User:SusunW/Women's nationality

Not to be confused with ethnicity.

https://www.loc.gov/item/2016878768/ https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-plain-speaker-proof-of-publishing/131141801/ Women's nationality encompasses the history and conditions under which a woman was entitled to nationality, or an individual, legal identity as a subject or national of a sovereign state. Nationality defines a woman's membership in a country, rather than the socio-politico-civil rights she is entitled to from being a citizen of a state, or the ethnic group with which she may affiliate. In the field of international law, nationality statutes were codified in the nineteenth century using customary practices and religious law to define who were members of the state and who were foreigners. Sex discriminatory laws relating to the acquisition, retention, and transmission of nationality were adopted in almost every country in the world. Based on a premise of women's subordination to men, dependent nationality was implemented as a protection for family units and required married spouses to have the same nationality. These laws required a woman to gain the nationality of her husband upon marriage and lose her own nationality, so that their children had a distinct path to the nationality of the father. Unmarried women were often denied the right to immigrate based upon fear that they could not support themselves and their children's nationality was often undefined. Conflicts in the various nationality laws gave rise to statelessness, creating a class of people who could not obtain protection or diplomatic assistance from any nation.

Women's rights activists recognized that for them to gain civil rights domestically, and not arbitrarily lose rights by automatic naturalization in another country, independent nationality was essential. Having their own nationality would also allow women to pass on their nationality to their children, regardless of whether those children were legitimate. From the early twentieth century, activists began pressing for change in international law. The Inter-American Commission of Women worked with women's rights organizations globally to compile a legal comparison of laws and lobbied the League of Nations to address the issues. In 1933, their work led to adoption by the Pan-American Union of the first international agreement on women's rights, the Convention on the Nationality of Women, which provided that nationality of a woman did not change upon marriage within the Americas. Continued activism throughout the century led to the adoption of numerous international treaties and conventions to protect nationality and prevent arbitrary denaturalization, such as the Convention Relating to the Status of Stateless Persons (1954), the Convention on the Nationality of Married Women (1957), the Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness (1961), the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (1965), the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (1979), and the Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989). There are still some countries which do not allow women to have individual nationality and prohibit children from acquiring nationality from their mothers.

Nationality vs. citizenship

The difference between nationality and citizenship has roots in the ancient world, contrasting the Roman Civitas, those who were united by common laws and status, to the Greek Polis, those who politically participated in their own governance. More specifically, the Roman concept linked persons to the territory or state without regard to their ethnicity, whereas the Greeks defined participation based upon common ethnic identification through shared bloodlines, language, and ritual. With the emergence of organized religions, ideological belief, or nationalism, became a unifying characteristic of identity for humanity. In other words, belief was open to anyone and territorial polities could be united by language groups to maximize the potential spread of ideology. Customary practices and religious law became the foundations of statutory laws which defined belonging or membership, roles and responsibilities of people within societies, and personal status, as well as who was considered an outsider, or foreigner.

Nationality, or an individual, legal identity as a subject or national of a sovereign state, describes a person's relationship to the state. It does not define the socio-politico-civil rights one may derive from being a citizen of a state, or the ethnic group with which one may affiliate. In other words, nationality describes the relationship of a person to the state under international jurisdiction and citizenship describes their relationship within the state under domestic statutes. Different regulatory agencies monitor legal compliance for nationality and citizenship. Although some states, particularly those with colonial ties to Britain, commonly use the terms interchangeably, they have different and specific meaning in law, and do not reflect any specific type of governance or any domestic guarantees of rights. Defining nationality is necessary to establish the rights and obligations of subjects and to define the protections from the state to which nationals are entitled. Within a federal state at any given time, there is only one nationality, but there can be multiple levels of citizenship, whereas within a confederation, there are multiple nationalities of member states which typically hold in common a single citizenship scheme, as in the Commonwealth of Nations. Because of the Master Nationality Rule, if a person holds dual nationality, they may be treated as if they have only a single nationality, typically where they are domiciled, in requests for diplomatic assistance in another state and may not seek protection from a state against another state of which they are a national.

Although the criteria for nationality differs between countries, its foundation is typically based upon either jus soli (right of soil), jus sanguinis (right of blood), or a combination of the two. Jus soli recognizes nationality of people born in a nation; whereas, jus sanguinis stems from the person's ancestry. If nationality is not acquired at birth, processes for naturalization, (and its opposite, denaturalization), are outlined in laws designed to allow foreign persons to acquire (or lose) rights equivalent to native persons. Beyond these basic premises, there were two distinct schools of thought with regard to legislation on women's nationality — dependent nationality, which protects family units by requiring married spouses to have the same nationality, and independent nationality, based upon protecting individual rights. In addition, marital status, legitimacy, and location, were traditionally factors in the ability of a woman to pass on her nationality to her children.

Historic background

Since globally, throughout history, the vast majority (85-90%) of people have married, the contractual and legal requirements of marriage are significant not only for social, but also economic development. From ancient times marriage has been linked to political order because it defines who belongs, or does not belong, to the family unit and joins different kinship groups to each other, creating alliances. Collective identity in the ancient world was based upon kinship ties and shared cultural identity. The intermixing of ethnicities was objectionable and to limit foreign intermarriage, strict adherence to policies controlling the suitablility of marriage partners emerged. During the period before the common era, it was generally unacceptable for people to marry outside of their cultural group and later their confessional community. Although from prehistoric times women who married were typically detached from their original tribe or nation and attached to that of their spouse, the codification of the custom occurred in Roman law, although nationality did not have the same modern connotation.

As tribal organization was replaced by imperial structures, heads of state emerged and allegiance shifted from kinship to a ruler. Rulers were responsible for security in the realm and management of the economy. In exchange for protection, subjects paid taxes and owed loyalty to the head of state and his leadership. Status in the ancient world derived from service to the ruler, and over time moved away being based upon kinship to being based upon military service. These emergent feudal systems would be refined, until they became dominant in the Middle Ages. Marriage in the ancient world was often cum manu meaning the wife was legally incapacitated and under the control of her husband. From the 7th century B.C.E. in India, the Laws of Manu subordinated women to their male relatives. In ancient China, under the Han dynasty (206 B.C.E. to 219 C.E.) a legal code called the Three Obediences and Four Virtues required subordination of women throughout their lives to their father, husband, or sons, and eliminated legal rights for women. From the end of the 7th century in Japan, family registration required enrollment by the male head of household. Although originally registration was for taxation and conscription purposes, and women retained individual rights, by the Edo period (1603 to 1867) women's legal subordination to men was fully established. In the West, these laws had their origins in religious ideology and in the customary practice of Normandy, which declared that upon marriage a husband and wife became one flesh. After the Norman Conquest these customs, known as coverture, spread in the Middle Ages to England, becoming part of English common law.

Over the course of the 19th century, legislation in many nations sought to define the relationship of subjects to the state and introduced sex discriminatory laws relating to the acquisition, retention, and transmission of nationality. The first of these rules conveying legal rights to nationality appeared in France. Codifications in the 19th century, such as the French Napoleonic Code of 1804, the US Naturalization Act of 1855, and the British Naturalisation Act of 1870 among others, led to widespread legal disqualification of women, unequal parental authority, and the automatic loss of a woman's nationality upon marriage. In essence, upon marriage, a woman's legal identity merged with her husband's and her physical body; all of her property, including wages; her ability to enter contracts, or bring suit in court; and her ability to create an independent residence disappeared. Trade and the prevalence of foreign rule spread these customary practices for marriage and inheritance throughout Europe and conquest spread them to colonies throughout the world. Colonization and trade necessitated defining the rights afforded to those who belonged to a nation and those who were foreigners in a realm. Customary terms of state succession developed which specified how rights and obligations would be impacted by the predecessor and successor nations, but also how other parties would be affected. Colonizers often adopted a delayed nationality provisions for inhabitants, or applied different rules for native populations and colonial settlers by decreeing that law which were in force at the time of acquisition remained in force.

By the 1870s, the field of international law was developing, as jurists realized that courts would need to settle legal matters in cases involving multiple jurisdictions and to determine which laws were applicable. Questions about nationality became central to the debate on international private law. While it was clear that nationals within their own country were subject to national law, it was less clear what law should be followed for nationals who were abroad. Also unclear was whether religious affiliation and religious law as an ideology of nationalism through united culture, as opposed to sovereign territorial boundaries established legal nationhood. Between 1851 and 1873, debate ensued between politicians and scholars, with many countries adopting policies that nationality, rather than territorial boundaries or ethnicity, should regulate applicable laws in cases of jurisdictional dispute. In 1873, the Institute of International Law was founded to create cooperation among those involved in the field for the development of international law. Nationality was one of the three components, the others being treaty obligations and public property and debt, codified to ensure continuity of customary rules.

Legal issues

Among the issues facing women were loss of nationality upon marriage or naturalization, re-acquisition of nationality at the dissolution of marriage, and restrictions in transmitting nationality to their children. Conflicts in nationality laws created a type of legal limbo, or statelessness in which a woman lost her nationality in one state, but did not gain the nationality of another. The policies which led to loss of nationality were "often the result of systemic racial discrimination", according to scholars, Michelle Foster and Timnah Rachel Baker. Laurie Fransman, a leading expert on British nationality law, called the legal practice of changing a woman's nationality a legal fiction, as it assumed that one nation had the ability to confer the nationality of another nation upon a subject, when in fact their only authority was to define who could acquire or lose their own nationality. As an example, Mexican feminist Elena Arizmendi Mejía married a German national in 1918. By virtue of the 1886 Mexican Law of Alienship and Naturalization, women automatically obtained their husbands' nationality at marriage. German nationality laws required families to have uniform nationality of the husband and father, so if a man naturalized all members of his family were considered to have naturalized. Arizmendi's husband naturalized as a United States citizen in 1924. German prohibitions against dual nationality required that persons who naturalized in another country were no longer German. Under Mexican law until 1934, a woman's nationality was required to be the same as her husband's, meaning that Mexico considered that Arizmendi became a US national when her husband naturalized. Mexican nationals were excluded from the quotas imposed by the Immigration Acts of 1921 and 1924, but, under the terms of the 1922 US Cable Act, foreign women could not automatically acquire a husband's nationality. They were required to individually apply to acquire US nationality.

Loss of nationality

By marriage

Until 1910, in almost every country globally except in Argentina, Chile, Paraguay and Uruguay, nationality laws concerning men and women were unequal. They required that upon marriage a wife automatically lost her own nationality and received her husband's nationality. Even in those countries where the law did not address the matter tradition assumed that a married woman obtained her nationality from her husband. For example, the first Argentine nationality statue, Law 346 (1869), had no provisions for the loss of nationality, but eleven cases came before the Argentine Supreme Court between 1867 and 1902, which confirmed that an Argentine woman who married a foreigner lost her nationality and a foreign woman married to an Argentine man gained his nationality. This view of nationality, dependent upon family unity, was based on traditions of spiritual unity, male superiority as head of the family, and the obligation of a husband to provide economic support for his legal dependents. Legal protections for dependent nationality recognized that a single nationality was necessary for a family unit because laws governing family relationships and inheritance were impracticable if more than one jurisdiction applied. Giving entire families the same nationality, eliminated the potential for divided loyalty to the state, which might threaten national interests. It also recognized that legal issues might arise from a mother having different nationality than her children. The consequences of dependent nationality included loss of rights to which a woman had been accustomed in her place of origin, as well as loss of the state's protection.

Under the terms of France's Napoleonic Code of 1804, women who married followed their husbands' nationality. The code made no differentiation for French women who married foreign men or foreign women who married French men. The Napoleonic Code was implemented in the Netherlands in 1809, and automatically bestowed upon a wife the nationality of her husband. The same provisions were enacted in Russia in 1864, in Portugal under the Civil Code of 1867, and in Spain under the first Civil Code enacted in 1889. The first phase of derivative nationality for women in the English-speaking world, impacted foreign women who married nationals. In the United States, the Naturalization Act of 1855 stated that foreign women who married American men became US nationals, but it did not address whether American women marrying foreign men lost their nationality. The law was based upon the British Aliens Act of 1844, which specified that foreign women married to British subjects were to be considered as British. However, it was not until passage of the 1870 British Naturalization Act that all British women automatically derived their nationality from their husbands. The United States followed suit requiring all women to have the same nationality as their husband by virtue of the Expatriation Act of 1907. The law automatically and retroactively denaturalized, any American woman who had married a foreigner. Similarly, the 1869 Ottoman nationality law (tâbiiyet-i osmaniye kanunnamesi), provided that foreign women acquired Ottoman nationality through marriage, but an amendment to the law in 1909 required all women to derive the nationality of their husband upon marriage. The Ottoman amendments were influenced by and were very similar to provisions in the 1894 Persian nationality law.

Typically the loss of a wife's nationality was without her formal consent, as legal opinion assumed that by consenting to marry, she had agreed to the legal conditions of marriage. Likewise, there were rarely provisions for protecting women who did not automatically obtain their spouses' nationality. Japanese law was an exception. In 1873 the Great Council of State issued Proclamation 103, which allowed for registration of marriages between aliens and Japanese nationals. It provided that if a foreign woman married a Japanese man, she would become a Japanese national, but a Japanese woman would only lose her Japanese nationality if she did not acquire her foreign husband's nationality upon her marriage. France modified its civil code in 1889 to allow a woman to retain her nationality if she did not automatically acquire her husband's, which prompted similar legislation in Bulgaria, China, Costa Rica, Italy, Mexico, Nicaragua, Portugal, and Switzerland. Between 1910 and 1930, reformers pressed for domestic laws to allow women to consent to loss of their nationality and to stipulate that unless her husband's nation granted a wife nationality her own would not be lost. Growing attention to the matter occurred during World War I, when some women who had lost their nationality through marriage were considered to be enemy aliens or spies. Such women's loyalty was called into question and in some cases they became targets for their property to be confiscated to prevent them aiding enemies of the state. Women became vulnerable to statelessness and had no consular office from whom to seek protection.

By naturalization and denaturalization

The myth of monoculturalism has often been the underpinning of national identity and thus nationality policy. The ability of an immigrant to assimilate into the mainstream society has been foundational to whether naturalization was possible. Entering a country as an immigrant was restricted by numerous provisions to keep undesirable immigrants out. These often included prohibitions against people with criminal records or who engaged in immoral behaviors, those who had disabilities or diseases, people who were unable to support themselves (including aged persons), those whose political or religious beliefs were radically different (including polygamists), and people whose race or ethnicity might be detrimental to the harmony of society. Single women, despite meeting criteria for immigration, were often rejected because of the fear that they would resort to prostitution to support themselves or would become dependent upon state support. As with nationality acquired at birth, for married women, naturalization was typically automatic upon a husband's change in nationality until the 20th century.

According to sociologist David Scott FitzGerald, every independent country in the Americas restricted immigration for at least one ethnic group in the period between 1803 and 1930. For example, in the United States, nationality from 1790 was limited to free White persons, and after passage of the 14th Amendment at the conclusion of the civil war was expanded to include Africans and descendants of Africans. Non-White persons, including Native Americans, First Nations Canadians, Mexican, and Asian nationals, were routinely barred from naturalization, until 1940 when the Nationality Act was amended to include anyone of a race "indigenous to the Western Hemisphere", and 1952 when the McCarran-Walter Act abolished racial restrictions against the naturalization of people from Asian countries. Because a wife derived her nationality from her husband, if he was ineligible to be a US national, his wife was also barred, even if she had been an American at birth. Although the Cable Act ostensibly granted married women individual nationality in 1922, it did not remove racial disqualifications and wives who married ineligible foreigners continued to lose their nationality, until an amendment of 1931 removed the requirement that the husband had to be eligible for naturalization.

The Australian colonies, began passing legislation to restrict African and Asian immigrants in the 1860s. In 1901 the Commonwealth of Australia replaced the Federal Council of Australasia and that same year implemented the White Australia policy, which would restrict immigration and naturalization in the country until 1973. Liberia from 1848 and later Sierra Leone, nations founded by former slaves, both passed constitutions that restricted nationality to Black descendants. Racial qualifications also appeared in nationality policies of other African nations as they gained independence. Libya restricted nationality to people of Arab descent, but the restriction did not apply to women. Other countries also had racial restrictions for naturalization and immigration including Canada between 1910 and 1947, Panama between 1909 and 1945, and Nazi Germany from 1933, until its demise. Each of these three countries had laws at the time that did not allow wives to naturalize separately from their husbands.

The legacy of colonialism and the processes of state succession during decolonization were also factors in statelessness caused by racism. Colonists often believed that they were superior to native inhabitants. For example, in Britain, the crown recognized from 1350 that all persons born within the territories of the British Empire were subjects. Those born outside the realm — except children of those serving in an official post abroad, children of the monarch, and children born on a British ship — were considered by common law to be foreigners. British Nationality Acts did not extend beyond the bounds of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, meaning that under Britain's rules of conquest, laws in place at the time of acquisition remained in place until changed.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/26405298

Transmitting nationality to offspring

In European nations, it was common for children to derive their nationality from their fathers. Under British common law, single women, including divorcées, were not allowed to be parents thus their children could not derive nationality maternally and were stateless unless legitimated by their father. In Latin America, from the time of each nation's independence, it was typical for children who were not born in the country to derive nathionality from either of their parents.

Re-acquisition of nationality

http://heinonline-org.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/HOL/Page?public=true&handle=hein.hoil/stlsnsr0001&div=8&start_page=23&collection=hoil&set_as_cursor=15&men_tab=srchresults Laws of some countries allowed repatriation after the termination of a marriage by death or divorce, while others did not. There was an assumption that as long as she was "covered" (in coverture), a woman shared her husband's nationality, but if the marriage ended, she could resume her prior nationality. If laws prevented a woman from regaining her nationality of origin or she was unable to return to her prior nation, she faced potential statelessness. In the United States, the ambiguous nature of the law before 1907, meant that Nellie Grant, daughter of President Ulysses S. Grant, who divorced her British husband had to obtain an individual Act of Congress in 1898 to reacquire her U.S. nationality. After 1907, a woman could regain her nationality by filing a declaration and returning to the U.S., but after 1922, she could only reaquire her U.S. nationality through naturalization. Typically to regain nationality women had to prove that their marriage had dissolved. This presented various problems, like in the case of Irma Bornheim, a Swiss woman who had married a Jewish, German man. When she applied during the Second World War for restoration of her nationality, because her husband was deported by the Nazis, her request was denied because he was classified as missing, but she was granted refugee status to return to Switzerland.

Dual nationality

Prohibiting dual nationality emerged as a result of war between powerful states, as a means of limiting the possibility that enemies could infiltrate the armed services in time of war. This war logic ignored the ties many immigrants and refugees maintained for their country of origin, their patriotism toward their new home, and the fact that the blanket prohibition barred obtaining nationality from any country, disregarding whether they were an ally or not. Bans against dual nationality could be used to expatriate women, even if their domestic law did not require derivative nationality at marriage. Such was the case in Chile, which from its founding allowed foreigners, who were engaged in a profession and were married to Chilean women, to be nationals. However, between 1925 and 1957, if a Chilean automatically acquired other nationality because of marriage, their Chilean nationality was cancelled because of a prohibition against dual nationality.

Global overview

https://www2.ed.gov/policy/rights/guid/ocr/raceoverview.html In the 20th century, there was a growing recognition in the period by activists and jurists alike that marriage between parties of different nationalities, statelessness, and dual nationality were international concerns because of conflicts between national laws. Increasingly, from the 1930s, the League of Nations developed treaties codifying international law to address disparate nationality laws. These changes were based on legal systems recognizing individual rights, specifically the idea that married persons could have different nationalities in an egalitarian system. Laws designed to protect individual nationality recognize that civil rights guaranteed for citizens of nations vary, for example, the ability to terminate a marriage or inherit property. Independent nationality statutes also protect against threats to national security which might arise from forced nationality, as opposed to patriotic consent to nationality.

The consequences of independent nationality include difficulty in maintaining a residence for the family if domestic law where the family wish to reside restricts immigration of foreigners. Another issue results from the vulnerability and dependency that an immigrant spouse has upon its partner until requirements of residency or nationality have been met. Denial of a derivative nationality for a foreign husband can have serious repercussions on families because of legal restrictions on an alien's ability to obtain employment, property, or residency.

Numerous international treaties and conventions have been adopted to protect nationality and prevent arbitrary denaturalization, such as the Convention Relating to the Status of Stateless Persons (1954), the Convention on the Nationality of Married Women (1957), the Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness (1961), Article 5 of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (1965), Article 9(1) of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (1979), and Article 7 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989).

Latin America

Prior to 1910, Argentina, Chile, Paraguay, and Uruguay did not require women to assume the nationality of their husband. The first Argentine nationality law of 1869, had no provisions for the loss of nationality, but eleven cases came before the Argentine Supreme Court between 1867 and 1902, which confirmed that an Argentine woman who married a foreigner lost her nationality and a foreign woman married to an Argentine man gained his nationality. In 1902, the Supreme Court of Argentina definitively ruled that marriage was not a factor in a woman acquiring or losing nationality. Under the 1822, 1823, and 1828 Constitutions of Chile, foreign men married to Chilean women were Chilean, as long as they lived in the country and were engaged in a profession. However, between 1925 and 1957, if a woman acquired the nationality of a foreign husband under the law of the husband's country, she was denationalized because dual nationality was not permitted. From the adoption of its first constitution in 1870, Paraguay made no gendered distinctions in acquiring nationality and had no requirement for women to lose their nationality upon marriage. With the adoption of the 1940 constitution, denaturalization was required upon acquisition of another nationality, but from 1959, dual nationality with Spain was permitted. Similarly, Uruguay's first constitution of 1830 was silent on loss of nationality by marriage, but did provide for denaturalization if a person obtained another nationality. Under Title II, Article 53 of the Uruguayan Civil Code of 1868 an undivorced married woman was required to maintain the same domicile as her husband. In Latin American jurisprudence, the principle of jus domicilii tied nationality to the place where one had established their legal residency. Amendments to the Civil Code in Uruguay 1895 and 1914 did not change the requirement for a married woman to maintain the same domicile as her husband. Although the Constitution of 1918, continued to bar dual nationality, Uruguay recognized dual nationality in 1919.

In the rest of Latin America, the states which had an automatic expatriation for women, upon marriage in the nineteenth century, included Argentina (1867), Bolivia (1830), Brazil (1860), Colombia (1843), Costa Rica (1841), Cuba (1889), the Dominican Republic (1845), Ecuador (1852), El Salvador (1886), Guatemala (1877), Honduras (1906), Mexico (1823), Peru, and Venezuela. Those that prevented denaturalization after 1889, if the wife did not acquire her husband's nationality at marriage were Costa Rica, Mexico, and Nicaragua. The Cuban Constitution of 1911 allowed native Cuban women to retain their nationality upon marriage, but required a foreign woman married to a Cuban man to derive nationality from her husband. Brazil issued Decree Nº 21.076 in 1932, eliminating the requirement for a woman to take the nationality of her foreign spouse.

In 1933, the first international agreement regarding women's equal rights was adopted by the Pan-American Union. The Convention on the Nationality of Women, prepared by the Inter-American Commission of Women was ratified by 19 of the independent states of the Americas, and provided that "neither matrimony nor its dissolution affects the nationality of the husband or wife or of their children". Shortly after the treaty ratification, numerous countries began modification of their constitutional provisions by eliminating women's derivative nationality – Colombia, Honduras and Venezuela (1936), Bolivia (1938), El Salvador and Nicaragua (1939), Cuba (1940), and Ecuador (1946).. The Costa Rican Options and Naturalizations Act of 1950, provided that a married woman's nationality could not be lost unless she chose to accept her spouse's nationality. This was modified on 6 June 1995, by Article 1 of Law No. 7514, making nationality an inalienable right. Women in the Dominican Republic no longer lost their nationality by marriage after the adoption of the 1994 Constitution. The Guatemalan Nationality Law of 1894, gave a foreign woman the right to obtain or relinquish nationality independently, if her husband naturalized. Changes to the Civil Code in 1933 allowed Guatemalan women to retain their original nationality if they specified a choice to do so, in their marriage contract. The 1945 Constitution of Guatemala granted gender equality. Article 9 of the Honduran Constitution of 1936 provided that nationality for women and children could not be lost by a change in marital status. It also instituted a provision for loss of nationality if naturalized by another country.

From independence, all of the South American countries adopted a policy that birth in the country established a person's nationality. Some of the states, for example, Colombia from 1866 and Ecuador from 1830, also followed the principle of jus domicilii, meaning residence in the country was required to retain nationality. For children born abroad, it was typical for them to derive nationality from either of their parents, but there were exceptions. In Brazil a mother could only transmit nationality to an illegitimate child from 1824 to 1934, when a constitution was adopted defining nationality as being derived from birth to a Brazilian father or mother. Between 1830 and 1839, children in Bolivia could only derive nationality from their fathers. The 1871 Costa Rican Constitution specified that for children born abroad, who were not legitimate or legitimated or were unrecognized by their fathers, nationality derived from the mother. From the adoption of the 1885 Civil Code, a mother's authority was only recognized for illegitimate children in Costa Rica, as in general it was considered that only legitimate children could receive protection from the state. From 1950, children in Costa Rica were able to derive their nationality from either parent. Cuban children who were illegitimate followed the nationality of the first person to recognize them and could only obtain the mother's nationality if the father did not acknowledge his paternity. From 1940, Cuban children could derive nationality from either parent. From the adoption of the 1886 Constitution of El Salvador, only unrecognized, illegitimate children could obtain nationality from their mothers. A constitutional change in 1939 in El Salvador allowed children to derive their nationality maternally. From 1946, Ecuadorian children could not be deprived of their nationality, by either a change in their parents' status or because of dual nationality. After adoption of the Constitution of 1871, illegitimate children born to Guatemalan mothers could choose to obtain Guatemalan nationality by residing in the country or declaring their intent within one year of obtaining their majority. Under the terms of the Immigration Act of 1936 children born to a Guatemalan mother and foreign father were not nationals. These requirements were negated by adoption of a new constitution in 1945 which eliminated conditions based on legitimacy, From 1906 in Honduras, a mother's nationality could only be derived for her children, even in the case of illegitimacy, if the child was unrecognized by the father. The Honduran Constitution of 1936, allowed children to derive nationality from either parent.

|- | {{nowrap|Mexico | 1823 | 1857 | 1934 (see details (1)) | 1843 (see details (2)) | 1969 | 1974 | 1917 | 1974 | |- | {{nowrap| Panama | 1843 | 1888 (see details) | 1941 | 1830 | | | 1888 | | The Naturalization Law (Ley 145) of 1888 stated in Article 17 that wives and minor children (under age 21) derived the nationality of the husband or father. This was challenged in two court cases before the Colombian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. As Panama gained independence prior to the 1923 ruling, its laws were ambiguous on whether Panamanian-born women lost their nationality upon marriage. |- | {{nowrap| Peru | 1836 | 1836 | 1979 (see details (1)) | 1839 | | | 1834 | | (1) Under the Constitution of 1933, wives were required to derive nationality from their husbands, but a birthright national could retain her nationality, unless she renounced it. Foreign wives' nationality remained an automatic derivation from the spouse. Article 93 of the 1979 Constitution of Peru, provided that neither marriage nor its dissolution impacted Peruvian nationality. |- | {{nowrap| Puerto Rico
Unincorporated territory of the United States
| 1889 | 1889 | 1934 (see details (1)) | 1902 | 1902 | | 1934 | | 1) The US Nationality Act of 1934 contained provisions allowing Puerto Rican women who had lost nationality because of marriage prior to 2 March 1917 to repatriate. |- | {{nowrap| United States | 1855 | 1855 (see details (1)) | 1922 (see details (2)) | not applicable | 1866 (see details (3)) | (see details (4)) | 1934 | 1) While the Naturalization Act of 1855 specified that foreign wives gained US nationality, the law created confusion as to whether it applied to American women who married aliens. For example, Nellie Grant, daughter of President Ulysses S. Grant, reacquired her US nationality in 1898 by an Act of Congress, after a divorce from a British husband. The confusion caused by the 1907 statute was definitively ended with the passage of the Expatriation Act of 1907, which tied all wives' nationality to that of their husband. 2) The passage of the Cable Act in 1922 granted limited individual nationality to married women. It was dependent upon her husband's ability to naturalize and if she had lost her nationality because of marriage and lived abroad, whether she could return to the United States to be naturalized. 3) Under the Civil Rights Act of 1866, children born on US soil were nationals, regardless of the status of their parents. Children born abroad could not derive nationality from their mothers until 1934. 4) Children born abroad outside of wedlock have different requirements for deriving nationality depending on if the US-national parent was their father or mother.

Dual nationality other than in Uruguay, began to be accepted from the 1970s in Latin America, for example, in Panama (1972), Peru (1980), El Salvador (1983), Colombia (1991), Dominican Republic (1994), Costa Rica and Ecuador (1995), Brazil (1996), and Mexico (1998). Argentina, Chile, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Paraguay only allow dual nationality for countries with which they have signed specific treaties.

Canada and the United States

Nationality legislation for Britain did not extend beyond the bounds of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland until 1911. This resulted in various colonies passing nationality regulations which applied to local jurisdictions and conflicted with other places in the realm. For example, a person who was naturalized in Canada would be considered a foreigner, rather than a British national, in Australia, Britain, or South Africa. Upper Canada passed a Nationality Act in 1849 requiring foreign wives to derive the nationality of their spouse. Quebec's Civil Code of 1866 had the same provisions. In 1867, the colonies of Canada, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia were united as the Canadian Confederation. The following year, a statute extended derivative nationality for foreign women to the rest of Canada. From 1869 to 1985, First Nations women in Canada who were Status Indians, under the provisions of the Indian Act, were required to follow the status of their husband. This meant primarily that if a Native woman married a person who was not a Status Indian, she lost their Native status. Until 1951, Indiginous registration applied only to Native males, who had Native blood with a tribal affiliation. His children or legal wife derived their Native status from their father or husband.

In 1881, the passage of the Act Respecting Naturalization and Aliens required all Canadian women to have the same nationality as their husbands. Following the British decision to implement a common nationality code across the realm in 1911, Canada passed the Naturalization Act of 1914, which entrenched dependent nationality until 1947, with two exceptions. Breaking with the idea of a common British code on the issue, Canada passed an amendment to its Nationality Act in 1931 which introduced the idea of consent, meaning that foreign women could only derive Canadian nationality from a husband, if she requested it. The amendment also provided that if a woman would become stateless because she did not derive her husband's nationality at marriage, she could not be denaturalized in Canada. Nonetheless, abolishing dependent nationality in 1947, did not repatriate those women who had previously lost their nationality until the law was amended in 1950.

With regard to children, Canadian law followed British law, meaning that legitimate children derived their nationality from their fathers and illigitimate children obtained their mother's nationality, until 1977. That year, new nationality legislation was passed to address discrepancies which had existed since Canada enacted independent nationality regulations from Britain in 1947. Some these Lost Canadians were descendants of people who died, such as servicemen, before Canada created a separate nationality policy from Britain. Provisions in the 1947 law provided Canadian nationality would be extened to Newfoundland, which joined Canada in 1949, and allowed non-aliens born in Canada who were British subjects to remain British, unless Britain determained they were ineligible. Also omitted from Canadian nationality were the children of women who had been denaturalized because of marriage to a foreigner or the naturalization of their spouse in a foreign country, or of war brides who came to Canada with their Canadian husbands and children, but who failed to register as Canadian. Others whose births were not registered and were not nationals included refugee children brought to Canada for adoption, children born in the Ideal Maternity Home, children born to rural mothers in hospitals at the US border, Indigenous children born to parents who feared their children would be removed and placed in residential schools and children born in Canada to immigrants ineligible for naturalization, like Chinese Canadians. The law of 1977 eliminated discrimination by legitimacy and prohibitions against dual nationality. Changes to the Indian Act in 1985 reversed requirements for Indigenous women to derive their nationality and Native status from their husbands, granted tribal governments the right to determine their own membership rules, and established procedures for women who had lost their status and their children to recover their status. Amendments to the nationality laws in 2005, 2009 and 2015 restored nationality to persons born abroad to Canadian nationals, war brides and their children, and the descendants of people who died prior to Canada developing its own nationality scheme in 1947.

Caribbean

Former French colonies

As a part of the French Empire, Haiti, known as Saint-Domingue, and the other colonies in the French Antilles were subject to the provisions of the Code Noir decreed by Louis XIV in 1685. The Code was designed to control the social relations between blacks and whites in the Caribbean, and was eventually extended to Louisiana in 1724. The code provided that freed persons were naturalized and contained provisions for manumission and emancipation of slaves. Though it did not prohibit the marriage of blacks and whites, it carried substantial fines for owners who produced illegitimate children with slaves, decreeing that the father had to give the child to a hospital as a slave who was ineligible for future emancipation, unless he married his slave woman in a church, automatically manumitting her and the children through the marriage. Children followed the status of the mother, regardless of the father's status, thus if she was a slave her children were slaves and if she was free her children were free.

In 1771, Médéric Louis Élie Moreau de Saint-Méry a magistrate in the northern district of the Saint-Domingue Court of Justice, compiled the manuscripts of legal documents into a compendium. In 1780, he was authorized by the Secretary of State of the Navy, the Marquis de Castries, to convert the compendium into a code. In 1784, the first of six volumes of the Loix et constitutions des colonies françaises ("Laws and Constitutions of the French Colonies") was published, which detailed all of the colonial laws issued between 1550 and 1784. He was unable to complete a formal Colonial Code before he left Saint-Domingue for France in 1788. Having separate codes for the colonies and metropole was a characteristic of the empire and created little unity and standardization in French law. Thus, the French Constitution of 1791, which gave legitimacy to the French Revolution and human rights protections by incorporating the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, did not include any of the colonies or possessions of France in Africa, Asia, or the Americas. In response, the Haitian Revolution began that year and lasted until independence from France was declared in 1804. The abolition of slavery in 1794 granted French nationality to all men in the French colonies, but the reestablishment of slavery in 1802, made the status of colonial subjects confusing. The 1802 Coup d'état of Napoleon Bonaparte rolled back gains made during the French Revolutionary period, re-establishing the law and customs in effect before the Revolution of 1789.

In 1805, the Napoleonic Code, the French Civil Code, was implemented in the French Antilles and French Guiana. The provisions contained in it applied only to the white French in the colonies, as the Code Noir was reimposed for people of color. Under the Civil Code, women were legally incapacitated and paternal authority was established over children. Upon marriage, a woman automatically acquired the same nationality as her spouse. Illegitimate children were barred from inheritance and nationality could only be transmitted through a father. Between 1805 and 1846, liberated slaves, those found on illegal slaving vessels, had a special status in the French colonies and were assigned to public works projects. Between 1831 and 1846, when the liberated slaves were freed, they worked as apprentices. In 1848 slavery was abolished for the second time. Freedom disrupted the social order, as it established patrilineal affiliations for family members. Simultaneously with the abolition of slavery, the Civil Code was extended to all of the inhabitants in the colonies of France.

From 1848, those persons who settled in the colonies and were from France were considered nationals who had full rights and were subject to French law. However, those born in the new territories were considered to be nationals without citizenship. The Nationality Law of 1889 allowed women who would become stateless to retain their French nationality upon marriage. When it passed, it specifically applied to the metropole, Guadeloupe, Martinique and Réunion, but was not extended to the other colonies until 1897. In 1927, France passed a new Nationality Law, which under Article 8, removed the requirement for married women to automatically derive the nationality of a husband and provided that her nationality could only be changed if she consented to change her nationality. It also allowed children born in France to native-born French women married to foreigners to acquire their nationality from their mothers. When it was implemented it included Guadeloupe, Martinique and Réunion but was extended to the remaining French possessions in 1928. In 1945, a new Code of French Nationality was passed, which conferred once again automatic French nationality on foreign wives of French men, but allowed mothers who were French nationals to pass their nationality to children born outside of France. It expressly applied to Algeria, French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique and Réunion and was extended to the Overseas Territories in 1953, but in the case of the latter had distinctions for the rights of those who were naturalized.

With the passage of the Constitution of 1958, nationality provisions were standardized for France, Overseas Departments, and Overseas Territories. Revisions to the Nationality Code in 1973, included a provision that a child born in French territory derived French nationality if either of its parents were born in a French colony or territory, allowing for the possibility that the parent's place of birth might no longer be part of the French realm. It eliminated language in previous legislation differentiating between legitimate and illegitimate children, providing that if either parent was a French national the child was a French national. The 1973 Code also allowed the foreign husband of a French national to obtain French nationality by declaration, provided that he was living with his wife and adjudged to be able to assimilate to French culture.

The Republic of Haiti was granted independence from France in 1825, and that same year adopted a Civil Code, which was based on the French Napoleonic Code, with significant differences. Only people with African or indigenous blood could be naturalized. Nationality could be obtained through birth in Haiti or birth abroad to a Haitian, regardless of legitimacy. The 1843 constitution introduced the requirement for Haitian women married to foreigners to be denationalized and dispossessed of their property, although the children of such unions were considered to be Haitians. A law was passed on 30 October 1860 stating that marriage did not alter a woman's nationality, but reversed when the 1874 Constitution reinstated a provision for a Haitian woman married to a foreigner to acquire her husband's nationality. An 1884 amendment clarified that a Haitian woman who married a foreigner automatically lost her Haitian nationality and could repatriate only upon the death of her spouse and following the procedures for naturalization. For foreign women who married Haitian men automatically acquired Haitian nationality.

The Haitian Nationality Law was amended in 1942 and thereafter no longer required married women to lose their nationality. A new repatriation process did not require them to naturalize as a foreigner, allowing them to simply make a declaration in the prosecutor's office of the place of residence stating her desire to retrieve Haitian nationality. The Constitutions of 1964 and 1971 granted derivative nationality by choice to foreign women marrying Haitian men, but required that the marriage certificate renounce any other nationality. Haitian women were unable to pass on nationality to children legally recognized by their fathers until passage of the Nationality Law of 6 November 1984. Between 1984 and the passage of the 1987 Constitution, children born abroad to Haitian parents were considered foreigners unless both parents were Haitians.

Former British colonies

In the British Caribbean, ten nations recognized dual nationality from the time of their independence. These included – Antigua (1981), Barbados (1966), Belize (1981), Dominica (1978), Grenada (1973), Jamaica (1962), Saint Kitts and Nevis (1983), Saint Lucia (1979), Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (1979), and Trinidad and Tobago (1988).

Current situation

In all countries of South America, marriage is the basis for relaxed naturalization processes, typically meaning residency periods are shortened and in some cases the documentation necessary is reduced. With the exception of Paraguay and Uruguay each country allows repatriation through various legal processes if nationality has been lost. None of the countries in South America allow nationals from birth to be denaturalized, but naturalized persons can be deprived of their nationality for various offenses.

Europe

Individual nationality for women became law for women in France in 1927, Denmark and Sweden in 1950, Germany in 1953, the Netherlands in 1964, Finland in 1968, Spain in 1975, Portugal in 1981, and Greece in 1984.

