Template:Did you know nominations/Divya Saxena
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 22:18, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Divya Saxena
- ... that Canadian cricketer Divya Saxena allegedly obstructed the field while batting against the United States but was given "not out"? Source: Canada cricketer allowed to continue her innings after obstructing the field against USA
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Ernest Muir (doctor)
- Comment: Ideally, this hook should be published between 1 and 15 May, when the subject will be playing in the Fairbreak Invitational 2022 Women’s T20 Cricket tournament in Dubai (not (yet) mentioned in the article).
Created by Bahnfrend (talk). Self-nominated at 08:01, 22 April 2022 (UTC).
I notice that this nomination is more than three weeks old, but the QPQ requirement is not complete. Please remember that a QPQ should be completed within a week of the nomination, as per RfC on excessively late supply of QPQ credits. Please do a QPQ promptly. Flibirigit (talk) 16:51, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Flibirigit: Sorry, I lost track of the time. QPQ now done. Bahnfrend (talk) 14:08, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Thank you. A full DYK review is still needed. Flibirigit (talk) 14:38, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
@Bahnfrend: New enough and long enough. QPQ present. Looks good from a reference standpoint. But I'm really not sure about this hook. From reading the obstructing the field article, this is clearly a very rare event. Our readers that understand cricket will understand why this would have, ahem, sparked a row. But this isn't very obvious to me. Is there a way to reword this in a way that might make it more accessible to readers that don't know the sport and provide some context? Perhaps... Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- ALT0a: ... that Canadian cricketer Divya Saxena was almost dismissed for allegedly obstructed the field but was ruled "not out"?
- @Sammi Brie: Thanks for your review. Sorry about the slow response. Yes, obstructing the field is very rare, especially in international matches. I suggest the following further modified hook:
- ALT0b: ... that Canadian cricketer Divya Saxena was accused of obstructing the field in an international match but was ruled "not out"?
- Bahnfrend (talk) 02:55, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
I would be fine with this. I think "accused" captures this well. I still prefer ALT0a myself, but the promoter can choose 0a or 0b. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:30, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
