks 15:44, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, and I look forward to working with you! Flcelloguy (A note?) 16:08, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on being elected on esperanza advisory committee! Since I am now a member I thought I should congratulate our small government for being elected. :) --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 18:48, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AWB

Hi ,when you use AWB can you make sure you check every edit, as I dont think you meant to make this edit. thanks Martin 16:37, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't use a bot to remove spaces from heading wikitext; eg don't change "== AWB ==" to "==AWB==". The former form is much more readable for editors; there is no reason to expend resources making this change. —Michael Z. 2005-12-31 19:30 Z

It only does that on "see also" and "external links" sections, as it makes it easier to fix other minor problems in these sections, I'll make it so it doesnt do that soon. thanks Martin 11:25, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year

For last year's words belong to last year's language

And next year's words await another voice.

And to make an end is to make a beginning.

T.S. Eliot, "Little Gidding"

Happy New Year! ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 20:24, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above is a talk page archive for Xy7. Please do not edit this page. To leave a message, please see the current talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.