User:NatalieBullis/Evaluate an Article
Evaluate an article
[edit]This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.
- Name of article: Law
- Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. I believe that Law itself is very interesting, important to know about and follow.
Lead
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes its very clear
- Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes the whole article is about Law
- Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No it clearly tells what Law is.
- Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? A little over detailed
Lead evaluation
[edit]Content
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes, the article's content relevant to the topic
- Is the content up-to-date? Yes, the content up-to-date
- Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No, I do think it is a little over detailed
Content evaluation
[edit]Tone and Balance
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Is the article neutral? Yes, it shows the good side of Law and why we need it and use it in our everyday lives.
- Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
- Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
Tone and balance evaluation
[edit]Sources and References
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes it gives a long detailed History paragraph
- Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
- Are the sources current?
- Check a few links. Do they work? Yes the vocabulary links work for each word.
Sources and references evaluation
[edit]Organization
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Its not easy to read its very detailed
- Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No grammar issues
- Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, gives the history and legal theory and much more.
Organization evaluation
[edit]Images and Media
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? The images look old.
- Are images well-captioned? Yes
- Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
- Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes, could be bigger
Images and media evaluation
[edit]Checking the talk page
[edit]- Guiding questions
- What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
- How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
- How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? Yes
Talk page evaluation
[edit]Overall impressions
[edit]- Guiding questions
- What is the article's overall status? Gives an over view of what Law is.
- What are the article's strengths? Very well written with many examples, and links to the vocabulary terms
- How can the article be improved? I think the article could be shorten where it has the History of Law
- How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? The article well-developed.
Overall evaluation
[edit]Optional activity
[edit]- Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback
with four tildes — ~~~~
- Link to feedback: