Template:Did you know nominations/Tudor City

Tudor City

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

A building in Tudor City

• ... that the architecture of Tudor City in Midtown Manhattan was intended to attract people who would have otherwise moved to the suburbs? Source: Samuel, Lawrence R. (2019). Tudor City: Manhattan's Historic Residential Enclave. Landmarks. The History Press. pp. 29, 31.
  • ALT1: ... that the main entrances of three buildings in Tudor City were stranded up to 17 feet (5.2 m) in the air after a neighboring street was widened? Source: "Tudor City Sues For Million on 42d St. Grading: Alleges New U.N. Approach Left Woodstock Tower's Entrance Hanging in Air". New York Herald Tribune. October 7, 1951. p. 27.
  • ALT2: ... that residents of Tudor City once put themselves in front of a bulldozer to prevent a park there from being demolished? Source: ."The City; Bulldozer Halted At Tudor City M.T.A. Unit Decries Plan to Raise Fares Gains Are Reported In P.B.A. Pact Talks". The New York Times. May 26, 1980
  • ALT3: ... that a New York City governmental board and a New York state court both ruled that parks at Tudor City were essential services? Source: "The City; Rent Office Blocks Tudor City Towers". The New York Times. July 30, 1983.
  • ALT4: ... that some residents of Tudor City were almost displaced by the United Nations? Source: Clarity, James F. (October 23, 1971). "Neighborhoods: Village of Tudor City". The New York Times;
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Everett Railroad 11

Improved to Good Article status by Epicgenius (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 694 past nominations.

Epicgenius (talk) 15:50, 9 January 2025 (UTC).

• I'll be reviewing this for my QPQ in a few hours. Wolverine X-eye (talk) 06:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
• General eligibility:
• New enough:
• Long enough:
• Other problems:

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing:
• Neutral:
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
• Other problems:

Hook eligibility:

• Cited:
• Interesting:
• Other problems:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: The article is pretty long yet it does a good job of staying focused and faithful to its sources. I didn't notice any glaring issues so this is a straightforward pass. I suggest you go with alt2 as the four other hooks seem rather bland in comparison. Wolverine X-eye (talk) 19:09, 10 January 2025 (UTC)