User:Jtruongucr/Liang Bua
This is the sandbox page where you will draft your initial Wikipedia contribution.
If you're starting a new article, you can develop it here until it's ready to go live. If you're working on improvements to an existing article, copy only one section at a time of the article to this sandbox to work on, and be sure to use an edit summary linking to the article you copied from. Do not copy over the entire article. You can find additional instructions here. Remember to save your work regularly using the "Publish page" button. (It just means 'save'; it will still be in the sandbox.) You can add bold formatting to your additions to differentiate them from existing content. |
Liang Bua Article Draft
[edit]Liang Bua is a limestone cave on the island of Flores, Indonesia. The cave is slightly north of the town of Ruteng in Manggarai Regency, East Nusa Tenggara. The cave demonstrated archaeological and paleontological potential in the 1950s and 1960s as described by the Dutch missionary and archaeologist Theodor L. Verhoeven.
In September 2003, an Indonesian field team and its coordinator of the excavation team, Thomas Sutikna, uncovered the first indications of a skull. Initially, the archeologists only analyzed the top of the cranium and believed that the skull discovered belonged to a small child due to the small size. However after several days of excavating the skull, Sutikna and his colleagues discovered that its teeth were permanent and mature, revealing that this skull actually belonged to a fully grown adult.[1] After a few weeks, the team had discovered most of this particular hominid's skeleton and later was coded LB1, LB2, etc., after the name of the cave.[2] This skeleton later became the holotype specimen of Homo floresiensis, also known as the "hobbit."[3] Despite the small stature and brain size of Homo floresiensis, they were capable of using stone tools, hunting animals such as small elephants and rodents, and dealing with many predators such as large Komodo Dragons.[4] Excavations are still being conducted and additional findings such as teeth are being discovered and analyzed.
There has been much debate if the skeletal remains are actually Homo floresiensis or not due to the small nature of these species. Further research and studies are still being conducted to confirm whether these discoveries are Homo floresiensis or not. So far Liang Bua is the only location in which such remains have been identified.
History of discoveries
[edit]Theodor L. Verhoeven, a Dutch missionary and archaeologist, was living in Flores in the 1950s and 60s. Verhoeven studied archeology at The University of Utrecht and showed a great interest in it. During this time, he worked at a Catholic Seminary and on his free time, he would explore many archeological sites and perform many excavations in Flores. He discovered stone tools and suspected that Homo erectus from Java were the ones making these stone tools.[5] However, Verhoeven's work was not acknowledged by many paleoanthropologists at this time and/or dismissed his work. After 30 years, an Indonesian-Dutch excavation team discovered new evidence that suggest that Verhoeven's predictions were correct.[6]
In 2001, an Indonesian-Australian team began excavations in Liang Bua. Their goal was to excavate deeper into the cave in the hopes to see if modern or pre-modern humans were using Liang Bua.[7] They were led by Indonesian field coordinator, Thomas Sutikna.[7]
In 2003, Benyamin Tarus, a locally hired worker, was excavating a 2 by 2 meter square and found the first indication of a skull at a depth of 6 meters.[7] At that point, many archeologists stepped in to help carefully remove sediment from the top of the skull. Rokus Due Awe, an Indonesian faunal expert, was called in to help inspect the excavated top portion of the skull.[8] By looking at just the top of the skull, Awe believed it belonged to a small child due to the small size of the cranium. However after several days of excavating, more of the cranium and mandible became exposed. This allowed Awe to further analyze the age and condition the skull was in. They discovered that its teeth were permanent, revealing that this skull actually belonged to a fully matured adult.[7] The team had discovered most of this particular hominid's skeleton and many stone tools that they may have created and used. They were later was coded LB1, LB2, etc., after the name of the cave.
Dr. Peter Brown, an expert on cranial, mandibular, and dental anatomy of early and modern humans was asked to help identify and analyze this new discovery. The skeletal evidence indicates that the adults of these species weighed approximately 66 - 86 pounds, had an average height of 106 cm (3'6") tall, and had very small brains (400 cubic centimeters).[9] Dr. Brown concluded that the proportions between the humerus and femur were very similar to the proportions in Australopithecus and Homo habilis. [10] The characteristics of this skeleton appeared more similar to early hominins like Australopithecus afarensis than compared to modern humans.[7] This skeleton later became the holotype specimen of Homo floresiensis[11].
