Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Disappearance of Donald James Cavanaugh and David Virgil Neily

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 07:48, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Article was deleted at AfD, so there's nothing left to review; closing

Disappearance of Donald James Cavanaugh and David Virgil Neily

[edit]

Created by Georgejdorner (talk). Self-nominated at 15:45, 1 September 2016 (UTC).

 • No issues found with article, ready for human review.

    • This article is new and was created on 15:27, 01 September 2016 (UTC)
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 6403 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (8.3% confidence; confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.

 • No overall issues detected

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 18:16, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

  • Comment by nominator: Two links to article added in response to the orphan tag.Georgejdorner (talk) 15:18, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
  • As neither subject has been officially confirmed dead, I think WP:BLP still has to apply (and in the case of near relatives, definitely does), and consequently this cannot satisfy the DYK criteria being a negative hook. Not really main page material in my view, I'm afraid. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:58, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
    • My rereading of the article shows no derogatory info about either of the missing men. How about supplying examples?Georgejdorner (talk) 16:06, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Article is now at AfD. This DYK nomination is on hold until the AfD closes. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:50, 16 October 2016 (UTC)