User:Ishangill10/Civic journalism/Brooke.baker873 Peer Review
Peer review
[edit]This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.
General info
[edit]- Ishangill10
- Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Ishangill10/sandbox
Lead
[edit]Guiding questions:
- The lead provides good detail about what civic journalism is and why it is important
- the user created a good background for readers to understand the rest of the article
Lead evaluation
[edit]Content
[edit]Guiding questions:
- The user added a good amount of content that was all relevant to the article
- the user did a good job of structuring the content into categories
Content evaluation
[edit]Tone and Balance
[edit]Guiding questions:
- the tone of the article was very neutral and the user did a good job of staying objective
Tone and balance evaluation
[edit]Sources and References
[edit]Guiding questions:
- the user should add more sources and citations to the article
- the one citation is a trustworthy source
Sources and references evaluation
[edit]Organization
[edit]Guiding questions:
- The content is all very easy to follow and read
- I think the article could benefit from headers and section titles
Organization evaluation
[edit]Images and Media
[edit]Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media
- N/A
Images and media evaluation
[edit]For New Articles Only
[edit]If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
- N/A
New Article Evaluation
[edit]Overall impressions
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Overall the user added a lot of great content
- Could use more citations
- Should add section headers