User:Maariveraa/Evaluate an Article
Evaluate an article
[edit]This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.
- LGBT People in Prison: LGBT people in prison
- LGBT People in Prison have traumatic experiences behind bars. These people get abused and discriminated on the daily. I question myself how they feel physically and mentally? I would like to find out more information about this topic this is why I chose this article to evaluate.
Lead
[edit]- Guiding questions
Yes, the lead includes that the prisoners that are LGBT face a lot of discrimination compared to non-LGBT prisoners.
- Yes the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections.
- No, the Lead doesn't include information that is not present in the article?
- The lead is concise
Lead evaluation
[edit]Content
[edit]- Guiding questions
Yes
Yes
No
- Is the article's content relevant to this topic?
- Is the content up to date?
- Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong
Content evaluation
[edit]Tone and Balance
[edit]- Guiding questions
Yes
Yes
Overrepresented
Persuades the reader in favor of one position
- Is the article neutral?
- Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
Tone and balance evaluation
[edit]Sources and References
[edit]- Guiding questions
Yes all facts in the article are backed up by a reliable secondary source of information
Yes the sources are through
Yes the sources are current
Yes
- Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
- Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
- Are the sources current?
- Check a few links. Do they work?
Sources and references evaluation
[edit]Organization
[edit]- Guiding questions
Yes the article is well written
No it doesn't have any spelling errors
Yes the article is well organized
- Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
- Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
- Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
Organization evaluation
[edit]Images and Media
[edit]- Guiding questions
Yes the article includes images
Yes they are well captioned
Yes
Yes
- Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
- Are images well-captioned?
- Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
- Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
Images and media evaluation
[edit]Checking the talk page
[edit]- Guiding questions
This article is trying to ensure the LGBT related issues.
The article is rated as C-Class on the project quality scale , yes it is part of WikiProjects
It doesn't differ at all, it let's us know how LGBT faces discrimination based on their sexual identity and sexual orientation.
- What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
- How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
- How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
Talk page evaluation
[edit]Overall impressions
[edit]- Guiding questions
It explained a lot of information well, article was well written
It is detailed with all the issues that prisoners face and support that LGBT has
The article can be improved by talking more about how prisoners feel how they get mistreated
The article is well-developed
- What is the article's overall status?
- What are the article's strengths?
- How can the article be improved?
- How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
Overall evaluation
[edit]Optional activity
[edit]- Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback
with four tildes — ~~~~
- Link to feedback: