The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted without image by Theleekycauldron (talk) 22:16, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Overall: A very substantial and well-formed article on an interesting figure; the things that went on... Developed as draft 31/12/20-14/8/21, that's patience - and so fully OK on timing. Well-cited, incl. every para of body text. Neutral. Required some time with Earwig but two notable numbers did not flag any substantive issues. While not included in the nomination, hook facts are well-cited in the text. Hooks are decent, the "unpatriotism" should catch eyes, and the "spying for King George" is even better. QPQ is done, with some depth, so AOK there. Approved to go. SeoR (talk) 16:37, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
.png)
A very substantial and well-formed article on an interesting figure; the things that went on... Developed as draft 31/12/20-14/8/21, that's patience - and so fully OK on timing. Well-cited, incl. every para of body text. Neutral. Required some time with Earwig but two notable numbers did not flag any substantive issues. While not included in the nomination, hook facts are well-cited in the text. Hooks are decent, the "unpatriotism" should catch eyes, and the "spying for King George" is even better. QPQ is done, with some depth, so AOK there. Approved to go. SeoR (talk) 16:37, 24 August 2021 (UTC)