User talk:Åkebråke

Welcome

Welcome...

Hello, Åkebråke, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. You may also be interested in our intuitive guide to Wikipedia.

Ling.Nut

Again, welcome! Ling.Nut ^{(talk—WP:3IAR)} 11:37, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dopamine

Hi -- I wanted to make sure you're aware that I removed the last sentence from the paragraph you added, because I have serious doubts that it represents mainstream views. If you can give a strong source to back up those statements, I will be happy to stand corrected. Regards, Looie496 (talk) 23:38, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Hope somebody else can find a better explanation. Åkebråke (talk) 20:53, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help with dermatology-related content

I am looking for more help at the dermatology task force, particularly with our new Bolognia push 2009!? Perhaps you would you be able to help us? I could send you the login information for the Bolognia push if you are interested? ---kilbad (talk) 22:56, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invitation! I would be glad to help. You can send me the login information by email.Åkebråke (talk) 11:27, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you enable e-mail... then I will send it ;) ---kilbad (talk) 18:57, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I didnt check that box. Now is it done.Åkebråke (talk) 19:07, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I sent you an e-mail. Thanks again for your help. See WP:DERM:MA for details on how we are using the source. ---kilbad (talk) 23:22, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Can we discuss the mass merging before you do it? ---kilbad (talk) 17:09, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, shall I revert it?Åkebråke (talk) 17:11, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for your reply. No need to revert/undo your edit. I think we should just discuss derm topic mergers at WT:DERM first. ---kilbad (talk) 17:13, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Venus vom Hohlen Fels.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Venus vom Hohlen Fels.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:00, 3 January 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 04:00, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Neural oscillation

Hello, I'd like to hear your opinion on the discussion I started here:

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Neuroscience#Neural_Oscillations

Xurtio (talk) 05:33, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Åkebråke. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Åkebråke. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]