Template:Did you know nominations/Liceu bombing

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by LunaEclipse talk 01:18, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Liceu bombing

(

)

Illustration of the Liceu bombing

... that audience members initially applauded the Liceu bombing (pictured), assuming it to have been part of the show?

Source: Bray, Mark (2022). The Anarchist Inquisition: Assassins, Activists, and Martyrs in Spain and France. Cornell University Press. pp. 55–56. ISBN 9781501761928. LCCN 2021038606.

ALT1: ... that after killing more than 20 people in the Liceu bombing (pictured), Santiago Salvador intended to kill even more people at his victims' funeral? Source: Bray, Mark (2022). The Anarchist Inquisition: Assassins, Activists, and Martyrs in Spain and France. Cornell University Press. p. 65. ISBN 9781501761928. LCCN 2021038606.
ALT2: ... that six innocent people were executed for the Liceu bombing (pictured), despite Santiago Salvador confessing to be the sole perpetrator? Source: Bray, Mark (2022). The Anarchist Inquisition: Assassins, Activists, and Martyrs in Spain and France. Cornell University Press. pp. 76–78. ISBN 9781501761928. LCCN 2021038606.
Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Abortion in the United Arab Emirates

Improved to Good Article status by Grnrchst (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 47 past nominations.

Grnrchst (talk) 14:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC).

Hi, I'll be reviewing this. E_F⁵ 15:21, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

General eligibility:

New enough:
Long enough:
Other problems:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing:
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Other problems:

Hook eligibility:

Cited:
Interesting:
Other problems:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: E_F⁵ 15:21, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Article has a decent size (~4800 words), so is definitely eligible in that aspect. The hooks are sourced but in a book, so I'll AGF. Article is neutral, with no weasel words, and Earwig doesn't find any significant plagiarism/paraphrasing. ALT0 is the most interesting to me, The image is clear, seems to be properly sourced, and is relevant. Good job! E_F⁵ 15:21, 8 January 2025 (UTC)