User:Mablanco28/Evaluate an Article
Evaluate an article
[edit]This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.
- Name of article: (link) Body positivity
- Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. Body positivity and acceptance is mentioned a lot in the media. I find this topic interesting.
Lead
[edit]- Guiding questions
Lead evaluation
[edit]Content
[edit]- Guiding questions
Content evaluation
[edit]The content is relevant to the topic. The content is not up to date. There are historically underrepresented eras.
Tone and Balance
[edit]- Guiding questions
Tone and balance evaluation
[edit]I think some of the information presented is biased towards men. The topic of body positivity in men is briefly mentioned.
Sources and References
[edit]Sources and references evaluation
[edit]Some of the links do not work. Sources seem to come from informal blogs.
Organization
[edit]Organization evaluation
[edit]Overall the topics are a little unorganized with the whole flow of the topic.
Images and Media
[edit]- Guiding questions
Images and media evaluation
[edit]There could be more pictures included to support the articles main topics. The images are not laid out in a visually appealing way.
Checking the talk page
[edit]- Guiding questions
Talk page evaluation
[edit]The topic has a lot of critique on the talk page. This article is part of the Wikipedia Education Program.
Overall impressions
[edit]- Guiding questions
- What is the article's overall status?
- What are the article's strengths?
- How can the article be improved?
- How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
Overall evaluation
[edit]I think there are a few things that need to looked over in the article. I think adding more factual information with reliable sources could improve this article.
Optional activity
[edit]- Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback
with four tildes — ~~~~
- Link to feedback: