User:Subhojit Naskar/sandbox

Submission declined on 9 September 2024 by Qcne (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by Qcne 51 days ago. Last edited by Qcne 51 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

Resubmit

Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 12 July 2024 by Qcne (talk).

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by Qcne 3 months ago.

Submission declined on 1 July 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk).

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Declined by DoubleGrazing 3 months ago.

---

1. Nehal Dutta

- Nehal Dutta** is a respected filmmaker known for his work in the Bengali film industry. His journey as a director was shaped by the mentorship of one of Indian cinema's greatest directors, Padmashri Sri Tarun Majumdar. Years of learning and assisting under his mentor's guidance provided Nehal with a comprehensive understanding of filmmaking and storytelling.

1. 1. Career Highlights

- **Debut Film**: Nehal made his directorial debut with the 2011 film *"Palatak"*. - **Notable Ventures**:

 - *"Vaastab"* (2012)
 - *"Agni"* (Joint Venture with Bangladesh, 2014)
 - *"Angaar"* (Joint Venture with Bangladesh, 2014)

- **Bollywood**: He ventured into Bollywood with the Hindi feature film *"Khusboo"* in 2013. - **Recent Projects**:

 - *"Jio Jamai"* (January 2020)
 - *"Baghini"* (December 2020), inspired by the life of West Bengal's Chief Minister, Smt. Mamata Banerjee.
 - *"Amar Challege"*
 - *"Chaddyabeshi"*
 - *"Aparajeo"*
 - *"Gaddar"* (Joint venture with Bangladesh)
 - *"Daroga Mamur Kirti"*

Nehal Dutta continues to contribute to the vibrant world of Bengali cinema, and his upcoming projects promise exciting storytelling. 🎬

---

Sources: [IMDb](https://www.imdb.com/name/nm4959011/), [BookMyShow](https://in.bookmyshow.com/person/nehal-dutta/30859), [Wikipedia](http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Aporajeyo)*

Source: Conversation with Copilot, 1/7/2024 (1) Nehal Dutta - IMDb. https://www.imdb.com/name/nm4959011/. (2) Nehal Dutta - Movies, Biography, News, Age & Photos | BookMyShow. https://in.bookmyshow.com/person/nehal-dutta/30859. (3) Nehal Dutta Production - Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/NehalDuttaOfficial/. (4) Aporajeyo - Wikipedia. http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Aporajeyo.