User talk:001blondjamie
001blondjamie, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi 001blondjamie! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 13 September 2016 (UTC) |
October 2016
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at List of oldest universities in continuous operation. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. clpo13(talk) 18:21, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Never started by me. First time, I even asked the person to take it to the talk page but he kept reverting. I did not break the policy. 001blondjamie (talk) 18:26, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
- It takes two to edit war. This is just a warning since you are verging on the WP:3RR limit. See also WP:BRD. Since you want the material included, you must justify it on the talk page when challenged. clpo13(talk) 18:29, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
- My justification is the citation which has not been proven wrong. 001blondjamie (talk) 18:31, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Your edits on List of oldest universities in continuous operation
[edit]Madrasahs are not, and have never been, universities by the mainstream definition we use here on Wikipedia, a fact thas has been discussed multiple times on the talk page of the article (see archives), so stop adding them to the list. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 18:27, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
- There is a discussion open on the talk page. Lets discuss it there. 001blondjamie (talk) 18:30, 20 October 2016 (UTC)