• Acosta, Diego (September 2016). "Report on Citizenship Law: The South American and Mexican Cases" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 August 2022. Retrieved 17 September 2023.
• Akiko, Yoshie (Winter 2005). "Gender in Early Classical Japan: Marriage, Leadership, and Political Status in Village and Palace". Monumenta Nipponica. 60 (4). Translated by Goodwin, Janet R. Tokyo, Japan: Sophia University: 437–479. ISSN 0027-0741. OCLC 6015285937. Retrieved 1 September 2023.
• "Aliens". Colonization Circular. 30. London: Her Majesty's Colonial Land and Emigration Commissioners: 47–54. 1871. OCLC 1181249269.
• Alvarado Quesada, Paola (December 2015). "Report on Citizenship Law: Costa Rica" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu (Translation of the original ed.). Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 January 2021. Retrieved 1 January 2021.
• Amorosa, Paolo (May 2019). "Pioneering International Women's Rights? The US National Woman's Party and the 1933 Montevideo Equal Rights Treaties". European Journal of International Law. 30 (2). Oxford, Oxfordshire: Oxford University Press: 415–437. doi:10.1093/ejil/chz025. ISSN 1464-3596. OCLC 1111079377. Retrieved 13 September 2023.
• Andrés Santos, Francisco J. (2014). "Napoleon in America?: Reflections on the Concept of 'Legal Reception' in the Light of the Civil Law Codification in Latin America" (PDF). In Duve, Thomas (ed.). Entanglements in Legal History: Conceptual Approaches. Global Perspectives on Legal History. Vol. 1. Frankfurt am Main: Max Planck Institute for European Legal History. pp. 297–313. doi:10.12946/gplh1. ISBN 978-3-944773-00-1.
• Asanza Espinoza, Janeth Del Carmen (August 2014). La Movilidad Humana y su Incidencia en el otorgamiento de la Nacionalidad Ecuatoriana por Naturalización producto del Matrimonio o Unión de Hecho [Human Mobility and Its Impact on the Granting of Ecuadorian Nationality by Naturalization as a Result of Marriage or De Facto Union] (PDF) (Abogado) (in Spanish). Quito: Universidad Central del Ecuador. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 August 2017. Retrieved 9 January 2021.
• Augustine-Adams, Kif (Winter 2002). "'She Consents Implicitly': Women's Citizenship, Marriage, and Liberal Political Theory in Late-Nineteenth and Early-Twentieth-Century Argentina". Journal of Women's History. 13 (4). Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press: 8–30. doi:10.1353/jowh.2002.0001. ISSN 1042-7961. OCLC 357514548. S2CID 145419401. – via Project MUSE (subscription required)
• Azarola, Enrique (1895). Proyecto de codigo civil para la republica o. del Uruguay [Draft Civil Code for the O[riental] Republic of Uruguay] (in Spanish). Montevideo, Uruguay: Imprenta de Dornaleche y Reyes. OCLC 456844580.
• Bagnall, Kate; Sherratt, Tim (2021). "Missing Links: Data Stories from the Archive of British Settler Colonial Citizenship". Journal of World History. 32 (2). Honolulu, Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press: 281–300. doi:10.1353/jwh.2021.0025. ISSN 1045-6007. OCLC 9144129385. Retrieved 14 September 2023.
• Baldwin, M. Page (October 2001). "Subject to Empire: Married Women and the British Nationality and Status of Aliens Act". Journal of British Studies. 40 (4). Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press: 522–556. ISSN 0021-9371. OCLC 4637986477. Retrieved 25 March 2021.
• Batlan, Felice (July 2020). "'She Was Surprised and Furious': Expatriation, Suffrage, Immigration, and the Fragility of Women's Citizenship, 1907–1940" (PDF). Stanford Journal of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties. XV (Special Issue). Palo Alto, California: Stanford Law School: 315–349. ISSN 1553-7951. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 July 2020. Retrieved 11 December 2020.
• Berinduague, Martín; Piñeyro del Campo, L.; Vargas, Eduardo; Castro, Juan P. (1914). Código Civil de la República Oriental del Uruguay [Civil Code of the Oriental Republic of Uruguay] (in Spanish) (New ed.). Montevideo, Uruguay: Librería Nacional A. Barreiro y Ramos. OCLC 822599164. Archived from the original on 15 January 2022.
• Betancourt, Angel C. (1916). Código Civil (Cuba) [Cuban Civil Code] (in Spanish) (2nd ed.). Havana: Rambla, Bouza y Compañia. OCLC 1114360786.
• Bevelander, Pieter; Spång, Mikael (January 2014). "From Aliens to Citizens: The Political Incorporation of Immigrants" (PDF). Discussion Paper Series. Bonn, Germany: IZA Institute of Labor Economics. ISSN 2365-9793. OCLC 931483936. Paper #7920. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 May 2022. Retrieved 15 September 2023.
• Boll, Alfred Michael (2007). Multiple Nationality And International Law. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. ISBN 978-90-04-14838-3.
• Bonifaz Stagnaro, Jorge (December 1946). "La condición jurídica del extranjero en el Perú" [The Legal Status of the Foreigner in Peru] (PDF). Revista de la Universidad Católica (in Spanish). 14 (2). Lima: Pontifical Catholic University of Peru: 206–348. Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2018. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
• Boswell, Richard A. (2003). "Racism and U.S. Immigration Law: Prospects for Reform After '9/11?'". Journal of Gender, Race & Justice (7). Iowa City, Iowa: Iowa College of Law: 315–356. ISSN 1550-7815. OCLC 193981356. Archived from the original on 10 September 2023. Retrieved 10 September 2023.
• Bozeman, Adda Bruemmer (1994). Politics and Culture in International History: From the Ancient Near East to the Opening of the Modern Age (2nd ed.). New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers. ISBN 978-1-56000-735-7.
• Brey, Elisa (March 2016). "Report on Citizenship Law: Paraguay" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 January 2022. Retrieved 15 September 2023.
• Burt, Sandra D. (1993). "6. The Changing Patterns of Public Policy". In Burt, Sandra D.; Code, Lorraine; Dorney, Lindsay (eds.). Changing Patterns: Women in Canada (2nd ed.). Toronto, Ontario: McClelland & Stewart. pp. 212–242. ISBN 978-0-7710-2854-0.
• Camiscioli, Elisa (Summer–Fall 1999). "Intermarriage, Independent Nationality, and the Individual Rights of French Women: The Law of 10 August 1927". French Politics, Culture & Society. 17 (3–4). New York, New York: Berghahn Books: 52–74. ISSN 1537-6370. OCLC 205909023. Retrieved 3 January 2021.
• Cano, Gabriela (April 2003). "Se llamaba Elena Arizmendi" [Her Name Was Elena Arizmendi]. Revista de la Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (in Spanish) (622). Mexico City, Mexico: National Autonomous University of Mexico: 17–29. ISSN 0185-1330. OCLC 820033859. Retrieved 28 September 2021.
• Chung, Erin Aeran; Kim, Daisy (Winter 2012). "Citizenship and Marriage in a Globalizing World: Multicultural Families and Monocultural Nationality Laws in Korea and JapanFamilies and Monocultural Nationality Laws in Korea and Japan". Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies. 19 (1). Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Maurer School of Law: 195–219. doi:10.2979/indjglolegstu.19.1.195. ISSN 1080-0727. OCLC 7785101853. Retrieved 10 September 2023.
• "Convention on the Nationality of Women (Inter-American); December 26, 1933". Avalon Project. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale Law School. December 26, 1933. Archived from the original on 27 December 2020. Retrieved 27 December 2020.
• Cott, Nancy F. (December 1998). "Marriage and Women's Citizenship in the United States, 1830-1934". The American Historical Review. 103 (5). Washington, D.C.: Oxford University Press: 1440–1474. doi:10.1086/ahr/103.5.1440. ISSN 0002-8762. OCLC 5137606250. Retrieved 9 September 2023.
• Crane, Lucius F. (1925). "The Nationality of Married Women". Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law. 3. 7 (1). London, UK: Society of Comparative Legislation: 53–60. ISSN 1479-5949. OCLC 9971527743. Retrieved 30 September 2023.
• Dailey, Ryan (14 May 2021). "FSU Eyes Candidates to Replace Thrasher as President". News 4 Jax. Jacksonville, Florida. News Service of Florida. Archived from the original on 14 May 2021. Retrieved 27 June 2021.
• Decottignies, Roger; Sy, Seydou Madani (2020). "Upper Volta". International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law. Vol. 1: National Reports - U: Uganda-Uruguay (1976 reprint ed.). Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 165–170. ISBN 978-3-11-232816-3.
• "Decreto Nº 21.076, de 24 de fevereiro de 1932" [Decree No. 21,076, of 24 February 1932]. Portal da Câmara dos Deputados (in Portuguese). Brasília: Câmara dos Deputados. 24 February 1932. Archived from the original on 24 November 2020. Retrieved 29 December 2020.
• de Hart, Betty; van Oers, Ricky (2006). "7. European Trends in Nationality Law". In Bauböck, Rainer; Ersbøll, Eva; Groenendijk, Kees; Waldrauch, Harald (eds.). Acquisition and Loss of Nationality: Policies and Trends in 15 European States. Vol. 1: Comparative Analyses. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press. pp. 317–358. ISBN 978-90-5356-920-7.
• Digby, Everard (1903). "Immigration Restriction in Australia". Journal of the Society of Comparative Legislation. 5 (1). Cambridge, Cambridgeshire: Cambridge University Press: 143–153. ISSN 1479-5973. OCLC 9971472368. Retrieved 14 September 2023. – via HeinOnline (subscription required)
• Donahoe, Amanda E. (2017). "Gender, Religion, and International Relations". In Sandal, Nukhet A. (ed.). Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. New York, New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-084662-6.
• Douglas, J. Allen (2005). "The 'Priceless Possession' of Citizenship: Race, Nation and Naturalization in American Law, 1880-1930". Duquesne Law Review. 43 (3–4). Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Thomas R. Kline School of Law of Duquesne University. ISSN 0012-7213. OCLC 192766542. Archived from the original on 10 September 2023. Retrieved 10 September 2023.
• Ebrey, Patricia Buckley (1993). The Inner Quarters: Marriage and the Lives of Chinese Women in the Sung Period. Berkeley, California: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-08158-1.
• Erickson, Amy Louise (Spring 2005). "Coverture and Capitalism". History Workshop Journal (59). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 1–16. ISSN 1363-3554. OCLC 5546550765. Retrieved 19 December 2020.
• Echeverría, Gabriel (April 2016). "Report on Citizenship Law: Chile" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 3 April 2018. Retrieved 30 December 2020.
• Echeverría, Gabriel (February 2017). "Report on Citizenship Law: Ecuador" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 January 2021. Retrieved 5 January 2021.
• Eder, Phanor J. (1951). "Efectos del matrimonio sobre la nacionalidad de las mujeres" [Effects of Marriage on Women's Nationality]. Boletin del Instituto de Derecho Comparado de México (in Spanish). 11. Translated by Elola Fernandez, Javier. Mexico City, Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México: 52–63. ISSN 0186-4335. Archived from the original on 12 September 2023. Retrieved 12 September 2023.
• Escobar, Cristina (May 2015). "Report on Citizenship Law: Colombia" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 March 2018. Retrieved 30 December 2020.
• Ezer, Tamar (Winter 2016). "Forging a Path for Women's Rights in Customary Law". Hastings Women's Law Journal. 27 (1). San Francisco, California: Hastings College of the Law: 65–86. ISSN 1061-0901. OCLC 8521989255. Archived from the original on 6 September 2023. Retrieved 6 September 2023.
• Fisher, Betsy (January 2015). "Why Non-Marital Children in the MENA Region Face a Risk of Statelessness" (PDF). Harvard Human Rights Journal Online. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Law School: 1–8. ISSN 1557-5624. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 October 2022. Retrieved 5 September 2023.
• FitzGerald, David Scott (2017). "The History of Racialized Citizenship". In Shachar, Ayelet; Bauböck, Rainer; Bloemraad, Irene; Vink, Maarten (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Citizenship. New York, New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198805854. ISBN 978-0-19-880585-4.
• Flournoy Jr., Richard W. (December 1923). "The New Married Women's Citizenship Law". Yale Law Journal. 33 (2). New Haven, Connecticut: Yale Law School: 159–170. doi:10.2307/789418. ISSN 0044-0094. OCLC 5544410365. Retrieved 30 September 2023.
• Foot, Richard; Osborne, Peggy Ann (25 July 2017). "Lost Canadians". The Canadian Encyclopedia. Toronto, Ontario: Historica Canada. Archived from the original on 11 April 2023. Retrieved 16 September 2023.
• Foster, Michelle; Baker, Timnah Rachel (January 2021). "Racial Discrimination in Nationality Laws: A Doctrinal Blind Spot of International Law?". Columbia Journal of Race & Law. 11 (1). New York, New York: Columbia Law School: 83–146. doi:10.7916/cjrl.v11i1.8018. ISSN 2155-2401. OCLC 8974805109. Retrieved 10 September 2023.
• Gabriel, Richard A. (2009). Thutmose III: A Military Biography of Egypt's Greatest Warrior King (1st ed.). Washington, D.C.: Potomac Books. ISBN 978-1-59797-373-1.
• Gao, Xiongya (2003). "Women Existing for Men: Confucianism and Social Injustice against Women in China". Race, Gender & Class. 10 (3). New Orleans, Louisiana: Southern University at New Orleans: 114–125. ISSN 1082-8354. OCLC 9975493237. Retrieved 1 September 2023.
• Gardner, Martha Mabie (2005). The Qualities of a Citizen: Women, Immigration, and Citizenship, 1870–1965. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-08993-5.
• Gil, Ana Rita; Piçarra, Nuno (February 2020). "Report on Citizenship Law: Portugal" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 June 2021. Retrieved 4 July 2021.
• Giraldo Gómez, Alicia (1987). "Los derechos de la mujer en la legislación colombiana" [The Rights of Women in Colombian Law] (PDF). Repertorio histórico (in Spanish). 38 (250). Medellín: Academia Antioqueña de Historia: 1–21. ISSN 0122-3232. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 February 2020. Retrieved 1 January 2021.
• Girard, Philip (March 2013). "'If two ride a horse, one must ride in front': Married Women's Nationality and the Law in Canada 1880–1950". Canadian Historical Review. 94 (1). Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto Press: 28–54. doi:10.3138/chr.1349. ISSN 0008-3755. OCLC 4960260033. Retrieved 21 April 2021. – via Project MUSE (subscription required)
• Glenn, Jane Matthews (May 2008). "Mixed Jurisdictions in the Commonwealth Caribbean: Mixing, Unmixing, Remixing" (PDF). Electronic Journal of Comparative Law. 12 (1). Tilburg, Netherlands: Tilburg University, Schoordijk Institute: 1–23. ISSN 1387-3091. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 October 2020. Retrieved 8 February 2021.
• Green, Joyce (December 2001). "Canaries in the Mines of Citizenship: Indian Women in Canada". Canadian Journal of Political Science. 34 (4). Ottawa, Ontario: Cambridge University Press for the Canadian Political Science Association: 715–738. doi:10.1017/S0008423901778067. ISSN 0008-4239. JSTOR 3232880. OCLC 937311398. S2CID 154776141. Retrieved 21 April 2021.
• Grossman, Andrew (October 2001). "Nationality and the Unrecognised State". International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 50 (4). Cambridge, Cambridgeshire: Cambridge University Press: 849–887. ISSN 0020-5893. OCLC 9963161887. Retrieved 5 September 2023. – via HeinOnline (subscription required)
• Guerry, Linda; Rundell, Ethan (2016). "Married Women's Nationality in the International Context (1918-1935)". Clio. 43 (1: Gender and the Citizen). Paris: Éditions Belin: 73–94. ISSN 2554-3822. OCLC 7788119453. Retrieved 19 December 2020.
• Habib, Javier I. (March 2016). "Report on Citizenship Law: Argentina" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 April 2018. Retrieved 26 December 2020.
• Hanley, Will (November 2016). "What Ottoman Nationality Was and Was Not". Journal of the Ottoman and Turkish Studies Association. 3 (2). Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press for the Ottoman and Turkish Studies Association: 277–298. doi:10.2979/jottturstuass.3.2.05. ISSN 2376-0699. OCLC 6883463202. Retrieved 26 June 2021.
• Haruko, Wakita (Winter 1984). "Marriage and Property in Premodern Japan from the Perspective of Women's History". The Journal of Japanese Studies. 10 (1). New York, New York: The Society for Japanese Studies: 73–99. doi:10.2307/132182. ISSN 0095-6848. OCLC 7781153719. Retrieved 1 September 2023.
• Hartkamp, Arthur S. (September 1975). "Civil Code Revision in the Netherlands: A Survey of Its System and Contents, and Its Influence on Dutch Legal Practice" (PDF). Louisiana Law Review. 35 (5). Baton Rouge, Louisiana: Louisiana State University: 1059–1090. ISSN 0024-6859. OCLC 8092736363. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 February 2021. Retrieved 5 February 2021.
• Hernández Juárez, Saúl Iván (December 2018). Mi esposo y mi nación: la nacionalidad de las mujeres casadas en México, 1886–1934 [My Husband and My Nation: The Nationality of Married Women in Mexico, 1886–1934] (PhD) (in Spanish). Mexico City: El Colegio de México. OCLC 1091580488. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
• Herrera y Obes, Manuel; Rodriguez Caballero, Antonio; Requena, Joaquin; Narvaja, Tristan (1868). Código civil para el Estado Oriental del Uruguay promulgado por el gobierno provisorio en 23 de enero de 1868 [Civil Code for the Oriental State of Uruguay Promulgated by the Provisional Government on 23 January 1868] (in Spanish). Vol. 1, 2, & 3 (official ed.). Montevideo, Uruguay: Imprenta de la Tribuna. OCLC 57646873.
• Hoxie, Frederick E. (December 2006). "What Was Taney Thinking? American Indian Citizenship in the Era of Dred Scott". Chicago-Kent Law Review. 82 (1). Chicago, Illinois: Chicago-Kent College of Law: 329–359. ISSN 0009-3599. OCLC 143598229. Archived from the original on November 25, 2020. Retrieved March 5, 2021.
• Hoyo, Henio (April 2016). "Report on Citizenship Law: Honduras" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived from the original on 1 November 2018. Retrieved 14 January 2021.
• Hoyo, Henio (August 2015). "Report on Citizenship Law: Mexico" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 January 2021. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
• Hudson, Valerie M.; Bowen, Donna Lee; Nielsen, Perpetua Lynne (2020). The First Political Order: How Sex Shapes Governance and National Security Worldwide. New York, New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-55093-2.
• Iacovetta, Franca (April 2019). "'In the Case of a Woman' or 'The Headache': Married Women's Nationality and Canada's Citizenship Act at Home and Europe, 1946–50". Women's History Review. 28 (3). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge: 396–420. doi:10.1080/09612025.2018.1484327. ISSN 0961-2025. OCLC 8044926765. S2CID 149559911. Retrieved 21 April 2021. – via Taylor & Francis (subscription required)
• Irving, Helen (2019). "14. Citizenship and Nationality". In Irving, Helen (ed.). Constitutions and Gender (Paperback ed.). Cheltenham, Gloucestershire: Edward Elgar Publishing. pp. 387–412. ISBN 978-1-78471-695-0.
• Jany, János (2020). "Persian Law". Legal Traditions in Asia: History, Concepts and Laws. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice. Vol. 80. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature. pp. 83–116. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-43728-2. ISBN 978-3-03-043728-2.
• Jerónimo, Patrícia (January 2016). "Report on Citizenship Law: Brazil" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 October 2016. Retrieved 30 December 2020.
• Jones-Correa, Michael (Winter 2001). "Under Two Flags: Dual Nationality in Latin America and Its Consequences for Naturalization in the United States". International Migration Review. 35 (4). New York, New York: Center for Migration Studies of New York: 997–1029. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2001.tb00050.x. ISSN 0197-9183. OCLC 7784691669. Retrieved 17 September 2023.
• Joseph, Cuthbert (1969). Nationality and Diplomatic Protection: The Commonwealth of Nations. Leiden, Netherlands: A. W. Sijthoff. OCLC 13067.
• Kapur, Ratna (2020). "Gender and the 'Faith' in Law: Equality, Secularism, and the Rise of the Hindu Nation" (PDF). Journal of Law and Religion. 35 (3). Cambridge, Cambridgeshire: Cambridge University Press: 407–431. doi:10.1017/jlr.2020.42. ISSN 0748-0814. OCLC 9029137388. Retrieved 6 September 2023.
• Kaye, Stuart B. (1996). "Forgotten Source: The Legislative Legacy of the Federal Council of Australasia" (PDF). Newcastle Law Review. 1 (2). Newcastle, New South Wales: University of Newcastle: 57–71. ISSN 1324-8758. OCLC 9069165047. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 May 2017. Retrieved 14 September 2023 – via Australasian Legal Information Institute.
• Kloek, Joost; Mijnhardt, Wijnand (2004). Dutch Culture in a European Perspective: 1800, Blueprints for a National Community. Translated by Jackson, Beverly. London: Uitgeverij Van Gorcum / Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-90-232-3964-2.
• Kondo, Atsushi (2001). "Introduction". In Kondo, Atsushi (ed.). Citizenship in a Global World. Migration, Minorities and Citizenship. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 1–4. doi:10.1057/9780333993880_1. ISBN 978-0-333-99388-0.(subscription required)
• Kondo, Atsushi (October 2016). "Report on Citizenship Law: Japan" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 February 2021. Retrieved 9 September 2023.
• Lazcano y Mazón, Andrés María (1952). "Proyecto de reforma integral de dicha ley constitucional de 1935 [Comprehensive Reform Project of Said Constitutional Law of 1935]" (PDF). Las Constituciones de Cuba [The Constitutions of Cuba] (in Spanish). Madrid: Ediciones Cultura Hispánica. pp. 774–843. OCLC 1887957.
• Leiva Salinas, Maria Lorena (March 2020). "Report on Citizenship Law: Bolivia" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Translated by Rubio Grundell, Lucrecia. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 February 2021. Retrieved 21 February 2021.
• "Ley de opciones y naturalizaciones: Ley n.º 1155" [Options and Naturalizations Law: Law No. 1155] (PDF). Tribunal Supremo de Elecciones de Costa Rica (in Spanish). San José, Costa Rica: Government of Costa Rica. 2019. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 December 2020. Retrieved 28 February 2021.
• Llewellyn-Jones, Frederick (1929). "The Nationality of Married Women". Transactions of the Grotius Society. 15. London: Grotius Society: 121–138. ISSN 1479-1234. OCLC 5544683551. Retrieved 25 March 2021.
• MacDonald, Victoria-María (2014). "Demanding their Rights: The Latino Struggle for Educational Access and Equity". American Latino Theme Study. Washington, D. C.: National Park Service. Archived from the original on May 27, 2020. Retrieved November 10, 2020.
• Manby, Bronwen (2010). Citizenship Law in Africa: A Comparative Study (PDF) (2nd ed.). New York, New York: Open Society Foundations, Africa Governance Monitoring and Advocacy (AfriMAP), Open Society Justice Initiative. ISBN 978-1-936133-29-1. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 February 2021.
• Margheritis, Ana (May 2015). "Report on Citizenship Law: Uruguay" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 March 2016. Retrieved 15 September 2023.
• Martin, Ged (1995). Britain and the Origins of Canadian Confederation: 1837-67. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan Publishers. ISBN 978-0-333-52288-2.
• Matas, David (1985). "Racism in Canadian Immigration Policy". Refuge. 5 (2). Toronto, Ontario: York University: 8–9. ISSN 1920-7336. Archived from the original on 22 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2023.
• Matos, José (1941). Curso de derecho internacional privado [Private International Law Course] (in Spanish). Guatemala City, Guatemala: Tipografía nacional. OCLC 5384443. Art. 9 - Ni el matrimonio ni su disolución afectan la nacionalidad de los cónyuges o de sus hijos
• McCord, Thomas (1867). The Civil Code of Lower Canada: Together with a Synopsis of Changes in the Law References to the Reports of the Commissioners. Montreal, Quebec: Dawson Brothers. OCLC 1198647021.
• Milhollan, David (21 June 1979). "Matter of Hernandez" (PDF). United States Department of Justice. Washington, D.C.: Board of Immigration Appeals. A-2113495, Interim Decision #2712. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 February 2022. Retrieved 18 September 2023.
• Mirow, Matthew C. (2015). "5. Latin American Constitutionalism after Independence" (PDF). Latin American Constitutions: The Constitution of Cádiz and its Legacy in Spanish America. Cambridge, Cambridgeshire: Cambridge University Press. pp. 145–200. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139198356. ISBN 978-1-139-19835-6.
• Molina, Natalia (May 2010). "'In a Race All Their Own': The Quest to Make Mexicans Ineligible for U.S. Citizenship". Pacific Historical Review. 79 (2). Berkeley, California: University of California Press: 167–201. doi:10.1525/phr.2010.79.2.167. ISSN 0030-8684. JSTOR 10.1525/phr.2010.79.2.167. Retrieved December 11, 2020.
• Nagatomo, Diane Hawley (2016). Identity, Gender and Teaching English in Japan. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. ISBN 978-1-78309-520-9.
• "Petitions for Naturalization and Petition Evidence 1923, New York County, New York: Robert Duersch". FamilySearch. Washington, D. C.: United States Department of Labor. 7 March 1924. volume 618, certificate #148093, microfilm images 639–640. Retrieved 29 September 2021.
• Pozo Montenegro, José Aniceto (September 2014). La Nacionalidad y la Naturalización Ecuatoriana, su relación con otras Legislaciones [Ecuadorian Nationality and Naturalization: Its Relationship with Other Legislation] (PDF) (Abogado) (in Spanish). Quito: Universidad Central del Ecuador. Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 July 2018. Retrieved 8 January 2021.
• Quisumbing, Agnes; Hallman, Kelly (2005). "7. The Transition to Marriage". In Lloyd, Cynthia B. (ed.). Growing Up Global: The Changing Transitions to Adulthood in Developing Countries. Washington, D. C.: National Academies Press. pp. 416–505. ISBN 978-0-309-09528-0.
• Rahman, Syed Ahmed Khabir Bin Abdul; Sharifuddin, Shakirah Binti Ahmad; Hafidz, Mirza Batrisyia Binti Mohd (2021). "Citizenship Rights in Malaysia: A Constitutional Reform" (PDF). Current Legal Issues (3). Bandar Baru Bangi, Malaysia: National University of Malaysia: 41–49. ISSN 2550-1704. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 October 2022. Retrieved 5 September 2023.
• Rallu, Jean Louis (2011). "Naturalization Policies in France and the USA and Their Impact on Migrants' Characteristics and Strategies". Population Review. 50 (1). Wilmington, Delaware: Sociological Demography Press: 40–61. ISSN 0032-471X. OCLC 5183523955. Retrieved 12 September 2023. – via Project MUSE (subscription required)
• Reeves, Jesse S. (January 1923). "Nationality of Married Women". American Journal of International Law. 17 (1). Concord, New Hampshire: American Society of International Law: 97–99. ISSN 0002-9300. OCLC 5545428470. Retrieved 12 September 2023.
• "Retention of Citizenship Prior Attaining 28 Years Old". Ottawa, Ontario: Government of Canada. 22 January 2016. Archived from the original on 12 February 2021. Retrieved 20 April 2021.
• Ribera Neumann, Teodoro (2002). "La nacionalidad chilena luego de la Reforma Constitucional de 2005 - La Jurisprudencia y la Práctica Administrativa" [Chilean Nationality after the 2005 Constitutional Reform: Jurisprudence and Administrative Practice] (PDF). Biblioteca Digital (in Spanish). Santiago, Chile: Instituto Nacional de Derechos Humanos. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 April 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
• Robins, Gay (1993). Women in Ancient Egypt. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-95469-4.
• Ruggiero, Raymond N. (Spring 2013). The Origins of a Democratic National Constitution: The 1945 Guatemalan Constitution and Human Rights (PhD). Tallahassee, Florida: Florida State University. Archived from the original on 20 March 2020. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
• Sagás, Ernesto (November 2017). "Report on Citizenship Law: Dominican Republic" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu (Translation of the original ed.). Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 January 2021. Retrieved 2 January 2021.
• Salenko, Alexander (July 2012). "Country Report: Russia" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 April 2023. Retrieved 9 September 2020.
• Sapiro, Virginia (March 1984). "Women, Citizenship, and Nationality: Immigration and Naturalization Policies in the United States". Politics & Society. 13 (1). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications: 1–26. doi:10.1177/003232928401300101. ISSN 0032-3292. OCLC 4650679194. Retrieved December 11, 2020.
• Schwarz, Tobias (2012). "Políticas de inmigración en América Latina: el extranjero indeseable en las normas nacionales, de la Independencia hasta los años de 1930" [Immigration Policies in Latin America: The Undesirable Foreigner in National Norms, from Independence to the 1930s] (PDF). Procesos (in Spanish). 36. Quito: Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar: 39–72. ISSN 1390-0099. OCLC 8056258725. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 February 2021. Retrieved 12 February 2021.
• Smith, Alexis (Spring 2023). "Who Belongs In Eighteenth-Century Mexico?: A Fictional Model For Scholarly Communities and Viceregal Vassalage in Tardes Americanas" (PDF). Dieciocho. 46 (1). Charlettesville, Virginia: University of Virginia: 31–50. ISSN 0163-0415. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 June 2023. Retrieved 15 September 2023.
• Soriano Cienfuegos, Carlos (January–April 2013). "Circulación de modelos y centralidad de los códigos civiles en el derecho privado latinoamericano" (PDF). Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado (in Spanish). XLVI (136). Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México: 125–164. ISSN 2448-4873. OCLC 5728414289. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 July 2020. Retrieved 3 January 2021.
• Stevens, Doris (28 November 1933). Report on the Nationality of Women (PDF). 7th Conference of American Republics, Montevideo, December 1933. Washington, D.C.: Inter-American Commission of Women – via Alexander Street Press: Women and Social Movements.
• Studer, Brigitte (November 2001). "Citizenship as Contingent National Belonging: Married Women and Foreigners in Twentieth-Century Switzerland" (PDF). Gender & History. 13 (3). Translated by Sturge, Kat4e. Oxford, Oxfordshire: Blackwell Publishing: 622–654. doi:10.25595/1382. ISSN 0953-5233. OCLC 175270488. Retrieved 8 September 2023.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: translators list (link)
• Tabachnik, Maxim (2019a). Citizenship, Territoriality, and Post-Soviet Nationhood: The Politics of Birthright Citizenship in Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Moldova. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-3-030-12881-4.
• "The New Constitution of El Salvador". Bulletin of the Pan American Union. 73 (6). Washington, D.C.: Pan American Union: 353–361. June 1939. OCLC 19074966.
• Thwaites, Rayner (May 2017). "Report On Citizenship Law: Australia" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 January 2021. Retrieved 23 March 2021.
• United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women; Chinkin, Christine (June 2003). "Women, Nationality and Citizenship" (PDF). Women2000 and Beyond. New York, New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. ISSN 2071-1514. OCLC 614497525. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 September 2020. Retrieved 2 January 2021.
• Unterman, Katherine (June 2014). "How Laws Affect Lives: Deportation and Denaturalization with a Human Face". Reviews in American History. 42 (2). Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press: 317–323. doi:10.1353/rah.2014.0050. ISSN 0048-7511. OCLC 5594929162. Retrieved 12 September 2023. – via Project MUSE (subscription required)
• Valdebenito Infante, Alfonso (1973). Evolución jurídica del régimen municipal en Chile (1541-1971) [Legal Rvolution of the Municipal Regime in Chile (1541-1971)] (in Spanish). Santiago, Chile: Editorial Jurídica de Chile. OCLC 10778794.
• Vetancourt Aristeguieta, Francisco (1959a). "Nacionalidad, naturalización y ciudadania en Hispano-América: Argentina, Bolivia, Colombia" [Nationality, Naturalization and Citizenship in Hispanic America: Argentina, Bolivia, Colombia] (PDF). Boletin de la Academia de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales (in Spanish) (14). Caracas: Academia de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales: 106–148. ISSN 0798-1457. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 January 2021. Retrieved 18 February 2021.
• Vetancourt Aristeguieta, Francisco (1959b). "Nacionalidad, naturalización y ciudadania en Hispano-América: Chile, Cuba" [Nationality, Naturalization and Citizenship in Hispanic America: Chile, Cuba] (PDF). Boletin de la Academia de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales (in Spanish) (15). Caracas: Academia de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales: 129–147. ISSN 0798-1457. Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 February 2021. Retrieved 18 February 2021.
• Vetancourt Aristeguieta, Francisco (1960). "Nacionalidad, naturalización y ciudadania en Hispano-América: Cuba, Costa Rica" [Nationality, Naturalization and Citizenship in Hispanic America: Cuba, Costa Rica] (PDF). Boletin de la Academia de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales (in Spanish) (18). Caracas: Academia de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales: 70–88. ISSN 0798-1457. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 February 2021. Retrieved 27 February 2021.
• Vetancourt Aristeguieta, Francisco (September 1961). "Nacionalidad, naturalización y ciudadania en Hispano-América: Ecuador" [Nationality, Naturalization and Citizenship in Hispanic America: Ecuador] (PDF). Boletin de la Academia de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales (in Spanish) (19). Caracas: Academia de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales: 47–65. ISSN 0798-1457. Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 January 2021. Retrieved 8 January 2021.
• Villazor, Rose Cuison (March 2017). "American Nationals and Interstitial Citizenship". Fordham Law Review. 85 (4). New York, New York: Fordham University School of Law: 1673–1724. ISSN 0015-704X. OCLC 8090930759. Archived from the original on March 22, 2020. Retrieved March 9, 2021.
• Viñas Farré, Ramón (2009). "Evolución del derecho de nacionalidad en España: continuidad y cambios más importantes [Evolution of the Right of Nationality in Spain: Continuity and Most Important Changes]". In López, F. J. (ed.). Cursos de derecho internacional y relaciones internacionales de Vitoria-Gasteiz [International Law and International Relations Courses in Vitoria-Gasteiz] (in Spanish). Bilbao, Biscay: Servicio Editorial Universidad del País Vasco. pp. 275–313. ISBN 978-84-9860-432-0.
• Vindas Matamoros, Jacqueline; Escobar Vega, Johanna (2008). "La razonabilidad y proporcionalidad de la limitación matrimonial impuesta a la mujer costarricense en el artículo 16 inciso 2) del Código de Familia, desde el derecho fundamental de Igualdad y la perspectiva de género" [The Reasonableness and Proportionality of the Marital Limitation Imposed on Costa Rican Women in Article 16, Paragraph 2) of the Family Code, from the Fundamental Right of Equality and the Gender Perspective] (PDF) (in Spanish). San José, Costa Rica: Universidad Estatal a Distancia. Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 February 2021. Retrieved 28 February 2021.
• Weil, Patrick (2008). How to Be French: Nationality in the Making since 1789. Translated by Porter, Catherine. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. ISBN 978-0-8223-4348-6.
• Westlake, John (1858). A Treatise on Private International Law: Or the Conflict of Laws, with Principal Reference to Its Practice in the English and Other Cognate Systems of Jurisprudence. London, UK: William Maxwell.
• Wold, Emma (1928). Effect of Marriage upon Nationality: Hearings before the Committee on Immigration and Naturalization House of Representatives, 70th Congress, First Session. Washington, D. C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. OCLC 237585125.
• Zúniga, Adolfo; Uclés, Cárlos Alberto; Zelaya, Jerónimo (1880). Código civil de la república de Honduras [Civil Code of the Republic of Honduras] (in Spanish). Tegucigalpa: Tipografía nacional. OCLC 18450798.

International women's movement involvement

https://web.archive.org/web/20210329155644/https://uprdoc.ohchr.org/uprweb/downloadfile.aspx?filename=4777&file=EnglishTranslation https://issuu.com/coconets/docs/jiosfall13-2 https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/mjil22&div=25&id=&page= http://search-alexanderstreet-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/view/work/bibliographic_entity%7Cbibliographic_details%7C1462337#page/6/mode/1/chapter/bibliographic_entity%7Cdocument%7C1464749 http://search-alexanderstreet-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/view/work/bibliographic_entity%7Cbibliographic_details%7C1462336#page/6/mode/1 http://heinonline-org.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org:9443/HOL/Page?public=true&handle=hein.journals/stlenctzr1&div=25&start_page=307&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=3&men_tab=srchresults Sex discrimination in legal status began to be a focus of international women's groups in the first decades of the 20th century. In 1905, the International Council of Women added a demand to address women's nationality to its platform of women's issues. It was a logical segue for suffragists in international marriages like Harriot Stanton Blatch, Crystal Eastman, Ethel Mackenzie, and Inez Milholland to extend the idea that rights should not be curtailed by marriage to the fight for individual nationality. In 1907, the United States adopted the Expatriation Act, which automatically and retroactively bestowed a husband's citizenship status on any American-born woman who had married a non-citizen. Passage of the law began a mobilization of American women to fight against being deprived of their citizenship. By 1914, British women were also holding protests regarding nationality.

Rather than declining after the major push to attain women's suffrage in Europe and the United States, international women's groups diversified their agendas. While they struggled to unify on one single issue, and divisions of class, ethnicity, and race made cohesion difficult, from the end of World War I, international women's organizations were united by the idea that by working together, they could challenge their subordinate status to men as a human rights issue. The three major international organizations operating at the time were the International Council of Women, the International Alliance of Women, and the Women's International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF) and they were joined by the All-Asian Women's Conference, Equal Rights International, the Inter-American Commission of Women (Spanish: Comisión Interamericana de Mujeres, CIM), the International Federation of University Women, and the World Union of Women for International Concord in an effort to address women's nationality as a human rights issue.

At the Inter-Allied Women's Conference, hosted from 10 February to 10 April 1919 as a parallel conference to the Paris Peace Conference, women delegates brought up the issue of married women's nationality as an issue critical to defining peace terms because nationality was an international problem. Delegates of the Peace Conference rejected the idea in favor of each nation maintaining the ability to determine its own nationality requirements. Following the Paris conference, in May, WILPF hosted the Zürich Peace Conference and requested that an international commission be created by the League of Nations to research the question of matrimony between people of different nationalities. The following year, the International Alliance of Women formed a committee to study the issue and at its next Congress, in Rome in 1923, urged members of the organization's national chapters to pressure their governments to draft nationality laws that promoted equal treatment of spouses. They also sent a draft of proposals to be considered by the International Law Commission requesting that the League of Nations take action. In 1924, the International Council of Women's Congress held in Copenhagen unanimously resolved to promote international cooperation in addressing married women's nationality.

The Committee of Experts appointed by the League of Nations agreed to consider the matter in 1925 because of the large number of married women who had become stateless as a result of various political actions. Though the committee collected input from governments over the next two years on the legal issues, they did not seek any input from women's organizations. In 1927, Doris Stevens, who would serve as chair of the Pan-American Union's Inter-American Commission of Women from its creation in 1928 through 1938, became alarmed about the proposed conference to codify international law. Fearing that such action would continue imposing existing discriminatory laws on women's nationality, she agreed to research the subject of women's nationality on an international basis and provide a report to the conference on the behalf of women's organizations. Working with Alice Paul, a co-founder and leader of the National Woman's Party, she undertook a massive international study to determine how national laws affected women's nationality. She met with feminists throughout Europe, including Luisa Baralt of Havana, Ellen Gleditsch of Oslo, Chrystal Macmillan and Sybil Thomas, Viscountess Rhondda of the UK, the Marquesa del Ter of Spain, Elena Văcărescu of Romania, and Maria Vérone of France, as well as members of the International Federation of University Women and other groups. She also held public meetings with the purpose of gathering data.

