User:Gb825/Arpilleras/Ag611232 Peer Review

Peer review

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

• Gb825
• Arpilleras

Lead

Guiding questions:

• Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes
• Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
• Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?Yes
• Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Not really.
• Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is not everly detailed, its a really good introduction.

Content

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added relevant to the topic?Yes I really liked the clarifications/additions you made on certain topics like the church's role in inspiring the Arpilleras
• Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
• Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?Nope

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added neutral? Yes. The facts you provided were pretty neutral and the sources support them
• Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?No
• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? I would say that all that I read gave me sufficient information that satisfied the viewpoints I wanted to see.
• Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

• Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? No,not all of it.
• Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes they do.
• Are the sources current? Most of them are.
• Check a few links. Do they work? Yes they all work.

Organization

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?Yes I really liked the organization of this particular wikipedia article.
• Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? NO
• Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

• Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
• Are images well-captioned?
• Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
• Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?