User:Caducut/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article

This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.

Name of article: Ilocano grammar
Briefly describe: It is in a topic that I find interesting and worth looking into.

Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No
Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Concise

Article needs brief description of major sections.

Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes
Is the content up-to-date? No
Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Yes
Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? No

Article needs new, relevant resources.

Is the article neutral? Yes
Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Article has its strength in neutral tones. Keep this neutrality when editing.

Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? No
Are the sources current? No
Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Yes
Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Sources should be updated. Sources are old and outdated.

Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Organizationally, it is good. Keep this structure continuous.

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No
Are images well-captioned? No
Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? No images in article
Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? No images in article

The media and images are lacking. Adding new photos will enhance the article.

What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? Following a grammar and linguistics convention
How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? Rated S
How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? This is a quick guide on the language. It does not note the history.

The article is rated S, meaning there is room to discuss more of it.

What is the article's overall status? There is room to improve this article. It is rated S.
What are the article's strengths? The article is straight-forward and has information accessible.
How can the article be improved? Adding better sources will help this article.
How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? It is sufficient, but needs to be developed more (underdeveloped).

This article has room for improvement. It needs new sources and needs to be better developed. It has potential.

Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~~~~