In September 1927, Stevens went to Geneva to attend a preliminary meeting of the League of Nations, obtaining unanimous support from the delegates to review her report. She continued gathering data until January 1928 and then traveled to Havana to attended the Pan-American Conference. Stevens convinced the governing board of the Pan-American Union to found the Inter-American Commission of Women on 4 April 1928, with the express purpose of creating a report giving an overview of women's civil and political equality needs for the 1933 conference. By August, Stevens was back in Paris working on the report and along with other suffragists picketed the French president, Gaston Doumergue, to support an equal rights treaty. She gathered data in Berlin, Geneva, Havana, London, Madrid, Paris, Washington, D. C., and other cities. She and Paul and compiled a report comparing the laws of 77 countries. The complete document indexed all laws impacting women's nationality from each country. On one page, the law was given in the native language and on an accompanying page was translated. They also created an abstract with tables comparisons between countries. It was the first report ever to comprehensively analyze the civil and political rights of women in detail and it had been prepared solely by women.

On 13 March, 1930, Stevens went to The Hague for the first World Conference on the Codification of International Law, presented the abstract, and asked that the international community enact laws to protect women's nationality. Though the women attendees of the conference, led by Chrystal Macmillan, lobbied the 45 male delegates, from the beginning the men indicated little support and admitted they were allowing them to present their materials as a courtesy. Among the women who also spoke at the conference were Margery Corbett Ashby, British president of the International Alliance of Women; Lizzy van Dorp, a Dutch legal scholar and suffragist; and French lawyer Maria Vérone. When the delegates voted on the issue, only the United States delegation agreed to withhold approval of the nationality convention which proposed continuance of unequal existing laws for men and women. When the final draft Convention on Certain Questions Relating to the Conflict of Nationality Laws was presented only 30 of the 40 nations signed the nationality proposal and the women in attendance vowed to continue their efforts to ensure that it was not ratified with discriminatory policies toward women.

After the conference in October, Henni Forchhammer, Denmark's delegate to the League of Nations and a vice president of the International Council of Women, presented the issue of women's nationality to the League of Nations for the first time. She argued against accepting the World Code of Law because of its discriminatory provisions on women's nationality. She proposed that women's organizations be consulted on the issue and proposed a list of organizations. The League agreed to the proposal and in 1931, the Committee of Representatives of Women's International Organizations, known among the participants as the Women's Consultative Committee on Nationality, was established. The reports that the committee developed, advocating for individual women's nationality, between 1931 and 1932 were cautiously reviewed by both the League and the member governments. The International Union of Catholic Women's Leagues, led by their Dutch president Florentine Steenberghe-Engeringh, also tried to influence the League. They advocated for dependent nationality for spouses to protect family unity. Other Catholic women from St. Joan's Social & Political Alliance in London, refuted the need for unity of nationality for families, pointing out that the four South American countries which did allow separate nationality all recognized Catholicism as the State religion. Germaine Malaterre-Sellier, who served on the board of the French branch of the International Council of Women, collected petitions signed by 8,000 men and women advocating for individual nationality for married women and submitted them in 1932 to the League on behalf of the International Commission of Catholic Women for the Nationality of the Married Woman. The YWCA's International Migration Service also weighed in on the issue in 1932 with the League of Nations. Their position was that neither dependent or independent nationality would resolve the issues faced by migrants and that a pragmatic approach was needed. They proposed that married women be allowed dual citizenship, so that if circumstances arose which might threaten her nationality she could not become stateless.

In 1933, Stevens attended the Seventh Pan-American Conference, in Montevideo, Uruguay, to present their data to the 21 member countries. The women proposed the first international resolution to recommend suffrage for women, which was rejected, and presented their report outlining the disparity between rights of men and women in the Americas. After reviewing the data, the conference approved the Convention on the Nationality of Women, the first international agreement ever adopted to solidify women's rights. The text stated, "There shall be no distinction based on sex as regards to nationality". The conference also passed the Inter-American Convention on Nationality, also known as the Montevideo Convention on Nationality, which established that neither marriage nor divorce could affect the nationality of the members of a family, solidifying protections for children's nationality. Women's organizations urged the League of Nations to adopt a similar convention or allow member states to endorse the Inter-American Convention, in 1935.

In 1937, the Convention on Certain Questions Relating to the Conflict of Nationality Laws went into force and had provisions to eliminate the possibility of statelessness thereby preventing the possibility that a woman would lose her citizenship upon marriage if she was ineligible to be naturalized by her husband's country. It also solidified that a change in nationality could not occur without consent, nor could nationality be restored without the expressed request for same. The United Nations took up the issue of women's nationality, assigning the Commission on the Status of Women to study the problem in 1948. That year, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights confirmed the right to nationality, but did not secure equal nationality rights for women and men. Though the Commission on the Status of Women recommended action in 1949, 1950, and 1951 to take steps to protect married women's nationality and prevent their statelessness because of legal conflicts, no action was taken. They also recommended that nationality laws should not make distinctions between the sex of nationals and that neither marriage nor its termination impact nationality of spouses. Finally in 1952, the International Law Commission began work on a draft proposal. Independent nationality for married women would finally be elaborated in the 1957 Convention on the Nationality of Married Women. Member states were not compelled to change their civil and common law provisions, thus there are still states which have unequal nationality laws and require that a married woman has the same nationality as her husband.

National women's movement involvement (by continent)

https://core.ac.uk/reader/217207320

Africa

https://uprdoc.ohchr.org/uprweb/downloadfile.aspx?filename=4778&file=EnglishTranslation&usg https://documents.aucegypt.edu/Docs/GAPP/Citizenship_Report.pdf

Le Roux v Minister of Home Affairs and Immigration (2011 (2) NR 606 HC), successfully overturned the prohibition for those born as Namibians to hold dual nationality.

• Hubbard, Dianne (January 2021). "Report on Citizenship Law: Namibia" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 June 2021. Retrieved 28 November 2021.
• Menges, Werner (7 June 2011). "Dual Citizenship Legal for Born Namibians". The Namibian. Windhoek, Namibia. Archived from the original on 2012-01-15. Retrieved 4 December 2021.

In 1980, the Federation of Voltaic Women began working on revisions to the Family Code and the new Persons and Family Code (French: Code des personnes et de la famille) was adopted in 1989, establishing gender equality in nationality laws.

https://core.ac.uk/reader/217207320 http://heinonline-org.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/HOL/Page?public=true&handle=hein.journals/branlaj33&div=20&start_page=293&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=22&men_tab=srchresults Unity Dow In 2021, Sithabile Pauline Mathe, instituted a legal challenge to Botswana's prohibition of dual nationality. Mathe claimed that the Citizenship Act of 1998 was discriminatory as it required her children to choose between their father's and mother's heritage and swear an oath of allegiance which was not required of other nationals considered Botswanan by birth. Judith Todd

Thandiwe Okeke v Minister of Home Affairs and The Controller of Immigration

• Masengu, Tabeth (March 2021). "Report on Citizenship Law: Malawi" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 October 2021. Retrieved 25 October 2021. http://heinonline-org.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/HOL/Page?public=true&handle=hein.journals/malawi2&div=21&start_page=209&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

https://web.archive.org/web/20130729140531/http://www.imow.org/wpp/stories/viewStory?storyid=1328 In 1996, the Constitutional Court declared Benin's previous family legislation, Coutumier du Dahomey (Customary Law of Dahomey) dating from 1931, unenforceable. Work began to change the Family Code, to promote equality in the rights and obligations of parents and change marriage and inheritance rules. Failure of the National Assembly to pass the new family regulations, prompted activists from Women in Law & Development in Africa-Bénin to launch a campaign including educators and students, human rights activists, trade unions, and women’s rights groups lobby for them to pass the legislation. On 12 April 2002, the campaign marched on the National Assembly and demanded a vote, though the legislators refused to allow them to enter. They called a press conference and ultimately the legislature approved the legislation on 7 June 2002. Though the law faced a constitutional challenge and modification, it went into effect in 2004.

• Boko Nadjo, Geneviève (October 2004). Le code des personnes et de la famille béninois [The Beninese Personal and Family Code] (PDF). Forum des ONG à Addis Abeba, Éthiopie les 6-7 octobre 2004 [NGO Forum, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 6-7 October 2004] (in French). Harare, Zimbabwe: Women in Law & Development in Africa. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 June 2020. Retrieved 9 July 2021.
• Bouda, Paulin (17 September 2020). "L'acquisition de la nationalité burkinabé: Ce qu'il faut savoir" [Acquiring Burkinabe Nationality: What You Need to Know]. RevueJuris.net (in French). Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso: Revue Juridique du Faso. Archived from the original on 12 July 2021. Retrieved 14 July 2021.
• Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (7 March 2014). "Preventing and Reducing Statelessness: Good Practices in Promoting and Adopting Gender Equality in Nationality Laws" (PDF). UNHCR. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 February 2016. Retrieved 2 July 2021.
• Manby, Bronwen (June 2015). Nationality, Migration and Statelessness in West Africa (PDF). Ministerial Conference on Statelessness in the ECOWAS Region, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire, 23 to 25 February 2015 (PDF). Dakar, Senegal: UNHCR Regional Office for West Africa. Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 June 2021. Retrieved 5 July 2021.
• Ontebetse, Khonani (16 March 2021). "Woman Wants Dual Citizenship for her Adult Children". The Sunday Standard. Gaborone, Botswana. Archived from the original on 26 June 2021. Retrieved 11 July 2021.
• U.S. Department of State (1981). "Upper Volta". Annual Human Rights Reports Submitted to Congress. 6. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office: 297–301. OCLC 968619115. Retrieved 14 July 2021 – via HeinOnline.
• "Benin: Forced Marriage, Including the Frequency, the Practice and the Groups Involved; Legislation; Protection and Assistance Provided by the State and Civil Society (2010-July 2013)". RefWorld. Ottawa, Ontario: Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada. 22 July 2013. Archived from the original on 21 October 2017. Retrieved 9 July 2021.
• "Woman Takes Gov't to Court over Dual Citizenship". The Botswana Gazette. Gaborone, Botswana. 18 March 2021. Archived from the original on 26 June 2021. Retrieved 11 July 2021.

Americas

Draft:Marcela Celorio, Elena Arizmendi Mejia https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3641229.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3A6a034f356eab258729abc678e560e481

In 2010, a new constitution entered into force in the Dominican Republic, under its terms nationality changed from jus soli to jus sanguinis. Under its terms, and Judgment 473/201 of the Constitutional Court of the Dominican Republic in the case of Juliana Deguis Pierre children of Haitian-Dominicans, even if registered previously were disqualified as nationals because their parents had not been nationals and were migrants. Her subsequent appeal led to a new Naturalization Law 168-13 in 2014, which repatriated 24,392 people, including Deguis, whose births had been registered as nationals of the Dominican Republic between 1929 and 2010. The law did not include an estimated 21,449 Haitian-Dominicans who had been born in the Dominican Republic but whose births were recorded as foreign.

• Canton, Santiago A.; McMullen, Wade H. (28 July 2014). "The Dominican Republic and Haiti: Shame". Americas Quarterly. New York, New York: Americas Society. ISSN 1936-797X. Archived from the original on 3 June 2023. Retrieved 10 September 2023.
• Foster, Michelle; Baker, Timnah Rachel (January 2021). "Racial Discrimination in Nationality Laws: A Doctrinal Blind Spot of International Law?". Columbia Journal of Race & Law. 11 (1). New York, New York: Columbia Law School: 83–146. doi:10.7916/cjrl.v11i1.8018. ISSN 2155-2401. OCLC 8974805109. Retrieved 10 September 2023.

Asia

https://scholarzest.com/index.php/ejrds/article/view/1713/1444 https://bebasnews.my/2021/10/27/can-a-child-born-out-of-wedlock-be-regarded-as-a-legitimate-child/ https://web.archive.org/web/20221025060434/http://journalarticle.ukm.my/17824/1/ARTICLE%206.pdf https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2019/03/27/why-malaysia-born-illegitimate-children-with-foreign-mothers-are-stateless/1736828 https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/malaysia-to-allow-automatic-citizenship-for-children-born-overseas-to-malaysian-mums https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/12259276.2018.1538646?scroll=top&needAccess=true Women's groups, including the Alliansi Pelangi Antar Bangsa (Rainbow Alliance Between Nations, APAB), Jaringan Kerja Prolegnas Pro Perempuan (Network for Pro-Women National Legislation Programme, JKP3), and Keluarga Perkawinan Campuran Melati (Jasmine Flower Community of Mixed Marriages, KPC Melati) began pushing from the return of democracy for legal changes on the nationality of women. Many of the activists were in trans-national marriages and were effected by the laws which in cases of divorce granted custody of the children to the father or did not allow mothers married to foreigners to pass their nationality on to their children. In 2006, these groups were successful in amending the Nationality Law No. 12 to allow children to derive nationality from their mothers and if their parents have different nationality, to hold dual nationality until they reach the age of eighteen at which time they must choose a single nationality. The modification also allowed an Indonesian woman the right to sponsor her foreign spouse for naturalization.

• Harijanti, Susi Dwi (February 2017). "Report On Citizenship Law: Indonesia" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 November 2020. Retrieved 11 May 2021.
• Noerdin, Edriana (2013). "2. Women's Organizations Amidst Political Openness". In Anastasia, Ayu (ed.). Indonesian Women's Movements: Making Democracy Gender Responsive (PDF) (First ed.). Jakarta, Indonesia: Women Research Institute. pp. 41–84. ISBN 978-602-9230-03-1. Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 November 2018.
• Winarnita, Monika Swasti (December 2008). "Motherhood as Cultural Citizenship: Indonesian Women in Transnational Families". The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology. 9 (4). Oxford: Routledge: 304–318. doi:10.1080/14442210802506412. ISSN 1444-2213. OCLC 4902292836. Retrieved 13 May 2021.
• "Lessons from Indonesia's Nationality Law Reform Campaign". Equal Nationality Rights. New York, New York: Global Campaign for Equal Nationality Rights. 2007. Archived from the original on 12 March 2021. Retrieved 13 May 2021.

Synopsis of legal status (by colonizer/continent)

Dutch Empire

Dutch colonies followed the laws of the Kingdom of the Netherlands and had no separate nationality laws until 1910. The first codification of nationality, inherited from France, was based upon the Napoleonic Code and implemented in the Netherlands in 1809. The Dutch Civil Code legally incapacitated married women, making them legal dependents, and automatically bestowed upon a wife the nationality of her husband. It was revised in 1838, and established nationality provisions for persons within the territory of the Kingdom. In 1850, a Nationality Act was passed creating a nationality scheme, which provided differing rights to people living in the motherland and those living in the colonies. Those born in the Netherlands or descended of Dutch nationals had political rights and those who were native inhabitants in Dutch colonies were excluded from rights. The scheme was confusing, and was replaced by a new Nationality Act in 1892. Under its provisions, Nederlanders were people born in the kingdom or colonies to parents who were domiciled within the territories of the kingdom. Legitimate or legitimized children derived nationality from their father, and only illegitimate children could derive a mother's nationality. The Levysohn Norman Amendment prevented the provisions from applicability to the non-European population of the Dutch East Indies, as it required that a parent or grandparent had resided in the Netherlands.

On 10 February 1910 the Act on the Status of Netherlands Subjects other than Nederlander, was passed creating the citizenship regime for the Dutch East Indies. The terms of this act granted a status of second-class citizenship, known as "Dutch subject non-Dutch citizen" (Dutch: Nederlands onderdaan niet-Nederlander), to natives of the East Indies. In 1927, the Act of 1910 was extended on 10 June to the Dutch Caribbean, Curaçao and Suriname. It was modified to provide that those born in the Dutch Indies, Curaçao, or Suriname, to parents domiciled in those colonies, or foundlings of unknown parentage, were subjects of the Netherlands. If the father was unknown, an illegitimate child derived the status of subject from its mother. The 1910 Act no longer applied to Indonesia after its independence in 1949, was abolished in the Caribbean and Suriname in 1951, and ceased to apply in Western New Guinea in 1962, when that region became part of Indonesia.

French Empire

http://heinonline-org.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/HOL/Page?public=true&handle=hein.journals/ajil5&div=22&start_page=325&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=27&men_tab=srchresults

The Ancien Régime of France developed a system of feudal allegiance in which subjects were bound together by a scheme of protection and service tied to land ownership. Possession of land was typically tied to military and court service and omitted women because they could not perform those obligations. Thus, French nationality also derived from place of birth in French territory, until the nineteenth century, but under feudal law married women were subjugated to the authority of their husbands under coverture. As a part of the French Empire, Haiti, known as Saint-Domingue, and the other colonies in the French Antilles (now known as Guadeloupe, Martinique, Saint Martin, Saint Barthélemy) were subject to the provisions of the Code Noir decreed by Louis XIV in 1685. The Code was designed to control the social relations between blacks and whites in the Caribbean, and was eventually extended to Louisiana in 1724. The code provided that freed persons were naturalized and contained provisions for manumission and emancipation of slaves. Though it did not prohibit the marriage of blacks and whites, it carried substantial fines for owners who produced illegitimate children with slaves, decreeing that the father had to give the child to a hospital as a slave who was ineligible for future emancipation, unless he married his slave woman in a church, automatically manumitting her and the children through the marriage. Children followed the status of the mother, regardless of the father's status, thus if she was a slave her children were slaves and if she was free her children were free.

Though attempts were made to codify the common law of the colonies in 1716, 1738, 1758, and between 1761 and 1768, none were successful. In 1771, Médéric Louis Élie Moreau de Saint-Méry a magistrate in the northern district of the Saint-Domingue Court of Justice, compiled the manuscripts of legal documents into a compendium. In 1780, he was authorized by the Secretary of State of the Navy, the Marquis de Castries, to convert the compendium into a code. In 1784, the first of six volumes of the Loix et constitutions des colonies françaises ("Laws and Constitutions of the French Colonies") was published, which detailed all of the colonial laws issued between 1550 and 1784. He was unable to complete a formal Colonial Code before he left Saint-Domingue for France in 1788. Having separate codes for the colonies and metropole was a characteristic of the empire and created little unity and standardization in French law. Thus, the French Constitution of 1791, which gave legitimacy to the French Revolution and human rights protections by incorporating the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, did not include any of the colonies or possessions of France in Africa, Asia, or the Americas. In response, the Haitian Revolution began that year and lasted until independence from France was declared in 1804. The abolition of slavery in 1794 granted French nationality to all men in the French colonies, but the reestablishment of slavery in 1802, made the status of colonial subjects confusing. The 1802 Coup d'état of Napoleon Bonaparte rolled back gains made during the French Revolutionary period, re-establishing the law and customs in effect before the Revolution of 1789.

In 1805, the Napoleonic Code, the French Civil Code, was implemented in the French Antilles and French Guiana. The provisions contained in it applied only to the white French in the colonies, as the Code Noir was reimposed for people of color. Under the Civil Code, women were legally incapacitated and paternal authority was established over children. Upon marriage, a woman automatically acquired the same nationality as her spouse. Illegitimate children were barred from inheritance and nationality could only be transmitted through a father. Between 1805 and 1846, liberated slaves, those found on illegal slaving vessels, had a special status in the French colonies and were assigned to public works projects. Between 1831 and 1846, when the liberated slaves were freed, they worked as apprentices. In 1848 slavery was abolished for the second time. Freedom disrupted the social order, as it established patrilineal affiliations for family members. Simultaneously with the abolition of slavery, the Civil Code was extended to all of the inhabitants in the colonies of France.

From 1848, those persons who settled in the colonies and were from France were considered nationals who had full rights and were subject to French law. However, those born in the new territories were considered to be nationals without citizenship. Nationals in the older colonies of the Antilles, Guiana, Réunion and parts of India and Senegal were granted political rights, but those in Algeria were confirmed by a decree on 14 July 1865 were to be subjects and not citizens, unless they renounced their allegiance to native custom and possessed sufficient understanding of the obligations of citizenship. Under the Code de l'indigénat (Code of Indigenous Status) promulgated for Algeria in 1881, nationals in the new colonies followed customary law. The Indigenous Code was extended to Cochinchina in 1881; New Caledonia and Senegal in 1887; Annam, French Polynesia, and Tonkin in 1897; Cambodia in 1898; Mayotte and Madagascar in 1901; French West Africa in 1904; French Equatorial Africa in 1910; French Somaliland in 1912; French Togoland in 1923; and French Cameroon in 1924. The Nationality Law of 1889 allowed women who would become stateless to retain their French nationality upon marriage. When it passed, it specifically applied to the metropole, Guadeloupe, Martinique and Réunion, but was not extended to the other colonies until 1897. Following the end of World War I France passed a law on 25 March 1915 that allowed subjects or protected persons who were non-citizen nationals of Algeria, Morocco, or Tunisia and had established domicile in a French territory to acquire full citizenship, including the naturalization of their wives and minor children, by having received the cross of the Legion of Honor, having obtained a university degree, having rendered service to the nation, having attained the rank of an officer or received a medal from the French army, who had married a Frenchwoman and established a one year residency; or who had resided for more than ten years in a colony other than their country of origin.

In 1927, France passed a new Nationality Law, which under Article 8, removed the requirement for married women to automatically derive the nationality of a husband and provided that her nationality could only be changed if she consented to change her nationality. It also allowed children born in France to native-born French women married to foreigners to acquire their nationality from their mothers. When it was implemented it included Guadeloupe, Martinique and Réunion but was extended to the remaining French possessions in 1928. A decade later, the legal incapacity of married women was finally invalidated. In an effort to amend marriage regulations in French Equatorial Africa and French West Africa, in 1939, the French government passed the Mandel Decree, to establish the principles of consent and standardize marriageable age. The decree invalidated the custom of child marriage and levirate marriage, unless the widow agreed. In 1945, a new Code of French Nationality was passed, which conferred once again automatic French nationality on foreign wives of French men, but allowed mothers who were French nationals to pass their nationality to children born outside of France. It expressly applied to Algeria, French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique and Réunion and was extended to the Overseas Territories in 1953, but in the case of the latter had distinctions for the rights of those who were naturalized. The Jacquinot Decree of 1951, reasserted the provisions in the Mandel Decree and added clarifications that after the age of twenty-one, or a divorce, women were free of the control of their parent or guardian. It also established legal processes to determine bride prices, codifying formerly traditional customs into legal statues with penalties for non-compliance. With the passage of the Constitution of 1958, nationality provisions were standardized for France, Overseas Departments, and Overseas Territories. Revisions to the Nationality Code in 1973, included a provision that a child born in French territory derived French nationality if either of its parents were born in a French colony or territory, allowing for the possibility that the parent's place of birth might no longer be part of the French realm. It eliminated language in previous legislation differentiating between legitimate and illegitimate children, providing that if either parent was a French national the child was a French national. The 1973 Code also allowed the foreign husband of a French national to obtain French nationality by declaration, provided that he was living with his wife and adjudged to be able to assimilate to French culture.

Ottoman empire

https://books.google.com.mx/books?id=aUMHEAAAQBAJ&lpg=PT95&ots=BkQvkW9uWL&dq=beratl%C4%B1lar%2C%20protege&pg=PT92#v=onepage&q=beratl%C4%B1lar,%20protege&f=false

Within the Ottoman Empire, the government was organized to maintain harmony with disparate groups assigning responsibility to persons in accord with their position within those social categories. For six centuries, there was an internal organization that defined government functions for subjects by balancing religious and communal ties, with aptitudes and occupations without a centralized national ideology. Ottoman subjecthood was strongly tied to religion and non-Muslims, if they were ahl al-Kitāb (People of the Book), meaning Jewish, Christian, or Zoroastrian, could benefit from being subjects by agreeing to pay a tax to the sultan. Under a pact known as zimma, in exchange for paying taxes, the sultan allowed these subjects freedom of religion and guaranteed their lives, property, and rights with an understanding that they were legally entitled to less status than Muslim subjects. The pact was agreed to by the leaders of the confessional community, who managed the adherents and their internal organization under the religious law of their community.

By the eighteenth century a political organization, known as the millet, managed the affairs of their respective religious communities and developed into the protégé system (Turkish: beratlılar, protected persons). Signing treaties with European powers, from the 1673 signing of a Capitulation with France, the Ottoman empire granted France control of certain Ottoman Christians, Austria control of some Ottoman Roman Catholics, most favoured nation status to British and Dutch traders, as well as specific rights to the Republic of Venice and Russian Empire. Under the terms of these treaties, foreign powers could recruit Ottoman subjects to serve their needs as commercial agents, consuls, or interpreters, and extend to these protégés diplomatic immunity from prosecution and privileges of trade, including lowered customs tariffs. Over time, abuses of the system led to a virtual monopoly of foreign trade by protégés, clandestine sales of letters patent (Turkish: berats), and demands from foreign powers for protection to extend from individuals to entire communities. The influence on Ottoman subjects by European powers changed the perception of these minority groups in the empire, meaning that they were increasingly seen not as Ottoman subjects, but as resident aliens.

To curb the disruptive effects of Europeans in the empire, from 1806, the Ottoman government began sending communiques to the foreign embassies demanding compliance with the terms of their agreements. Failing to achieve success diplomatically, Mahmud II began a series of reforms to reorganize the government and centralize its authority and administration. In 1826, he abolished the Guild of Janissaries and established a modern army of conscripted subjects with the intent of creating a unified Ottoman identity. Once the army was reorganized, he began to abolish and transform the other guilds aiming to modernize the state. Mahmud II drafted the Edict of Gülhane, incorporating the observations of his foreign minister Mustafa Reşid Pasha. The Edict was designed to end bribery and corruption, and to create fair tax schemes and institutions to protect the basic rights of Ottoman subjects, but Mahmud II died in 1839 before it was promulgated. He was succeeded by his son Abdulmejid I, who continued the reforms of his father. In November, after Mahmud II's death, Reşid declared the Edict, first of the Tanzimat Edicts (Imperial Edicts of Reorganisation) in Istanbul's Gülhane Park to a gathering of ambassadors and dignitaries.

The Ottoman Reform Edict of 1856 (Turkish: Islâhat Fermânı) categorized subjects by whether they were Muslim or non-Muslim, granting different civil statuses to each. In 1863, new regulations upon protégés restricted the privileges they received in the empire and clarifying who were thereafter considered to be Ottoman subjects and who were foreigners. This change, led to nationality legislation and the passage of the 1869 Ottoman nationality law (tâbiiyet-i osmaniye kanunnamesi). The law specified terms for the acquisition and loss of who was within the soverignty of the empire, rather than the domestic obligations and rights of citizenship. It described who was a subject, owing allegiance, and made provisions for wives, children, emigrants and immigrants. Under its terms, children derived nationality from their fathers, foreigners born in the territory could acquire nationality at majority, and foreigners born elsewhere could obtain nationality after five years residency within the imperial realm. Specific provisions included that foundlings discovered within the territory; stateless persons living in the empire; Muslim women, who despite the ban on such marriages, had married Persian men and the children of such a union; unregistered persons who had not been counted in the Ottoman census, either because no census was taken or their births were unregistered, were all considered to be Ottoman. Foreign women acquired Ottoman nationality through marriage, but could return to their original nationality upon the death of their spouse. Nationality could also be granted based on special contribution or service to the nation. Dual nationality was permitted, but was discouraged, as the government could choose not to recognize naturalization of an Ottoman subject by another state.

In 1873, a property law was passed forbidding foreign husbands and children from inheriting from a Muslim woman. Subsequently a law passed in 1883 to prohibit Ottoman subjects from inheritance if they had taken other nationality. These changes were made to curtail the types of extra-territorial abuses which had occurred under the protégé system. Amendments made to the Nationality Law in 1909 included conveyance of nationality to adoptees and to children born on ships in Ottoman waters. It also introduced in in Article 6 that foreign wives who acquired nationality by marriage could repatriate to their original nationality upon termination of the marriage; in Article 7 that foreign wives could only naturalize with their foreign husbands; and in Article 19 that women derived the nationality of their husband upon marriage. From 1909, Ottoman subjects were allowed to denaturalize with permission of the authorities, but doing so would result in banishment from the empire.

• Çiftçi, Yusuf (2019). "Modernisation in the Tanzimat Period and the Ottoman Empire: An Analysis of the Tanzimat Edict within the Scope of the Modern State". Maarif Mektepleri Uluslararası Sosyal ve Beşerî Bilimler Dergisi. 2 (2). Ankara, Turkey: Maarif Mektepleri: 14–24. ISSN 2619-9300. Archived from the original on 26 June 2021. Retrieved 26 June 2021.
• Dailey, Ryan (14 May 2021). "FSU Eyes Candidates to Replace Thrasher as President". News 4 Jax. Jacksonville, Florida. News Service of Florida. Archived from the original on 14 May 2021. Retrieved 27 June 2021.
• Goldschmidt Jr., Arthur; Boum, Aomar (2018). A Concise History of the Middle East (11th ed.). New York, New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-97515-8.
• Hanley, Will (November 2016). "What Ottoman Nationality Was and Was Not". Journal of the Ottoman and Turkish Studies Association. 3 (2). Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press for the Ottoman and Turkish Studies Association: 277–298. doi:10.2979/jottturstuass.3.2.05. ISSN 2376-0699. OCLC 6883463202. Retrieved 26 June 2021.
• Harris, Judith (2017). Evelina: A Victorian Heroine in Venice. Stroud, Gloucestershire: Fonthill Media Ltd. ISBN 978-1-78155-593-4.
• Karpat, Kemal H. (1974). "Introduction". In Karpat, Kemal H. (ed.). The Ottoman State and Its Place in World History. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill Publishers. pp. 1–14. ISBN 90-04-03945-7.
• Masters, Bruce (2004). Christians and Jews in the Ottoman Arab World: The Roots of Sectarianism. Cambridge, Cambridgeshire: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-00582-1.
• Sonyel, Salahi R. (1991). "The Protégé System in the Ottoman Empire". Journal of Islamic Studies. 2 (1). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 56–66. ISSN 0955-2340. OCLC 4644014241. Retrieved 27 June 2021.

Portuguese empire

Portuguese law was first compiled in 1446 by the Ordinances of Afonso V (Portuguese: Ordenações Afonsinas), which established that the law of the kingdom was based in statues, case law and custom. Revised in 1521 by the Ordinances of Manuel I (Portuguese: Ordenações Manuelinas), courts were granted the ability to interpret common law by opinion and create solutions for newly arisen situations. In areas of the kingdom without established High Courts, common law and local custom prevailed. Nationals were those born in the territory and leaving the territory without permission of the sovereign was grounds for denaturalization. In 1603, the Ordinances of Philip I (Portuguese: Ordenações Filipinas) established that Portuguese nationals were children born on the Iberian Peninsula or adjacent islands, Brazil, or to an official in service to the crown in the Portuguese possessions of Africa or Asia, whose father was a native of Portugal, or whose mother was a native of Portugal and was married to a foreigner who had established domicile in Portugal for a minimum of ten years. Those who were not in service to the crown in the colonies (except Brazil) were not considered to be Portuguese. A child could not derive nationality directly from its mother unless it was illegitimate.

Portugal drafted its first constitution in 1822, which defined subjects of the Portuguese crown as the children of a male native to any of the territories of the kingdom. The nationality scheme laid out in 1603 remained mostly unchanged except for some clarifications, such as legitimate children of a Portuguese father or illegitimate children of a Portuguese mother born abroad could be nationals if they resided in Portugal and children born to a Portuguese mother and foreign father could only derive Portuguese nationality upon reaching their majority and requesting it. Two new provisions included that foundlings discovered on Portuguese soil were considered nationals, as were freedmen. Naturalization was only available to foreign men who married Portuguese women, and only if they had investments in the country or provided service to the crown. Denaturalization resulted from service to, or receiving benefits from, a foreign government, or obtaining other nationality. Society was male-oriented and male-dominated, and women's roles were isolated to family concerns keeping them separated from everyday realities of society. The father of a family was expected to provide for the well-being of his household. Women's legal status varied based upon their skin color. White women legally could serve as head of household absent the presence of the father figure, were able to administrate wills and inheritances, and could own land and inherit property. Slave and Amerindian women could seek arbiters to assist them in buying their freedom and could appeal to authorities for mistreatment. Any woman could petition the crown to assist them in legal disputes.

A new constitution was adopted in 1826 (which was in force from 1826 to 1828, 1834 to 1836, and 1842 to 1910) which granted nationality to anyone born on Portuguese soil. Birth by descent was accepted as establishing nationality, as long as the father lived in Portugal or was abroad in service to the monarch. Provisions stipulated that only illegitimate children could derive nationality from their mother and established that a nationality law was to define provisions for naturalization. The new nationality code was promulgated as the Decree of 22 October 1836, which established that grounds for naturalization included having reached majority, demonstrating adequate means of self-support, and having a minimum of two years residency, which could be waived if one had Portuguese ancestry. The Civil Code of 1867 reiterated similar nationality requirements to those that had previously been in effect, with the exception that a foreign woman, upon marriage to a Portuguese husband, automatically acquired Portuguese nationality. It also provided that Portuguese women who married foreigners lost their nationality, unless they would become stateless, and could not reacquire Portuguese status unless the marriage terminated and she lived in Portugal. It retained the provisions of the 1836 Decree for naturalization but increase residency to three years and added stipulations that applicants must have completed their military duties to their country of origin and that they have no criminal record.

The nationality requirements remained stable and did not significantly change again until 1959, when a new Nationality Law (Lei n.º 2098) granted nationality to anyone born Portuguese territory, unless the parents were foreign diplomats. Nationality if a child was born abroad could only be acquired automatically at birth if the Portuguese parents were abroad serving the crown; otherwise, nationality was at the discretion of officials and upon application required proof of that the birth had been registered in Portugal, that the applicant was domiciled in Portugal, and that they declared a desire to be a national. Married women continued to derive their nationality from their husband, with the exception that a woman could retain her nationality of origin if she specifically declared she did not want to be Portuguese and could prove that her country of origin allowed retention of her nationality after marriage.

Spanish empire

Nationality in colonial Spanish America was based in custom, rather than law. People born in Spain or Spanish America were considered to be members of the community and those born outside of those territories, whether of Spanish descent or not, were considered to be foreigners. Typically, naturalization was interpreted as personal, something granted to an individual, who met specified criteria. The first provisions for foreigners to be allowed to operate in Spanish territories were known as Carta de naturaleza, established by royal decree in 1567. Naturalization gave an alien the same rights as a native, but did not change their legal status as a foreigner. To obtain a carta, an applicant to the Council of the Indies had to confirm they had resided in the Spanish Empire for 20 years, had sufficient financial means to conduct business, and provide for their support and had been married to a native or a foreign national, who was born locally, for at least 10 years. Non-whites or non-Christians were excluded, unless they obtained a gracias al sacar, a royal certificate, which legally allowed them to operate as white persons, by limpieza de sangre (cleaning the blood). The ability to change races was an important consideration in the Americas because the majority of immigrants to the Americas were male, thus there was widespread racial mixing, and from 1514, a royal decree of Ferdinand II of Aragon encouraged mixed marriages as a way of creating a homogenous Spanish-Catholic society. From 1778, royal decree stipulated that marriages were to be contracted by equals. Further, in order to leave their possessions to an heir, as opposed to the crown, illegitimate mestizo offspring needed to be legitimized.

In colonial Latin America, as had been established by the Siete Partidas (Seven-Part Code) enacted by Alfonso X of Castile in the 13th century, families were organized with a male head of household, who controlled the power, required obedience, and provided support and protection. Married women were legally required to submit to their husband's authority to maintain family unity. Women had latitude to execute contracts and documents, such as wills, and were able to appear in court, but were required to obtain permission from a father or spouse, though consent was typically given. Women had equal property and inheritance rights; though administration of their assts was via the head of her household. Women were not considered to be legal citizens. Instead, a wife's obligation was to fulfill the social role of mother and spouse, care for the education and moral upbringing of her children and remain secluded in her home. Her public interactions were expected to correspond to these roles, meaning that she was allowed to participate in activities to care of the sick and those which provided moral uplift. Spain's first constitution, the Constitution of Cadiz, enacted in 1812, specifically recognized as nationals only "[a]ll free-men, born and bred up in the Spanish dominions, and their sons". Freedmen from Africa and foreigners residing within Spanish territory were permitted to naturalize as Spanish.

The law was passed during the period (1808-1814) when Ferdinand VII of Spain was detained in France and Spanish juntas were organized to govern during his absence. Ferdinand's return to power and proclamation to reestablish an absolute monarchy led to the Spanish American wars of independence. In 1814 upon returning to Spain from captivity in France, Ferdinand VII abrogated the constitution and reinstated an absolute monarchy, leading to independence wars throughout Spanish America. Revolution in 1820 reinstated the Constitution of Cádiz, but the return to power of Ferdinand in 1823, saw it suspended again. Instability in the Spanish empire continued until 1874 with periods of conflict followed by calm only to erupt into insurrection again. The Constitution of Cádiz was reinstated in 1836 and revoked a year later. Two Carlist Wars followed by the 1868 Revolution, led to a democratic experiment and the drafting of a new constitution in 1869. The constitution called for significant colonial reforms, but before they could be acted upon the Third Carlist War and subsequent restoration of the monarchy ended its authority. A new constitution was adopted in 1876, and in 1889 the first Spanish Civil Code was adopted. The Code was extended to Puerto Rico, Panama, the Philippines and Guam, establishing that nationality was acquired either from birth in Spanish territory or by descent from a Spanish national. Legitimate children could derive nationality from a father, but only illegitimate children could derive Spanish nationality from a mother, as a married woman was required to take the nationality of her husband. It also contained provisions for foreigners to naturalize.

The first constitutions of the nations of South America upon gaining their independence were written to include people born in the territory and exclude those born in Europe who might challenge the national sovereignty. Definitions emerged based upon who were nationals and who were foreigners. Rights of citizens differed based on these broad categories, excluding those who were criminal, illiterate, in debt, mentally incapacitated, or dependents, such as children, indentured persons or migrant workers, servants and women. To create a nation of ideal citizens, nationality was regulated through the lens of class, gender, and race. In opposition to colonial policies of exclusion, foreigners were welcomed in the early days of independence in Latin America and typically were regulated only by policies designed to protect the interests of the state. At the turn of the twentieth century, the former Spanish colonies had codified who were undesireables based upon fairly similar characteristics. These traits included those who were non-European, criminal, suffered from chronic disease, or were unable to support themselves, or who might threaten the social order. Many of the nations began restricting the immigration of those of African, Asian, Caribbean, Middle Eastern, or Ottoman origin, as well as nomadic peoples.

United States empire

Prior to 1898, all persons born in the possessions of the United States were treated as having been born in the United States, and upon acquisition, provisions were made for collective naturalization of the inhabitants. After that date, possessions were selectively judged to be foreign localities and not subject to the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Under the Insular Cases (1901–1922), the US Supreme Court ruled that unincorporated territories and insular possessions of the United States, which were not on a path toward statehood, had limited applicability of the U.S. Constitution. At the time, these included Guam, the Philippines, and Puerto Rico, acquired in 1898 at the end of the Spanish–American War. According to the decisions, those born in insular possessions or unincorporated territories were not eligible for citizenship, though they were considered nationals and could hold a U.S. passport and gain diplomatic protection from the United States. Specifically, in Downes v. Bidwell (182 U.S. 244, 1901) the Supreme Court found that possessions of the United States were not part of it constitutionally because they were "inhabited by alien races, differing from us in religion, customs, laws, methods of taxation and modes of thought and therefore the administration of government and justice, according to Anglo-Saxon principles, may for a time be impossible". Because of the rulings, all persons in the U.S. outlying possessions were considered U.S. non-citizen nationals. In Gonzales v. Williams (192 U.S. 1, 1904) the Supreme Court affirmed that non-citizen nationals were not aliens, or immigrants, causing Congress to pass in 1906, special provisions for persons born in unincorporated territories to naturalize in the United States.

