User:PeterSenseney/Evaluate an Article
Evaluate an article
[edit]This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.
- Name of article: High-mountain tea
- This type of tea was mentioned in class and the article is a appropriate size
Lead
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, it includes details concerning the classification of the tea and growing location
- Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No, its lead does not talk about its only section: the tea production.
- Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes, its lead contains facts about the tea, while the rest of the article is about its production.
- Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is concise.
Lead evaluation
[edit]Content
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes.
- Is the content up-to-date? Yes, updated on july 4th 2020.
- Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? It is a short article that leaves out a lot.
Content evaluation
[edit]Tone and Balance
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Is the article neutral? Yes.
- Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No, it is purely informative, with no controversy.
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Not really, there are no viewpoints.
- Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No.
Tone and balance evaluation
[edit]Sources and References
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Wikipedia indicates that there are many citations needed.
- Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? No, there are not sufficient sources to reflect the literature.
- Are the sources current? Yes.
- Check a few links. Do they work? Yes.
Sources and references evaluation
[edit]Organization
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, it is short and to the point.
- Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? Not that I can see.
- Is the article well-organized - i.e. Broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? There is one section, there could be more.
Organization evaluation
[edit]Images and Media
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes, but there could be more.
- Are images well-captioned? Yes.
- Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes, they are attributed to their authors.
- Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? yes.
Images and media evaluation
[edit]Checking the talk page
[edit]- Guiding questions
- What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? There are none.
- How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? is rated as start-class, low importance by both food and drink/beverages and Taiwan wikiprojects.
- How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
Talk page evaluation
[edit]Overall impressions
[edit]- Guiding questions
- What is the article's overall status? Stub
- What are the article's strengths? Consicision
- How can the article be improved? More information could be provided.
- How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? It is underdeveloped and could use much information.
Overall evaluation
[edit]Optional activity
[edit]- Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback
with four tildes — ~~~~
- Link to feedback: