Jump to content

User:Lionelt/Foobar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Welcome to WikiProject Conservatism! A friendly and fun place where group members can easily ask questions, meet new colleagues and join A-Team collaborations to create prestigious, high quality A-Class articles. Whether you're a newcomer or regular, you'll receive encouragement and recognition for your achievements with conservatism-related articles. This project does not extol any point of view, political or otherwise, other than that of a neutral documentarian.

  • Have you thought about submitting your new article to "Did You Know"? It's the easiest and funnest way to get your creation on the Main Page. More info can be found in our guide "DYK For Newbies."
  • We're happy to assess your new article as well as developed articles. Make a request here.
  • Experienced editors may want to jump right in and join an A-Team. While A-Class is more rigorous than a Good Article, you don't have to deal with the lengthy backlog at GA. If you already have an article you would like to promote, you can post a request for co-nominators here.
  • Do you have a question? Just ask

Alerts

[edit]
Articles needing attention

Did you know

Articles for deletion

  • 27 Jan 2025Man's World (periodical) (talk · edit · hist) AfDed by Reflord (t · c) was closed as merge by Liz (t · c) on 03 Feb 2025; see discussion (6 participants)

Categories for discussion

Files for discussion

Good article nominees

Good article reassessments

Requests for comments

Peer reviews

Requested moves

Articles to be merged

Articles to be split

Articles for creation

Other alerts
Deletion sorting/Conservatism

Conservatism

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Jonathan Keeperman. Liz Read! Talk! 07:21, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Man's World (periodical) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Don't think it passes WP:GNG, only a casual mention in one independent secondary source (The Guardian), can't really find any additional secondary sources via Google search Reflord (talk) 03:51, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Merge to its publisher Jonathan Keeperman (well, he owns the publisher) since the only good source used is about him. PARAKANYAA (talk) 11:06, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
I did the merge basically. Well, I added the due weight content from there to Keeperman's article. PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:45, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
OK, actually I have now realized Raw Egg Nationalist is notable. I may make that article. If I do I will merge the content there instead, but until then Keeperman's article is OK. PARAKANYAA (talk) 04:47, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
I'm of the mind that all of these total upendings and movings of articles are way too hasty. Whether the Man's World article should exist and whether the Raw Egg Nationalist article should exist are separate questions, as is Keeperman and Passage (which, too, can should, and now has to be remade). Bluetik (talk) 03:02, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Why not keep them separate? Bluetik (talk) 03:02, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Keep: There are at least two critical analyses of this magazine: [1] [2]. Should be enough to write a decent article. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 01:32, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Struck my vote because the two analyses were written by the same author. Changing my vote to Merge to Jonathan Keeperman since one author isn't enough. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 01:35, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
    @Helpful Raccoon Thank you for finding that source! PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Jonathan Keeperman#Man's World as an ATD. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 08:05, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
    This is extremely silly. Someone moved the original page to be about the person, even though it obviously makes more sense for it to be with the publishing house, if merged at all - they're separate entities Bluetik (talk) 03:08, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
    I don’t know why but I find the fact that you said that my !vote is silly to be extremely funny. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 18:05, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Tasks

[edit]

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
vieweditdiscusshistorywatch