User:Phchan1/Acculturation/Leoalves11 Peer Review
Peer review
[edit]This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.
General info
[edit]- Whose work are you reviewing? Phchan1
- Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Phchan1/Acculturation
Lead
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes
- Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
- Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes
- Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
- Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Overly Detailed
Lead evaluation
[edit]I think that the lead of this article is solid and straight to the point but could save some details for the other sections in the meat of the article. Perhaps a simply summary of the points made would be more effective in this section.
Content
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes
- Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
- Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No
Content evaluation
[edit]You did well with the contributions you made but I would suggest perhaps adding a bit more to your psychological influence from Accultrative stress.
Tone and Balance
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Is the content added neutral? Yes
- Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
- Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No
Tone and balance evaluation
[edit]Fairly balanced and informative article. Simply information based, little to no noticeable bias.
Sources and References
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
- Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
- Are the sources current? Yes
- Check a few links. Do they work? Yes
Sources and references evaluation
[edit]Everything looks good here.
Organization
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Not exactly, couldn't really find the information added about sociocultural adaptation though the section was fine so I'm sure your contribution was fine.
- Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
- Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes
Organization evaluation
[edit]Good, just hard to pick out your contributions. But article is solid so you did well to blend your work into it.
Overall impressions
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes
- What are the strengths of the content added? Simple and to the point, article link addition is good.
- How can the content added be improved? Only by adding more to it.
Overall evaluation
[edit]Good contributions to a good article, nice work. I would add more to what you have already and perhaps even start a new section to expand on your comparative analysis of the relationship between acculturative stress and adaptability levels.