Template:Did you know nominations/Georgia Cryptologic Center

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 23:32, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Georgia Cryptologic Center

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that the Georgia Cryptologic Center is an NSA facility that uses the code name "Sweet Tea"? Source: https://www.wired.com/2012/03/ff-nsadatacenter/ Quote: "NSA Georgia, Fort Gordon, Augusta, Georgia...Codenamed Sweet Tea, the facility has been massively expanded..."
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Edith Rosenwald Stern
  • Comment: Eagwig matches a quote in the article taken from an NSA website, but it's in quotations to make clear where it's coming from, and per Copyright status of works by the federal government of the United States is PD text as is the description that matches in the "Role" parameter of the infobox.
    • Added {{USGovernment}} to the reference. BorgQueen (talk) 13:00, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
      • @BorgQueen: Thank you, I didn't know about that template, I'll make a note of that for future use. - Aoidh (talk) 13:04, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

5x expanded by Aoidh (talk). Self-nominated at 11:13, 31 December 2022 (UTC).

• I'll review this. BeanieFan11 (talk) 01:45, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: New enough, long enough (just barely), neutral and sourced. No copyvios. Hook is interesting and cited. QPQ done. This looks good to go! BeanieFan11 (talk) 02:03, 1 January 2023 (UTC)