User:Ivana Yizhang Li/Art therapy/Yonna95 Peer Review
Peer review
[edit]This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.
General info
[edit]- Whose work are you reviewing? (Ivana Yizhang)
- Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Ivana Yizhang Li/Art therapy
Lead
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? No not yet
- Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Not yet
- Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Not yet
- Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Not yet
- Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? No
Lead evaluation
[edit]Waiting for a Lead to be created...but other information has been developed.
Content
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes the User:Ivana Yizhang Li/Art therapy has uploaded a case.
- Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
- Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Content that is missing are Definition, History of art therapy, Schizophrenia, Art therapy and Depression.
Content evaluation
[edit]Add information to the blank Headers such as Definition History of Art therapy etc.
Tone and Balance
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Is the content added neutral? Yes
- Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No, I think the viewpoints that are there are represented very well.
- Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No
Tone and balance evaluation
[edit]Tone and balance is very good no persuasion anyway.
Sources and References
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
- Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
- Are the sources current? Yes
- Check a few links. Do they work? Yes
Sources and references evaluation
[edit]The User:Ivana Yizhang Li/Art therapy sources and references are accurate and useful for her Article but needs more sources she only has 4.
Guiding questions:
- Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
- Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
- Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes
Organization evaluation
[edit]The organization of the article is well done and includes Art Therapy instructions and outcomes of one particular participant
Images and Media
[edit]Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media
- Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes its one of the participants work.
- Are images well-captioned? Sort of...its missing the year it was possibly published but when you click it your able to see everything.
- Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? I think this one particular image does
- Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes
Images and media evaluation
[edit]If its possible to upload at least 2-3 more images and a video that is instructional base of Art therapy? I think these will help explore the article more in depth and draw more viewers to it.
For New Articles Only
[edit]If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
- Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? Yes
- How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? The list only contains 4 sources, and yes.
- Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? Sort of
- Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? Not really
New Article Evaluation
[edit]Find a way to link other articles to your article.
Overall impressions
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Not yet
- What are the strengths of the content added? The strengths of the article is art therapy instructions and cases, you do not really see that in Wikipedia
- How can the content added be improved? Filling out the missing paragraphs under the headers.
Overall evaluation
[edit]Hopefully the User:Ivana Yizhang Li/Art therapy finish uploading the missing information.