The key specimens that many researchers focus on are LB1 and LB6. LB1 was discovered unfossilized in September 2003 and consisted of an almost complete skull and partial skeleton. Scientists assume that LB1 was an approximately 30 year old female, approximately 3 feet, had a brain volume of about 380 - 420 cc, and weighed approximately 55 pounds. [12] On the other hand, LB6 consisted of a partial skeleton that appeared shorter than LB1 and its jaw was significantly different as it had a more V- shaped jaw. Scientists assume that LB6 was a child and was approximately five years old. [12]
In 2004 Kira Westaway, a paleoanthropologist at the University of Wollongong, analyzed a thick blanket of sediment that the fossils were found in and discovered that these bones ranged from 18,000 to 38,000 years old.[13] This suggests that these species at Liang Bua were alive during modern times and could have possibly shared this island with modern humans for approximately 30,000 years.[13]
Further Research and Findings
[edit]In 2010 and 2011, archaeologists discovered two hominin teeth in the cave that did not come from Homo floresiensis. According to Sutikna, the teeth date to around 46,000 BP and speculate that the teeth are likely to have come from Homo sapiens.[14] Sutikna proposed that Homo sapiens could have coexisted with the "hobbits" for thousands of years and he also proposed that Homo sapiens could have led to the extinction of Homo floresiensis. However, there is no evidence to indicate that and research is still being conducted to prove his hypothesis.[14]
In 2013, a 3D model of the cave created via laser scanning was made available online by the Smithsonian Institution.[15]
In 2016, scientists discovered a lower jaw and teeth from at least one adult and potentially two children in Mata Menge[16], about 70 kms east of Liang Bua. These findings are dated to about 700,000 years old and could possibly be an early form of Homo floresiensis.[12] Additionally in 2016, Sutikna, Smithsonian researcher Matt Tocheri, and other researchers announced that they concluded that the geological dating at Liang Bua became extinct around 50,000 years ago, which is much earlier than many researchers originally thought.[17] In addition, archaeologists discovered stone tools in the cave that were used from 190,000 to 50,000 years old.[7]
Disagreement
[edit]There is continuing disagreement among scientists as to whether or not the discoveries represent a new and distinct hominid species.[18] The disagreement stems from the abnormal size of the skeletal remains found in Liang Bua. At the time, many of the skeletal remains found before were significantly larger and many researchers doubt that the skeletal remains found were actually a new hominid species.
There are many different theories that researchers have created when trying to explain that the skeletal remains found do not represent a new hominid species. Many believe that it is more likely that the bones of the most complete individual found in Liang Bua (individual LB1) are those of a local person who was possibly suffering from a medical condition or a developmental disorder (perhaps Down Syndrome) rather than a unique species of Homo that lived in Flores.[19] LB1 had a small cranial volume, reported as approximately only 380 milliliters, which is about one third less than the average modern human. LB1 has very distinct short thighbones, which is a characteristic seen in those with down syndrome.[20] Robert B Eckhardt, professor of developmental genetics and evolution at Penn state, and his team suggest that the small cranial volume and short thigh bones are consistent with a down syndrome diagnosis. The size of the cranial volume and thigh bones fall within the range of a modern human with down syndrome from the same geographic region.[21] These characteristics are only present in LB1 and not in the other skeletal remains found in Liang Bua. Dr. Eckhardt believes that this is only further evidence that LB1 had down syndrome due to its abnormality.
Another theory that researchers in 2011 suggested was that the species found in Liang Bua actually suffered from microcephaly[22], a condition where a baby's head is much smaller than expected. To test this, Ralph Holloway, an anthropologist at Columbia University, used a technique called magnetic resonance imaging. Holloway and his team found that the skeletal remains found in Liang Bua do not fall within the range for microcephalic humans and do not fall within the range for normal modern humans.[23] As a result, Holloway and his team concluded that the skeletal remains found in Liang Bua most likely did not suffer from microcephaly and the findings are most likely a new set of species. Holloway believed the reason for their abnormal small brain was because their brain was organized differently, which allows them to be more efficient in a smaller space. However, many researchers disagree with Holloway's conclusion believing that there were many confounding variables that were not taken into account when testing for microcephaly in these fossils.[24] Dean Falk, an anthropologist at Florida State University in Tallahassee, critiques Holloway's conclusion believing that Holloway's endocast (a 3D representation of the space within a cavity) was mis-shaped by the cracks and chips present in the ancient fossil head. Falk previously conducted a computed tomography (CT) scan of the Homo floresiensis skull and found that the skeletal evidence found is likely to be a separate species.[25]
On the other hand, other researchers believed that the small stature and brain size resulted from island dwarfism, an evolutionary phenomenon that body size decreases significantly over time.[26] However, opponents of this theory argue that Homo erectus's brain would not be able to shrink in relation to its body.[27]
Even so, there are still many researchers that argue that the discoveries in Liang Bua represent a distinct species that lived in relatively modern times. Sutikna, Smithsonian researcher Matt Tocheri, and other researchers announced that they conclude that the geological dating at Liang Bua became extinct around 50,000 years ago, which would be 10,000 years before Homo sapiens arrived in the region.[17]
References
[edit]- ^ "'Hobbits' on Flores, Indonesia". The Smithsonian Institution's Human Origins Program. Retrieved 2022-06-02.
- ^ "Homo floresiensis". www.cs.mcgill.ca. Retrieved 2022-06-02.
