User talk:2600:1012:B05D:7959:89F0:1563:D9B6:E284

October 2021

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2022 California gubernatorial election, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. TheXug (talk) 21:30, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2022 California gubernatorial election. TheXug (talk) 21:32, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Edits on the 2022 California gubernatorial election

If there's any problems you have with my editing, please tell me directly. I have politely explained myself and tried to reason with you. I have been trying to follow WP:DR in order to resolve our conflict. If you feel it appropriate to involve a third opinion, which I have already suggested, then please do so. Thank you. TheXug (talk) 22:08, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you'd like to further discuss how to properly edit the article, I'd be happy to do so on the article's talk page. TheXug (talk) 22:10, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Read my post on the report and please stop your crude reversion behavior. You should self revert your most recent reversions since they added false material to the article. I already explained in my edit summaries so please use your time to become informed, not mine. 2600:1012:B05D:7959:89F0:1563:D9B6:E284 (talk) 22:16, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You did not engage appropriately, you didn't even discuss it until violating ironclad reversion rules, and you should know better. You have re-inserted Jenner and Steyer's candidacies, along with other names that don't belong. The Steyer Bloomberg article concerned the 2021 recall, and the Jenner one isn't even an official declaration. The other names were cherry picked from a govt database with dozens of names, so it shouldn't be included WP:DIR. You also reverted a ton of other improvements I made, crudely and indiscriminately. I really hope you would take more care in the future. I look forward to your self revert. I'm not a fan of punitive crap but your behavior was horrendous. Take care. 2600:1012:B05D:7959:89F0:1563:D9B6:E284 (talk) 22:26, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

this is what i get for making an internet mistake. have a happy halloween, random internet person — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheXug (talk • contribs) 22:36, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

wait, before your dynamic IP resets? isn't that sockpuppetry? you can't use multiple IPs/accounts on wikipedia TheXug (talk) 22:39, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.