Of course, I could have also added the userboxes for my favourite TV shows that have been cancelled, but you wouldn't have the bandwidth.
Wikipedia is built on irony. You have the vandals that mess it up, but in order for that to mean something, thousands of people flock to see it. Wikipedians, hundreds of thousands of them are compelled to revert it. Many of those rubber-neckers end up joining our community. If you are a WPedian getting bent out of shape in this whole Colbert Report mess, you should be informed that you just might be creating a Wikiality without realizing it. I continue to have faith in Colbert's ability to entertain me, and in the diligent anti-vandal vanguard to counter any incidents before the large pan pepperoni comes knocking on the door. Circle of Life.
At the moment, I'm taking random pictures around Toronto. I haven't fully read the articles concerning fair use, and that's why I haven't posted anything to the commons as of yet. If anyone wants to clarify the concept to me, feel free to do so. For a Wikipedian, I really don't care for reading a lot. Seriously.
I am currently one of the zookeepers at the Better Know a District article. Do not feed the bears.
You have a series of articles that aren't really linked to each other in a reasonable fashion, or that rations out the information in the most efficient way. To top that off there are a few very confusing links on it. (Try Chinese Diaspora, read it a little and you'll see what I mean.) Before I plaster NPOV, Expert required, needs to cite sources, or any heads-up banner, I'm grouping them together here:
.gif){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}