Jump to content

User:Lethlorian/Nuclear electromagnetic pulse

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Protecting infrastructure

[edit]

The problem of protecting civilian infrastructure from electromagnetic pulse has been intensively studied throughout the European Union, and in particular by the United Kingdom.[1][2]

As of 2017, several power utility companies in the United States had been involved in a three-year research program on the impact of HEMP to the United States power grid led by an industry non-profit organization, Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI).[3][4]

In 2018, The US's Department of Homeland Security released the Strategy for Protecting and Preparing the Homeland against Threats from Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) and Geomagnetic Disturbance (GMD), which was the Department’s first articulation of a holistic, long-term, partnership-based approach to protecting critical infrastructure and preparing to respond and recover from potentially catastrophic electromagnetic incidents.[5][6] Progress on that front is described in the EMP Program Status Report.[7]

NuScale, the small modular nuclear reactor company from Oregon, USA, has made their reactor resistant to EMP.[8][9]

Automated monitoring and controlled systems also known as supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems are the backbone of the computer age. They are critical for mass data transformation across the globe. These systems control fuel lines, water management, and controlling the grid.[10] These systems are not usually in populated environments, but in remote locations and operate autonomously. By being in remote operation it leaves them heavily susceptible to EMP attacks. Due to the nature of these systems companies are investing billions of dollars each year into developing safer SCADA systems to protect them from EMP blasts to prevent massive infrastructure damages. With the protection of these systems EMP attacks would pose little threat to the infrastructure as water, fuel, and electricity would still be able to flow. However, this is a huge cost as the systems are highly complex and integrated through out each system and would take years to replace.

  1. ^ House of Commons Defence Committee, Developing Threats: Electro-Magnetic Pulses (EMP) Archived 2021-03-18 at the Wayback Machine Tenth Report of Session 2010–12.
  2. ^ Extreme Electromagnetics – The Triple Threat to Infrastructure Archived 2013-06-28 at the Wayback Machine, 14 January 2013 (Proceedings of a seminar)
  3. ^ "America's utilities prepare for a nuclear threat to the grid". The Economist. Retrieved 2017-09-21.
  4. ^ "Hearing of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee". www.energy.senate.gov. May 4, 2017. Archived from the original on 2017-05-06. Retrieved Sep 20, 2017.
  5. ^ "DHS Combats Potential Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Attack | Homeland Security". www.dhs.gov.
  6. ^ https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/18_1009_EMP_GMD_Strategy-Non-Embargoed.pdf [bare URL PDF]
  7. ^ https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/emp-program-status-report_508.pdf [bare URL PDF]
  8. ^ "Can Nuclear Power Plants Resist Attacks of Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP)?". Forbes.
  9. ^ https://www.nuscalepower.com/-/media/Nuscale/Files/Technology/Technical-Publications/nuscale-plant-resiliency-to-an-electromagnetic-pulse.ashx [bare URL PDF]
  10. ^ Attack., Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP). Report of the Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Attack : critical national infrastructures. ISBN 978-0-615-53567-8. OCLC 909414639.