Africa

already cited as: (United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women|Chinkin|2003|p=x) https://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/public/jun03e.pdf https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/black-women-and-international-law/african-women-and-the-gender-equality-regime-in-africa-from-patriarchy-to-parity/198633740775BFDEE43DEC096AB8F861 https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/54cb3c8f4.pdf https://www.unhcr.org/ecowas2015/Nationality-Migration-and-Statelessness-in-West-Africa-REPORT-EN.pdf https://www.unhcr.org/4cbc60ce6.pdf https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/uploads/d5d1d086-1a0d-4088-b679-003e09e9c125/citizenship-law-africa-third-edition-20160129.pdf http://academic-oup-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/book/2672/chapter/143096294?searchresult=1

Dependencies: Canary Islands Autonomous Community of Spain, Ceuta Autonomous city of Spain, French Southern and Antarctic Lands Overseas territory of France, Madeira Autonomous Region of Portugal, Melilla Autonomous city of Spain, Pelagie Islands Italian archipelago, Plazas de soberanía Overseas Territory of Spain, Réunion Mayotte Overseas region of France, Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha British Overseas Territory, Socotra Archipelago Governate of Yemen

Algeria

moved

Angola

moved

Benin

moved

Botswana

moved

Burkina Faso

moved

Burundi

moved

Cameroon

moved

Cape Verde

moved

Central African Republic

moved

Chad

moved

Comoros

moved

Congo

moved

Democratic Republic of the Congo

moved

Djibouti

moved

Egypt

moved

Equatorial Guinea

moved

Eritrea

moved

Eswatini

moved

Ethiopia

moved

Gabon

Gabonese nationality law moved

The Gambia

Gambian nationality law moved

Ghana

Ghanaian nationality law moved

Guinea

Guinean nationality law moved

Guinea-Bissau

Bissau-Guinean nationality law moved

Ivory Coast

Ivorian nationality law moved

Kenya

Kenyan nationality law moved

Lesotho

Basotho nationality law moved

Liberia

Liberian nationality law moved

Libya

Libyan nationality law moved

Madagascar

Malagasy nationality law moved

Malawi

Malawian nationality law moved

Mali

Malian nationality law moved

Mauritania

Mauritanian nationality law moved

Mauritius

Mauritian nationality law moved

Morocco

Moroccan nationality law moved

Mozambique

Mozambican nationality law moved

Namibia

Namibian nationality law moved

Niger

Nigerien nationality law moved

Nigeria

Nigerian nationality law moved

Rwanda

Rwandan nationality law moved

São Tomé and Príncipe

São Toméan nationality law moved

Senegal

Senegalese nationality law moved

Seychelles

Seychellois nationality law moved

Sierra Leone

Sierra Leonean nationality law moved

Somalia

Somali nationality law moved

Somaliland

Somaliland citizenship and nationality moved

South Africa

South African nationality law moved

South Sudan

South Sudanese nationality law moved

Sudan

Sudanese nationality law moved

Tanzania

Tanzanian nationality law moved

Togo

Togolese nationality law moved

Tunisia

Tunisian nationality law moved

Uganda

Ugandan nationality law moved

Western Sahara

Sahrawi nationality law moved

Zambia

Zambian nationality law moved

Zimbabwe

Zimbabwean nationality law moved

Asia

Asia: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09612025.2016.1163924

Afghanistan

Afghan nationality law moved

Armenia

Armenian nationality law

Azerbaijan

Azerbaijani nationality law moved

Bahrain

Bahraini nationality law https://www.jstor.org/stable/3012867

• Albarazi, Zahra (November 2017). "Regional Report on Citizenship: The Middle East and North Africa (MENA)" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 December 2019. Retrieved 7 February 2022.
• Alsabeehg, Zeineb (March 2021). "Report on Citizenship Law: Bahrain" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 March 2021. Retrieved 7 February 2022.

Bangladesh

Bangladeshi nationality law

• Hoque, Ridwanul (December 2016). "Report on Citizenship Law: Bangladesh" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 22 December 2020. Retrieved 7 February 2022.

Bhutan

Bhutanese nationality law

Brunei

Bruneian nationality law https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/5ccab7d67.pdf#page=2&zoom=auto,-24,718 https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/604257d34.pdf#page=2&zoom=auto,-24,776

Cambodia

Cambodian nationality law

• Sperfeldt, Christoph (January 2017). "Report on Citizenship Law: Cambodia" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 January 2022. Retrieved 7 February 2022.

China

Chinese nationality law

• Low, Choo Chin (October 2016). "Report on Citizenship Law: China and Taiwan" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 January 2022. Retrieved 7 February 2022.

Cyprus

Cypriot nationality law

• Trimikliniotis, Nicos (November 2015). "Report on Citizenship Law: Cyprus" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu (revised ed.). Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 January 2022. Retrieved 7 February 2022.

Georgia

Georgian nationality law Georgian nationality law is regulated by the Constitution of Georgia, as amended; the Citizenship Law of Georgia and its revisions; and various international agreements to which the country is a signatory. These laws determine who is, or is eligible to be, an Georgian national. The legal means to acquire nationality, formal legal membership in a nation, differ from the domestic relationship of rights and obligations between a national and the nation, known as citizenship. Nationality describes the relationship of an individual to the state under international law, whereas citizenship is the domestic relationship of an individual within the nation. Some countries use the terms nationality and citizenship as synonyms, despite their legal distinction and the fact that they are regulated by different governmental administrative bodies. Colloquially, as in most former Soviet states, citizenship is often used as a synonym for nationality, because nationality is associated with ethnicity. Georgian nationality is typically obtained under the principle of jus sanguinis, i.e. by birth to parents with Georgian nationality. It can be granted to persons with an affiliation to the country, or to a permanent resident who has lived in the country for a given period of time through naturalization.

• ==Acquiring Azerbaijani nationality==

Nationality in Georgia is typically acquired by birth to a Georgian or later in life through naturalization.

• ===By birth===

Until the 2014 amendment changed nationality requirements, jus soli, birth in Azerbaijan was the primary basis for acquiring nationality. A reversal of that policy was prompted by fears of the actions of neighboring post-Soviet spaces and challenges to Azerbaijani sovereignty. If both parents of a child born in Azerbaijan are foreigners or if one parent is a foreigner and the other is stateless or unknown, the child is not considered to be Azerbaijani. Those who can acquire nationality by birth include:

• Children born anywhere to at least one parent who is an Azerbaijani national; or
• Children born in Azerbaijan, if both parents are stateless.

• ===By naturalization===

Foreigners can apply for naturalization in Azaerbaijan provided that they have continuously resided in the country, being absent no more than three months, for at least five years from the issuance of a permanent residency permit or confirmation of refugee status. General provisions are that applicants have a legal income, have sufficiency in the Azerbaijani language, and respect the laws of the country. Applications for naturalization must be submitted to the State Migration Service (Azerbaijani: Dövlәt Miqrasiya Xidmәti) in Baku. Documentation must be presented to confirm that the applicant meets the residency requirements, has paid any taxes due to the state, has a certificate from the Ministry of Education verifying language proficiency, and documents which confirm the current nationality. Minor children follow the nationality of their parents, thus if a parent naturalizes and the child is under fourteen years old, the child automatically becomes Azerbaijani as long as both parents agree, or in the case that one parent is stateless. Naturalization is not allowed if the person has participated in activities that could damage the state, its territory or security, or the health, morality, or public order of the country; if they have been accused of attempting to overthrow or change the systems of the state or social order; or if they have participated in terrorism or activities that would foment hostility on the basis of race, religion, or ethnic superiority. The President of Azerbaijan is the final authority on who is admitted as a national of the country. Those who are admitted as nationals must swear that they have no civic obligations outstanding to other states and take an oath of allegiance. Other persons who can acquire nationality by naturalization include:

• Foundlings or orphans whose parents are unknown, after an administrative process;
• Adoptees of Azerbaijani nationals upon completion of a legal adoption if requested;
• Children between the ages of fourteen and eighteen who consent to be naturalized at the time that their parents are naturalized;
• Children who did not gain Azrbaijani nationality when their parent(s) nationality changed, through an administrative procedure;
• Persons who are current residents of Azerbaijan and who were nationals of Azerbaijan or the Azerbaijan SSR or who were born in the country prior to the 1998 Citizenship Act coming into force, but who did not gain nationality under the Act and have remained in the country;
• Refugees or forced migrants who entered the country between 1988 and 1992, through an administrative procedure;
• Persons with exceptional skill in the arts or culture, science, sport, or technology, whose contributions may be beneficial to the country may naturalize without meeting naturalization requirements; or
• Persons who the state deems to be of special interest or those who have rendered significant service to the nation may naturalize without meeting other requirements.

• ==Loss of nationality==

Azerbaijani are allowed to renounce their nationality, provided that comply with registration processes. The government may oppose if the applicant has outstanding civic obligations to the state, persons, or legal entities, or is involved in a criminal proceeding. Nationals can be denaturalized for obtaining other nationality; for serving in the government administration or armed services of a foreign country; for committing crimes against the state or state security; for actions related to religious extremism or terrorism including recruitment; or for fraud, misrepresentation, or concealment in acquiring nationality. Loss of nationality involves a legal proceeding in Azerbaijan, rather than being a process of the operation of law. Persons who have previously lost their Azerbaijani nationality may repatriate as long as they meet the requirements to naturalize.

• ==Dual nationality==

Azerbaijan does not recognize dual nationality and it can be grounds for criminal prosecution. Persons who acquire another nationality are required to notify the authorities within thirty days or risk denturalization and/or payment of fines under the Criminal Code.

• ==History==

Humans have been present in the territory now known as Azerbaijan since Paleolithic times. From the ninth century BC semi-nomadic Scythian peoples began settling in the region and within a century, the Medes, an ancient Persian people, had conquered the southern part of what is Azerbaijan. For much of the history of the territory, was ruled by successive Persian Empires. The Median Empire was defeated in the region by Cyrus the Great in the sixth century BC and then in the fourth century BC by Alexander the Great, who called the area Caucasian Albania (or Albanoi) and retained the Persian satraps as governors. In ancient Persia the king had absolute authority as the administrator of his subjects and armies, the giver of law, and the supreme judge of the empire. The centralized government of the empire was divided into satrapies, or provinces, for ease of management and taxation. Local satraps had no control over the military forces in their region to prevent them diluting the power of the ruler, but they managed the civilian administration over the areas for which they governed. Ethnic groups had legal autonomy to regulate their own internal conflicts. Rulers were responsible for security in the realm and management of the economy. In exchange for protection, Persian subjects paid taxes and owed loyalty to the king and his leadership. Marriage in the period was cum manu meaning the wife was legally incapacitated and under the control of her husband.

When Alexander's Macedonian Empire collapsed, Caucasian Albania became a vassal state of the Seleucid Empire in the second century BC. Between the fourth and third centuries BC the union of tribes throughout the Caucasus formed the Kingdom of Albania. Roman annexation of Albania occurred between the first and third centuries AD, but as Rome declined, Persia re-established vassalage over the kingdom, first through the Parthian Empire and then its successor, the Sasanian Empire. By the forth century, the Sasanians and Byzantine Empire, successor state to Rome, were in conflict which caused a gradual decline and the eventual collapse of the Sassanid empire in the last half of the seventh century. At that time, Arabs brought Islam to the area and annexed Arran, as they called the former territory of Caucasian Albania, to the Abbasid Caliphate. Arabic rule continued through the eleventh century. In the Islamic state, subjects were defined by religious allegiance and loyalty to a ruler was as a result of his membership in the confessional community and his religious position, meaning that religious and political principles and offices were inseparable. Leaders served as religious and administrative authorities, teaching doctrine and acting to settle disputes, maintain order, and provide economic benefits to their communities. In exchange, subjects were committed to the leader and the defense of Islam. Women were required to have a guardian, either their father, a relative, or the sultan, who gave her in marriage. After marriage, she was required to be obedient to her husband's authority over her.

From the ninth century, the Shirvanshah Kingdom became dominant in the northeastern region of the territory lasting through the sixteenth century. The Kingdom was strongly influenced by the Turko-Persian Seljuk Empire, which had invaded in the eleventh century from Central Asia and ended the dominance of Arab rule. The Mongol Empire invaded in the thirteenth century, subjugating the Shirvanshah Kingdom to the Il Khanate, when the Mongols divided their empire in 1256. The Il Khanate returned the region to Islamic practices but with predominant Persian cultural influences, which were retained by the Turko-Mongol Timurid Empire which was dominant between 1370 and 1405. Upon the collapse of the Timurids, two successive Turkic tribes ruled the area until it was returned to Persian dominance under the Safavid Empire in 1501. The Safavids were the predominate power in the area until 1722.

• ===Persian, Ottoman, and Russian conflicts (18th-19th centuries)===

From the beginning of the eighteenth century, conflict emerged between the Safavids and Ottoman Empire for control of the territory. These struggles weakened the Safavid Empire, which then came under attack by the Russian Empire. In 1722, Peter the Great led a campaign that established Russian dominance in the Northern Caucuses, including the northern part of Arran. Though the Persians retained control over the southern regions of Arran successive wars resulted in continuous loss of territory to the Russians and by 1828 all remaining Persian possessions in the Caucasus had been ceded to Russia. In Russia, persons residing in the territory of the empire were known as "poddanstvo" (subjects) and were under obligation of absolute subjection to the Tsar until 1917. Subjects were neither allowed to emigrate nor naturalize in a foreign state. The policy emphasized the collective nature of the community, which was jointly responsible to pay tax, provide labor, and share in the harvest to the landlord and state. Foreigners could not enter the country without the approval of the Tsar and were restricted to reside in specific areas and wear identifying clothing.

Groups which were prohibited from becoming Russian subjects included Dervishes, Jesuits, Jews, and married women, unless their spouse was Russian. Treaties and trade agreements defined the extraterritorial jurisdiction of foreigners residing in the nation and gave foreigners special privileges, like exemptions from paying taxes, the right to practice their religion, and freedom of movement. From 1721, the only requirement for naturalization of foreigners in the Russian Empire changed from conversion to Russian Orthodoxy to swearing an oath of allegiance to the Tsar. The following year a decree was issued which confirmed that sons born in Russia to foreigners in service to the Tsar were automatically subjects of Russia. Russian policy on territorial annexation up to 1860 was that all persons living in such a territory automatically were conferred Russian nationality, but the rights of citizenship of these groups varied based upon ethnicity, religion, and social status.

From 1864, naturalization required a five-year residency. Persons who were in service of the nation, who invested funds that benefited Russia, or who had unique ability or scientific knowledge could acquire nationality with a reduced residency period. Children born to foreigners in Russian territory could choose to acquire Russian nationality within one year of reaching majority, if they had been educated and grew up in Russia. Russian women who married foreigners were no longer Russian subjects and foreign women who married Russians automatically became Russian upon solemnization of a religious marriage. In 1879, Article 7 of the Treaty of Constantinople which was signed at the end of the Russo-Turkish War, set a precedent for annexation thereafter, establishing that residents could choose which nationality they wished to have after annexation terms were agreed upon. Persons who failed to express a desire within the allotted time frame to retain their existing nationality would automatically become Russian. An update to the nationality statutes in 1899 provided that children born anywhere to Russian parents automatically became Russian.

• ===War and independence (1905-1920)===

While the 1905 Russian Revolution did not spark an independence movement among the peoples in Arran, it did mark the start of the rise of political activity and ethnic identification. Upon the collapse of the Russian Empire in 1917, however, the provincial council declared the independence of the Azerbaijan Democratic Republic in 1918. The Republic was backed by the Ottoman Empire and Ottoman troops remained in the territory until World War I ended, when they were replaced in late 1918 by British forces. In August 1918, the Azerbaijans passed the Act on Subjecthood, which defined subjects as those who were maternally descended from an Azerbaijani. One year later, the country passed a Law on Citizenship, which bestowed blanket nationality upon any former Russian subject who had been born in Azerbaijan. The statute did not permit dual nationality.

• ===Soviet Azerbaijan (1920–1991)===

In April 1920, the Red Army backed by supporters in the Azerbaijani Communist Party invaded the country. Though the government attempted to form a union with Persia, it was unable to come to terms and in September signed a treaty with Russia granting Russia control over its economy, foreign affairs, and military. In 1922, the Azerbaijan Soviet Socialist Republic was joined with the Armenian Soviet Socialist Republic and Georgian Soviet Socialist Republic to form the Transcaucasian Socialist Federative Soviet Republic, which lasted until 1936 and was then separated into its constituent states. In 1924, the Soviet Union created a unitary nationality for all inhabitants of the various socialist republics. It presumed that anyone residing within the territory prior to enactment of the statute was automatically a Soviet national, unless they were able to prove otherwise. Under its terms, a child born to at least one parent who was a national of one of the Soviet republics was automatically a national of that republic, as well as the federation. If the parents were residing abroad at the birth of the child, the parents could chose to have Soviet nationality or other nationality. Neither marriage nor naturalization of one party automatically impacted a spouse or children; however, if both parents changed their nationality or renounced Soviet nationality children under the age of fourteen followed the parental nationality.

Each Soviet republic was allowed to determine who was eligible for naturalization in their territory. Naturalization gave them Soviet nationality, but did not automatically grant the rights of citizenship other republics. Renunciation of nationality was allowed upon obtaining permission from the Central Executive Committee of the Soviet Union. Nationals could be denaturalized for obtaining dual nationality, leaving federation territory without permission, or by a court order as a punishment for crime. An amendment (Law 581) in 1925 provided that persons who had been granted amnesty for service in the White Army and prisoners of war who had served in the Tsarist or Red Army who were abroad and failed to register with the Soviet Federation were deprived of their nationality, but could apply to be reinstated through naturalization. The mass denaturalizations of Russian people living abroad resulted in approximately 1.5 million stateless persons who were unable to acquire nationality in their places of residence under restrictive policies implemented globally in the interwar years.

In 1930, a resolution was passed specifying that all people within Soviet territory who did not prove that they were nationals of a foreign state were to be recognized as Soviet. In 1938 a new Soviet Nationality Law was passed to conform with the provisions of the 1936 Constitution of the Soviet Union. Under its terms, the soviet republics no longer defined nationality within their borders. Instead, nationality was acquired under the specifications of the Soviet law. Soviet passports indicated with which republic a national was affiliated and change of permanent residence automatically changed the state affiliation. The 1938 nationality law did not specify that nationality was acquired at birth through a Soviet parent and made no provisions for foundlings, leaving the possibility open that a child could be born stateless. It affirmed that those who had previously acquired Soviet nationality by being subjects of the Russian Empire and those who acquired it under prior laws remained nationals unless they had previously been denaturalized. It specified that persons who were permanent residents in Soviet territory but were foreigners without proof of other nationality were considered to be stateless, a reversal of the previous policy that they were automatically assumed to be Soviet. As a consequence, their children would also be stateless, unless they were allowed to naturalize upon reaching majority. In 1939, a resolution was passed which confirmed that laws which had previously been enacted but which countered the 1938 provision for statelessness were no longer valid.

A 1944 change to the Family Code repealed the right of a woman to sue for the father's identity and nationality to be bestowed upon a child born out of wedlock. The 1944 decree effected all applicable codes, making acquisition of nationality for an illegitimate child derivative of its mother. The result of the statute was that if the mother was stateless or foreign, the child, even if its father was known was unable to be a Soviet national. A decree in 1945 modified the provision slightly, determining that if the parents married the child could be recognized by its father on an equal footing as children born within the marriage. The age of the child was immaterial and their nationality became automatic, as if from birth. In 1977, the Soviet Union adopted a new constitution, which contained nationality provisions in Chapter 6, reaffirming that persons of any of the constituent states of the Union were Soviet nationals. A new nationality statute was created in 1978, which incorporated all previous legislation for acquiring nationality. It expressly prohibited both dual nationality and extradition of a Soviet national to a foreign state. The final Soviet nationality statute was adopted in 1990 and went into effect on 1 January 1991. Under its terms, children acquired nationality by being born to parents who were Soviet nationals. It was primarily notable for codifying, rather than leaving the grounds for denaturalization up to the discretion of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet. These included service to a foreign state or military, failure to register with a consulate while residing abroad, and falsifying information to obtain nationality. The law also changed the final authority on nationality decisions, moving the power to approve or deny from the Presidium to the president.

On 9 April 1991, Georgia declared its independence from the Soviet Union. Children born anywhere to Azerbaijani nationals acquired nationality at birth. Children born in the territory or born abroad to at least one parent who was a permanent resident of Azerbaijan also automatically became nationals, as did children born in Azerbaijan whose parents were stateless or unknown. The law contained no requirements for naturalization other than the filing of an application and taking of an oath of allegiance, but specified that applications could be rejected by the President of Azerbaijan for various actions that might harm the country. Nationals could renounce their nationality, if the state agreed that it would not be against the interests of the country and could repatriate upon application. Denaturalization was based upon a decision by authorities that a national was serving in the military or government administration of a foreign nation, was permanently residing abroad for more than five years, had acted in a manner to damage state interest or security, or had acquired nationality through fraud.

On 2 September 1991, the Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast declared its independence from the Soviet Union, though legally it was part of Azerbaijan which was followed 18 October by an independence declaration for Azerbaijan. Under the terms of the proposed constitution, adopted with the independence declaration and awaiting approval through a plebiscite, as of 1 January 1992, anyone who was a registered resident in Azerbaijan on that date was automatically conferred nationality. Persons who were of Azerbaijani descent, who were not residing in the country on the effective date were not granted nationality. Afterward, anyone born in the territory of Azerbaijan or to at least one Azerbaijani parent acquired Azerbaijani nationality, but dual nationality was barred. On 10 December a referendum confirmed that 99.89 percent of the voters in Nagorno-Karabakh favored independence. The Soviet Union officially ended on 26 December and the fifteen former Soviet republics became independent nations. Azerbaijan's referendum on independence was held three days later on 29 December, and approved by 95 percent of the voters.

• ===Post-independence (1991–present)===

On 25 March 1993, Georgia passed a Citizenship Act, which went into force two days later. Transitional provisions included that those who were residing in the territory as of the effective date, who had not in the previous six month period rejected Georgian nationality and were permanent residents for at least give years became nationals. It also granted nationality to persons who had been born in the country but left after 21 December 1991, as long as they had not acquired any other nationality. For those born after the effective date, nationality was granted automatically at birth anywhere if both parents were Georgian. If only one parent was Georgian, a child acquired nationality if they were born in the country or if the other parent was stateless. Children born abroad to a parent who is a permanent resident of Georgia were eligible to acquire Georgian nationality at birth, as were foundlings and orphans discovered in the territory whose parents were unknown. Naturalization required a ten-year residency, an ability to communicate in the Georgian language, sufficient knowledge of the Georgian constitution and the country's history, and adequate income and/or assets to provide for their own support. Spouses of Georgians could naturalize after a three-year residency. Persons who were barred from naturalization included those who had committed crimes against the state or international crimes against humanity and peace. Persons could be denaturalized for obtaining dual nationality; for permanently living abroad without properly registering with a Georgian consulate; for serving in a foreign government administration, military or police service, or judicial body without the permissian of Georgian authorities; or for fraudulently obtaining Georgian nationality.

An amendment to the nationality law was made on 2 March 2001, which specified that if a child was born abroad to one Georgian parent but both parents were permanent residents of a country other than Georgia, the parents had to reach a mutual agreement on the child's nationality, or in the absence of such an agreement the child acquired nationality based upon the rules of the country in which they were born.

• Adalian, Rouben Paul (2010). Historical Dictionary of Armenia. Historical Dictionaries of Europe. Vol. 77 (2nd ed.). Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0-8108-7450-3.
• Bayramli, Nigar (18 October 2020). "Azerbaijan Marks 29 Years Since Independence". Caspian News. Baku, Azerbaijan. Archived from the original on 14 June 2021. Retrieved 11 March 2022.
• Blount, Donald (20 March 1986). "Russian Scholar Calls Emigration of Jews a Game Without Rules". The Morning Call. Allentown, Pennsylvania. p. B4. Retrieved 21 February 2022 – via Newspapers.com.
• Country of Origin Information Reports Section (July 2020). General Country of Origin Information Report for Azerbaijan (PDF) (Report). The Hague, Netherlands: Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 February 2022. Retrieved 12 March 2022.
• Directie Consulaire Zaken en Migratiebeleid Afdeling Asiel (August 2011). Thematisch ambtsbericht staatsburgerschapsen vreemdelingenwetgeving in Georgië [Thematic Official Message on Citizenship and Alien Legislation in Georgia] (Report) (in Dutch). The Hague, Netherlands: Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken. Archived from the original on 14 March 2022. Retrieved 16 March 2022.
• Flournoy Jr., Richard W.; Hudson, Manley O. (1929). "(Russia) Union of Soviet Socialist Republics". A Collection of Nationality Laws of Various Countries as Contained in Constitutions, Statutes and Treaties. New York, New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 510–515. OCLC 875321407. – via HeinOnline (subscription required)
• Fransman, Laurie (2011). Fransman's British Nationality Law (3rd ed.). Haywards Heath, West Sussex: Bloomsbury Professional. ISBN 978-1-84592-095-1.
• Ginsburgs, George (January 1966). "Soviet Citizenship Legislation and Statelessness as a Consequence of the Conflict of Nationality Law". International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 15 (1). London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law: 1–54. ISSN 0020-5893. OCLC 4663021818. Retrieved 21 February 2022. – via HeinOnline (subscription required)
• Jany, János (2020). "Persian Law". Legal Traditions in Asia: History, Concepts and Laws. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice. Vol. 80. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature. pp. 83–116. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-43728-2. ISBN 978-3-03-043728-2.
• Joly, Josephine; Daunt, Rebekah (13 December 2021). "It's 30 Years since the Collapse of the Soviet Union". Euronews. Lyon, France. Archived from the original on 9 January 2022. Retrieved 11 March 2022.
• King, David C. (2006). Azerbaijan. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish. ISBN 978-0-7614-2011-8.
• Lapidus, Ira M. (October 1975). "The Separation of State and Religion in the Development of Early Islamic Society". International Journal of Middle East Studies. 6 (4). Cambridge, Cambridgeshire: Cambridge University Press: 363–385. doi:10.1017/S0020743800025344. ISSN 0020-7438. OCLC 4815048409. Retrieved 6 March 2022.
• Liberman, Sherri (2004). A Historical Atlas of Azerbaijan. New York, New York: Rosen Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-8239-4497-2.
• Lohr, Eric (2012). Russian Citizenship: From Empire to Soviet Union. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-06634-2.
• Manasyan, Anahit (April 2019). "The Issue of the Development of the Preamble to the Armenian Constitution: From Theory to Practice". Revista Institutului Naţional de Justiţie. 13 (1). Chişinău, Moldova: Institutul Național al Justiţiei: 46–51. ISSN 1857-2405. OCLC 8125149879. Retrieved 3 March 2022. – via HeinOnline (subscription required)
• Mehdiyev, Mushvig (5 May 2017). "23 Year[s] Later, Bishkek Protocol Remains Unfulfilled". Caspian News. Baku, Azerbaijan. Archived from the original on 3 March 2022. Retrieved 3 March 2022.
• Nichol, James (1995). "2. Azerbaijan". In Curtis, Glenn E. (ed.). Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia: County Studies. Area Handbook Series (first ed.). Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office. pp. 79–148. ISBN 978-0-7881-2813-4.
• Pappas, Nicholas C. J. (1994). "Albanian". In Olson, James S.; Pappas, Lee Brigance; Pappas, Nicholas C. J. (eds.). An Ethnohistorical Dictionary of the Russian and Soviet Empires. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press. pp. 27–29. ISBN 978-0-313-27497-8.
• Regional Bureau for Europe (1 July 1993). Nationality Laws of the Former Soviet Republics (Report). Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Archived from the original on 26 February 2022. Retrieved 12 March 2022.
• Research Directorate (25 November 2016). Responses to Information Requests: Azerbaijan (Report). Ottawa, Ontario: Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada. Report AZE105680.E. Archived from the original on 13 March 2022. Retrieved 13 March 2022.
• Rezvani, Babak (2015). Conflict and Peace in Central Eurasia: Towards Explanations and Understandings. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill Publishers. ISBN 978-90-04-27636-9.
• Roque, Maria Isabel; Forte, Maria João (2019). "2. Heritage Tourism in Iran: A Historical Perspective". In Correia, Antónia; Kozak, Metin; Rodrigues, Ana Isabel (eds.). Experiencing Persian Heritage: Perspectives and Challenges. Bridging Tourism Theory and Practice. Vol. 10 (first ed.). Bingley, West Yorkshire: Emerald Group Publishing. pp. 29–42. ISBN 978-1-78754-812-1.
• Rosas, Allan (1994). "Nationality and Citizenship in a Changing European and World Order". In Suksi, Markku (ed.). Law Under Exogenous Influences. Turku, Finland: Turku Law School. pp. 30–60. ISBN 978-951-29-0284-2.
• Salenko, Alexander (July 2012). "Country Report: Russia" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 February 2022. Retrieved 18 February 2022.
• Shaffer, Brenda (2005). Babak, Vladimir; Vaisman, Demian; Wasserman, Aryeh (eds.). Political Organization in Central Asia and Azerbaijan: Sources and Documents. Cummings Center Series (2nd ed.). London: Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-7146-4838-5.
• Spectorsky, Susan A. (2010). Women in Classical Islamic Law: A Survey of the Sources (PDF). Themes in Islamic Studies. Vol. 5. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill Publishers. ISBN 978-90-04-17435-1. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 March 2022.
• Tabachnik, Maxim (2019a). Citizenship, Territoriality, and Post-Soviet Nationhood: The Politics of Birthright Citizenship in Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Moldova. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-3-030-12881-4.
• Tabachnik, Maxim (January 2019b). "Report on Citizenship Law: Azerbaijan" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 December 2021. Retrieved 7 February 2022.
• Verda, Matteo (2014). Azerbaijan: An Introduction to the Country. Novi Ligure, Italy: Edizioni Epoké. ISBN 978-88-98014-34-7.
• Yusifova, Nərgiz (2015). "'Azərbaycan Respublikasının vətəndaşlığı haqqında' Qanunda edilmiş dəyişiklik- lərin Konstitusiyaya uyğunluğu məsələsi" [The Problem of the Conformity of Changes to the Law on Citizenship of the Republic of Azerbaijan to the Constitution]. Baku State University Law Review (in Azerbaijani) (1). Baku, Azerbaijan: Baku State University: 17–22. ISSN 2412-5555. Retrieved 11 March 2022. – via HeinOnline (subscription required)
• Algemeen Ambtsbericht Staatsburgerschaps- en Vreemdelingenwetgeving in de republieken van de voormalige Sovjet-Unie [General Official Message on Citizenship and Citizenship Immigration Law in the Republics of the Former Soviet Union] (Report) (in Dutch). The Hague, Netherlands: Department of Asylum and Migration Affairs. August 2002. Archived from the original on 12 March 2022. Retrieved 12 March 2022.
• "Dual Citizenship Azerbaijan". dualcitizenshipreport.org. Valletta, Malta: CCLEX. 2022. Archived from the original on 17 February 2022. Retrieved 14 March 2022.
• "Prof. Eric Lohr, Ph.D." Munich Graduate School for East and Southeast European Studies. Munich, Germany: Ludwig Maximilian University. July 2014. Archived from the original on 19 February 2022. Retrieved 19 February 2022.
• "The Definitive Treaty of Peace between Russia and the Porte: Signed at Constantinople on 8th February, 1879" (PDF). American Journal of International Law (in French). 2 (4 Supplemental). Cambridge University Press for the American Society of International Law: 424–426. October 1908. doi:10.2307/2212671. ISSN 0002-9300. JSTOR 2212671. OCLC 5545378434. Retrieved 19 February 2022.
• "The Referendum on Independence of the Nagorno Karabakh Republic". Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Artsakh. Stepanakert, Artsakh: Republic of Artsakh. 2018. Archived from the original on 10 December 2021. Retrieved 11 March 2022.

India

Indian nationality law

• Ashesh, Ashna; Thiruvengadam, Arun (July 2017). "Report on Citizenship Law: India" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 July 2021. Retrieved 7 February 2022.

Indonesia

Indonesian nationality law moved

Iran

Iranian nationality law https://www.jstor.org/stable/3012867

In ancient Persia the king had absolute authority as the administrator of his subjects and armies, the giver of law, and the supreme judge of the empire. The centralized government of the empire was divided into satrapies, or provinces, for ease of management and taxation. Local satraps (governors) had no control over the military forces in their region to prevent them diluting the power of the ruler, but they managed the civilian administration over the areas for which they governed. Ethnic groups had legal autonomy to regulate their own internal conflicts. Rulers were responsible for security in the realm and management of the economy. In exchange for protection, Persian subjects paid taxes and owed loyalty to the king and his leadership. Marriage in the period was cum manu meaning the wife was legally incapacitated and under the control of her husband.

The Achaemenid Empire collapsed in around 330 BC.

In 1494, the Safavid Empire was founded and began expanding from Persia on a quest to conquer and convert territories to Shia Islam. In 1514, battles began again between the Ottoman Empire and Safavid Persia for control of the South Caucasus. In Persia, the word "tabeiat" (Persian: تابعیت), meaning allegiance, described legal belonging to the state, whereas, "meliat" (Persian: ملیت), described ethnic identity and one's sociological context. Prior to drafting nationality laws, Persian nationality regulations were specified in treaties which defined the extraterritorial jurisdiction that other nations could exercise over their nationals within Persian territory. As early as 1600, Capitulations, also known as ahidnâmes, were granted by Persia to Britain, France, and the Netherlands, which gave those nations not only trade monopolies and privileges, but rights for protecting their nationals. Similar to the Ottoman arrangements, for example, France was given the exclusive right over Catholic inhabitants in Persia. Until 1764, persons belonging to the Persian state were referred to as subjects. That year, a treaty was signed with the Ottoman Empire which restricted Persian or Ottoman nationals from fleeing to each other's territory to change their allegiance. An 1822 statute prohibited marriage between Persian and Ottoman subjects.

Persian nationality continued to be defined by treaties into the nineteenth century and from the 1870s, was typically based upon the principal of jus sanguinis, or descent from a Persian father, regardless of what territory a person was born in. In 1875, the Ottoman-Persian Convention was signed giving each state reciprocal authority over their nationals residing in the other state. In 1890, a royal decree was issued that restored Persian nationality to widows who had lost their nationality because of marriage to a foreigner. In August 1894, the first nationality law was issued for Persia. Under its terms children born in Persia acquired nationality at birth if they were born to Persians, or upon reaching majority if they were born to foreigners. Persons born outside Persia continued to acquire nationality through descent from their father. Married women were required to have the same nationality as their husband, but upon termination of the marriage through death or divorce a foreign woman could reclaim her prior nationality. Adult foreigners could naturalize after a five-year residency, provided they had no criminal record or obligation to serve in a foreign military. The wife of a foreigner could not naturalize separately from her spouse. As the law did not allow Persians to renounce their nationality, without the consent of the ruler, persons who obtained other nationality might be denied entry into the country or be required to sell their assets in Persia. The prohibition against renouncing Persian nationality was an attempt to prevent Persians from obtaining special privileges as subjects of other nations under the agreements for extraterritorial jurisdiction. Persons who had formerly lost their Persian nationality were allowed to repatriate without a residency period.

• Albarazi, Zahra (November 2017). "Regional Report on Citizenship: The Middle East and North Africa (MENA)" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 December 2019. Retrieved 7 February 2022.
• Calmard, Jean (2012). "France II. Relations with Persia to 1789". Encyclopædia Iranica. New York, New York: Center for Iranian Studies, Columbia University. pp. 127–131. Archived from the original on 18 January 2022. Retrieved 17 February 2022.
• Delavari, Eliyeh (September 2020). "Report on Citizenship Law: Iran" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 January 2022. Retrieved 7 February 2022.
• Finkel, Caroline (2006). Osman's Dream: The Story of the Ottoman Empire, 1300-1923 (2nd ed.). New York, New York: Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-465-02396-7.
• Hanley, Will (November 2016). "What Ottoman Nationality Was and Was Not". Journal of the Ottoman and Turkish Studies Association. 3 (2). Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press for the Ottoman and Turkish Studies Association: 277–298. doi:10.2979/jottturstuass.3.2.05. ISSN 2376-0699. OCLC 6883463202. Retrieved 26 June 2021.
• Kern, Karen M. (2011). Imperial Citizen: Marriage and Citizenship in the Ottoman Frontier Provinces of Iraq (1st ed.). Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press. ISBN 978-0-8156-3285-6.
• Khatchadourian, Lori (2011). "20. The Iron Age in Eastern Anatolia". In Steadman, Sharon R.; McMahon, Gregory (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Anatolia, 10,000-323 B.C.E. Oxford, Oxfordshire: Oxford University Press. pp. 464–499. ISBN 978-0-19-537614-2.
• Razzari, Daniel (2019). "Through the Backdoor: An Overview of the English East India Company's Rise and Fall in Safavid Iran, 1616–40" (PDF). Iranian Studies. 52 (3–4). New Haven, Connecticut: Routledge for the Society for Iranian Cultural and Social Studies: 485–511. doi:10.1080/00210862.2019.1646118. ISSN 0021-0862. OCLC 8261906463. Retrieved 17 February 2022. – via Cambridge Core (subscription required)
• Stebbins, H. Lyman (November 2021). "Extraterritoriality, Nationality, and Empire in the Persianate World, 1890-1940". Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient. 64 (5–6). Leiden, Netherlands: Brill Publishers: 752–791. doi:10.1163/15685209-12341552. ISSN 0022-4995. OCLC 9359406809. Retrieved 17 February 2022.
• Ward, Steven R. (2009). Immortal: A Military History of Iran and Its Armed Forces. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. ISBN 978-1-62616-032-3.

Iraq

Iraqi nationality law https://www.jstor.org/stable/3012867 http://heinonline-org.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/HOL/Page?public=true&handle=hein.journals/ajil25&div=50&start_page=658&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=26&men_tab=srchresults http://heinonline-org.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/byrint7&id=101&collection=journals http://heinonline-org.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/HOL/Page?public=true&handle=hein.journals/ajil25&div=50&start_page=658&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=26&men_tab=srchresults

• Albarazi, Zahra (November 2017). "Regional Report on Citizenship: The Middle East and North Africa (MENA)" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 December 2019. Retrieved 7 February 2022.
• Yassen, Abdullah Omar (May 2021). "Report on Citizenship Law: Iraq" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 July 2021. Retrieved 7 February 2022.

