User:Neve.Toth/Evaluate an Article
Evaluate an article
[edit]This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.
- Name of article: Lily Inglis
- Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. I chose this article because it lacked an in depth look at the architect. It was also an interesting architect to look at, as she was a Canadian female architect.
Lead
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, it is clear.
- Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Kind of, but leaves out important topics. It is a very short introduction to Lily Inglis.
- Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? no
- Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Very short, not a ton of detail.
Lead evaluation
[edit]Content
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes, just not in depth
- Is the content up-to-date? Yes
- Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? There is missing content, lacks analysis of architect
Content evaluation
[edit]Tone and Balance
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Is the article neutral? Yes
- Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
- Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No
Tone and balance evaluation
[edit]Sources and References
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
- Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? No
- Are the sources current? Yes
- Check a few links. Do they work? Some links do not work
Sources and references evaluation
[edit]Organization
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? It is concise, but there is a lot of copy and pasting from resources instead of rewriting in their own words
- Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
- Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Kind of disorganized
Organization evaluation
[edit]Images and Media
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No
- Are images well-captioned? NA
- Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? NA
- Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? NA
Images and media evaluation
[edit]Checking the talk page
[edit]- Guiding questions
- What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? No conversations
- How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? Start-Class, wiki project biography, architecture, women's history, Canada/Ontario, and Women Artist
- How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2020, which I did not know was a thing. It is seem as low importance.
Talk page evaluation
[edit]Overall impressions
[edit]- Guiding questions
- What is the article's overall status? Start-class
- What are the article's strengths? They had basic information on the topic.
- How can the article be improved? Adding photos, adding more sub-headings, discussing projects and architectural style.
- How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? Poorly developed.
Overall evaluation
[edit]Optional activity
[edit]- Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback
with four tildes — ~~~~
- Link to feedback: