User talk:195.226.152.202

Hippocampal theory of consciousness

Please do not persist trying to add this section to the article on Consciousness. Instead, please open a discussion on the article's talk page, where you can explain why you think this hitherto rather obscure theory warrants so much attention. --Epipelagic (talk) 20:34, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

i can see many obscure theories and i can see prejudice and not even a willingness to read or consider what i have added (there a plenty of peer reviewed articles in circulation from 2010, which have been endorsed by numerous reviewers); you are cutting a discussion short, trying to suppress something you do not like; this is what wikipedia means by vandalism — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.226.152.202 (talk • contribs) 20:50, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not "cutting a discussion short". It is the opposite – I'm trying to get you to open a discussion (in the most appropriate place, which is on the article's talk page). I've removed the section from the article again. Please do not continue reinstating it. Behaviour like that is called edit warring, and can get you blocked. Also, you have already reverted three times, and reverting more than three times in 24 hours can earn a mandatory block. --Epipelagic (talk) 21:01, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm with Epipelagic on this one: the sources quoted by this anonymous user are mainly from one person, which is not desirable, indeed rather suspicious. Also the other sources do not see to confirm the hippocampus as the source of self consciousness, or of consciousness itself. Instead, it may play some role in long-term memory, but how relevant is that? I think the original poster needs to be more open about their viewpoint and their evidence. If reverts continue, then I think this page needs protection.

TonyClarke (talk) 14:16, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider this a final warning. If you continue to add this material to articles with discussing it, I will ask for this IP address to be blocked from editing. Looie496 (talk) 18:31, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 18:37, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.