Israel

Israeli nationality law https://www.jstor.org/stable/3012867

• Albarazi, Zahra (November 2017). "Regional Report on Citizenship: The Middle East and North Africa (MENA)" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 December 2019. Retrieved 7 February 2022.
• Harpaz, Yossi; Herzog, Ben (June 2018). "Report on Citizenship Law: Israel" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 August 2021. Retrieved 7 February 2022.

Japan

Japanese nationality law https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057%2F9780230288256_8 https://www.jstor.org/stable/752247?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents

• Kondo, Atsushi (October 2016). "Report on Citizenship Law: Japan" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 December 2021. Retrieved 7 February 2022.

Jordan

Jordanian nationality law https://www.jstor.org/stable/3012867

• Albarazi, Zahra (November 2017). "Regional Report on Citizenship: The Middle East and North Africa (MENA)" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 December 2019. Retrieved 7 February 2022.

Kazakhstan

Kazakhstani nationality law https://www.unhcr.org/4dfb592e9.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20130913224146/http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/bestanden/documenten-en-publicaties/ambtsberichten/2012/09/19/centraal-azie-2012-09-19-thematisch-ambtsbericht/thematisch-ambtsbericht-centraal-azie-september-2012.pdf

• Algemeen Ambtsbericht Staatsburgerschaps- en Vreemdelingenwetgeving in de republieken van de voormalige Sovjet-Unie [General Official Message on Citizenship and Citizenship Immigration Law in the Republics of the Former Soviet Union] (Report) (in Dutch). The Hague, Netherlands: Department of Asylum and Migration Affairs. August 2002. Archived from the original on 12 March 2022. Retrieved 12 March 2022.

Kuwait

Kuwaiti nationality law https://www.jstor.org/stable/3012867

• Albarazi, Zahra (November 2017). "Regional Report on Citizenship: The Middle East and North Africa (MENA)" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 December 2019. Retrieved 7 February 2022.

Kyrgyzstan

Kyrgyz nationality law https://www.unhcr.org/4dfb592e9.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20130913224146/http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/bestanden/documenten-en-publicaties/ambtsberichten/2012/09/19/centraal-azie-2012-09-19-thematisch-ambtsbericht/thematisch-ambtsbericht-centraal-azie-september-2012.pdf

• Algemeen Ambtsbericht Staatsburgerschaps- en Vreemdelingenwetgeving in de republieken van de voormalige Sovjet-Unie [General Official Message on Citizenship and Citizenship Immigration Law in the Republics of the Former Soviet Union] (Report) (in Dutch). The Hague, Netherlands: Department of Asylum and Migration Affairs. August 2002. Archived from the original on 12 March 2022. Retrieved 12 March 2022.

Laos

Laotian nationality law

• Vonk, Olivier (December 2017). "Comparative Report: Citizenship in Asia" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 November 2020. Retrieved 7 February 2022.

Lebanon

Lebanese nationality law https://elpais.com/elpais/2013/10/21/mujeres/1382328000_138232.html https://web.archive.org/web/20210301181944/https://journals.openedition.org/remmm/9031 https://www.jstor.org/stable/3012867

• Albarazi, Zahra (November 2017). "Regional Report on Citizenship: The Middle East and North Africa (MENA)" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 December 2019. Retrieved 7 February 2022.

Malaysia

Malaysian nationality law

• Low, Choo Chin (February 2017). "Report on Citizenship Law: Malaysia and Singapore" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 October 2017. Retrieved 7 February 2022.

Maldives

Maldivian nationality law

Mongolia

Mongolian nationality law

• Vonk, Olivier (December 2017). "Comparative Report: Citizenship in Asia" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 November 2020. Retrieved 7 February 2022.

Myanmar

Myanmar nationality law,[1]

• Arraiza, José María; Vonk, Olivier (October 2017). "Report on Citizenship Law: Myanmar" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 January 2022. Retrieved 7 February 2022.

Nepal

Nepali nationality law https://web.archive.org/web/20210422105858/https://fwld.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Legal-Analysis-of-Citizenship-Law-of-Nepal-Citizenship-Report-English.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20130919134502/http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/bestanden/documenten-en-publicaties/ambtsberichten/2012/03/06/nepal-2012-03-05/algemeen-ambtsbericht-nepal-maart-2012.pdf

• Shrestha, Sabin (March 2017). "Report on Citizenship Law: Nepal" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 March 2018. Retrieved 7 February 2022.

North Korea

North Korean nationality law

• Lee, Chulwoo (March 2019). "Report on Citizenship Law: The Republic of Korea" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu (revised ed.). Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 7 February 2022. Retrieved 7 February 2022.

Oman

Omani nationality law https://www.jstor.org/stable/3012867 https://www.hrw.org/node/377179/printable/print https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/58dcfe444.pdf

During the reign (1807–1856) of Sultan Sayyid Said, Omani subjects (Arabic: ra'īya) were recognized as all Africans, Arabs, and Kutchi people residing in Oman or Zanzibar. Upon the death of the sultan in 1856, a succession crisis occurred. The result was that the Sultanate of Zanzibar separated from Oman in 1861. Upon the separation, Sultan Thuwaini bin Said decreed that Lawati and Khoja people, regardless of whether they lived in Zanzibar or Oman, were his subjects because of their previous settlement in Oman. In 1865, Sayyid Majid bin Said, the first Sultan of Zanzibar, decreed that married women followed the nationality of their spouse, losing their Omani-Zanzibari status if the husband was foreign.

• Albarazi, Zahra (November 2017). "Regional Report on Citizenship: The Middle East and North Africa (MENA)" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 December 2019. Retrieved 7 February 2022.
• Limbert, Mandana E. (2015). "10. Marriage and Management of Place in Southern Arabia". In Tagliacozzo, Eric; Siu, Helen F.; Perdue, Peter C. (eds.). Asia Inside Out: Connected Places. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. pp. 302–320. ISBN 978-0-674-96768-7.
• Okawa, Mayuko (2015). "The Empire of Oman in the Formation of Oman's National History: An Analysis of School Social Studies Textbooks and Teachers' Guidelines". Annals of Japan Association for Middle East Studies. 31 (1). Tokyo, Japan: Japan Association for Middle East Studies: 95–120. ISSN 0913-7858. OCLC 5867266880. Archived from the original on 20 September 2021. Retrieved 20 September 2021.

Pakistan

Pakistani nationality law

• Nazir, Faryal (December 2016). "Report on Citizenship Law: Pakistan" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 January 2022. Retrieved 7 February 2022.

Philippines

Philippine nationality law

• Aguilar, Filomeno V. (January 2017). "Report on Citizenship Law: Philippines" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 October 2021. Retrieved 7 February 2022.

Palestine

History of Palestinian nationality

• Khalil, Asem (2007). "Palestinian Nationality and Citizenship: Current Challenges and Future Perspectives" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 January 2022. Retrieved 7 February 2022.

Qatar

Qatari nationality law https://www.jstor.org/stable/3012867 https://web.archive.org/web/20211227165810/https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/05/12/qatar-families-arbitrarily-stripped-citizenship https://web.archive.org/web/20220120202757/https://files.institutesi.org/UPR33_Qatar.pdf

• Albarazi, Zahra (November 2017). "Regional Report on Citizenship: The Middle East and North Africa (MENA)" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 December 2019. Retrieved 7 February 2022.

Saudi Arabia

Saudi Arabian nationality law https://www.jstor.org/stable/3012867 https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/3fb9eb6d2.pdf

• Albarazi, Zahra (November 2017). "Regional Report on Citizenship: The Middle East and North Africa (MENA)" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 December 2019. Retrieved 7 February 2022.

Singapore

Singaporean nationality law

• Low, Choo Chin (February 2017). "Report on Citizenship Law: Malaysia and Singapore" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 October 2017. Retrieved 7 February 2022.

South Korea

South Korean nationality law http://klri.re.kr:9090/bitstream/2017.oak/6448/1/The%20South%20Korean%20Citizenship%20of%20North%20Korean%20Escapees%20in%20Law%20and%20Practice.pdf

• Lee, Chulwoo (March 2019). "Report on Citizenship Law: The Republic of Korea" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu (revised ed.). Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 7 February 2022. Retrieved 7 February 2022.

Sri Lanka

Sri Lankan nationality law

• Ganeshathasan, Luwie; Welikala, Asanga (May 2017). "Report on Citizenship Law: Sri Lanka" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 October 2017. Retrieved 7 February 2022.

Syria

Syrian nationality law https://www.jstor.org/stable/3012867 https://www.jstor.org/stable/41858152 http://heinonline-org.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/HOL/Page?public=true&handle=hein.journals/ajil25&div=50&start_page=658&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=26&men_tab=srchresults http://heinonline-org.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/byrint7&id=101&collection=journals http://heinonline-org.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/HOL/Page?public=true&handle=hein.journals/ajil25&div=50&start_page=658&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=26&men_tab=srchresults https://web.archive.org/web/20130915225928/http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/bestanden/documenten-en-publicaties/ambtsberichten/2012/05/22/syrie-2012-05-15/syrie-2012-05-15.pdf

• Albarazi, Zahra (November 2017). "Regional Report on Citizenship: The Middle East and North Africa (MENA)" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 December 2019. Retrieved 7 February 2022.
• Kienle, Eberhard (1995). "Imagined Communities Legislated: Nationalism and the Law of Nationality in Syria and Egypt". Yearbook of Islamic and Middle Eastern Law, 1994. Vol. 1. London: Kuwler Law International for the Centre of Islamic and Middle Eastern Law at the School of Oriental and African Studies. pp. 47–67. ISBN 978-90-411-0883-8. OCLC 822567664 – via HeinOnline.

Taiwan

Taiwanese nationality law

• Low, Choo Chin (October 2016). "Report on Citizenship Law: China and Taiwan" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 January 2022. Retrieved 7 February 2022.

Tajikistan

Tajikistani nationality law https://www.unhcr.org/4dfb592e9.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20220203041520/https://reliefweb.int/report/tajikistan/unhcr-welcomes-tajikistan-s-new-law-tackling-statelessness https://web.archive.org/web/20130913224146/http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/bestanden/documenten-en-publicaties/ambtsberichten/2012/09/19/centraal-azie-2012-09-19-thematisch-ambtsbericht/thematisch-ambtsbericht-centraal-azie-september-2012.pdf

• Algemeen Ambtsbericht Staatsburgerschaps- en Vreemdelingenwetgeving in de republieken van de voormalige Sovjet-Unie [General Official Message on Citizenship and Citizenship Immigration Law in the Republics of the Former Soviet Union] (Report) (in Dutch). The Hague, Netherlands: Department of Asylum and Migration Affairs. August 2002. Archived from the original on 12 March 2022. Retrieved 12 March 2022.

Thailand

Thai nationality law

• Vonk, Olivier (December 2017). "Comparative Report: Citizenship in Asia" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 November 2020. Retrieved 7 February 2022.

Turkey

Turkish nationality law http://heinonline-org.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/HOL/Page?public=true&handle=hein.journals/ajil25&div=50&start_page=658&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=26&men_tab=srchresults http://heinonline-org.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/byrint7&id=101&collection=journals http://heinonline-org.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/HOL/Page?public=true&handle=hein.journals/ajil25&div=50&start_page=658&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=26&men_tab=srchresults https://web.archive.org/web/20130922151722/http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/bestanden/documenten-en-publicaties/ambtsberichten/2012/02/03/turkije---2012-02-03/turkije-2012-02-03.pdf

• Bentwich, Norman (1926). "Nationality in Mandated Territories Detached from Turkey". The British Year Book of International Law. 7. London: British Institute of International Affairs: 97–109. OCLC 992985624. Retrieved 20 February 2022.
• Kadirbeyoğlu, Zeynep (May 2010). "Country Report: Turkey" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu (revised ed.). Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 3 April 2018. Retrieved 7 February 2022.
• Westermann, William Linn (1921). "VIII. The Armenian Problem and the Disruption of Turkey". In House, Edward Mandell; Seymour, Charles (eds.). What Really Happened at Paris: The Story of the Peace Conference, 1918-1919. New York, New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. pp. 176–203. OCLC 464754153.

Turkmenistan

Turkmenistani nationality law https://www.unhcr.org/4dfb592e9.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20130913224146/http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/bestanden/documenten-en-publicaties/ambtsberichten/2012/09/19/centraal-azie-2012-09-19-thematisch-ambtsbericht/thematisch-ambtsbericht-centraal-azie-september-2012.pdf

• Algemeen Ambtsbericht Staatsburgerschaps- en Vreemdelingenwetgeving in de republieken van de voormalige Sovjet-Unie [General Official Message on Citizenship and Citizenship Immigration Law in the Republics of the Former Soviet Union] (Report) (in Dutch). The Hague, Netherlands: Department of Asylum and Migration Affairs. August 2002. Archived from the original on 12 March 2022. Retrieved 12 March 2022.

United Arab Emirates

Emirati nationality law https://www.jstor.org/stable/3012867 https://web.archive.org/web/20220119130838/https://www.mei.edu/publications/breaking-citizenship-taboo-uae

• Albarazi, Zahra (November 2017). "Regional Report on Citizenship: The Middle East and North Africa (MENA)" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 December 2019. Retrieved 7 February 2022.

Uzbekistan

Uzbekistani nationality law https://web.archive.org/web/20220119055515/https://www.unhcr.org/news/press/2020/3/5e70b9474/uzbekistan-end-statelessness-50000-people.html https://web.archive.org/web/20201127020228/https://cabar.asia/en/uzbekistan-simplified-procedure-for-obtaining-citizenship-what-changed-and-how-does-it-work https://web.archive.org/web/20130913224146/http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/bestanden/documenten-en-publicaties/ambtsberichten/2012/09/19/centraal-azie-2012-09-19-thematisch-ambtsbericht/thematisch-ambtsbericht-centraal-azie-september-2012.pdf

• Algemeen Ambtsbericht Staatsburgerschaps- en Vreemdelingenwetgeving in de republieken van de voormalige Sovjet-Unie [General Official Message on Citizenship and Citizenship Immigration Law in the Republics of the Former Soviet Union] (Report) (in Dutch). The Hague, Netherlands: Department of Asylum and Migration Affairs. August 2002. Archived from the original on 12 March 2022. Retrieved 12 March 2022.

Vietnam

Vietnamese nationality law

• Nguyen, Lyma (September 2017). "Report on Citizenship Law: Vietnam" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 December 2021. Retrieved 7 February 2022.

Yemen

Yemeni nationality law https://www.jstor.org/stable/3012867 https://web.archive.org/web/20220122080533/https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/Treaties/CEDAW/Shared%20Documents/YEM/INT_CEDAW_NGO_YEM_19356_E.pdf https://irb-cisr.gc.ca/en/country-information/rir/Pages/index.aspx?doc=453288

• Albarazi, Zahra (November 2017). "Regional Report on Citizenship: The Middle East and North Africa (MENA)" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 December 2019. Retrieved 7 February 2022.

Europe

In the decade that followed the end of World War I, individual nationality for married women was granted by the USSR (1918); Belgium and Estonia (1922); Sweden, Norway, and Romania (1924); Denmark (1925); Iceland (1926); Finland and France (1927); Turkey and Yugoslavia (1928); Albania (1929), and Spain (1931). https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2190490.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3A8e350929650c8781b3ef62c9c904ceab https://books.google.com.mx/books?id=5M1EAQAAMAAJ&lpg=PA52&ots=wWDLIisZ27&dq=Reyes%20Gnecco%20de%20Dugand%201888&pg=PA47#v=onepage&q=Reyes%20Gnecco%20de%20Dugand%201888&f=false https://www.jstor.org/stable/752247?seq=6#metadata_info_tab_contents https://www.academia.edu/11342825/European_Citizenship_in_the_Context_of_Gender_Equality_Legislation_in_Eastern_European_Countries_The_Case_of_Croatia?email_work_card=view-paper http://scholar.ceu.edu/sites/default/files/publications/ececompreport.pdf

Austria

An Austrian Jewish woman, Yella Hertzig, chose a marriage of convenience in 1938 during World War II to enable her to maintain her independence and travel. Upon marriage, she was granted Czech nationality. When the war ended, her Czech husband had died and she chose not to renew her passport. Although she was granted an Austrian visa by the Allied Control Council and applied for her Austrian nationality to be restored in 1945, she died as a stateless person three years later.

• Oesch, Corinna (2018). "Yella Hertzka (1873–1948). Scheinehe, Flucht und Exil einer Frauenrechtlerin im Nationalsozialismus / Yella Hertzka (1873-1948). Sham Marriage, Escape and Exile of a Women's Rights Activist under National Socialism". In Bergler, Sabine; Messinger, Irene; Somers, Nick (eds.). Verfolgt, Verlobt, Verheiratet: Scheinehen ins Exil / Persecuted. Engaged. Married: Marriages of Convenience in Exile (1. Auflage ed.). Vienna, Austria: Jüdisches Museum der Stadt Wien. pp. 118–125. ISBN 978-3-901398-85-8.

Belgium

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Machteld_Venken/publication/292103920_Gemengd_huwen_nationaliteit_en_de_verschillen_voor_mannen_en_vrouwen/links/57ad7da008ae3765c3bb3ad5/Gemengd-huwen-nationaliteit-en-de-verschillen-voor-mannen-en-vrouwen.pdf http://www.just-his.be/eprints/5716/ https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2187513.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3A9e558440d50c09c22b867c8ac0fae719 https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/19603/RSCAS_EUDO_CIT_2013_27.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y

• Foblets, Marie-Claire; Loones, Sander (2006). "2. Belgium". In Bauböck, Rainer; Ersbøll, Eva; Groenendijk, Kees; Waldrauch, Harald (eds.). Acquisition and Loss of Nationality: Policies and Trends in 15 European States. Vol. 2: Country Analyses. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. pp. 63–104. ISBN 978-90-5356-921-4.

Britain

https://www.jstor.org/stable/742756?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents https://www.jstor.org/stable/3070746?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents https://books.google.com.mx/books?id=NGq1Nh6h3X8C&lpg=PA105&ots=GbD7riubh9&dq=women's%20citizenship%20in%20canada&pg=PA11#v=onepage&q=nationality&f=false https://web.archive.org/web/20201112031938/https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/650994/Background-information-on-nationality-v1.0EXT.pdf

In Britain, allegiance, in which subjects pledged to support a monarch, was the precursor to the modern concept of nationality. The crown recognized from 1350 that all persons born within the territories of the British Empire were subjects. Those born outside the realm — except children of those serving in an official post abroad, children of the monarch, and children born on a British ship — were considered by common law to be foreigners. Marriage did not affect the status of a subject of the realm, but under common law, single women, including divorcées, were not allowed to be parents thus their children could not derive nationality maternally and were stateless unless legitimated by their father. Nationality Acts passed in 1708, 1730, and 1772 expanded those who were considered subjects to include the children of native-born fathers and grandfathers and allowed foreigners to naturalise by a private act of Parliament.

Britain did not establish a uniform slave code in its colonies. Instead, various colonies adopted slave statutes, for example Barbados in 1661, Jamaica 1664, and Antigua 1702, which addressed crime, policing, punishments, and rights, including marriage and legitimacy. Despite the lack of a common code, as was true in most slave societies, in the British West Indies, children followed the status of the mother, meaning if she was free her children were free and if she was in bondage, her children were bound. In 1807, the British Parliament passed the Slave Trade Act, barring the Atlantic slave trade in the empire. The Act did not abolish slavery, which did not end until the 1833 Emancipation Act went into effect in 1834. Under its terms, slaves were converted into apprentices and remained bound to their former owners for four years if they had worked in the home and for six years if they had been field labourers. Though free, there was never a British plan to give former slaves a voice in Parliament, leaving them as British subjects in a highly stratified system of rights. Denied political and economic rights, former slaves were not entitled to formal recognition as nationals by other nations.

In 1844, a Naturalisation Act was passed creating an administrative process, whereby the Secretary of State could naturalise applicants by collecting a fee and administering an Oath of Allegiance. The 1844 Act made no provisions for minor children, but it required a married woman to derive her status from their British husband. Thus, if a foreign woman's husband was native-born or naturalised, she automatically was British. British-born women maintained their status as British subjects, even if married to foreign men, under the 1844 statute. Because of confusion, an amendment was passed in 1847, confirming that the 1844 Act did not extend to British colonies.

In 1870 a revision to the Naturalisation Act required the automatic loss of nationality for British women upon marriage with a foreigner, regardless of whether she became stateless from the denaturalisation. She could re-aquire British nationality only by application for naturalisation, after the death of her spouse. The 1870 Act stipulated that minor children be automatically denaturalised if their father, or a widowed mother, lost their British nationality or naturalised in another country. As single women, including divorcées, under common law were not allowed to be parents, under the Act, their children could not derive nationality maternally. Naturalised British fathers, or widows, could not pass on their nationality to children born abroad, even if the parent was in service abroad to the crown. As with previous nationality acts, the legislation did not extend beyond the bounds of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. An amendment was made in the Naturalisation Act of 1895 to revise the section dealing with these children's automatic derivative naturalisation.

In 1911, at the Imperial Conference a decision was made to draft a common nationality code for use across the empire. Other than common law, there was no standard statutory law which applied for subjects throughout the realm, meaning different jurisdictions created their own legislation for local conditions, which often conflicted with the laws in other jurisdictions in the empire. Thus, a person who was naturalised in Canada, for example, would be considered a foreigner, rather than a British national, in Australia or South Africa. The British Nationality and Status of Aliens Act 1914 allowed local jurisdictions in the self-governing Dominions to continue regulating nationality in their territories, but also established an imperial nationality scheme throughout the realm. The uniform law, which went into effect on 1 January 1915, required a married woman to derive her nationality from her spouse, meaning if he was British, she was also, and if he was foreign, so was she. It stipulated that upon loss of nationality of a husband, a wife could declare that she wished to remain British and provided that if a marriage had terminated, through death or divorce, a British-born national who had lost her status through marriage could reacquire British nationality through naturalisation without meeting a residency requirement. The statute reiterated common law provisions for natural-born persons born within the realm on or after the effective date. By using the word person, the statute nullified legitimacy requirements for jus soli nationals. For those born abroad on or after the effective date, legitimacy was still required, and could only be derived by a child from a British father (one generation), who was natural-born or naturalised. Naturalisations required five years residence or service to the crown.

Amendments were enacted in 1918 to prevent British-born women from becoming enemy aliens and to relax provisions for children born abroad, allowing fathers abroad in service to the Crown to pass their nationality to their legitimate children. In 1922, the statute was replaced with a new British Nationality and Status of Aliens Act. The new act clarified that persons born before 1 January 1915 became nationals based on the provisions of the 1730 and 1772 Acts and that the 1922 Act was retrospective to that date. The statute allowed indefinite transmission of descent by a father to his legitimate children born on or after 4 August 1922, as long as a child was registered within the first year of its birth and upon reaching majority expressed a desire to remain British. For children born between 1 January 1915 and 4 August 1922, registration with a consulate before 1 August 1923 would allow derived British nationality to stem from their father or grandfather. Upon reaching the age of majority, the child was required to declare a desire to retain British nationality and revoke any other allegiance, if that were possible.

After the World Conference on the Codification of International Law held in The Hague in 1930, the British Parliament again drafted a new British Nationality and Status of Aliens Act in 1933, to conform with the provisions to prevent statelessness in the Convention on Certain Questions Relating to the Conflict of Nationality Laws. The primary effect of the new Act was to add language that a woman would not lose her nationality upon marriage if she became stateless. If by marriage, or if by her husband's naturalisation in another country, a British-born woman did not acquire her spouse's nationality she could remain British. The law was retroactive (not just to 1 January 1915), meaning any woman who had previously become stateless through marriage, was restored as a British national. The law also allowed a foreign wife of a naturalised British husband to choose whether she wished to take his new status within one year of the naturalisation. The 1943 revision allowed a child born abroad at any time to be a British national by descent if the Secretary of State agreed to register the birth.

In 1935, the Irish Free State adopted the Irish Nationality and Citizenship Act, establishing Irish nationality as a distinct status from British nationality. The law provided that marriage had no effect upon an Irish woman's nationality. In 1935 New Zealand adopted provisions from the Hague Convention of 1930 and modified their laws to allow New Zealand women to retain the rights of British nationals in New Zealand, even if they had become foreigners by marriage. Australia passed similar legislation to New Zealand the following year. In 1946, Canada passed the Canadian Citizenship Act redefining the order of nationality. The Canadian Act stipulated that Canadians were nationals of Canada first and only secondarily nationals of Britain. This served as a catalyst to restructure the nationality laws again and the British Commonwealth Conference on Nationality and Citizenship was held in 1947. In attendance were delegates from Australia, Burma, Canada, Ceylon, India, the Irish Free State, Newfoundland, New Zealand, Pakistan, Southern Rhodesia, the Union of South Africa and the UK. The goal of the conference was to establish guidelines for each Commonwealth nation to adopt laws conferring nationality upon the population in its territory from which British nationality would be derived. In other words, British nationality was dependent upon obtaining nationality in an independent Commonwealth country but would continue to serve as a common uniting principle for membership in the realm.

Under the terms of the British Nationality Act 1948 British nationals were reclassified into five categories: Citizens of the UK and Colonies (CUKC); nationals of independent Commonwealth countries; Irish-British citizens, who opted to remain British after Ireland's withdrawal from the Commonwealth; nationals of Commonwealth countries who had yet to define status for their populations; and British Protected Persons, who were people residing on foreign soil in mandated and trust territories, protected states, and protectorates, but were not treated as foreigners. Anyone not categorized by these divisions, was considered an alien, or foreigner. Other than the reclassifications, the basic nationality scheme did not change overmuch, and typically those who were previously defined as British remained the same. Changes included that wives and children no longer automatically acquired the status of the husband or father, children who acquired nationality by descent no longer were required to make a retention declaration, and registrations for children born abroad were extended. A new type of nationality acquisition, registration, was provided for in the Act, because of the change in wives' status. Believing that it was excessive to require foreign wives to naturalize, the registration system was devised to create a more streamlined process for those with an affiliation to the country. Those who could be registered included, wives of CUKCs, minor children of CUKCs, citizens of Commonwealth countries and the Republic of Ireland, and stateless persons or persons who had been deprived of British nationality. Transitional processes were also included for pending registrations of birth and naturalisation.

Adoption had not been addressed in previous nationality laws in Britain, but to enable ratification of the Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness, the Adoption Act of 1949, as amended in 1950, 1958, and 1968, and the British Nationality Act Amendment of 1964 provided measures for adoptees to gain nationality. The 1964 amendment also provided that foundlings going forward would be considered to have been born in the territory in which they were found.

The 1981 Act also eliminated gender disparities on who could derive nationality from a parent or spouse.

• Baldwin, M. Page (October 2001). "Subject to Empire: Married Women and the British Nationality and Status of Aliens Act". Journal of British Studies. 40 (4). Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press: 522–556. ISSN 0021-9371. OCLC 4637986477. Retrieved 25 March 2021.
• Bush, Jonathan A. (December 1993). "Free to Enslave: The Foundations of Colonial American Slave Law". Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities. 5 (2). New Haven, Connecticut: Yale Law School: 417–470. ISSN 1041-6374. OCLC 8091556650. Archived from the original on 21 April 2017. Retrieved 23 March 2021.
• Cooper, Frederick (2018). Citizenship, Inequality, and Difference: Historical Perspectives. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-17184-5.
• Cousins, Winifred M. (January 1935). "Slave Family Life in the British Colonies: 1800–1834". The Sociological Review. 27 (1). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications: 35–55. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1935.tb01925.x. ISSN 0038-0261. OCLC 4798438910. – via SAGE Publishing (subscription required)
• Fransman, Laurie (2011). Fransman's British Nationality Law (3rd ed.). Haywards Heath, West Sussex: Bloomsbury Professional. ISBN 978-1-84592-095-1.
• Kelley, Sean M. (2020). "Precedents: The 'Captured Negroes' of Tortola, 1807-22". In Anderson, Richard; Lovejoy, Henry B. (eds.). Liberated Africans and the Abolition of the Slave Trade, 1807-1896. Rochester, New York: University of Rochester Press. pp. 25–44. ISBN 978-1-58046-969-2.
• Latimer, James (Winter 1964). "The Apprenticeship System in the British West Indies". Journal of Negro Education. 33 (1). Washington, D.C.: Howard University: 52–57. ISSN 0022-2984. OCLC 5545420065. Retrieved 25 March 2021.
• Llewellyn-Jones, Frederick (1929). "The Nationality of Married Women". Transactions of the Grotius Society. 15. London: Grotius Society: 121–138. ISSN 1479-1234. OCLC 5544683551. Retrieved 25 March 2021.
• May, Samuel Joseph (1845). Emancipation in the British W. Indies: An Address Delivered in the First Presbyterian Church in Syracuse, on the First of August 1845. Syracuse, New York: J. Barber, Liberty Intelligencer Office. OCLC 841410417.
• Morgan, Kenneth (1999). "The Tudway of Wells Antiguan Estate Papers 1689-1907: In Somerset Record Office" (PDF). East Ardsley, West Yorkshire: Microform Academic Publishers. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 March 2021. Retrieved 24 March 2021.
• Samore, William (July 1951). "Statelessness as Result of Conflict of Nationality Laws". American Journal of International Law. 45 (3). Washington, D.C.: American Society of International Law: 476–494. ISSN 0002-9300. OCLC 7376579759. Retrieved 25 March 2021. – via Cambridge Core (subscription required)
• Sickmon, May C. (26 April 1930). "Nationality of Women and the Hague Conference". The Erie County Republican. Hamburg, New York. p. 3. Retrieved 19 December 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
• "Historical Background Information on Nationality: Version 1.0" (PDF). Home Office. London: Government of the UK. 21 July 2017. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 March 2021. Retrieved 25 March 2021.

France

https://books.google.com.mx/books?id=1TXT8cVC_YsC&lpg=PA267&pg=PA267#v=onepage&q&f=false https://books.google.com.mx/books?id=GFpuDwAAQBAJ&lpg=PP1&dq=The%20Family%20and%20the%20Nation%3A%20Gender%2C%20Nationality%20and%20Citizenship%20in%20Revolutionary%20France&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q=The%20Family%20and%20the%20Nation:%20Gender,%20Nationality%20and%20Citizenship%20in%20Revolutionary%20France&f=false Already cited (Camiscioli|1999|p=x) https://www.jstor.org/stable/42843081

Germany

http://aei.pitt.edu/63702/1/PSGE_00_5.pdf https://books.google.com.mx/books?id=Ma_mFARina4C&lpg=PP1&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=false

Greece

https://www.athensjournals.gr/history/2017-3-2-2-Che.pdf

Ireland

https://muse.jhu.edu/article/666480/pdf https://www.jstor.org/stable/30007221?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/heritage/century/century-women-and-the-vote/denial-of-citizenship-1.553543 https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/citizenship-alienage-and-the-modern-constitutional-state/2C913E1B6147BDD08DDF151FC0ABA4BB (also South Africa, New Zealand and Australia)

Italy

https://www.taddone.it/a-perda-da-nacionalidade-de-mulheres-casadas-antes-de-1-1-1948/ Italian subjecthood was first declared during the Unification of Italy in 1861. As the states united, their former kingdoms and duchies ceased to exist and no alternative means of belonging had been devised. Thus, in March, 1861 the former Savoy-Piedmont-Sardinia Kingdom officially proclaimed that the former Piedmontese subjecthood was extended to the entirety of Italy. Inhabitants were afforded protection based upon their allegiance to the monarchy. Subjecthood was derived from an Italian father, and could only be derived maternally if the father was unknown. Birth in the territory was treated differently in different areas; in some states it conferred subjecthood, and in others it did not. Naturalization and denaturalization processes also varied depending upon the province. In 1865 laws from the various states was codified into national legislation, including a new civil code, which went into force on 1 January 1866.

Under the 1865 Civil Code, unity of the family was a driving foundation of the code, thus the emphasis was on descent. Nationality was derived paternally, regardless of where a child was born, unless the father was unknown. Foundlings born in the territory were presumed to have an Italian father and were granted nationality. Children born in Italy to foreigners who had lived in the territory for ten years, could acquire nationality at majority and those born in the territory to foreigners who did not meet the requisite residency could opt for Italian nationality at majority after service to the nation. Wives were required to follow the nationality of their husband. Italian women married to foreigners lost their Italian nationality and could only reacquire it if the marriage terminated and they established residence in Italy. Foreign women who married Italian men gained Italian nationality and retained it even after termination of the marriage. Nationality provisions were amended by Law 23 of 1901, which allowed children born in the territory or abroad who became foreigners because of a father's loss of nationality to acquire nationality without parliamentary intervention. Law no. 217 (known as Sonnino's Law), passed on 17 May 1906, allowed naturalization by royal decree if the Council of State supported the application and the applicant either resided in Italy or the colonies for six years, or had provided four years of service to the Italian state, or had been married to an Italian woman for three years.

Colonial subjecthood differed from that in the motherland. A civil code (Italian: L'ordinamento giuridico della colonia Eritrea) was drafted in 1911, for Eritrea but never officially entered in to force because it was required to be published in Amharic, Arabic, and Italian. Nonetheless, it was used as the guide and provided that persons born in or members of a tribe indigenous to the territory were Italian subjects but did not have the same civil rights as those born in Italy. If a colonial subject naturalized to attain civil rights, their status was intransmissible to other family members. Children born within a legal marriage between colonial subjects and metropolitan subjects automatically became Italian, though the majority of such unions were informal. Those children born outside of marriage, who were legitimated, or legally recognized and registered in official colonial birth records, were also automatically granted Italian nationality with full citizenship. Native women who married metropolitan Italians automatically acquired metropolitan status, but if a metropolitan woman married a native, she was able to retain her status, as it was deemed unlikely that she would be a dependent of a native man.

In 1912, Italy introduced new nationality provisions (Law No. 555) to address Italians living outside of the motherland. It did not challenge the tenet of unity of nationality in the family for metropolitan nationals, and bestowed Italian nationality by descent from an Italian father. But, if the child was born abroad in a country that automatically granted its nationality through jus soli, Italian nationality could be renounced at majority. Adding this provision allowed Italy to perpetually recognize the nationality of emigrants and foster a sense of belonging to Italy, even if expatriates chose to no longer act as citizens. For foreigners, it reduced the general residency requirement to five years, or three years if in service to the state. In 1914, to discourage marriages between colonial and metropolitan subjects, a decree was issued in Eritrea requiring civil servant to resign their posts upon marriage to a colonial. Three years later, Regent Governor in Eritrea Camillo De Camillis issued an instruction to attribute automatic metropolitan nationality to any bi-racial (Italian: meticci) child regardless of an acknowledgement of paternity.

Between 1922 and 1943, Mussolini's fascist regime expanded its territory in Africa, as well as states in the Mediterranean. Besides Eritrea, Italian territories included Ethiopia, Libya, and Somalia. A 1933 statute formalized the practice of allowing illegitimate mixed-race children to choose metropolitan status upon reaching their majority. In 1936, the territories of Ethiopia, Eritrea, and Somalia were combined into a single colony, Italian East Africa (Italian: Africa Orientale Italiana). In June, Italy began a redefinition of subjecthood for Italian East Africa. The new statute retained the provision that a colonial subject was one not descended of a metropolitan Italian or national of any other state. It also continued the policy of attributing metropolitan nationality to legitimate or legitimated children of an Italian father. But, it eliminated provisions for mixed-race children to opt for metropolitan status at majority. Further, a law passed in 1937 prohibited concubinage and another promulgated the following year banned formal marriages between metropolitan and native subjects. Legislation passed in 1940 barred conferring metropolitan status on mixed-race, illegitimate, legitimate, legitimated children, or children of unknown parentage, unless they had reached age thirteen that year, had been raised as an Italian, and could confirm their good character.

Women in Italy did not gain individual nationality until 1975.

• Donati, Sabina (2013). A Political History of National Citizenship and Identity in Italy, 1861-1950. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0-8047-8451-1.

Moldova

https://portal.vindburgerzaken.nl/StippWebDLL/Resources/Handlers/DownloadBestand.ashx?id=2000014282

Netherlands

https://resolver.kb.nl/resolve?urn=MMKB05:000037401:pdf https://books.google.com.mx/books?id=PPseXaPHxmwC&lpg=PA75&ots=JUxOmemkI2&dq=De%20nationaliteit%20van%20de%20gehuwde%20vrouw%20in%20Belgi%C3%AB%20en%20in%20Nederland&pg=PA75#v=onepage&q=De%20nationaliteit%20van%20de%20gehuwde%20vrouw%20in%20Belgi%C3%AB%20en%20in%20Nederland&f=false http://www.just-his.be/eprints/5716/ https://globalcit.eu/revision-of-the-netherlands-nationality-act/ https://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/public/jun03e.pdf

Russia

https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/60230/RSCAS_EUDO_CIT_2012_1.pdf

Scandanavia: Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden

https://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1197581/FULLTEXT03.pdf

Spain

https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/324049366.pdf http://www.ub.edu/ciudadania/hipertexto/evolucion/introduccion/civiles/civ1.htm https://revistaselectronicas.ujaen.es/index.php/rej/article/download/3210/2596/10815

Ukraine

https://www.globalcit.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Ukraine.pdf https://portal.vindburgerzaken.nl/StippWebDLL/Resources/Handlers/DownloadBestand.ashx?id=2000014282

North America

Already cited (Vonk|2014|p=?): https://books.google.com.mx/books?id=Jo3PBAAAQBAJ&lpg=PA118&dq=nationality%2C%20bolivia&pg=PA119#v=onepage&q=nationality,%20bolivia&f=false

Antigua and Barbuda

moved

Aruba

moved

Bahamas

moved

Barbados

moved

Belize

moved

Bonaire

moved

British Overseas Territories

https://web.archive.org/web/20190528081501/https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/33839/EUDO-CIT_2014_01_UK.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20181127091813/https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-44322874 British Overseas Territories include the Falkland Islands and South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands in South America; etc....

Canada

Moved

Clipperton Island

Overseas state and private property of France

Costa Rica

moved

Cuba

moved

Curaçao

moved

Dominica

moved

Dominican Republic

moved

El Salvador

moved

Greenland

Autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark

Grenada

moved

Guadeloupe

moved

Guatemala

moved

Haiti

moved

Honduras

moved

Jamaica

moved

Martinique

moved

Mexico

moved

Nicaragua

moved

Panama

moved

Puerto Rico

moved

Saba

moved

Saint Barthélemy

moved

Saint Kitts and Nevis

moved

Saint Lucia

moved

Saint Martin

moved

Saint Pierre and Miquelon

moved

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

moved

Sint Eustatius

moved

Sint Maarten

moved

Trinidad and Tobago

moved

United States

moved

United States Virgin Islands

moved

Oceania

https://books.google.com.mx/books?id=-GIzkDtohqQC&printsec=frontcover&vq=Canada,+Law+of+Naturalization+and+Allegiance,+1868,+wives#v=onepage&q=Canada%2C%20Naturalization%2C%201871%2C%20wives&f=false (Colonization Circular 1871, p. 48) https://teara.govt.nz/en/biographies/4s36/soljak-miriam-bridelia http://www.nzjh.auckland.ac.nz/docs/2018/NZJH_52_2_02.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20210121122533/https://www.solomontimes.com/news/women-holds-consultation-for-draft-federal-constitution/2519

New Zealand introduced a measure to adopt the common code in 1914, but passage was postponed by the outbreak of World War I. War measures such as the Revocation of Naturalization Act and Registration of Aliens Act of 1917 left denaturalisation procedures regarding women vague. Provisions in the Revocation of Naturalization Act stated that revocation of an enemy alien's status did not impact his wife and minor children and the Registration Act merely required an alien to list the names and ages of his wife and children. However, an amendment to the Registration of Aliens Act in 1920 clarified that married women in New Zealand who lost their nationality because of marriage were required to register as aliens. Despite the lack of clear provisions in the law, women like Miriam Soljak were deprived of their nationality during the war. In 1923, New Zealand adopted the British nationality scheme, except for the provisions that naturalised people from throughout the empire were automatically British subjects in New Zealand, which they did not incorporate until 1928. Thus, effective from 1923, the law clearly specified that New Zealand women who married aliens lost their nationality upon marriage.

