User:A12anne/Evaluate an Article
Evaluate an article
[edit]This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.
- Name of article: (link) http://fr.wiki.x.io/wiki/Magasin_(archives_et_biblioth%C3%A8ques)
- Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. Parce que c'est lui qu'on travail dessus
Lead
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Oui
- Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?Non
- Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Y'a pas de séparation.
- Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Y'a pas de lead.
Lead evaluation
[edit]Content
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Oui
- Is the content up-to-date? Oui
- Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? oui
- Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? Non
Content evaluation
[edit]Tone and Balance
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Is the article neutral? Oui
- Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Non
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Non
- Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? Non
Tone and balance evaluation
[edit]Sources and References
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Non
- Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Non
- Are the sources current? Y'en a pas
- Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Non
- Check a few links. Do they work? Y'en a pas.
Sources and references evaluation
[edit]Organization
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? oui
- Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? Non
- Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Non
Organization evaluation
[edit]Images and Media
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?Oui
- Are images well-captioned? Non
- Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Non
- Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?Oui
Images and media evaluation
[edit]Checking the talk page
[edit]- Guiding questions
- What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? There is no
- How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? ''bon début'' Moyenne, yes.
- How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? Laissé à l'abandon alors que clairement il respecte pas les consignes.
Talk page evaluation
[edit]Overall impressions
[edit]- Guiding questions
- What is the article's overall status? Mauvais, y'a qu'une section et aucune citations.
- What are the article's strengths? Il résume bien.
- How can the article be improved? Faire des sections et mettres des sources.
- How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? Mal développé
Overall evaluation
[edit]Optional activity
[edit]- Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback
with four tildes — ~~~~
- Link to feedback: