Template:Did you know nominations/William Hood Dunwoody
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by — Maile (talk) 16:01, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
William Hood Dunwoody
[edit]![Portrait of William Hood Dunwoody by Julian Russell Story](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/77/William_Hood_Dunwoody-MIA.jpg/120px-William_Hood_Dunwoody-MIA.jpg)
Portrait of William Hood Dunwoody by Julian Russell Story
- ... that William Hood Dunwoody (pictured) was a silent partner in what was to become General Mills?
ALT1:... that the Minneapolis Institute of Art bought what is called one of the best Rembrandts in the United States (pictured) with a gift from William Hood Dunwoody?- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Lance Gibbs
- Comment: picture for ALT1
Created by SusanLesch (talk). Self-nominated at 01:39, 19 August 2015 (UTC).
- Comment I'm sure Lucretia is "called one of the best Rembrandts in the United States" but the only ref here is a museum publication from 1922, which I can't see. Also chunks of the article should be integrated into Minneapolis Institute of Art (not a DYK requirement). Johnbod (talk) 15:35, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, Johnbod. You're right I neglected a citation. It's there now! P.S. Moved some to the MIA article. There's an argument for moving the gallery but I don't know the context well enough to do that (MIA may have several or many million dollar donors). -SusanLesch (talk) 14:16, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:41, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
This article is new enough and long enough. The image is in the public domain, the article is neutral and I detected no close paraphrasing. Both the hooks are acceptable, with inline citations, but I would go for the original hook as in ALT1 it is not readily apparent which article the hook is about. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:31, 5 September 2015 (UTC)