• Baldwin, M. Page (October 2001). "Subject to Empire: Married Women and the British Nationality and Status of Aliens Act". Journal of British Studies. 40 (4). Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press: 522–556. ISSN 0021-9371. OCLC 4637986477. Retrieved 25 March 2021.
• Green, David (8 February 2005). "Citizenship - Towards New Zealand Citizenship". TeAra.govt.nz. Wellington, New Zealand: Encyclopaedia of New Zealand. Archived from the original on 25 January 2021. Retrieved 1 June 2021.
• Hall, T. D. H. (August 1931). "Status of Aliens in New Zealand". Pacific Affairs. 4 (8). Vancouver, British Columbia: University of British Columbia: 700–710. doi:10.2307/2750412. ISSN 0030-851X. OCLC 5545501061. Retrieved 1 June 2021.
• Legislative Council and House of Representatives (1920). Parliamentary Debates: First Session, Twentieth Parliament: 6 August to 24 September 1920. Vol. 187. Wellington, New Zealand: Marcus F. Marks, Government Printer. ISSN 0110-3415.
• McLintock, A. H.; Wilson, James Oakley (1966). "Nationality". TeAra.govt.nz. Wellington, New Zealand: Encyclopaedia of New Zealand. Archived from the original on 24 February 2018. Retrieved 1 June 2021.
• Page, Dorothy (1998). "Soljak, Miriam Bridelia". TeAra.govt.nz. Wellington, New Zealand: Dictionary of New Zealand Biography. Archived from the original on 4 March 2021. Retrieved 1 June 2021.
• "Registration of Aliens Act" (PDF). New Zealand Legal Information Institute. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Parliament. 1917. 8 GEO V 1917 No 12c. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 June 2021.

American Samoa

moved

Australia

moved

East Timor

moved

Fiji

moved

Guam

moved

Kiribati

moved

Marshall Islands

moved

Micronesia

moved

Nauru

moved

New Zealand

moved

Northern Mariana Islands

moved

Palau

moved

Papua New Guinea

moved

Samoa

moved

Solomon Islands

moved

Tonga

moved

Tuvalu

moved

Vanuatu

moved

South America

• Cross, Jane E. (2009). "South and Central America: Other Colonial Laws". In Katz, Stanley N. (ed.). The Oxford International Encyclopedia of Legal History. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-513405-6.

Argentina

moved

Bolivia

moved

Bouvetøya

Dependency of Norway

Brazil

moved

Chile

moved

Colombia

moved

Ecuador

moved

French Guiana

moved

Guyana

moved

Paraguay

Paraguayan nationality law: Paraguay gained independence from Spain in 1811 and called a Constitutional Convention to draft the Government Regulations, the first governing documents of the independent nation. Approved by the Congress in 1813, the Regulations defined nationals as people born in the territory. It also recognized people born in other places in the Americas who resided in the nation and were ideologically aligned with Paraguayans. Women were excluded, as they were subordinated to the head of the family, who was authorized to act on behalf of the family unit. In 1842, the Law of Free Womb was passed, which was effective the beginning of the following year. It declared that all children born to slaves were not slaves, but obligated as libertos to work in service for their masters for 25 years for males or 24 years for females to earn their freedom. The law outlawed the slave trade in the territory and forbade the entrance of fugitive slaves to Paraguay. The 1844 Constitution, or the Paraguayan Political Administration Law, carried no definitions of nationals or foreigners. After its defeat in the War of the Triple Alliance, the majority of the population had been killed and the economy was destroyed.

To attract immigrants and rebuild the country, a new constitution was drafted in 1870. The 1870 constitution provided that birthright nationals were those born in Paraguay, children of birthright nationals living in Paraguay, and children born abroad to a Paraguayan serving the government. Foreigners could be naturalized after two years of residency provided they owned real estate or invested in industry, or engaged in a profession or art. Marriage by a foreigner with a Paraguayan or performance of service for the nation were grounds for the two year residency period to be shortened. in Article 25, slavery was abolished. In 1876, Paraguay adopted the Argentine Civil Code, with modification for local custom; however, like the Argentine Code, Paraguay's statue incapacitated married women, placing them under the authority of their husbands. The Marriage Code, drafted in 1897 reinforced women's inability to act in civil capacities, though it established civil marriage.

In 1903, Paraguay passed a restrictive immigration law which barred people of Asian and African descent, as well as nomadic people. In 1928, jurists concluded that a married woman did not lose her nationality upon marriage, as the constitution of 1870 mentioned neither alien wives married to citizens or Paraguayan wives married to foreigners, nor were there provisions for loss of nationality by marriage in the Civil Code. In 1933, Justo Pastor Benítez and María Felicidad González, the Paraguayan delegates to the Pan-American Union's Montevideo conference, signed the Inter-American Convention on the Nationality of Women, which became effective in 1934, without legal reservations. After the Chaco War, a new constitution was adopted in 1940. It recognized that nationality was derived from birth in the territory, birth abroad to a national, and by naturalization of a foreigner who had resided in the country for a minimum of five years. Loss of nationality could result from treasonous acts, illegal bankruptcy or becoming a national of another nation. In 1959, Paraguay signed a dual nationality agreement with Spain. A new constitution was adopted in 1967, maintaining a similar nationality scheme. For the first time, it introduced in Article 30 that neither marriage nor its termination resulted in a corresponding change of nationality.

Peru

moved

Suriname

moved

Uruguay

https://www.colibri.udelar.edu.uy/jspui/bitstream/20.500.12008/9518/1/TTS_Casa%C3%B1asMariaLaura.pdf http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2301-06652019000100422 https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:XYyJxgXBBuYJ:https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/download/843/846/3277+&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=mx&client=firefox-b-d

• League of Nations Committee of Experts for the Progressive Codification of International Law (April 1929). "The Law of Nationality". American Journal of International Law. 23 (2). Washington, D.C.: American Society of International Law: 1–129. doi:10.2307/2212861. ISSN 0002-9300. OCLC 5545385674. Retrieved 14 August 2021.

Uruguayan nationality law: The legal means to acquire nationality, formal membership in a nation, differ from the relationship of rights and obligations between a national and the nation, known as citizenship.

• Boll, Alfred Michael (2007). Multiple Nationality And International Law. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. ISBN 978-90-04-14838-3.
• Guerry, Linda; Rundell, Ethan (2016). "Married Women's Nationality in the International Context (1918–1935)". Clio. 43 (1: Gender and the Citizen). Paris: Éditions Belin: 73–94. ISSN 2554-3822. OCLC 7788119453. Retrieved December 19, 2020.
• Honohan, Iseult; Rougier, Nathalie (October 2018). "Global Birthright Citizenship Laws: How Inclusive?". Netherlands International Law Review. 65 (3). The Hague, Netherlands: Springer Science+Business Media, T.M.C. Asser Press: 337–357. doi:10.1007/s40802-018-0115-8. ISSN 1741-6191. OCLC 1189243655. Retrieved 16 March 2021.

Uruguay attempted to gain its independence from Spain in 1820, but was unsuccessful in becoming independent and was incorporated into the Cisplatine Province of the United Kingdom of Portugal, Brazil and the Algarves. Brazil declared its independence from Portugal in 1822, establishing the Empire of Brazil under Pedro I. The first constitution, adopted in 1824, provided that Brazilian were free-born or emancipated men, who had been born in Brazil, unless their father was a foreigner in the service of another nation. Legitimate children born outside of the territory to a Brazilian father, or illegitimate children born to a Brazilian mother, could establish nationality by becoming domiciled in Brazil; however residence was waved if their father was in government service. Foreigners who resided in Brazil at the time of independence were naturalized by residence in the empire. Citizenship could be lost if one was naturalized in another country or accepted employment or honors from foreign governments without the approval of the crown. In 1825, the country again declared its independence and aligned with the United Provinces of the Río de la Plata, precipitating a three year war between Brazil and Argentina, which culminated in Uruguayan independence in 1828. The nation's first constitution was drafted in 1830 and provided that citizens were natural — free-born men, born within the territory — or legal — foreigners; parents of natural citizens; children born abroad to natural fathers or mothers who now resided within the country; and those who worked in art, science or industry or owned assets or property in the nation at the time of the establishment of the constitution. Man, as used in the constitution, excluded women.

In 1852 Uruguay attempted to write a civil code based upon the Napoleonic model, but it was never completed. The first Civil Code of Uruguay was completed in 1867 and went into effect the following year. It provided for the legal incapacity of married women and granted a husband marital authority over a wife's person and property. In 1890, Uruguay passed its first immigration law (Ley 2096), which carried restrictions prohibiting the immigration of Africans, Asians, Bohemians, and Hungarians. The law was amended in 1906 when the legislature, pressed by Syrian and Lebanese immigrants, removed migrants from Asia Minor as a prohibited group. From 1921, Uruguayan authorities were authorized to issue passports to married women were foreign but married to Uruguayans and had lost their nationality by virtue of marriage, with the stipulation that the issuance of the document did not confer nationality upon her. By 1928, it was the "official opinion" whose? legal? immigration? Seems like a court case possibly resulted in this decision? of the government of Uruguay that neither their constitution or laws addressed whether women lost their nationality by marriage. Based upon that decision, the position of the government was that marriage had no effect upon nationality in Uruguay. In 1933, the Uruguayan delegates to the Pan-American Union's Montevideo conference, signed the Inter-American Convention on the Nationality of Women, which became effective in 1934, without legal reservations.

Venezuela

http://heinonline-org.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/HOL/LuceneSearch?terms=A+Collection+of+Nationality+Laws+of+Various+Countries%3A+As+Contained+in+Constitutions%2C+Statutes+and+Treaties&collection=all&searchtype=advanced&typea=text&tabfrom=&submit=Go&sendit=&all=true http://acienpol.msinfo.info/bases/biblo/texto/boletin/1936/BolACPS_1936_1_3_4_119-134.pdf

Venezuelan nationality law: Venezuela gained independence from Spain in 1821, having declared its independence in 1811, and union with Gran Colombia in 1819. The the Colombian Constitution of 1821 was the founding document of Gran Colombia, which encompassed parts of what is now Ecuador, Colombia, Panama, and Venezuela. It defined as nationals free persons and their descendants, who were born in the territory; residents of the territory who supported its independence; and naturalized foreigners, who had been born elsewhere. In 1829 a commission was appointed to draft a civil and criminal code, but they were unsuccessful in completing it before Venezuela separated in 1830 from Gran Colombia and new codifying commissions were established. A new constitution for the state was drafted in that year granting nationality by birth in the territory or naturalization. Birthright nationals were free men born in the former Gran Colombia whose parents were Venezuelan or children born abroad to Venezuelan parents serving in an official capacity outside the territory. Automatic naturalization was given to foreigners residing in the country at the time of independence, who supported its independence. Other foreigners, or children born abroad to Venezuelan parents who were not serving the nation, could be naturalized by establishing a residence in the territory and officially declaring their intent.

Venezuela adopted twenty-six constitutions between 1811 and 1999, but there was little change in the nationality scheme. The Constitution of 1857, recognized nationals born abroad to Venezuelan parents without requiring residence in the territory and anyone born within Gran Colombian boundaries. Constitutional requirements were amended in 1863, requiring children born abroad to reside in Venezuela as a condition of birthright nationalism. It also extended the right to derivative birthright nationality to anyone born in the territories of the Spanish Caribbean and recognized dual nationality. In 1862 and again in 1867 draft Civil Codes were prepared which defined nationals and foreigners and included language that married women derived the nationality of their husbands, taken from the French and Italian civil codes. From the acceptance of the Civil Code of 1873 until 1942, loss of nationality upon marriage was the official policy of the nation.

From 1891, Venezuela excluded from immigration of people who were of Asian or African origin, specifically barring those from the Caribbean islands. The laws were amended in 1912 and again in 1918, to continue the prohibition and exclude generally those who were non-European. The Constitution of 1893 extended the right to children of naturalized citizens to acquire Venezuelan nationality by declaration of will, if they were residing in Venezuela. Changes in the Constitution of 1901 included confirmation that those from the Caribbean were unable to acquire birthright nationality, but extended the right to obtain birthright status for anyone born in Hispanic America who declared a willingness to become Venezuelan at the Civil Registry following formal procedures. Until 1904, birthright nationality was solely based upon birth in the territory and then from 1904 to 1947, it could be derived from birth in Venezuela or by descent from Venezuelan parents. This meant that any child born in Venezuela, whether its parents were foreign or natural, was given birthright nationality. A child born abroad to Venezuelan parents, as long as it was legitimate or legally recognized by the parent, was also deemed to have Venezuelan nationality. Naturalization or relinquishment of nationality of a foreign man during this period automatically changed the nationality of his minor children. As Venezuelan women could not independently obtain nationality, they could not similarly impact the nationality of their offspring, unless they were widowed.

From 1922, married women born in Venezuela, automatically regained their nationality upon termination of the marriage. Foreign women who had gained Venezuelan nationality by marrying automatically lost their nationality when the marriage ended unless they declared in the official manner a wish to retain Venezuelan nationality. The Constitution of 1947, granted birthright citizenship to foreigners' children, if the parent was working in service to the government and extended nationality to those born on airplanes or ships within Venezuelan airspace or waters. It also allowed children born abroad to Venezuelans to be registered with consulate officials to qualify for birthright nationality. When the military regime ended in 1958, a new constitution was drafted in 1961. It granted birthright nationality to anyone born within Venezuelan territory, regardless of whether the parents were nationals or even in the country legally. To those born abroad, both parents were required to be Venezuelan nationals for birthright nationality. It revoked the ability to have dual nationality; changed the status for people born in Latin America, allowing them to naturalize upon request; and allowed women married to Venezuelan men, children of naturalized persons who been minors but had reached majority, and adoptees to naturalize by request. The latter two categories, were required to make their request prior to their twenty-fifth birthday and reside in Venezuela. Race disappeared as an exclusion in the nationality laws for immigration in Venezuela in 1966.

Overview of women's nationality

Women's nationality
(Dates correspond the first time a policy was implemented in a territory, which may precede that nation's independence.)

Country	Foreign women derived spouse's nationality	Native women derived spouse's nationality	Married women obtained individual nationality	Illegitimate children could derive nationality from mother	Legitimate children could derive nationality from mother	Children derive nationality equally from parents	Spouse could obtain nationality of wife by naturalization	Spouses derive nationality equally	Details
Algeria	1848 (see comments (1))	1848 (see comments (1))	1928	1928 (see comments (2))	1945	2005	2005	2005	1) The French Civil Code was extended to all of its possessions in 1848. Algerian Jews, until 1870, and Muslims, until 1946, were considered non-citizen nationals and were not required to adhere to the Civil Code. 2) Changes to the French Civil Code allowed French-citizen mothers to pass their nationality to their children born in France from 1928. French-national mothers could pass on their nationality to children born abroad from 1945. Most French non-citizen nationals, became Algerian nationals at independence in 1963. Nationality after independence was derived from fathers until a change in the Nationality Code in 1970 allowed mothers to pass on their nationality to illegitimate children, or those who would be stateless because she was married to a foreigner.
American Samoa Unincorporated territory of the United States	1907 (see details (1))	1907 (see details (1))	1922 (see details (2))	not applicable	not applicable	1900 (see details (3))	not applicable (see details (4))		1) The Expatriation Act of 1907, which required women to have the same nationality as their husband applied to all women. 2) The Cable Act of 1922 repealed the 1907 Act and stated that women who were citizens of the United States lost their nationality, if their spouse was ineligible for naturalization. Since American Samoan women were non-citizen nationals, after 1922, they no longer lost their nationality upon marriage. 3) From the time American Samoa was acquired by the United States, nationals were defined as those born to parents who were indigenous to American Samoa. 4) There are currently no processes for foreigners to naturalize in American Samoa.
Angola	1867	1867	1975	1603	1975	1975	1975	1975
Anguilla British Overseas Territory (see comments (1))	1857	1914	1948	1914	1981		1981	1981	1) From 1660, when a sole governor was assigned to St. Kitts and Anguilla, the territory was administratively linked to St. Kitts and later St. Kitts & Nevis, despite attempts to gain independence from them. It separated from them formally in 1980.
Antigua & Barbuda	1914	1914	1948	1914	1986		1981
Aruba Constituent state of the Kingdom of the Netherlands	1809	1809	1964 (see details (1))	1892	1985		1985		(1) The 1892 Law on Dutch Citizenship and Residence was modified in 1936, to provide that if a Dutch woman became stateless through marriage, because her husband's country did not automatically bestow nationality upon her, she could retain her Dutch nationality, though otherwise, she continued to lose her nationality until the revision of the Nationality Act in 1964.
Australia	1848	1875	1936	1914			1984	1984
The Bahamas	1914	1914	1973 (see comments (1))	1914	(see comments (2))	(see comments (2))	(see comments (3))	1) Though the British Nationality Act of 1948 eliminated the provision for married women to automatically derive nationality from a husband, The Bahamian Independence Act and Constitution of 1973, required women to follow the status of their husband at the transition from British nationality to Barbadian nationality. After independence, women who married Barbadian men could choose whether to become Barbadian by registration. 2) Under 1973 Bahamian statutes illegitimate children derive their nationality from the mother and an unwed man cannot pass nationality to his children. 3) Foreign men who are married to Bahamian women cannot derive nationality from their spouse and do not receive preferential nationalisation by registration.
Barbados	1914	1914	1966 (see comments (1))	1914		(see comments (2)	(see comments (3))	1) Though the British Nationality Act of 1948 eliminated the provision for married women to automatically derive nationality from a husband, the Barbados Independence Act and Constitution required women to follow the status of their husband at the transition from British nationality to Barbadian nationality. After independence, women who married Barbadian men could choose whether to become Barbadian by registration. 2) Under 1966 Barbadian statutes illegitimate children derive their nationality from the mother if she was born in Barbados, and an unwed man cannot pass nationality to his children. 3) Foreign men who are married to Barbadian women cannot derive nationality from their spouse and do not receive preferential nationalisation by registration.
Belize	1855 (see comments (1))	1914	1948	1914	1981		1981		1) The 1855 Naturalization Act of British Honduras (18 Vict, C. 18) copied the act of New South Wales, which provided that wives of British subjects followed the nationality of the husband.
Benin	1894 (see details (1))	1894 (see details (1))	1928	1928 (see details (2))	1945	2014	1965	2014	1) The French Civil Code was extended to all of its possessions in 1848. Dahomey came under French rule in 1894 and statutory legislation in the colonies provided that French subjects domiciled in a colony were divided into those born in France and subject to French law and those who were considered non-citizen nationals and were subject to customary local law. 2) Changes to the French Civil Code allowed French-citizen mothers to pass their nationality to their children from 1928. Until the passage of the 1958 French Constitution, nationality laws remained separated for natives born in Dahomey and the other French colonies. Under the first Nationality law of Dahomey promulgated in 1965, only illlegitimate or stateless children could derive their nationality from their mothers. In 2014, the Constitutional Court of Benin nullified the gender inequality in the 1965 Nationality Code, which allowed children to repudiate nationality if it was derived from a mother.
Bermuda British Overseas Territory	1914	1914	1948	1914	1981		1981
Bonaire Caribbean Netherlands administrative division of the Kingdom of the Netherlands	1809	1809	1964 (see details (1))	1892	1985		1985		(1) The 1892 Law on Dutch Citizenship and Residence was modified in 1936, to provide that if a Dutch woman became stateless through marriage, because her husband's country did not automatically bestow nationality upon her, she could retain her Dutch nationality, though otherwise, she continued to lose her nationality until the revision of the Nationality Act in 1964.
Botswana	1914 (see comments (1))	1914 (see comments (1))	1948 (see comments (2))	1914	1995	1995	1995	1995	1) Persons living in the Bechuanaland Protectorate who were British subjects, followed British law. Those who were native born were considered British Protected Persons and not entitled to British nationality. 2) Women who were British nationals living in Bechuanaland gained individual nationality in 1948. Native-born Botswanan women did not gain individual nationality until after independence and a 1982 Citizenship Act revision.
British Virgin Islands British Overseas Territory	1914	1914	1948	1914	1981		1981
Burkina Faso	1896 (see details (1))	1896 (see details (1))	1928	1928 (see details (2))	1945	1961	1961	1989	1) The French Civil Code was extended to all of its possessions in 1848. The territory which would became Upper Volta and later Burkina Faso, came under French rule in 1896. Statutory legislation in the colonies provided that French subjects domiciled in a colony were divided into those born in France and subject to French law and those who were considered non-citizen nationals and were subject to customary local law. 2) Changes to the French Civil Code allowed French-citizen mothers to pass their nationality to their children from 1928. Until the passage of the 1958 French Constitution, nationality laws remained separated for natives born in Dahomey and the other French colonies. Under the first Nationality Code of Upper Volta promulgated in 1961, children could derive their nationality from either parent.
Burundi	1894 (see details (1))	1894 (see details (1))	1932 (see details (2))	1932 (see details (3))			1971		1) Germany established the colony of German East Africa in 1894. The nationality law at that time, applied only to natives of Germany residing in Burundi, not natives of Burundi. 2) In 1932, Belgian law allowed women to decline automatically deriving the nationality of a spouse. The law was only applicable in Burundi to natives of Belgium. 3) Illegitimate children born to a Belgian womman could derive nationality from their mother only if their filiation with a father was unknown or determined after that of the mother. This provision was slightly modified when Burundi adopted its first nationality law in 1971, allowing acquisition from a mother for illegitimate children if the father was stateless.
Cameroon	1884 (see comments (1))	1884 (see comments (1))	1928 (see comments (2))	1914			1959		1) Natives of German colonies were not nationals, but German nationality laws applied to naturalized citizens and native Germans living in its colonies. Under German nationality law, all family members had the same nationality as the husband or father. 2) Married women who were French nationals living in French Cameroun gained individual nationality in 1928. Those who were British nationals living in British Cameroon acquired their own nationality in 1948. However, at independence in 1960, foreign wives married to Cameroonian nationals automatically became Cameroonian, unless they specifically declined. 3) From 1914 in British Cameroon and 1945 in French Cameroun, mothers could transmit nationality to illegitimate children. Under the nationality code of 1959, illegitimate children could inherit the mother's nationality if she was the first parent to establish a filiation or in the event that her husband was stateless.
Cape Verde	1867	1867	1976	1603 (see details (1))	1976	1976	1976	1976
Cayman Islands British Overseas Territory (see comments (1))	1914	1914	1948	1914	1981		1981		1) From 1863 to 1962, the Cayman Islands were legally part of the colony of Jamaica;
Central African Republic	1894 (see details (1))	1894 (see details (1))	1928	1928	1961	1961	1966		1) The French Civil Code was extended to all of its possessions in 1848. The territory of Ubangi-Shari, which would later become the Central African Republic, came under French rule in 1894. Statutory legislation in the colonies provided that French subjects domiciled in a colony were divided into those born in France and subject to French law and those who were considered non-citizen nationals and were subject to customary local law. 2) Changes to the French Civil Code allowed French-citizen mothers to pass their nationality to their children from 1928. Until the passage of the 1958 French Constitution, nationality laws remained separated for natives born in France and those born in French colonies. Under the first Nationality Code of the Central African Republic promulgated in 1961, children could derive their nationality from either parent.
Chad	1893 (see details (1))	1893 (see details (1))	1928	1928	1962	1962	1962	1962	1) The French Civil Code was extended to all of its possessions in 1848. Part of the territory which would later become Chad came under French rule in 1893. Statutory legislation in the colonies provided that French subjects domiciled in a colony were divided into those born in France and subject to French law and those who were considered non-citizen nationals and were subject to customary local law. 2) Changes to the French Civil Code allowed French-citizen mothers to pass their nationality to their children from 1928. Until the passage of the 1958 French Constitution, nationality laws remained separated for natives born in France and those born in French colonies. Under the first Nationality Code of Chad promulgated in 1962, children could derive their nationality equally from either parent.
Comoros	1848 (see details (1))	1848 (see details (1))	1928	1928 (see details (2))	1945	1979	1979	1979	1) The French Civil Code was extended to all of its possessions in 1848. Part of the territory which would later become the Comoros came under French rule in 1841. Statutory legislation in the colonies provided that French subjects domiciled in a colony were divided into those born in France and subject to French law and those who were considered non-citizen nationals and were subject to customary local law. 2) Changes to the French Civil Code allowed French-citizen mothers to pass their nationality to their children born in France from 1928. French-national mothers could pass on their nationality to children born abroad from 1945. Until the passage of the 1958 French Constitution, nationality laws remained separated for natives born in France and those born in French colonies. Under the first Nationality Code of the Comoros promulgated in 1979, children could derive their nationality equally from either parent.
Cook Islands Self-governing island territory, in free association with New Zealand	1888 (see comments (1))	1888 (see comments (1))	1946	1923	1977		1977		1) The Cook Islands came within the nationality laws of Britain from 1888 when they became a British Protectorate. They were transferred to the administration of New Zealand in 1901. From 1815 British subjects and British Protected Persons had the same status until 1914, when protected persons were defined as neither being nationals nor aliens. New Zealand adopted the 1914 British common code in 1923, but their version of the law defined Cook Islanders as nationals.
Curaçao Constituent state of the Kingdom of the Netherlands	1809	1809	1964 (see details (1))	1892	1985		1985		(1) The 1892 Law on Dutch Citizenship and Residence was modified in 1936, to provide that if a Dutch woman became stateless through marriage, because her husband's country did not automatically bestow nationality upon her, she could retain her Dutch nationality, though otherwise, she continued to lose her nationality until the revision of the Nationality Act in 1964.
Democratic Republic of the Congo	1892	1909	1981	1932	1981	1981	2004	2004
Djibouti	1836	1884 (see comments 1)	1928	1928 (see comments (2))	1945	2004	1981	2004	1) The French Civil Code was extended to all of its possessions in 1848. France created a protectorate in the territory in 1884 2) Changes to the French Civil Code allowed French-citizen mothers to pass their nationality to their children born in France from 1928. French-national mothers could pass on their nationality to children born abroad from 1945. After independence and the passage of the first Nationality Code in 1981, Djiboutian mothers could only pass nationality to their illegitimate children.
Dominica	1914	1914	1948	1914	1978		1978
East Timor	1867	1867	1981	1822			1981		The Portuguese Constitution of 1822 provided that only illegitimate children could derive nationality from their mothers. The 1981 revision to the Portuguese Nationality Law removed gender inequalities of previous legislation.
Egypt	1836	1909	1950	1929	2004 (see comments (1)	2014			The 2004 amendment to the Nationality law retroactively equalized provisions for children to derive nationality from either parent for a one-year period. However, until further change was made in 2014, after the 2004 grace period, only children born after the amendment could automatically derive nationality maternally without authorization from the Minister of the Interior.
Equatorial Guinea	1889 (see comments (1)	1889 (see comments (1)	1968 (see comments (2)	1889 (see comments (1)	1968	1982	2011	2011	1) Spain's position on its African colonies was that they were subjects not nationals. Spanish nationals living in Spanish territories were subject to the requirements of the Civil Code when it was passed in 1889. 2) At independence in 1968, Equatorial Guinea allowed women to retain their own nationality if their husband's country did not bestow its nationality upon her. But under the 1990 code, women who married Equatoguinean men automatically acquired his nationality. Spousal requirements were equalized in 2011.
Eritrea	1869	1889 (see comments (1)	1992	1861	1930 (see comments (2)	1992	1906	1992	1) Eritrea officially became an Italian colony in 1889. Under the terms of the 1865 Civil Code, all members of a family were required to have the same nationality and women automatically derived their husband's nationality upon marriage. 2) Under Ethiopian law, children could derive their mother's nationality if her spouse was stateless.
Eswatini	1881 (see comments (1)	1881 (see comments (1)	1967	1992 (see comments (2)	1992 (see comments (2)	(see comments (2)			1) Swaziland officially became a British protectorate in 1881. For British subjects living in Swaziland, British nationality law applied as of that date. Protected persons were not considered to be British, nor were they aliens, but in 1967 when the first nationality laws were passed for Swaziland, women did not automatically attain nationality from their husband. 2) The 1992 Citizenship Act allowed illegitimate children whose fathers were unknown or stateless to derive nationality maternally, and allowed children born to a married Swazi mother and foreign father to naturalize. However, the 2005 Constitution overrode these provisions and since 2005, children can only derive nationality from their fathers.
Ethiopia	1930	1930	2003	1930	1930 (see comments (1)	2003	2003	2003	1) Under the 1930 Nationality Code, children born to Ethiopian women married to foreigners, could only derive nationality maternally, if they could prove they would have no other nationality.
Fiji	1914	1914	1948	1914	1997		1997
French Guiana Overseas departments and regions of France	1805	1805	1928 (see comments (1))	1928 (see comments (2))	1945		1973		1) The Nationality Law of 1889 only allowed women to retain their nationality upon marriage if they would become stateless and was not applicable in French Guiana until 1897. Married women did not achieve individual nationality until 1927, but the law was not extended to all French possessions until 1928. 2) Until 1928, French children in French Guiana could not derive nationality from their mothers.
French Polynesia Overseas Collectivity of France (see comments (1))	1843 (see comments (1))	1843 (see comments (1))	1928 (see comments (2))	1928 (see comments (3))	1945		1973		1) France first established a presence in French Polynesia when it annexed Tahiti in 1843. From 1805 the civil code of France required married women to follow the nationality of their husband, but it was not necessarily extended to all persons in French colonies, as native nationals followed customary law. The Nationality Law of 1889 only allowed women to retain their nationality upon marriage if they would become stateless and was extended to the colonies in 1897. 2) Married women did not achieve individual nationality until 1927, but the law was not extended to all French possessions until 1928. 3) Until 1928, French children in the colonies could not derive nationality from their mothers.
Grenada	1914	1914	1948	1914	1974		1974
Guadeloupe Overseas departments and regions of France	1805	1805	1927 (see comments (1))	1805 (see comments (2))	1945		1973		1) The Nationality Law of 1889 only allowed women to retain their nationality upon marriage if they would become stateless. Married women did not achieve individual nationality until 1927. 2) Under the Code Noir, children in the French possessions followed the status of the mother. Between 1805 and 1848, people of color in French colonies continued to follow the Code Noir, but white women in the realm were unable to pass on their nationality to their children under the Napoleonic Code. From 1848 to 1927, children could not derive nationality from their mothers.
Guam Unincorporated territory of the United States	1889	1889	1922 (see details (1))	1889	1934		1934		1) The Cable Act of 1922 repealed the 1907 Expatriation Act and stated that women who were citizens of the United States lost their nationality, if their spouse was ineligible for naturalization. Since Guamanian women were non-citizen nationals, after 1922, they no longer lost their nationality upon marriage. 3) The Spanish Civil Code of 1889 only allowed illegitimate children to derive nationality from their mothers. From 1930 all children born in Guam regardless of legitimacy were considered Guamanian.
Guyana	1809	1809	1970 (see comments (1))	1914	1970		1970	1) At independence in 1966, married women followed the status of their spouse, but a constitutional change in 1970 and supplemental changes in 1980 gave women and men equal nationality rights.
Indonesia	1809	1809	1974	1958	2006		2006
Jamaica	1851	1914	1993	1914	1993	1993	1993	1993
Kiribati	1914	1914	(see comments (1))	1914	(see comments (2))		(see comments (3))		1) Married women in 2020 continue to derive their nationality from their husband. 2) Though now independent, under I-Kiribati statutes, only illegitimate children can derive their nationality from the mother. 3) Foreign men who are married to I-Kiribati women cannot derive nationality from their spouse and do not receive preferential nationalisation by registration.
Marshall Islands	1885 (see comments (1))	1952 (see comments (2))	1984	not applicable	not applicable	1952	(see comments (3))	not applicable	1) Spain extended subject status to inhabitants in the Marshall Islands, but lost the colony prior to passing legislation on women's nationality by the first Spanish Civil Code in 1889. Other colonizers did not extend nationality to the Marshallese population, but they were allowed to naturalize. German and Japanese naturalization laws required women and children to derive nationality from the husband/father. 2) The 1952 Code of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands did not allow dual nationality, thus until the Citizenship Act of 1984 made an exception to loss of nationality rules, women could lose their nationality if they automatically acquired another nationality upon marriage. 3) There are no special provisions for a spouse of any gender to derive nationality from their spouse in the Marshall Islands.
Martinique Overseas departments and regions of France	1805	1805	1927 (see comments (1))	1685 (see comments (2))	1945		1973		1) The Nationality Law of 1889 only allowed women to retain their nationality upon marriage if they would become stateless. Married women did not achieve individual nationality until 1927. 2) Under the Code Noir, children in the French possessions followed the status of the mother. Between 1805 and 1848, people of color in French colonies continued to follow the Code Noir, but white women in the realm were unable to pass on their nationality to their children under the Napoleonic Code. From 1848 to 1927, children could not derive nationality from their mothers.
Mayotte Overseas Region of France (see comments (1))	1848 (see details (1))	1848 (see details (1))	1928	1928 (see details (2))	1945	1973	1973	1973	1) The French Civil Code was extended to all of its possessions in 1848. Part of the territory which would later become the the Protectorate of Mayotte and later the Protectorate of the Comoros came under French rule in 1841. Statutory legislation in the colonies provided that French subjects domiciled in a colony were divided into those born in France and subject to French law and those who were considered non-citizen nationals and were subject to customary local law. 2) Changes to the French Civil Code allowed French-citizen mothers to pass their nationality to their children born in France from 1928. French-national mothers could pass on their nationality to children born abroad from 1945. Until the passage of the 1958 French Constitution, nationality laws remained separated for natives born in France and those born in French colonies.
Micronesia (Federated States of Micronesia)	1889	1889	1979	1889	1979		not applicable (see comments (1))	1979	1) Marriage has no effect upon nationality since the adoption of the 1979 Constitution.
Montserrat British Overseas Territory	1914	1914	1948	1914	1981		1981
Nauru	1954	not applicable (see comments (1))	1968	1921			2005 (see comments (2))		1) Indigenous persons in Nauru were unable to marry without the consent of the district chief who administered their district, ensuring that they remained within the native community. 2) The Nauruan constitution still holds that only wives can derive nationality from a husband, but the Naoero Citizenship Act of 2005 introduced the gender-neutral language of spouse.
New Caledonia special collectivity of France	1852 (see comments (1))	1852 (see comments (1))	1928	1928	1945		1973		1) New Caledonia became a colony of France in 1852. From 1805 the civil code of France required married women to follow the nationality of their husband, but it was not necessarily extended to all persons in French colonies, as native nationals followed customary law. The Nationality Law of 1889 only allowed women to retain their nationality upon marriage if they would become stateless and was extended to the colonies in 1897. 2) Married women did not achieve individual nationality until 1927, but the law was not extended to all French possessions until 1928. 3) Until 1928, French children in the colonies could not derive nationality from their mothers.
New Zealand	1866	1917 (see comments (1))	1946	1923	1977	1977	1977	1977	1) During World War I, statutes on women's nationality were vague, but women were denaturalized because they had married aliens. In 1923, New Zealand amended its nationality statutes to require wives to have the same nationality as their husband.
Nicaragua	1893	1893	1939			1858 (see details)	1824		The 1858 Constitution specifically allowed nationality to be derived from either parent, as long as they had not lost their nationality.
Niue Self-governing island territory, in free association with New Zealand	1888 (see comments (1))	1888 (see comments (1))	1946	1923 (see comments (2))	1977	1977	1977	1977	1) Niue came within the nationality laws of Britain from 1888 when it, as part of the Cook Islands, became a British Protectorate. They were transferred to the administration of New Zealand in 1901. From 1815 British subjects and British Protected Persons had the same status until 1914, when protected persons were defined as neither being nationals nor aliens. New Zealand adopted the 1914 British common code in 1923, but their version of the law defined Cook Islanders as nationals.
Northern Mariana Islands Unincorporated territory of the United States	1889	1889	1952 (see details (1))	1889	1952		1986		1) Under the Code of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, adopted in 1952, there were no provisions for women to lose their nationality upon marriage.
Palau	1889	1889	1952 (see details (1))	1889	1952	1994	not applicable (see details (2))	1994	1) Under the Code of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, adopted in 1952, there were no provisions for women to lose their nationality upon marriage. 2) Spouses cannot derive nationality from each other in Palau, as the constitution requires nationals to descend from a Palauan.
Papua New Guinea	1920 (see details (1))	1920	1975	1920	1975		2016		1) It was commmon practice in Australia and its colonies from 1875 for women to lose their nationality upon marriage, but no law required it throughout the territory until Australia adopted the uniform British Nationality Act in 1920.
Pitcairn Islands British Overseas Territory	1914	1914	1948	1914	1981		1981
Republic of the Congo	1880 (see comments (1))	1880 (see comments (1))	1928	1928 (see comments (2))	1945	1961			1) The French Civil Code was extended to all of its possessions in 1848. The French established a protectorate over the territory in 1880. 2) Changes to the French Civil Code allowed French-citizen mothers to pass their nationality to their children born in France from 1928. French-national mothers could pass on their nationality to children born abroad from 1945. After independence and the passage of the first Nationality Code in 1961, Congolese mothers were allowed to pass nationality to their children.
Réunion Overseas departments and regions of France	1805	1805	1927 (see comments (1))	1685 (see comments (2))	1945		1973		1) The Nationality Law of 1889 only allowed women to retain their nationality upon marriage if they would become stateless. Married women did not achieve individual nationality until 1927. 2) Under the Code Noir, children in the French possessions followed the status of the mother. Between 1805 and 1848, people of color in French colonies continued to follow the Code Noir, but white women in the realm were unable to pass on their nationality to their children under the Napoleonic Code. From 1848 to 1927, children could not derive nationality from their mothers. French women were able to pass on their nationality to children born in French territories or abroad from 1945.
Saba Caribbean Netherlands administrative division of the Kingdom of the Netherlands	1809	1809	1964 (see details (1))	1892	1985		1985		(1) The 1892 Law on Dutch Citizenship and Residence was modified in 1936, to provide that if a Dutch woman became stateless through marriage, because her husband's country did not automatically bestow nationality upon her, she could retain her Dutch nationality, though otherwise, she continued to lose her nationality until the revision of the Nationality Act in 1964.
St Barts Overseas collectivity of France (see comments (1))	1878	1878	1927 (see comments (2))	1685 (see comments (3))	1945		1973		1) From 1648 to 1784, the island was French. The colony was part of the Swedish Empire until 1878, when it was returned to France and placed within the colony of Guadeloupe, from which it separated in 2007. 2) The Nationality Law of 1889 only allowed women to retain their nationality upon marriage if they would become stateless. Married women did not achieve individual nationality until 1927. 3) Under the Code Noir, children in the French possessions followed the status of the mother. Between 1805 and 1848, people of color in French colonies continued to follow the Code Noir, but white women in the realm were unable to pass on their nationality to their children under the Napoleonic Code. From 1848 to 1927, children could not derive nationality from their mothers. French women were able to pass on their nationality to children born in French territories or abroad from 1945.
St Kitts & Nevis	1857 (see comments (1))	1914	1948	1914	1981		1981		1) By local Act No. 127, passed in 1857, foreign women married to native-born men were deemed to be naturalized in St. Kitts and Anguilla. A similar statute was passed in Nevis in 1866.
St Lucia	1879	1914	1956	1914	1979		1979
St Martin Overseas collectivity of France (see comments (1))	1805	1805	1927 (see comments (2))	1685 (see comments (3))	1945		1973		1) From 1763 to 2007, Saint Martin was part of the colony of Guadeloupe. 2) The Nationality Law of 1889 only allowed women to retain their nationality upon marriage if they would become stateless. Married women did not achieve individual nationality until 1927. 3) Under the Code Noir, children in the French possessions followed the status of the mother. Between 1805 and 1848, people of color in French colonies continued to follow the Code Noir, but white women in the realm were unable to pass on their nationality to their children under the Napoleonic Code. From 1848 to 1927, children could not derive nationality from their mothers. French-national mothers could pass on their nationality to children born abroad from 1945.
St Pierre & Miquelon Overseas collectivity of France	1805	1805	1928 (see comments (1))	1928 (see comments (2))	1945		1973		1) The Nationality Law of 1889 only allowed women to retain their nationality upon marriage if they would become stateless and was not applicable in Saint Pierre and Miquelon until 1897. Married women did not achieve individual nationality until 1927, but the law was not extended to all French possessions until 1928. 3) Until 1928, French children in Saint Pierre and Miquelon could not derive nationality from their mothers. French-national mothers could pass on their nationality to children born abroad from 1945.
St Vincent & the Grenadines	1914	1914	1948	1914	1979		1979
Samoa	1923	1923	2004	1923	2004		2004
Sint Eustatius Caribbean Netherlands administrative division of the Kingdom of the Netherlands	1809	1809	1964 (see details (1))	1892	1985		1985		(1) The 1892 Law on Dutch Citizenship and Residence was modified in 1936, to provide that if a Dutch woman became stateless through marriage, because her husband's country did not automatically bestow nationality upon her, she could retain her Dutch nationality, though otherwise, she continued to lose her nationality until the revision of the Nationality Act in 1964.
Sint Maarten Constituent state of the Kingdom of the Netherlands	1809	1809	1964 (see details (1))	1892	1985		1985		(1) The 1892 Law on Dutch Citizenship and Residence was modified in 1936, to provide that if a Dutch woman became stateless through marriage, because her husband's country did not automatically bestow nationality upon her, she could retain her Dutch nationality, though otherwise, she continued to lose her nationality until the revision of the Nationality Act in 1964.
Solomon Islands	1914 (see details (1))	1914 (see details (1))	2018	1893	2018		2018		British subjects living in the Solomon Islands followed British nationality law; whereas indigenous natives did not. Thus women who were British nationals living in the Solomons lost their nationality from 1914 and indigenous women lost theirs after passage of the British Protected Persons Order 1934.
Suriname	1809	1809	1964 (see details (1))	1892	2014	2014	(1) The 1892 Law on Dutch Citizenship and Residence was modified in 1936, to provide that if a Dutch woman became stateless through marriage, because her husband's country did not automatically bestow nationality upon her, she could retain her Dutch nationality, though otherwise, she continued to lose her nationality until the revision of the Nationality Act in 1964.
Tokelau dependent territory of New Zealand	1877 (see comments (1))	1877 (see comments (1))	1946	1914	1977	1977	1977	1977	1) Tokelau came within the nationality laws of Britain from 1877 when the Union Islands became a British Protectorate. In 1916, islands were annexed into the Gilbert and Ellice Islands Colony. The Union Islands were transferred to the administration of New Zealand in 1925 and formally incorporated as a territory of New Zealand in 1946. From 1815 British subjects and British Protected Persons had the same status until 1914, when protected persons were defined as neither being nationals nor aliens.
Tonga	1915	1915	1959	1915	2007		2007
Trinidad & Tobago	1914	1914	1948	1914	1976		1976
Turks & Caicos British Overseas Territory (see comments (1))	1914	1914	1948	1914	1981		1981		1) From 1874 to 1959, the Turks and Caicos were legally part of the colony of Jamaica;
Tuvalu	1914	1914	1992	1914	1992		1992
United Kingdom	1844	1870	1948	1914	1981		1981
US Virgin Islands Unincorporated territory of the United States	1831 (see details (1))	1831 (see details (1))	1922 (see details (2))	1831	1917 (see details (3)		1934		1) Married women in the Danish West Indies were required to follow the status of their husbands from 1831, which was reiterated in an 1898 statute of Denmark. 2) The passage of the Cable Act in 1922 granted limited individual nationality to married women. It was dependent upon her husband's ability to naturalize and if she had lost her nationality because of marriage and lived abroad, whether she could return to the United States to be naturalized. 3) Under the Civil Rights Act of 1866, children born on US soil were nationals, regardless of the status of their parents. The United States purchased the Danish Virgin Islands in 1917. Children born abroad could not derive nationality from their mothers until 1934.
Vanuatu	1906 (see details (1))	1906 (see details (1))	1927 (see details (2))	1914 (see details (3))	1945 (see details (3))	1980	2013		1) Indigenous Ni-Vanuatuans had no nationality or statutes governing nationality until 1980. British and French nationals under the 1906 Anglo-French Condominium followed the laws of Britain or France. 2) Under French law married women no longer lost their nationality because of marrying from 1927; British women no longer lost their nationality from 1948; and Ni-Vanuatu statutes removed gender discriminatory clauses related to marriage in 2013. 3) Under British law, only illegitimate children could derive nationality from a mother between 1914 and 1948. French nationality required legitimacy and passed through the father only until 1927. French-national mothers could pass on their nationality to children born abroad from 1945. From independence, Ni-Vanuatu children could derive nationality from either parent.
Wallis and Futuna Territorial collectivity of France	1887 (see comments (1))	1887 (see comments (1))	1928 (see comments (2))	1928	1945		1973		1) Wallis and Futuna became a French protectorate in 1887. From 1805 the civil code of France required married women to follow the nationality of their husband, but it was not necessarily extended to all persons in French colonies, as native nationals followed customary law. The Nationality Law of 1889 only allowed women to retain their nationality upon marriage if they would become stateless and was extended to the colonies in 1897. 2) Married women did not achieve individual nationality until 1927, but the law was not extended to all French possessions until 1928. 3) Until 1928, French children in the colonies could not derive nationality from their mothers. French-national mothers could pass on their nationality to children born abroad from 1945.