- ^ Morwood, M. J.; Brown, P.; Jatmiko; Sutikna, T.; Wahyu Saptomo, E.; Westaway, K. E.; Awe Due, Rokus; Roberts, R. G.; Maeda, T.; Wasisto, S.; Djubiantono, T. (2005-10). "Further evidence for small-bodied hominins from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia". Nature. 437 (7061): 1012–1017. doi:10.1038/nature04022. ISSN 1476-4687.
{{cite journal}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ "Homo floresiensis". The Smithsonian Institution's Human Origins Program. Retrieved 2022-06-02.
- ^ "The long search for the earliest inhabitants of Flores". the Guardian. 2016-06-09. Retrieved 2022-05-17.
- ^ Collins, Richard (2016-06-27). "New evidence on human evolution on the Indonesian island of Flores". Irish Examiner. Retrieved 2022-05-18.
- ^ a b c d e f "'Hobbits' on Flores, Indonesia". The Smithsonian Institution's Human Origins Program. Retrieved 2022-04-28.
- ^ Callaway, Ewen (2014-10-01). "The discovery of Homo floresiensis: Tales of the hobbit". Nature. 514 (7523): 422–426. doi:10.1038/514422a. ISSN 1476-4687.
- ^ Brown, P.; Sutikna, T.; Morwood, M. J.; Soejono, R. P.; Jatmiko; Wayhu Saptomo, E.; Awe Due, Rokus (2004-10). "A new small-bodied hominin from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia". Nature. 431 (7012): 1055–1061. doi:10.1038/nature02999. ISSN 1476-4687.
{{cite journal}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ Brown, Peter; Maeda, Tomoko (2009-11). "Liang Bua Homo floresiensis mandibles and mandibular teeth: a contribution to the comparative morphology of a new hominin species". Journal of Human Evolution. 57 (5): 571–596. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.06.002. ISSN 0047-2484.
{{cite journal}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ "Homo floresiensis", Wikipedia, 2022-05-09, retrieved 2022-05-12
- ^ a b c News, Opening Hours 10am-5pmFree General EntryClosed Christmas Day Address 1 William StreetSydney NSW 2010 Australia Phone +61 2 9320 6000 www australian museum Copyright © 2022 The Australian Museum ABN 85 407 224 698 View Museum. "Homo floresiensis". The Australian Museum. Retrieved 2022-05-12.
{{cite web}}
:|last=
has generic name (help)CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ a b "The woman who dates Hobbits and giant apes". cosmosmagazine.com. 2017-10-13. Retrieved 2022-06-02.
- ^ a b Callaway, Ewen (2016-09-21). "Human remains found in hobbit cave". Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2016.20656. ISSN 1476-4687.
- ^ "Liang Bua | 3D Digitization". 3d.si.edu. Retrieved 2022-05-12.
- ^ "Mata Menge", Wikipedia, 2022-05-05, retrieved 2022-05-12
- ^ a b "The 'hobbit' was a separate species of human, new dating reveals". www.science.org. Retrieved 2022-05-12.
- ^ Roberts, Richard 'Bert'; Sutikna, Thomas. "A decade on and the Hobbit still holds secrets". The Conversation. Retrieved 2022-05-12.
- ^ Henneberg, Maciej; Eckhardt, Robert. "'Hobbit' more likely had Down Syndrome than a new species". The Conversation. Retrieved 2022-05-12.
- ^ "Flores bones show features of Down syndrome, not a new 'hobbit' human | Penn State University". www.psu.edu. Retrieved 2022-06-02.
- ^ "Flores bones show features of Down syndrome, not a new 'hobbit' human | Penn State University". www.psu.edu. Retrieved 2022-06-02.
- ^ CDC (2020-02-18). "Facts about Microcephaly | Birth Defects | NCBDDD | CDC". Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved 2022-05-12.
- ^ Vannucci, Robert C.; Barron, Todd F.; Holloway, Ralph L. (2011-08-23). "Craniometric ratios of microcephaly and LB1, Homo floresiensis , using MRI and endocasts". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108 (34): 14043–14048. doi:10.1073/pnas.1105585108. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 3161571. PMID 21825126.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: PMC format (link) - ^ Kaplan, Matt (2011-08-08). "'Hobbit' just a deformed human?". Nature. doi:10.1038/news.2011.466. ISSN 1476-4687.
- ^ Falk, Dean; Hildebolt, Charles; Smith, Kirk; Morwood, M. J.; Sutikna, Thomas; Jatmiko; Saptomo, E. Wayhu; Imhof, Herwig; Seidler, Horst; Prior, Fred (2007-02-13). "Brain shape in human microcephalics and Homo floresiensis". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 104 (7): 2513–2518. doi:10.1073/pnas.0609185104. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 1892980. PMID 17277082.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: PMC format (link) - ^ Schrein, Caitlin. "Why Dwarfism?". SAPIENS. Retrieved 2022-05-13.
- ^ "Study backs 'hobbit' island dwarfism theory". BBC News. 2013-04-17. Retrieved 2022-05-27.