Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/First Nations in Alberta

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:46, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

First Nations in Alberta

[edit]

5x expanded by Kevlar67 (talk). Self nominated at 16:32, 26 February 2014 (UTC).

  • The following has been checked in this review by Maile
  • QPQ done by Kevlar67
  • DYK Check confirms 5X expansion that began on Feb 24, 2014
  • 10033 characters (0 words) "readable prose size"
  • Duplication Detector check of online sourcing found no copyvio
  • First hook stated in the article and sourced
  • ALT1 hook stated in the article and sourced
  • ALT2 hook stated in the article, but the sourcing does not seem to specify the number "48"
  • Every paragraph needs to have at least one inline source
  • Dab links need to be taken care of
  • External links tool shows 3 dead links
This is a nicely detailed article on the First Nations in Alberta. Just needs a few little fixes.— Maile (talk) 15:00, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Comment: Kevlar67 has just posted to my talk page that a little more time is needed (new baby!) to address the issues here. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:00, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Update: Removed dead links, added more detailed refs with quotations for ALT 3, removed uncited section completely, fixed DAB links. Should be good now. --Kevlar (talkcontribs) 23:05, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
  • New reviewer needed to complete review. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:27, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
    • Still paragraphs starting Anthropologists and Bands have no citation. I fixed on DAB link myself too. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:59, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
      • Also, ref 9 is a bare URL, which is not allowed for DYK articles; it needs to be filled in. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:30, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Update - Citations added for problem paras, bare ref converted to a template. --Kevlar (talkcontribs) 20:36, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Reiterating call for new reviewer to complete review now that citations have been added. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:43, 10 April 2014 (UTC)