References

Bibliography

• Acosta, Diego (2018). The National Versus the Foreigner in South America: 200 Years of Migration and Citizenship Law. Cambridge, Cambridgeshire: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-108-42556-8.
• Adair, Robert L. (Spring 2011). "Closing a Loophole in the Pacific: Applying the Immigration and Nationality Act to the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands". UCLA Asian Pacific American Law Journal. 16 (1). Los Angeles, California: UCLA School of Law: 74–99. ISSN 2169-7809. Retrieved 2 June 2021 – via HeinOnline.
• Ahmadali, Hamied; Luk, Ngo Chun (September 2015). "Report on Citizenship Law: Suriname" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 December 2018. Retrieved 5 February 2021.
• Alvarez, Angel E. (March 2016). "Report on Citizenship Law: Venezuela" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 February 2021. Retrieved 16 February 2021.
• André, Marc (June 2016). "Algerian Women in France: What Kind of Citizenship? (1930s-1960s)". Clio. Women, Gender, History. 43 (1). Translated by Tomlinson, Helen. Toulouse, France: Éditions Belin: 95–117. ISSN 1252-7017. OCLC 7290793879. Retrieved 29 June 2021.
• Aranha, Stephen B. (October 2015). "Citizenship as a Fundamental Right". The International Journal of Bahamian Studies. 21. Nassau, The Bahamas: College of the Bahamas: 7–21. doi:10.15362/ijbs.v21i1.212. ISSN 2220-5772. OCLC 7724331432.
• Argudo Périz, José Luis; Pérez Milla, José Javier (March 1991). "Vinculación nacional y nacionalidad de los habitantes de los territorios descolonizados del África española" [National Linkage and Nationality of the Inhabitants of the Territories Decolonized in Spanish Africa]. Acciones e Investigaciones Sociales (in Spanish). 1 (151–204). Zaragoza, Spain: Universidad de Zaragoza. doi:10.26754/ojs_ais/ais.199113699. ISSN 1132-192X. OCLC 7174639846. Retrieved 18 August 2021.
• Augustine‐Adams, Kif (April 2006). "Constructing Mexico: Marriage, Law and Women's Dependent Citizenship in the Late‐Nineteenth and Early‐Twentieth Centuries". Gender & History. 18 (1). Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell: 20–34. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0424.2006.00412.x. ISSN 0953-5233. OCLC 202510887.
• Augustine-Adams, Kif (Fall 2001). "Gendered States: A Comparitive Construction of Citizenship and Nation". Virginia Journal of International Law. 41 (1). Charlottesville, Virginia: John Bassett Moore Society of International Law: 93–139. ISSN 0042-6571. OCLC 93293362. Retrieved March 4, 2021 – via HeinOnline.
• Augustine‐Adams, Kif (Winter 2002). "'She Consents Implicitly': Women's Citizenship, Marriage, and Liberal Political Theory in Late-Nineteenth and Early-Twentieth-Century Argentina". Journal of Women's History. 13 (4). Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press: 8–30. doi:10.1353/jowh.2002.0001. ISSN 1042-7961. OCLC 357514548. – via Project MUSE (subscription required)
• Badawy, Tarek (December 2014). "Egyptian Citizenship Legislation, Private International Law, and Their Impact on Individual Rights". Middle East Law and Governance. 6 (3). Leiden, Netherlands: Brill Publishers: 272–295. ISSN 1876-3367. OCLC 5712837566. Retrieved 13 August 2021.
• Baldwin, M. Page (October 2001). "Subject to Empire: Married Women and the British Nationality and Status of Aliens Act". Journal of British Studies. 40 (4). Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press: 522–556. ISSN 0021-9371. OCLC 4637986477. Retrieved 25 March 2021.
• Basch, Norma (Summer 1979). "Invisible Women: The Legal Fiction of Marital Unity in Nineteenth-Century America". Feminist Studies. 5 (2). College Park, Maryland: Feminist Studies, Inc.: 346–366. doi:10.2307/3177600. ISSN 0046-3663. OCLC 5552680992. Retrieved 19 December 2020.
• Batlan, Felice (July 2020). "'She Was Surprised and Furious': Expatriation, Suffrage, Immigration, and the Fragility of Women's Citizenship,1907-1940" (PDF). Stanford Journal of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties. XV (Special Issue). Palo Alto, California: Stanford Law School: 315–349. ISSN 1553-7951. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 15, 2020. Retrieved 11 December 2020.
• Baumert, Thomas; Paradinas Márquez, Carmen; Sánchez Padilla, Andrés (2020). A History of Spanish Institutions. Madrid, Spain: ESIC Editorial. ISBN 978-84-17914-90-5.
• Bellino, Emma (2020). "Married Women's Nationality and the White Australia Policy,1920-1948". law&history. 7 (1). Broadway, New South Wales: Australian and New Zealand Law and History Society: 166–192. ISSN 2652-4201. Retrieved 9 May 2021 – via HeinOnline.
• Belton, Kristy A. (April 2020). "Comparative Regional Report on Citizenship Law: Anglophone Caribbean" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 January 2021. Retrieved 23 March 2021.
• Bertossi, Christophe (April 2010). "Report on Citizenship Law: France" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 November 2020. Retrieved 9 April 2021.
• Bethell, Leslie (1989). Brazil: Empire and Republic, 1822-1930. Cambridge, Cambridgeshire: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-36837-7.
• Bezabeh, Samson A. (October 2011). "Citizenship and the Logic of Sovereignty in Djibouti". African Affairs. 110 (441). London: Royal African Society: 587–606. doi:10.1093/afraf/adr045. ISSN 0001-9909. OCLC 5112985951.
• Blaustein, Albert P.; Sigler, Jay A. (1988). Constitutions That Made History (1st ed.). New York, New York: Paragon House Publishers. ISBN 0-913729-67-1.
• Boggiano, Barbara (6 November 2019). "Long-term Effects of the Paraguayan War (1864-1870): From Male Scarcity to Intimate Partner Violence". SSRN. Rochester, New York: Social Science Research Network. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3476548. Retrieved 31 January 2021.
• Bousquet, G. H. (October 1953). "How the Natives of Algeria Became French Citizens". International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2 (4). London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law: 596–605. ISSN 0020-5893. OCLC 8271467775. Retrieved 29 June 2021.
• Braganza, Pedro I de (2019). Constitution of the Empire of Brazil. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Dalcassian Publishing Company. ISBN 978-1-07-873664-0.
• Bredbenner, Candice Lewis (1998). A Nationality of her Own: Women, Marriage, and the Law of Citizenship. Berkeley, California: University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-20650-9.
• Brey, Elisa (March 2016). "Report on Citizenship Law: Paraguay" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 January 2021. Retrieved 29 January 2021.
• Brunschwig, Henri (1968). "Une colonie inutile: Obock (1862-1888)" [A Useless Colony: Obock 1862–1888]. Cahiers d'Études Africaines (in French). 8 (29). Paris: Éditions de l'École des hautes études en sciences sociales: 32–47. ISSN 0008-0055. OCLC 883018467. Retrieved 11 August 2021.
• Bulletin of the Bureau of the American Republics (1906). "Paraguay". In Root, Elihu (ed.). Citizenship of the United States, Expatriation, and Protection Abroad. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. pp. 480–481. OCLC 681905398.
• Cabanis, André G.; Martin, Michel Louis (1996). "Un exemple de créolisation juridique modulée: le Code civil haïtien de 1825 et le Code Napoléon" [An Example of Modulated Legal Creolization: the Haitian Civil Code of 1825 and the Napoleon Code]. Revue internationale de droit comparé (in French). 48 (2). Paris: Centre Français de Droit Comparé: 443–456. ISSN 0035-3337. OCLC 769963077. Retrieved 3 January 2021.
• Camiscioli, Elisa (Summer–Fall 1999). "Intermarriage, Independent Nationality, and the Individual Rights of French Women: The Law of 10 August 1927". French Politics, Culture & Society. 17 (3–4). New York, New York: Berghahn Books: 52–74. ISSN 1537-6370. OCLC 205909023. Retrieved 3 January 2021.
• Carano, Paul; Sanchez, Pedro C. (1980). A Complete History of Guam (8th printing ed.). Rutland, Vermont: Charles E. Tuttle Company. ISBN 978-0-8048-0114-0. – via FamilySearch (subscription required)
• Casañas, María Laura (2010). "Una mirada histórica a la ciudadanía de las mujeres en el Uruguay" [A Historical Look at the Citizenship of Women in Uruguay] (PDF). colibri.udelar.edu.uy (Licenciatura en Trabajo Social) (in Spanish). Montevideo: Universidad de la República. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 February 2021. Retrieved 10 February 2021.
• Chen, Edward I-te (1984). "Part II. Chapter 6, The Attempt to Integrate the Empire: Legal Perspectives". In Myers, Ramon H.; Peattie, Mark R. (eds.). The Japanese Colonial Empire, 1895-1945. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. pp. 240–274. ISBN 0-691-10222-8.
• Chusid, Martin (2012). Verdi's 'Il Trovatore': The Quintessential Italian Melodrama. Rochester, New York: University of Rochester Press. ISBN 978-1-58046-422-2.
• Coates, Timothy J. (2001). Convicts and Orphans: Forced and State-sponsored Colonizers in the Portuguese Empire, 1550-1755. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0-8047-3359-5.
• Coker-Gonzalez, Charity (November 2000). "Agitating for Their Rights: The Colombian Women's Movement, 1930-1957". Pacific Historical Review. 69 (4). Oakland, California: University of California Press: 689–706. doi:10.2307/3641230. ISSN 0030-8684. OCLC 5972217296. Retrieved 30 December 2020.
• Collier, John L. (1990). "1. Historical Setting". In Collelo, Thomas (ed.). Chad: A Country Study (PDF). Area Handbook Series. Washington, D. C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. pp. 1–32. OCLC 909915559.
• Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (28 January 2005). Concluding Comments of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women: Samoa (PDF) (Report). Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations. Thirty-second session: 10–28 January 2005, Supplement No. 38 (A/60/38). Archived (PDF) from the original on 3 July 2019. Retrieved 16 June 2021.
• Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (20 February 1990). Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties under Article 18 of the Convention: Initial Reports Of States Parties — Guyana (Report). New York, New York: United Nations. v.90-83740. Archived from the original on 4 April 2021. Retrieved 4 April 2021.
• Cooney, Jerry W. (1974). "Abolition in the Republic of Paraguay: 1840-1870". Jahrbuch für Geschichte Lateinamerikas – Anuario de Historia de America Latina. 11 (1). Hamburg, Germany: Hamburg University Press: 149–166. ISSN 2194-3680. OCLC 1939381. Retrieved 29 January 2021.
• Corrales Morales, José Vicente (June 2019). "La Soberanía Nacional y el Sufragio Universal como derechos de difícil conquista en el devenir de la historia Constitucional" [National Sovereignty and Universal Suffrage as Rights Difficult to Conquer for the Future of Constitutional History]. Revista Multi-Ensayos (in Spanish). 5 (10). Managua: Facultad Regional Multidisciplinaria de Estelí de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Nicaragua: 41–48. ISSN 2412-3285. OCLC 8405214183. Archived from the original on 19 January 2021. Retrieved 19 January 2021.
• Cott, Nancy F. (2009). "Justice for All? Marriage and Deprivation of Citizenship in the United States". In Sarat, Austin; Kearns, Thomas R. (eds.). Justice and Injustice in Law and Legal Theory. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press. pp. 77–98. ISBN 0-472-02368-3.
• Cottias, Myriam (August 2005). "Gender and Republican Citizenship in the French West Indies, 1848–1945". Slavery & Abolition. 26 (2). Abingdon: Routledge: 233–245. doi:10.1080/01440390500176400. ISSN 0144-039X. OCLC 6895438010. – via Taylor & Francis (subscription required)
• Cox Alomar, Rafael (2015). "7. The Ideological Decolonization of Puerto Rico's Autonomist Movement". In Neuman, Gerald L.; Brown-Nagin, Tomiko (eds.). Reconsidering the Insular Cases: The Past and Future of the American Empire. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. pp. 129–166. ISBN 978-0-9796395-7-9.
• Dawkins, K. E. (1978). "New Zealand Citizenship Redefined". Otago Law Review. 4 (2). Dunedin, New Zealand: University of Otago: 201–216. ISSN 0078-6918. Retrieved 1 June 2021 – via HeinOnline.
• Decottignies, Roger (1957). "La condition des personnes au Togo et au Cameroun" (PDF). Annales Africaines. Paris, France: Imprimerie Guillemot et de Lamothe: 7–52. ISSN 0066-202X. OCLC 772651263. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 January 2022. Retrieved 16 January 2022.
• de Groot, Gerard-René (2013). Survey on Rules on Loss of Nationality in International Treaties and Case Law (PDF). Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies. ISBN 978-94-6138-334-1.
• del Moral, Octavio (January–June 2006). "El Código Civil de Bello en Panamá" [The Civil Code of Bello in Panama] (PDF). Estudios Socio-Jurídicos (in Spanish). 8 (1). Bogotá: Centro de Investigaciones Socio-Juridicas Carlos Holguin Holguin: 169–179. ISSN 0124-0579. OCLC 8520986592. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 July 2020. Retrieved 23 January 2021.
• Denis, Maurice Eugène; Viraud, René André Marie (1931). Histoire militaire des colonies, pays de protectorat et pays sous mandat. 7, Histoire militaire de l'Afrique Equatoriale française [Military History of the colonies, Protectorate Countries and Countries under Mandate: 7. Military History of French Equatorial Africa]. Les armées françaises d’outre-mer (in French). Vol. 1. Paris: Imprimerie nationale. OCLC 763734109.
• Diaz, Ana Maria (July 2004). "El primer ciudadano: Paraguay 1811-1814" [The First Citizen: Paraguay 1811-1814]. Cahiers des Amériques Latines (in Spanish) (46). Paris: Institut des Hautes Etudes de l'Amérique Latine, Université Paris Sorbonne: 103–113. doi:10.4000/cal.7694. ISSN 1141-7161. OCLC 7158045590. Retrieved 29 January 2021.
• Dobkin de Rios, Marlène (1968). "Colonialism and the Legal Status of Women in Francophonic Africa". Cahiers d'Études Africaines. 8 (31). Paris: École des hautes études en sciences sociales: 390–405. doi:10.3406/cea.1968.3134. ISSN 0008-0055. OCLC 772667063. Retrieved 29 June 2021.
• Donati, Sabina (2013). A Political History of National Citizenship and Identity in Italy, 1861–1950. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0-8047-8451-1.
• Donner, Ruth (1994). The Regulation of Nationality in International Law (2nd ed.). Irvington-on-Hudson, New York: Transnational Publishers. ISBN 978-0-941320-77-1.
• Dookhan, Isaac (1994). A History of the Virgin Islands of the United States. Mona, Jamaica: Canoe Press. ISBN 978-976-8125-05-7.
• Dummett, Ann (2006). "15. United Kingdom". In Bauböck, Rainer; Ersbøll, Eva; Groenendijk, Kees; Waldrauch, Harald (eds.). Acquisition and Loss of Nationality: Policies and Trends in 15 European States. Vol. 2. Country Analyses. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. pp. 551–586. ISBN 978-90-5356-921-4.
• Dyde, Brian (2005). Out of the Crowded Vagueness: A History of the Islands of St Kitts, Nevis & Anguilla. Oxford: Macmillan Publishers. ISBN 0-333-97598-7.
• Dziedzic, Anna (February 2020). "Comparative Regional Report on Citizenship Law: Oceania" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 April 2021. Retrieved 30 April 2021.
• Eder, Phanor J. (May–August 1951). "Efectos del matrimonio sobre la nacionalidad de las mujeres" [Effects of Marriage on the Nationality of Women] (PDF). Boletin del Instituto de Derecho Comparado (in Spanish). 4 (11). Translated by Elola Fernandez, Javier. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico: 52–64. ISSN 0041-8633. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 January 2021. Retrieved 19 January 2021.
• Emde, Sina (2019). "3. Between Vulnerability, Resilience and Resistance: Fiji Islander Women Activists and the Ethno-Nationalist Political Crises in 2000". In Dousset, Laurent; Nayral, Mélissa (eds.). Pacific Realities: Changing Perspectives on Resilience and Resistance. New York, New York: Berghahn Books. pp. 65–88. ISBN 978-1-78920-041-6.
• Ersbøll, Eva (July 2015). "Report on Citizenship Law: Denmark" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 16, 2016. Retrieved March 19, 2021.
• Escobar, Cristina (May 2015). "Report on Citizenship Law: Colombia" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 March 2018. Retrieved 30 December 2020.
• Facal Santiago, Silvia (November 2006). "Recorriendo el largo camino de la integración: los judíos alemanes en Uruguay" [Traveling the Long Road to Integration: German Jews in Uruguay]. Les Cahiers Amérique latine histoire et mémoire (in Spanish). 12 (Vision socio-économique). Paris: Université de Paris 8. doi:10.4000/alhim.1412. ISSN 1628-6731. OCLC 8080887210. Retrieved 12 February 2021.
• Fahrmeir, Andreas K. (September 1997). "Nineteenth-Century German Citizenships: A Reconsideration". The Historical Journal. 40 (3). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press: 721–752. ISSN 0018-246X. OCLC 5548980323. Retrieved 20 May 2021.
• Fassil, Zecharias (April 2020). "Report on Citizenship Law: Ethiopia" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 August 2021. Retrieved 21 August 2021.
• Fiorentini Cañedo, Natalia (December 2012). "Familia y diferenciación genérica en la Nueva España del siglo XVI a través de los ordenamientos civiles y la correspondencia privada" [Family and Gender Differentiation: A Contrast between Civil Arrangements and Daily Life in the Sixteenth Century in New Spain] (PDF). Tzintzun (in Spanish) (56). Morelia, Michoacán: Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo: 13–57. ISSN 0188-2872. OCLC 5728482935. Retrieved 26 December 2020.
• Fitzgerald, David (January 2005). "Nationality and Migration in Modern Mexico" (PDF). Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 31 (1). Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Taylor & Francis: 171–191. doi:10.1080/1369183042000305735. ISSN 1369-183X. OCLC 710830827. Retrieved 18 January 2021.
• Flournoy Jr., Richard W.; Hudson, Manley O. (1929). A Collection of Nationality Laws of Various Countries as Contained in Constitutions, Statutes and Treaties. New York, New York: Oxford University Press. OCLC 875321407 – via HeinOnline.
• Foblets, Marie-Claire; Loones, Sander (2006). "2. Belgium". In Bauböck, Rainer; Ersbøll, Eva; Groenendijk, Kees; Waldrauch, Harald (eds.). Acquisition and Loss of Nationality: Policies and Trends in 15 European States. Vol. 2: Country Analyses. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. pp. 63–104. ISBN 978-90-5356-921-4.
• Fransman, Laurie (2011). Fransman's British Nationality Law (3rd ed.). Haywards Heath, West Sussex: Bloomsbury Professional. ISBN 978-1-84592-095-1.
• Gainot, Bernard (April–June 2009). "Jean-François Niort (dir.), Du Code noir au Code civil. Jalons pour l'histoire du droit en Guadeloupe. Perspectives comparées avec la Martinique, la Guyane et la République d'Haïti" [Jean-François Niort (dir.), From the Black Code to the Civil Code. Milestones for the History of Law in Guadeloupe. Prospects Compared to Martinique, Guyana and the Republic of Haiti]. Annales historiques de la Révolution française (in French) (356). Paris, France: Société des Études Robespierristes. doi:10.4000/ahrf.10695. ISSN 1952-403X. Retrieved 23 April 2021.
• Ganzert, Frederic W. (27 December 1936). "Get Half a Loaf (pt 1)". The Salt Lake Tribune. Salt Lake City, Utah. p. C5. Retrieved 19 December 2020 – via Newspapers.com.; "Get Half a Loaf (pt 2)". The Salt Lake Tribune. Salt Lake City, Utah. 27 December 1936. p. C10. Retrieved 19 December 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
• "The "Code Noir" (1685)". Washington State University Vancouver. Translated by Garrigus, John. Vancouver, Washington. 1980. Archived from the original on 25 November 2007. Retrieved 13 January 2021 – via Société d'histoire de la Guadeloupe.
• Ghachem, Malick W. (Summer 1999). "Montesquieu in the Caribbean: The Colonial Enlightenment between "Code Noir" and "Code Civil"". Historical Reflections. 25 (2). New York, New York: Berghahn Books: 183–210. ISSN 0315-7997. OCLC 5543378476. Retrieved 13 January 2021.
• Ghachem, Malick W. (2012). The Old Regime and the Haitian Revolution. Cambridge, Cambridgeshire: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-83680-7.
• Gil, Ana Rita; Piçarra, Nuno (February 2020). "Report on Citizenship Law: Portugal" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 June 2021. Retrieved 4 July 2021.
• Giraldo Gómez, Alicia (1987). "Los derechos de la mujer en la legislación colombiana" [The Rights of Women in Colombian Law] (PDF). Repertorio histórico (in Spanish). 38 (250). Medellín: Academia Antioqueña de Historia: 1–21. ISSN 0122-3232. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 February 2020. Retrieved 1 January 2021.
• Girard, Philip (March 2013). "'If two ride a horse, one must ride in front': Married Women's Nationality and the Law in Canada 1880–1950". Canadian Historical Review. 94 (1). Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto Press: 28–54. doi:10.3138/chr.1349. ISSN 0008-3755. OCLC 4960260033. Retrieved 21 April 2021. – via Project MUSE (subscription required)
• Global Campaign for Equal Nationality Rights; Institute on Statelessness and Inclusion (2017). "Joint Submission to the Human Rights Council at the 29th Session of the Universal Periodic Review: Barbados". uprdoc.ohchr.org. New York, New York: Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Archived from the original on 29 March 2021. Retrieved 29 March 2021.
• Global Campaign for Equal Nationality Rights; Institute on Statelessness and Inclusion (20 January 2020). "Joint Submission to the Human Rights Council at the 35th Session of the Universal Periodic Review: Kiribati" (PDF). Institute on Statelessness and Inclusion. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Human Rights Council. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 June 2020. Retrieved 15 May 2021.
• Gousse, Bernard H. (29 April 2015). "La nationalité: Le point sur les I et la barre sur les T (mise à jour)" [Nationality: The Dot of the I and the Cross of the T (update)]. Le Nouvelliste (in French). Port-au-Prince. Archived from the original on 17 September 2018. Retrieved 15 January 2021.
• Grandmaison, Olivier Le Cour (2006). "The Exception and the Rule: On French Colonial Law". Diogenes. 53 (4). London: SAGE Publications for the International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies: 34–53. doi:10.1177/0392192106070346. ISSN 0392-1921. OCLC 437606336. Retrieved 25 June 2021.
• Green, David (8 February 2005). "Citizenship - Towards New Zealand Citizenship". TeAra.govt.nz. Wellington, New Zealand: Encyclopaedia of New Zealand. Archived from the original on 25 January 2021. Retrieved 1 June 2021.
• Gumedze, Sabelo (March 2021). "Report on Citizenship Law: Eswatini" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 August 2021. Retrieved 26 August 2021.
• Habib, Javier I. (March 2016). "Report on Citizenship Law: Argentina" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 April 2018. Retrieved 26 December 2020.
• Hacker, Meg (Spring 2014). "When Saying "I Do" Meant Giving Up Your U.S. Citizenship" (PDF). Prologue. Washington, D. C.: National Archives and Records Administration: 56–61. ISSN 0033-1031. Retrieved November 22, 2020.
• Hall, T. D. H. (August 1931). "Status of Aliens in New Zealand". Pacific Affairs. 4 (8). Vancouver, British Columbia: University of British Columbia: 700–710. doi:10.2307/2750412. ISSN 0030-851X. OCLC 5545501061. Retrieved 1 June 2021.
• Hamann, Hartmut; Berger, Antje C. (2019). "Burundi". In Minnerop, Petra; Wolfrum, Rüdiger; Lachenmann, Frauke (eds.). International Development Law: The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 124–134. ISBN 978-0-19-883509-7.
• Han, Eric C. (December 2018). "The Nationality Law and Entry Restrictions of 1899: Constructing Japanese Identity between China and the West". Japan Forum. 30 (4). London: Routledge: 521-542. doi:10.1080/09555803.2018.1516687. ISSN 0955-5803. OCLC 8085951630. – via Taylor & Francis (subscription required)
• Hanley, Will (November 2016). "What Ottoman Nationality Was and Was Not". Journal of the Ottoman and Turkish Studies Association. 3 (2). Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press for the Ottoman and Turkish Studies Association: 277–298. doi:10.2979/jottturstuass.3.2.05. ISSN 2376-0699. OCLC 6883463202. Retrieved 26 June 2021.
• Harijanti, Susi Dwi (February 2017). "Report On Citizenship Law: Indonesia" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 November 2020. Retrieved 11 May 2021.
• Hartkamp, Arthur S. (September 1975). "Civil Code Revision in the Netherlands: A Survey of Its System and Contents, and Its Influence on Dutch Legal Practice" (PDF). Louisiana Law Review. 35 (5). Baton Rouge, Louisiana: Louisiana State University: 1059–1090. ISSN 0024-6859. OCLC 8092736363. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 February 2021. Retrieved 5 February 2021.
• Hein, John R. (January 2009). "Born in the U.S.A., But Not Natural Born: How Congressional Territorial Policy Bars Native-Born Puerto Ricans from the Presidency". University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law. 11 (2). Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Law School: 423–457. ISSN 1521-2823. OCLC 8092055580. Archived from the original on September 4, 2020. Retrieved March 9, 2021.
• Hernández Juárez, Saúl Iván (December 2018). Mi esposo y mi nación la nacionalidad de las mujeres casadas en México, 1886-1934 [My Husband and My Nation: The Nationality of Married Women in Mexico, 1886-1934] (PhD) (in Spanish). Mexico City: El Colegio de México. OCLC 1091580488. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
• Hernández Pina, Fuensanta (March 2013). "Constitution, Education and Research". European Educational Research Journal. 12 (1). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications: 34–47. doi:10.2304/eerj.2013.12.1.34. ISSN 1474-9041. OCLC 4960170259. Retrieved 25 December 2020.
• Herzog, Tamar (June 1997). "'A Stranger in a Strange Land': The Conversion of Foreigners into Community Members in Colonial Latin America (17th-18th Centuries)". Social Identities. 3 (2). London: Taylor & Francis: 247-264. doi:10.1080/13504639752087. ISSN 1350-4630. OCLC 6894742529.
• Heuer, Jennifer (Fall 2009). "The One-Drop Rule in Reverse? Interracial Marriages in Napoleonic and Restoration France". Law and History Review. 27 (3). Notre Dame, Indiana: American Society for Legal History: 515–548. ISSN 0738-2480. OCLC 8271382325. Retrieved 13 April 2021.
• Hoogers, Herman; Karapetian, Gohar (13 June 2018). Europe's Caribbean Borders: The Peculiar Case of the Sint Maarten/Saint Martin Border (PDF). ECPR SGEU Conference: Contradictions – Whither the Political, Economic and Social Integration of Europe?. Paris, France: European Consortium for Political Research. OCLC 8086836042. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 April 2021.
• Horn, Denise M. (2014). "Citizenship, Nationality and Gender". In Shepherd, Laura J. (ed.). Gender Matters in Global Politics: A Feminist Introduction to International Relations. New York, New York: Routledge. pp. 320–330. ISBN 978-1-134-75252-2.
• Hudson, Manley O. (1958). "Report on Nationality, Including Statelessness" (PDF). In United Nations Law Commission (ed.). Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 1952. Vol. 2. New York, New York: United Nations. pp. 3–24. OCLC 1032570108.
• Illueca, Jorge E. (1945). "Síntesis histórica de la Codificación civil panameña" [Historical synthesis of the Panamanian Civil Code] (PDF). Boletin del Instituto de legislación comparada y derecho internacional (in Spanish). 1 (89–156). Panama City, Panama: Universidad de Panamá: 89-104, 105-156. OCLC 183311684. Retrieved 24 January 2021.
• Ivy, William (21 September 1928). "Post Cards From Europe". The Anniston Star. Anniston, Alabama. Retrieved 19 December 2020 – via Newspaperarchive.com.
• Jerónimo, Patrícia (April 2019). "Report on Citizenship Law: Angola" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 June 2021. Retrieved 2 July 2021.
• Jacques, Catherine (2017). "13. Tracking Feminist Interventions in International Law Issues at the League of Nations". In Kimble, Sara Lynn; Röwekamp, Marion (eds.). New Perspectives on European Women's Legal History. New York, New York: Routledge. pp. 321–348. ISBN 978-1-138-80554-5.
• Jerónimo, Patrícia (March 2017). "Report on Citizenship Law: East Timor (Timor-Leste)" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 April 2018. Retrieved 26 April 2021.
• Jivan, Vedna; Forster, Christine (2007). Translating CEDAW into Law: CEDAW Legislative Compliance in Nine Pacific Islands Countries (May 2007 ed.). Suva, Fiji: United Nations Development Fund for Women, Pacific Centre. ISBN 978-982-304-022-6. Archived from the original on 26 November 2020.
• Justin, Joseph (1905). "Chapitre VII: Influence du marriage sur la nationalité ou acquisition de la nationalité haitienne par le bienfait de la loi [Chapter VII: Influence of Marriage on Nationality or Acquisition of Haitian Nationality by the Benefit of the Law]". De la nationalité en Haïti: suivie d'un aperçu historique sur le droit haïtien [Nationality in Haiti: Followed by a Historical Overview of Haitian Law] (in French). Port-au-Prince: Imprimerie de l’Abeille. pp. 91–108. OCLC 1557495.
• Kebir, Yamina (1994). "Algeria". Yearbook of Islamic and Middle Eastern Law Online. 1 (1). London: Centre of Islamic and Middle Eastern Law at the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London: 397–401. ISSN 2211-2987. OCLC 875046566. Retrieved 1 July 2021 – via HeinOnline.
• Kerber, Linda K. (1998). No Constitutional Right to Be Ladies: Women and the Obligations of Citizenship (1st ed.). New York, New York: Hill & Wang. ISBN 0-8090-7383-8.
• Kienle, Eberhard (1995). "Imagined Communities Legislated: Nationalism and the Law of Nationality in Syria and Egypt". Yearbook of Islamic and Middle Eastern Law, 1994. Vol. 1. London: Kuwler Law International for the Centre of Islamic and Middle Eastern Law at the School of Oriental and African Studies. pp. 47–67. ISBN 978-90-411-0883-8. OCLC 822567664 – via HeinOnline.
• Kinsbruner, Jay (2000). Independence in Spanish America: Civil Wars, Revolutions, and Underdevelopment (2nd Revised Diálogos ed.). Albuquerque, New Mexico: University of New Mexico Press. ISBN 978-0-8263-2177-0.
• Klapdor, Michael; Coombs, Moira; Bohm, Catherine (11 September 2009). "Australian Citizenship: A Chronology of Major Developments in Policy and Law". Social Policy and Law and Bills Digest Sections. Canberra, Australian Capital Territory: Parliament of Australia. Archived from the original on 22 April 2021. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
• Körber, Lill-Ann (Summer 2019). "Sweden and St. Barthélemy: Exceptionalisms, Whiteness, and the Disappearance of Slavery from Colonial History". Scandinavian Studies. 91 (1–2). Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press: 74–97. ISSN 0036-5637. OCLC 8183746865. Retrieved 23 April 2021. – via Project MUSE (subscription required)
• Kuznesof, Elizabeth (April 2013). "The House, the Street and the Brothel: Gender in Latin American History". History of Women in the Americas. 1 (1). Uxbridge, Middlesex: Society for the History of Women in the Americas: 17–31. ISSN 2042-6348. OCLC 7181453193. Retrieved 25 December 2020.
• Lamy, Amilcar (1953). Nationalité: lois et conventions doctrine, jurisprudence et repertoire; droit haitien (extraits) [Nationality: Laws and Conventions, Doctrine, Case Law and Repertoire (Haitian Law Extracts)] (in French). Port-au-Prince: Impr. de l'État. OCLC 1908423.
• Lavoie, Yolande; Fick, Carolyn; Mayer, Francine-M. (December 1995). "A Particular Study of Slavery in the Caribbean Island of Saint Barthelemy: 1648-1846". Caribbean Studies. 28 (2). Río Piedras, Puerto Rico: Institutte of Caribbean Studies: 369–403. ISSN 0008-6533. OCLC 5547020198. Retrieved 23 April 2021.
• Lazarus-Black, Mindie (1994). "Alternative Readings: The Status of the Status of Children Act in Antigua and Barbuda". Law & Society Review. 28 (4). Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell: 101–115. doi:10.2307/3054021. ISSN 0023-9216. OCLC 201168080. Retrieved 26 March 2021.
• Lee, Muna (2004). "The Inter-American Commission of Women" (PDF). In Cohen, Jonathan (ed.). A Pan-American Life: Selected Poetry and Prose of Muna Lee. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press. pp. 222–229. ISBN 978-0-299-20234-7.
• Legislative Council of Saint Lucia (1879). The Civil Code of Saint Lucia. London: Harrison and Sons. p. 12. OCLC 868946456. 17. An alien may be naturalised by ordinance, or if a woman, is naturalised by marriage with a British subject.
• Leila, Reem (7 July 2004). "Citizens at last". Al-Ahram Weekly. No. 697. Cairo, Egypt. Archived from the original on 2012-10-23. Retrieved 2011-09-10.
• Leiva Salinas, Maria Lorena (March 2020). "Report on Citizenship Law: Bolivia" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Translated by Rubio Grundell, Lucrecia. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 February 2021. Retrieved 21 February 2021.
• Lewis, Allen Montgomery (1959). The Civil Code of Saint Lucia: Revised Ordinances, 1957, Chapter 242. Castries, Saint Lucia: Voice Publishing Company. OCLC 872566244.
• Llewellyn-Jones, Frederick (1929). "The Nationality of Married Women". Transactions of the Grotius Society. 15. London: Grotius Society: 121–138. ISSN 1479-1234. OCLC 5544683551. Retrieved 25 March 2021.
• Loeb, Isidore (August 1900). "The German Colonial Fiscal System". Publications of the American Economic Association. 1 (3). New York, New York: American Economic Association: 40–72. ISSN 1049-7498. OCLC 5791225492. Retrieved 20 May 2021.
• Lobingier, Charles Sumner (December 1932). "Rise and Fall of Feudal Law" (PDF). Cornell Law Review. 18 (1). Ithaca, New York: Cornell Law School: 192–231. ISSN 0010-8847. OCLC 8254996940. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 April 2021. Retrieved 9 April 2021.
• Mackenzie, Charles (1830). Notes on Haiti: Made During a Residence in that Republic. Vol. 2. London: Henry Colburn and Richard Bentley. OCLC 973229801.
• Maestre Alfonso, Juan (1987). Constituciones y leyes políticas de América Latina, Filipinas y Guinea Ecuatorial [Constitutions and Political Laws of Latin America, the Philippines and Equatorial Guinea] (in Spanish). Vol. 1: Mexico, Nicaragua, Peru, Guinea Ecuatorial — Tomo 1: La expectative revolucionaria [The Revolutionary Expectation]. Seville: Editorial CSIC - CSIC Press. ISBN 978-84-00-06491-4.
• Malek, Dalia (July 2021). "Report on Citizenship Law: Egypt" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 July 2021. Retrieved 13 August 2021.
• Manby, Bronwyn (2016). Citizenship Law in Africa (PDF) (3rd ed.). Cape Town, South Africa: African Minds. ISBN 978-1-928331-08-7. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 June 2021.
• Manby, Bronwen (2018). Citizenship in Africa: The Law of Belonging. Oxford: Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-1-5099-2078-5.
• Manby, Bronwen (2010). Citizenship Law in Africa: A Comparative Study (PDF) (2nd ed.). New York, New York: Open Society Foundations, Africa Governance Monitoring and Advocacy (AfriMAP), Open Society Justice Initiative. ISBN 978-1-936133-29-1. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 February 2021.
• Manby, Bronwen (2019). "The Nationality Laws of the Lusophone States in Africa" (PDF). Electronic British Library Journal. 2 (3). London: British Library: 14–34. ISSN 2616-9649. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 February 2021. Retrieved 23 July 2021.
• Mander, Linden A. (June 1944). "The New Hebrides Condominium". Pacific Historical Review. 13 (2). Berkeley, California: University of California Press: 151–167. doi:10.2307/3634610. ISSN 0030-8684. OCLC 5972217587. Retrieved 23 June 2021.
• Mann, Jatinder (January 2014). "'Anglo-Conformity': Assimilation Policy in Canada, 1890s–1950s". International Journal of Canadian Studies. 50. Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto Press: 253–276. ISSN 1180-3991. OCLC 5714525681. Retrieved 22 April 2021. – via Project MUSE (subscription required)
