User talk:Braindot4

Welcome!

Hello, عليّ سعيد, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Sayed Darwish (1966 Egyptian Movie). I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! VKZY^LUFan (talk) (Mind the Gap!) 05:11, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, عليّ سعيد. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article OnePath Network, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted.

In this case, it is important that you follow the disclosure rules for paid editing - there is a description of how to do so at WP:PAID. Thank you. Bilby (talk) 08:51, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shawn Adamo (Accountant)

Hello عليّ سعيد,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Shawn Adamo (Accountant) for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Natureium (talk) 20:35, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shawn Adamo (Accountant)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shawn Adamo (Accountant), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 21:21, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Natureium (talk) 21:44, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, you may be blocked from editing. Natureium (talk) 21:44, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of StreamingVideoProvider

Hello عليّ سعيد,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged StreamingVideoProvider for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Hello TheLongTone

I tried immediately to "contest the speedy deletion" but I found the page deleted! and the reason is "unambiguous promotion", which I believe is not true at all, even in just one single sentence.

I believe the platform is notable for many reasons:

The website had +1000 Organizations Worldwide to host over 120,000 corporate videos and stream over 30,000,000 Minutes of video a Year.
Has important customers like Ericom Software.
Launched in 2006. (which makes it one of the oldest of the nowadays living video networks).
The founder himself has a whole article in The Telegraph talking about his business in 2005 (before launching the StreamingVideoProvider).
The company has +50 employees.
Headquartered in London and has locations in other 2 European countries and one location in the US.
I think this reason is enough to consider the platform notable: Got permission to broadcast in China, which is a very important achievement, as most of the similar platforms are banned.
Has certified cased studies and projects for church and TV-stations in different locations, also Universities like the University of Essex and Dulwich college.
The article itself is informative and I believe there is no promotional tone at all, and I tried to be short. And there are links from Reuters and other reliable sources.

Thank you.

) --عليّ سعيد (talk) 14:14, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: StreamingVideoProvider (August 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Justlettersandnumbers was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This company apparently does not meet our new and more stringent notability requirements for companies and organisations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:StreamingVideoProvider and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:StreamingVideoProvider, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:24, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, عليّ سعيد! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:24, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cavafy Museum

In 2014, the entrance fee was LE 15, and for students LE 5. At Commons, you will find some photographs. --RolandUnger (talk) 09:55, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. This is very useful.عليّ سعيد (talk) 03:34, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Opening of Arby's in Egypt

Hello,

I have noticed that you have recently added information about the opening of Arby's restaurants in Egypt with this edit. You claimed that the new restaurants had opened in October 2018. Unfortunately, the source that you have given is from 2017. Can you actually find any sources that would support your claim? I have yet to see any English language sources. However, since I have noticed that you are from Egypt, are there any Arabic language newspapers or news source that might support your claim? Thank you in advance. -- 50.195.200.161 (talk) 03:01, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Yes, the source I added is old, I replaced it with a new one (in English) with a clear statement of opening: The first three locations in Cairo are now open and are located inside a shopping mall, inline alongside other restaurants and retail and as a standalone location. عليّ سعيد (talk) 14:57, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help! I have added a sentence about the restaurant openings in the History section of the article. It would be nice if it would be possible to flesh out this paragraph about Arby's involvement in Egypt. How are the local residents of Cairo are liking the new restaurants? (If you would like to help, please look at the single paragraph that described Arby's brief involvement in the United Kingdom at the end of the 20th century.) Would it be possible to find any information about Arby's previous involvement in Egypt, such as when the previous restaurants were opened and closed? Were the former franchise owners associates of the former president Hosni Mubarak? The Facebook page for Arby's Egypt advertize somthing called "Chicken Bacon & Cheese Combo". Are they serving pork? Thanks for your help in improving the article. -- 50.195.200.161 (talk) 02:32, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing disclosure required

Hello Braindot4. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Berry Brothers Bolt Works, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Braindot4. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Braindot4|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS (talk|c|em) 02:48, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the only un-disclosed edit is Berry Brothers article, it was made just an hour ago and I'm still improving it. I usually make the disclosures immediately but sometimes it takes few hours after my edit, just to make sure that I will finish editing, make the disclosure, then stop editing on the article. And as long as it is quite short time, I believe this is not an issue.Braindot4 (talk) 03:54, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'm wrong. After reading the links you mentioned, I believe the edit could be included in "to use Wikipedia to promote their interests.". I will stick to all of these rules in the future. Thanks.Braindot4 (talk) 04:10, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Carl Gould (author)

The article Carl Gould (author) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not seeing significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject and current sources do not establish notability. Fails WP:NAUTHOR and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS (talk|c|em) 15:06, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Braindot4. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Bobby Hamrick has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bobby Hamrick. Thanks! JC7V (talk) 04:33, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marc-David Munk has been accepted

Marc-David Munk, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 07:38, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Marc-David Munk) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Marc-David Munk.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

There's a few uncited claims about the subject's personal life that need to have citations attached, or else be deleted per WP:BLP.

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:59, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bobby Hamrick (December 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Milowent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

He's written a lot of songs, and I acknowledge the effort put into this draft as thorough. But subject itself is not the subject of significant news coverage, i.e., profiles of him, the juicy stories about how he wrote some song that went to #1 and was written about his upbringing, etc., etc, so that a biography can be written. Wikipedia is not linkedin.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bobby Hamrick and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bobby Hamrick, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Milowent • ^hasspoken 19:19, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: StreamingVideoProvider (December 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not much improvement since previous submit. Needs stronger news sources not "contributions" from Forbes.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:StreamingVideoProvider and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:StreamingVideoProvider, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:46, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ron Hamrick

Hello, Braindot4. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ron Hamrick".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:43, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:StreamingVideoProvider

Hello, Braindot4. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "StreamingVideoProvider".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 16:47, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bobby Hamrick

Hello, Braindot4. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bobby Hamrick".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! — MRD2014 (talk) 00:51, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ClearTax (company)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ClearTax (company), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrsSnoozyTurtle 03:05, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ClearTax (company)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ClearTax (company) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ClearTax (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MrsSnoozyTurtle 03:12, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ClearTax (company) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ClearTax (company), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ClearTax (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

You are receiving a final warning for two reasons.

Firstly, as a paid editor, you are failing to comply with our conflict of interest guidelines. Do not again edit a mainspace article for which you have been paid. For an existing article, you may suggest an edit on the talk page, then place {{request edit}} to ask that an editor without a COI review it. For creation of a new article, you must create a draft, then request the review from articles for creation.

Similarly, you may never duck create protection by just changing the title of an article or adding a parenthetical. Again, use the draft and AfC process, or discuss the matter with the protecting admin. Do not ever again end run create protection that way.

Should you do either of these things again, you will be blocked from editing. If you have any questions regarding the above, let me know. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 02:40, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SKYX Platforms

Hello Braindot4,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged SKYX Platforms for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

OwainDavies ^(about)_(talk) edited at 09:07, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for creation of promotional content and failure to abide by paid editing guidelines after final warning.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spicy (talk) 11:18, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]