• Marglin, Jessica M. (March 2018). "Nationality on Trial: International Private Law across the Mediterranean". Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales. 73 (1) (English ed.). Paris: Éditions de l'École des Hautes études en sciences sociales: 81–113. doi:10.1017/ahsse.2020.12. ISSN 2398-5682. OCLC 8937961391. Retrieved 19 January 2022. – via Cambridge Core (subscription required)
• Matsuda, Matt K. (2005). Empire of Love: Histories of France and the Pacific. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-534747-0.
• Manzano Cosano, David (April 2016). "Filipinas en la historia del constitucionalismo español y su representación en las cortes españolas" [Philippines in the Spanish Constitutional History and its Representation in the Spanish Courts] (PDF). Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional (in Spanish) (106). Madrid, Spain: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales: 273–302. doi:10.18042/cepc/redc.106.0. ISSN 0211-5743. OCLC 6032305166. Retrieved 22 May 2021.
• McLintock, A. H.; Wilson, James Oakley (1966). "Nationality". TeAra.govt.nz. Wellington, New Zealand: Encyclopaedia of New Zealand. Archived from the original on 24 February 2018. Retrieved 1 June 2021.
• Merle, Isabelle (Summer 2002). "Retour sur le régime de l'indigénat: Genèse et contradictions des principes répressifs dans l'empire français" [The Indigenous Status Regime Revisited: Genesis and Contradictions of the Repressive Principles in the French Empire]. French Politics, Culture & Society (in French). 20 (2). New York, New York: Berghahn Books: 77–97. ISSN 1537-6370. OCLC 5792451223. Retrieved 25 June 2021.
• Moran, Sarah Joan; Pipkin, Amanda C. (2019). "Introduction". In Moran, Sarah Joan; Pipkin, Amanda C. (eds.). Women and Gender in the Early Modern Low Countries 1500-1750. Studies in Medieval and Reformation Traditions. Vol. 217. Leiden: Brill Publishers. pp. 1–20. ISBN 978-90-04-39135-2.
• Mugnier, Clifford J. (March 2012). "Grids & Datums: Central African Republic" (PDF). Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. 78 (3). Falls Church, Virginia: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing: 192–194. ISSN 0099-1112. OCLC 780462390. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 July 2021. Retrieved 26 July 2021.
• Neill, J. S. (1937). "Review of Legislation, 1935: Kingdom of Tonga". Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law. 19 (2–3). London: John Murray Publishing: 108–109. ISSN 1479-5949. Retrieved 21 June 2021 – via HeinOnline.
• Newbury, C. W. (April 1959). "A Note on the Abomey Protectorate". Africa. 29 (2). London: Cambridge University Press for the International African Institute: 146–155. doi:10.2307/1157517. ISSN 0001-9720. OCLC 772533112. Retrieved 7 July 2021.
• Neyrand, Gerard; M'Sili, Marine (1998). "Mixed Couples in Contemporary France: Marriage, Acquisition of French Nationality and Divorce". Population. 10 (2). Paris: Institut national d'études démographiques: 385–416. ISSN 1169-1018. OCLC 5546128348. Retrieved 14 July 2021.
• Niort, Jean-François (August 2007). "L'application du Code civil à la Guadeloupe dans le contexte dela réaction napoléonienne" [The Application of the Civil Code to Guadeloupe in the Context of the Napoleonic Reaction] (PDF). Bulletin de la Société d'Histoire de la Guadeloupe (in French) (146–147). Basse-Terre, Guadeloupe: Société d'histoire de la Guadeloupe: 19–45. doi:10.7202/1040648a. ISSN 0583-8266. Retrieved 23 April 2021.
• Niyonzima, Matthias (December 1995). "Burundi: Debat au Sujet de la Double Nationalite" [Burundi: Debate on Dual-Nationality]. African Journal of International and Comparative Law (in French). 7 (4). Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press: 895–905. ISSN 0954-8890. OCLC 769928668. Retrieved 17 July 2021 – via HeinOnline.
• Noerdin, Edriana (2013). "2. Women's Organizations Amidst Political Openness". In Anastasia, Ayu (ed.). Indonesian Women's Movements: Making Democracy Gender Responsive (PDF) (First ed.). Jakarta, Indonesia: Women Research Institute. pp. 41–84. ISBN 978-602-9230-03-1. Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 November 2018.
• Oehser, Paul Henry (1943). Proceedings of the Eighth American Scientific Congress Held in Washington May 10–18, 1940, Under the Auspices of the Government of the United States of America. Vol. 10: International Law, Public Law, and Jurisprudence. Washington, D.C.: Department of State. OCLC 1181595500.
• Olcott, Jocelyn H. (2006). Revolutionary Women in Postrevolutionary Mexico. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. ISBN 0-8223-8735-2.
• Orfield, Lester B. (December 1934). "The Citizenship Act of 1934" (PDF). The University of Chicago Law Review. 2 (1). Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago: 99–118. ISSN 0041-9494. OCLC 5544328554. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 March 2021. Retrieved 6 March 2021.
• Page, Dorothy (1998). "Soljak, Miriam Bridelia". TeAra.govt.nz. Wellington, New Zealand: Dictionary of New Zealand Biography. Archived from the original on 4 March 2021. Retrieved 1 June 2021.
• Parra Aranguren, Gonzalo (1970). "La influencia del matrimonio sobre la nacionalidad de la mujer en el proyecto de Código Civil publicado en 1869" [The Influence of Marriage on the Nationality of Women in the Civil Code Project Published in 1869] (PDF). Revista de la Facultad de Derecho (in Spanish) (11). Caracas: Editorial Sucre for the Universidad Católica Andrés Bello: 7–54. OCLC 717920074. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 February 2021. Retrieved 15 February 2021.
• Passinhas, Sandra (2019). Property and Trust Law in Portugal (2nd ed.). Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer. ISBN 978-94-035-1791-9.
• Pazo Pineda, Oscar Andrés (June 2015). "Report on Citizenship Law: Peru" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Translated by Mendes, Mariana. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 February 2021. Retrieved 1 February 2021.
• Pedersen, Christian Damm (6 January 2012). Mellem slave og borger. Stat, rettigheder og etniske forskelle i det danske imperium, 1814-48 [Between Slave and Citizen: State, Rights and Ethnic Differences in the Danish Empire, 1814-48] (PDF) (Kandidatspeciale) (in Danish). Copenhagen, Denmark: University of Copenhagen. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 March 2021. Retrieved 21 March 2021.
• Peña, Lorenzo (2002). "Un puente jurídico entre Iberoamérica y Europa:la Constitución española de 1812 [A Legal Bridge between Latin America and Europe: the Spanish Constitution of 1812]" (PDF). In González García, José María (ed.). América y Europa, identidades, exilios y expectativas: Pensar en Español II [America and Europe, Identities, Exiles and Expectations: Thinking in Spanish II] (in Spanish). Madrid: Casa de América. pp. 95–114. ISBN 978-84-88490-55-1.
• Perrin, Delphine (2014). "Struggles of Citizenship in the Maghreb". Routledge Handbook of Global Citizenship Studies (Revised 2016 ed.). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-51972-4. Archived from the original on 27 October 2020.
• Plaisant, Robert; Sutherland Jr., Arthur E. (March 1948). "New French Law of Nationality A Study ofDemographic Policy and Comparative Legislation". Cornell Law Review. 33 (3). Ithaca, New York: Cornell Law School: 373–390. ISSN 0010-8847. OCLC 8254475182. Archived from the original on 19 March 2020. Retrieved 31 July 2021.
• Plender, Richard (October 1974). "The New French Nationality Law". The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 23 (4). Cambridge, Cambridgeshire: Cambridge University Press: 709–747. ISSN 0020-5893. OCLC 769971121. Retrieved 23 April 2021.
• Polack, Kenneth (March 1963). "The Defence of Act of State in Relation to Protectorates". Modern Law Review. 26 (2). London: Blackwell Publishers: 138–155. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.1963.tb00704.x. ISSN 0026-7961. OCLC 4794706569. Retrieved 18 June 2021.
• Pollock, Nancy (June 1990). "Doctor Administrators in Wallis and Futuna". The Journal of Pacific History. 25 (1). Canberra, Australian Capital Territory: Australian National University: 47–67. ISSN 0022-3344. OCLC 5543897714. Retrieved 25 June 2021.
• Prihatiningsih, Rinawati; Irianto, Sulistyowati; Adelina, S. (2017). "Indonesian Women in Transnational Marriages: Their Struggles, Negotiations, and Transformations on Ownership Rights as Indonesian Citizens: A Gender Studies Perspective". In Adi, Isbandi Rukminto; Achwan, Rochman (eds.). Competition and Cooperation in Social and Political Sciences: Proceedings of the Asia Pacific Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, Depok, Indonesia, 7-9 November 2016: Topics in Social and Political Sciences. London: Routledge. pp. 157–165. ISBN 978-1-138-62676-8.
• Rawlings, Gregory (March 2019). "Stateless Persons, Eligible Citizens and Protected Places: The British Nationality Act in Vanuatu". Twentieth Century British History. 30 (1). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 53–80. doi:10.1093/tcbh/hwy011. ISSN 0955-2359. OCLC 8017753876. Retrieved 23 June 2021 – via Oxford Journals].
• Reestman, Jan Herman (Autumn 1999). "Citizenship and Nationality: The Case of (Post-) Colonial France and Europe". The Irish Review (24). Togher, Cork: Cork University Press: 18–30. doi:10.2307/29735938. ISSN 0790-7850. OCLC 5557043058. Retrieved 28 June 2021.
• René, Carl; Wohltmann, Ferdinand (1905). Kamerun und die Deutsche Tsâdsee-Eisenbahn [Cameroon and the German Tsâdsee Railway] (in German). Berlin: E.S. Mittler & Sohn. OCLC 251679727.
• Roberts, Walter Adolphe (1971). The French in the West Indies (1942 Reprint ed.). New York, New York: Cooper Square Publishers Inc. ISBN 0-8154-0377-1.
• Rodríguez Serna, Nicolás (June 2016). "Report on Citizenship Law: Panama" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Translated by Rubio Grundell, Lucrecia. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 June 2017. Retrieved 2 January 2021.
• Rosemain, Mathieu (4 October 2020). "New Caledonia Rejects Full Independence from France Again". Canary Wharf, London. Reuters. Archived from the original on 18 March 2021. Retrieved 24 June 2021.
• Rossi, M. Laura (1998). El desarrollo de la ensenanza social de los obispos del Paraguay (1940-1993). Un compromiso progresivo con la dignidad de la persona humana [The Development of the Social Education of the Bishops of Paraguay (1940-1993): A Progressive Commitment to the Dignity of the Human Person] (in Spanish). Rome: Editrice Pontificia Università Gregoriana. ISBN 978-88-7652-802-6.
• Russell-Wood, A. J. R. (May 1977). "Women and Society in Colonial Brazil". Journal of Latin American Studies. 9 (1). Cambridge, Cambridgeshire: Cambridge University Press: 1–34. ISSN 0022-216X. OCLC 936885301. Retrieved 27 December 2020.
• Saada, Emmanuelle (2012). Empire's Children: Race, Filiation, and Citizenship in the French Colonies. Translated by Goldhammer, Arthur. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-73307-4.
• Salvatto, Fabricio Gabriel; Carzolio, María Inés (December 2015). "'Naturaleza' and Citizenship in Modern Spain: From Subject Representation to the Dawn of Contemporary Citizenship (17th-19th Centuries)" (PDF). Almanack (11). São Paulo, Brazil: Federal University of São Paulo: 670–687. doi:10.1590/2236-46332015110. ISSN 2236-4633. Retrieved 25 December 2020.
• Sandell, Marie (2015). The Rise of Women's Transnational Activism: Identity and Sisterhood Between the World Wars. London: I.B. Tauris. ISBN 978-0-85773-730-4.
• Sarazua, Juan Carlos (March 2020). "Report on Citizenship Law: Guatemala" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Translated by Rubio Grundell, Lucrecia Carlos. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 January 2021. Retrieved 9 January 2021.
• Şaul, Mahir (29 June 2015). "Burkina Faso (Upper Volta)". Oxford Bibliographies. Oxford, Oxfordshire: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/obo/9780199846733-0174. Retrieved 13 July 2021.
• Sawyer, Caroline; Wray, Helena (December 2014). "Country Report: United Kingdom" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu (revised ed.). Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 May 2019. Retrieved 17 June 2021.
• Schwarz, Tobias (2012). "Políticas de inmigración en América Latina: el extranjero indeseable en las normas nacionales, de la Independencia hasta los años de 1930" [Immigration Policies in Latin America: The Undesirable Foreigner in National Norms, from Independence to the 1930s] (PDF). Procesos (in Spanish). 36. Quito: Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar: 39–72. ISSN 1390-0099. OCLC 8056258725. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 February 2021. Retrieved 12 February 2021.
• Sembe, Eugene Arnaud Yombo (May 2021). "Report on Citizenship Law: Cameroon" (PDF). Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 July 2021. Retrieved 18 July 2021.
• Sickmon, May C. (26 April 1930). "Nationality of Women and the Hague Conference". The Erie County Republican. Hamburg, New York. p. 3. Retrieved 19 December 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
• Siegel, Mona L. (2020). Peace on Our Terms: The Global Battle for Women's Rights After the First World War. New York, New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-55118-2.
• Sik, Ko Swan (1980). "19. The Netherlands and the Law concerning Nationality". In van Panhuys, H. F.; Heere, W. P.; Jitta, J. W. Josephus; Sik, Ko Swan; Stuyt, A. M. (eds.). International Law in the Netherlands. Vol. III. Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands: Sijthoff & Noordhoff. pp. 3–80. ISBN 90-286-0179-1.
• Sluga, Glenda (2000). "Female and National Self‐Determination: A Gender Re‐reading of 'The Apogee of Nationalism'". Nations and Nationalism. 6 (4). Wiley-Blackwell for the Association for the Study of Ethnicity and Nationalism: 495–521. doi:10.1111/j.1354-5078.2000.00495.x. ISSN 1354-5078. Retrieved 27 January 2019.
• Smith, Andrea Lynn (May 1996). "Citizenship in the Colony: Naturalization Law and Legal Assimilation in 19th Century Algeria". Political and Legal Anthropology Review. 19 (1). Arlington, Virginia: American Anthropological Association: 33–49. ISSN 1081-6976. OCLC 4632790285. Retrieved 30 June 2021.
• Smith, Marian L. (Summer 1998). "'Any woman who is now or may hereafter be married...': Women and Naturalization, ca. 1802–1940". Prologue Magazine. 30 (2). Washington, D.C.: U.S. National Archives and Records Administration: 146–153, part 1, part 2. ISSN 0033-1031. OCLC 208742006.
• Söhngen, Frederika Adolphina (1930). De nationaliteit van de gehuwde vrouw [The Nationality of the Married Woman] (in Dutch). Amsterdam: H. J. Paris. OCLC 1024185871.
• Sorensen, Annemette; McLanahan, Sara (November 1987). "Married Women's Economic Dependency, 1940-1980". American Journal of Sociology. 93 (3). Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press: 659–687. ISSN 0002-9602. OCLC 936702896. Retrieved 23 December 2020.
• Soux, María Luisa; Lema, Ana María (2017). Las mujeres en la historia boliviana, siglos XIX y XX: de la invisibilización a la lucha por la equidad e igualdad [Women in Bolivian History, 19th and 20th Centuries: From Invisibility to the Struggle for Equity and Equality] (in Spanish). La Paz, Bolivia: Fondo de Población de las Naciones Unidas – UNFPA.
• Spiro, Peter J. (July 2015). "Report on Citizenship Law: United States" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 13, 2019. Retrieved March 8, 2021.
• Stevens, Doris (19 May 1930). Doris Stevens Returns from The Hague (PDF) (Speech). National Woman's Party reception, 114 B Street N.E., Washington, D. C. Washington, D.C.: Inter-American Commission of Women. Retrieved 20 December 2020 – via Alexander Street Press: Women and Social Movements.
• Stevens, Doris (28 November 1933). Report on the Nationality of Women (PDF). 7th Conference of American Republics, Montevideo, December 1933. Washington, D.C.: Inter-American Commission of Women – via Alexander Street Press: Women and Social Movements.
• Steward, Theophilus Gould (1915). The Haitian Revolution, 1791 to 1804: Or, Side Lights on the French Revolution (2nd ed.). New York, New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company. OCLC 2453450.
• Stolcke, Verena (July 2009). "Los mestizos no nacen sino que se hacen" [Mestizos Are Not Born but Are Made] (PDF). Avá (in Spanish) (14). Posadas , Misiones: Universidad Nacional de Misiones: 1–30. ISSN 1515-2413. OCLC 7179195100. Retrieved 26 December 2020.
• Stratton, Lisa C. (1992). "The Right to Have Rights: Gender Discrimination in Nationality Laws". Minnesota Law Review. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Law School. ISSN 0026-5535. paper 1838. Retrieved 23 December 2020.
• Tagupa, William (June 1994). "Law, Status and Citizenship: Conflict and Continuity in New Zealand and Western Samoa (1922–1982)". The Journal of Pacific History. 29 (1). Canberra, Australian Capital Territory: Australian National University: 19–35. ISSN 0022-3344. OCLC 6015501156. Retrieved 14 June 2021.
• Takirambudde, Peter Nanyenya (1983). "A Note on the 1982 Botswana Citizenship Act" (PDF). Pula: Botswana Journal of African Studies. 3 (2). Gaborone, Botswana: University of Botswana: 76–81. ISSN 0256-2316. OCLC 772470302. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 July 2020. Retrieved 12 July 2021.
• Territorial Planning Commission (6 August 2012). "American Samoa's Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy, 2012" (PDF). doi.gov. Pago Pago, American Samoa: United States Department of the Interior. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 February 2017. Retrieved 25 April 2021.
• Theodorou, Angelina E. (5 August 2014). "27 Countries Limit a Woman's Ability to Pass Citizenship to Her Child or Spouse". Pew Research. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center. Archived from the original on 3 December 2020. Retrieved 20 April 2021.
• Thwaites, Rayner (May 2017). "Report On Citizenship Law: Australia" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 January 2021. Retrieved 23 March 2021.
• Torres, Manuel (1834). "Manuel Torres, Agent and Chargé des Affaires of the Republic of Colombia, in the United States to John Quincy Adams, Esq., Secretary of State 20 February 1821". In Lowrie, Walter; Franklin, Walter S. (eds.). American State Papers: Documents, Legislative and Executive, of the Congress of the United States. Vol. 4. From the First Session of the Fourteenth to the First Session of the Seventeenth Congress, Inclusive: Commencing March 4, 1815 and Ending May 8, 1822. Washington, D.C.: Gales and Seaton. p. 832. OCLC 2053058.
• Towns, Ann (November 2010). "The Inter-American Commission of Women and Women's Suffrage, 1920–1945". Journal of Latin American Studies. 42 (4). Cambridge, Cambridgeshire: Cambridge University Press: 779–807. doi:10.1017/S0022216X10001367. ISSN 0022-216X. OCLC 8272805411. Retrieved 19 December 2020.
• Trigg, Mary (1995). "To Work Together for Ends Larger Than Self: The Feminist Struggles of Mary Beard and Doris Stevens in the 1930s". Journal of Women's History. 7 (2). Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press: 52–85. doi:10.1353/jowh.2010.0307. ISSN 1042-7961. OCLC 4896484700. S2CID 144171486. – via Project MUSE (subscription required)
• Umpiérrez Blengio, Camila (December 2018). "Los derechos políticos de la mujer en la evolución constitucional uruguaya" [The Political Rights of Women in the Uruguayan Constitutional Evolution]. Revista de Derecho Público (in Spanish). 27 (54). Montevideo: Fundación de Cultura Universitaria: 83–100. ISSN 0797-4302. OCLC 7943306793. Archived from the original on 29 April 2019. Retrieved 11 February 2021.
• United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women; Chinkin, Christine (June 2003). "Women, Nationality and Citizenship" (PDF). Women2000 and Beyond. New York, New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. ISSN 2071-1514. OCLC 614497525. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 September 2020. Retrieved 2 January 2021.
• US Department of State (2005). Annual Human Rights Reports Submitted to Congress: Algeria (Report). Vol. 2 (30th annual ed.). Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office. pp. 1753–1769. OCLC 72763851 – via HeinOnline.
• US Department of State (1964). Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands. International Organization and Conference Series 53. Vol. 16th Annual Report: July 1, 1962 to June 30, 1963. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of International Organization Affairs, Office of United Nations Political Affairs. Publication 7676.
• United States Department of Justice (1950). "In the Matter of W: In Exclusion Proceedings A-6391576". In Sharon, Joel Paul (ed.). Administrative Decisions Under Immigration & Nationality Laws. Vol. 2: January 1944 to August 1947. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. pp. 778–782.
• United States Department of State (1873). Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States. Vol. II: Part I. General Correspondence, and Papers Relating to Naturalization and Expatriation. Washington, D. C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. OCLC 3173585.
• Uribe, Antonio José (1901). Anales diplomáticos y consulares de Colombia [Diplomatic and Consular Annals of Colombia] (in Spanish). Vol. 6: Tratados publicos. Bogotá: Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores. OCLC 1586416. Ley 145 de 1888… Entre los ya citados artículos 16 á 22 de la Ley 145, merecen especial mención el 17, por el importante principio de que en cabeza del marido quedarán naturalizados su mujer y sus hijos menores de 21 años
• US Department of State (1964). Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands. International Organization and Conference Series 53. Vol. 16th Annual Report: July 1, 1962 to June 30, 1963. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of International Organization Affairs, Office of United Nations Political Affairs. Publication 7676.
• US Office of Personnel Management (2001). Citizenship Laws of the World (PDF). Washington, D.C.: American Immigration Lawyers Association. ISBN 978-1-57370-110-5. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 November 2020.
• U.S. Senate Committee on Immigration (1933). American Citizenship Rights of Women: Hearing Before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Immigration, United States Senate, Seventy-second Congress, Second Session...March 2, 1933. Washington, D. C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. OCLC 6257990.
• van den Bosch, D.P. (September 2013). "Toescheiding van nationaliteit" [Attribution of Nationality] (PDF). rechtenoverheid.nl (in Dutch). The Hague: Academie voor Overheidsjuristen. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 May 2019. Retrieved 6 February 2021.
• Van Dyne, Frederick (July 1914). "Reviewed Work: Commentaire de la Loi du 17 Juin 1909, Ayant pour Objet l'Acquisition et la Perte de la Nationalite Belge by Fernand Glesner" [Reviewed Work: Commentary on the Law of June 17, 1909, Concerning the Acquisition and Loss of Belgian Nationality by Fernand Glesner]. American Journal of International Law. 8 (3). Washington, D.C.: American Society of International Law: 673–676. doi:10.2307/2187513. ISSN 0002-9300. JSTOR 2187513. OCLC 5545358086. Retrieved 17 July 2021.
• van Oers, Ricky; de Hart, Betty; Groenendijk, Kees (2006). "11 The Netherlands". In Bauböck, Rainer; Ersbøll, Eva; Groenendijk, Kees; Waldrauch, Harald (eds.). Acquisition and Loss of Nationality. Vol. 2: Country Analyses: Policies and Trends in 15 European Countries. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. ISBN 978-90-5356-920-7.
• van Oers, Ricky; de Hart, Betty; Groenendijk, Kees (April 2010). "Country Report: The Netherlands" (PDF). cadmus.eui.eu (revised ed.). Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. Archived from the original on 2 November 2018. Retrieved 5 February 2021.
• Venator-Santiago, Charles R. (March 2017). "US Territorial Citizenship Today: Four Interpretations". PS – Political Science & Politics. 50 (2). New York, New York: Cambridge University Press: 515–519. doi:10.1017/S1049096516003103. ISSN 1049-0965. OCLC 8271230316. Retrieved March 12, 2021. – via Cambridge Core (subscription required)
• Villarroel Smeall, Gratzia (2001). "Bolivia: Women's Rights, the International Women's Convention, and State Compliance". In Walter, Lynn (ed.). Women's Rights: A Global View. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Publishing Group. pp. 15–28. ISBN 978-0-313-30890-1.
• Villazor, Rose Cuison (March 2017). "American Nationals and Interstitial Citizenship". Fordham Law Review. 85 (4). New York, New York: Fordham University School of Law: 1673–1724. ISSN 0015-704X. OCLC 8090930759. Archived from the original on March 22, 2020. Retrieved March 9, 2021.
• Volpp, Leti (2005). "Divesting Citizenship: On Asian American History and the Loss of Citizenship through Marriage" (PDF). UCLA Law Review. 53 (2). Los Angeles, California: UCLA School of Law: 405–483. ISSN 0041-5650. OCLC 193654281.
• Vonk, Olivier Willem (2014). Nationality Law in the Western Hemisphere: A Study on Grounds for Acquisition and Loss of Citizenship in the Americas and the Caribbean. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. ISBN 978-90-04-27641-3.
• Walker, Iain (2019). Islands in a Cosmopolitan Sea: A History of the Comoros. New York, New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-007130-1.
• Westlake, Donald E. (1972). Under an English Heaven. New York, New York: Simon and Schuster. ISBN 0-671-21311-3.
• Whiteman, Marjorie M. (1967). Digest of International Law. Vol. 8. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. OCLC 635025053. Department of State Publication 8290.
• Wint, Carl (5 March 1993). "Election Day by April 8th". The Gleaner. Kingston, Jamaica. p. 1. Retrieved 7 April 2021 – via Newspaperarchive.com.
• Wintour, Patrick (24 May 2020). "New UK Legal Advice Could Open Door to Hong Kong Citizens". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 16 February 2021. Retrieved 24 February 2021.
• Wold, Emma (1928). Effect of Marriage upon Nationality: Hearings before the Committee on Immigration and Naturalization House of Representatives, 70th Congress, First Session. Washington, D. C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. OCLC 237585125.
• Wylie, Campbell (1967). The Law of Tonga: Comprising All Laws, Acts, and Ordinances in Force on the 1st Day of January, 1967. Vol. I. (Revised ed.). Nukualofa, Tonga: Government Printer. OCLC 1001024946.
• Yohannes, Okbazghi (1991). Eritrea: A Pawn in World Politics. Gainesville, Florida: University of Florida Press. ISBN 0-8130-1044-6.
• Zahniser, Jill Diane; Fry, Amelia R. (2014). Alice Paul: Claiming Power. New York, New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-995842-9.
• Zavareh, Seyyed Mohsen Hashemi-Nasab; Ghaffarian, Elham; Ghamkhar, Naser (April 2018). "The Principles of the Dependent and Independent Nationality of Spouses: Advantages and Disadvantages" (PDF). Ius Humani: Revista de derecho. 7. Quito: Universidad de los Hemisferios: 105–121. doi:10.31207/ih.v7i0.187. ISSN 1390-440X. OCLC 7547579123. Retrieved 22 December 2020.
• "Aanpassing Wet Surinaamse nationaliteit aangenomen" [Surinamese Nationality Act Adopted]. Star Nieuws (in Dutch). Paramaribo, Suriname. 11 July 2014. Archived from the original on 13 July 2014. Retrieved 6 February 2021.
• "Act No. 11: Citizenship of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago". laws.gov.tt. Port of Spain: Government of Trinidad and Tobago. 30 March 1976. Archived from the original on 19 April 2021. Retrieved 19 April 2021.
• "Barbados Constitution of 1966". Political Database of the Americas. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University. 5 July 2011. Archived from the original on 24 February 2021. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
• "Bolivia Decreto Supremo del 24-10-1936" [Bolivia Supreme Decree of October 24, 1936]. Gaceta Oficial del Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia (in Spanish). No. GOB-50. La Paz, Bolivia. 22 May 1936. p. 1894. Archived from the original on 21 February 2021. Retrieved 21 February 2021.
• "Citizenship (Amendment) Act No. 39 of 2013" (PDF). Citizenship Office and Commission. Port Vila, Vanuatu: Government of Vanuatu. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 June 2021. Retrieved 24 June 2021.
• Codigo Civil: Portuguez (PDF) (Segunda edição official ed.). Lisbon: Imprensa Nacional. 1868. OCLC 33477664. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 April 2021 – via Faculty of Law, University of Lisbon. Titulo II: De como se adquire a qualidade de cidadão portuguez, Artigo 18° 6.° A mulher estrangeiros naturalisados, que casa com cidadão portuguez; Titulo III: De como se perde a qualidade de cidadão portuguez, Artigo 22° 4.° A mulher portugueza que casa com estrangeiro, salvo se não for, por esse facto, naturalisada pela lei do paiz de seu marido. (pp. 6–7)
• "Constitución de 1830" [Constitution of 1830]. Miguel de Cervantes Virtual Library (in Spanish). Alicante, Spain: Fundación Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes. 10 September 1829. Archived from the original on 10 February 2021. Retrieved 10 February 2021.
• "Constitución de 1967" [Constitution of 1967]. Political Database of the Americas (in Spanish). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University. 25 August 1967. Archived from the original on 1 November 2020. Retrieved 1 February 2021.
• "Constitución de Honduras" [Constitution of Honduras]. Miguel de Cervantes Virtual Library (in Spanish). Alicante, Spain: University of Alicante. 28 March 1936. Archived from the original on 26 December 2020. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
• "Constitution of the Co-Operative Republic of Guyana of 1970". Political Database of the Americas. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University. 1970. Archived from the original on 17 February 2020. Retrieved 5 April 2021.
• "Convention on the Nationality of Women (Inter-American); December 26, 1933". Avalon Project. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale Law School. December 26, 1933. Archived from the original on 27 December 2020. Retrieved 27 December 2020.
• "Décret-loi n° 1/93 du 10 août 1971 portant code de la nationalité burundaise" [Decree-Law N° 1/93 of 10 August 1971 Relating to the Burundian Nationality Code] (PDF). Citizenship Rights Africa (in French). Gitega, Burundi: Government of Burundi. 10 August 1971. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 July 2021. Retrieved 18 July 2021.
• "Devenir centrafricain: Les privilégiés et les autres" [Becoming a Central African: The Privileged and the Others] (in French). Dakar, Senegal. Agence de Presse Africaine. 14 August 2007. Archived from the original on 27 July 2021. Retrieved 27 July 2021 – via sangonet.com.
• "Historical Background Information on Nationality" (PDF). publishing.service.gov.uk. London: Home Office. 21 July 2017. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 November 2020. Retrieved 8 February 2021.
• "Law No. 65-17 of 23/06/65 containing the Code of Dahomean Nationality". RefWorld. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. 23 June 1965. Archived from the original on 16 February 2018. Retrieved 6 July 2021.
• "Lei da nacionalidade e regulamento: Decreto-Lei n.º 71/76 de 24 de Julho" [Nationality Law and Regulation: Decree-Law No. 71/76 of July 24th] (PDF). Citizenship Rights Africa Organization (in Portuguese). Praia, Cape Verde: Government of Cape Verde. 24 July 1976. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 July 2021. Retrieved 24 July 2021.
• "Lei n.º 37/81, de 03 de Outubro: Lei da nacionalidade" [Law no. 37/81, of 3 October: Nationality Law]. Procuradoria-Geral da República (in Portuguese). Lisbon: Public Prosecution Service. 2020. Archived from the original on 21 March 2021.
• "Loi n° 1981/002 du 29 juin 1981 sur la nationalité zaïroise" [Law N° 1981/002 of 29 June 1981 about Zairian Nationality]. RefWorld (in French). Kinshasa, Zaire: Government of Zaire. 29 June 1981. Archived from the original on 11 February 2021. Retrieved 8 August 2021.
• "Mile. Henni Forchhammer". Equal Rights. XVI (44). Washington, D. C.: National Woman's Party: cover. 8 November 1930. ISSN 1936-9417. Retrieved 2 September 2023. – via ASP: Women and Social Movements (subscription required)
• "Naoero Citizenship Act 2005" (PDF). Republic of Nauru. Yaren, Nauru: Parliament of Nauru. 30 December 2005. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 November 2019. Retrieved 31 May 2021.
• Nauru: Report for Pre-Mandate Period, Ending 17th December, 1920. Papers Past (Report). Thorndon, Wellington: National Library of New Zealand. 1922. Retrieved 31 May 2021.
• "Nauruan Community Ordinance 1956–1962". RefWorld. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. 31 December 1962. Archived from the original on 30 January 2018. Retrieved 30 May 2021.
• "Obtaining Jamaican Citizenship". Embassy of Jamaica. Washington, D.C.: Government of Jamaica. 2014. Archived from the original on 9 June 2020. Retrieved 7 April 2021.
• Revised Statutes and Codes of Porto Rico, Containing All Laws Passed at the First and Second Sessions of the Legislative Assembly, in Effect after July First, Nineteen Hundred And Two, Including the Political Code, the Penal Code, the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Civil Code. San Juan, Puerto Rico: Boletin Mercantil Press. 1902. OCLC 60410913.
• "Social Institutions and Gender Index: Congo" (PDF). OECD. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2019. Archived (PDF) from the original on 3 August 2021. Retrieved 3 August 2021.
• "Suffragists Storm Kellogg Conference". Press-Courier. Oxnard, California. 28 August 1928. Retrieved 19 December 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
• The 2014–2019 National Review Report on Solomon Islands Implementation of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action (PDF) (Report). Honiara, Guadalcanal: Ministry of Women Youth Children and Family Affairs, Government of the Solomon Islands. 2019. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 June 2021. Retrieved 19 June 2021.
• "The Assembly of the League of Nations". Equal Rights. XVI (43). Washington, D. C.: National Woman's Party: cover. 1 November 1930. ISSN 1936-9417. Retrieved 2 September 2023. – via ASP: Women and Social Movements (subscription required)
• "The Bahamas/Bahamas Constitution of 1973". Political Database of the Americas. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University. 16 July 2008. Archived from the original on 11 February 2021. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
• "The New Constitution of El Salvador". Bulletin of the Pan American Union. 73 (6). Washington, D.C.: Pan American Union: 353–361. June 1939. OCLC 19074966.
• "The Political Constitution of the Spanish Monarchy: Promulgated in Cádiz, the Nineteenth Day of March, 1812". Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes. Alicante, Spain: Fundación Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes. 2016. Archived from the original on 4 December 2019. Retrieved 25 December 2020.
• "The World's First Treaty of Equality for Women – Montevideo, Uruguay, 1933". Organización de los Estados Americanos. Washington, DC: Inter-American Commission of Women. 2008. Archived from the original on 26 February 2016. Retrieved 13 July 2015.
• "Tongan Expatriates Eligible for Dual Citizenship". Pacific Islands Report. Honolulu, Hawaii: Pacific Islands Development Program. 5 February 2008. Archived from the original on 17 March 2021. Retrieved 21 June 2021.
• Uruguay. American Nation Series. Vol. 20. Washington, D.C.: Pan American Union. 1941. OCLC 800460134.
• "Vanuatu Achieves Independence". Commonwealth Law Bulletin. 6 (4). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office: 1466–1474. October 1980. ISSN 0305-0718. OCLC 4655294128. Retrieved 24 June 2021.

Category:Nationality Category:Human migration Category:Nationality law Category:People by legal status Category:Women's rights