Template:Did you know nominations/Corinne Rey-Bellet

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by JuniperChill talk 06:19, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Corinne Rey-Bellet

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that the murder of Swiss skier Corinne Rey-Bellet led to a change in Swiss gun control regulations? Source: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2018/02/21/switzerland-loves-its-guns-but-mass-shootings-rare/358500002/ "But that changed somewhat in 2007, a year after Swiss champion skier Corinne Rey-Bellet and her brother were shot by Corinne's estranged husband, who used his old military-issue rifle to commit the murder. After that incident, the government ordered that ammunition for army weapons be left in arsenals, although the guns could still be kept at home."
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Boneghazi

Created by PARAKANYAA (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 6 past nominations.

PARAKANYAA (talk) 07:03, 19 December 2024 (UTC).

• Tagging this as my QPQ review. Howard the Duck (talk) 12:05, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

  LOL oops sorry someone is already reviewing this. Howard the Duck (talk) 18:52, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

  If we were supposed to do two QPQs, which I am not sure of, I also did Template:Did you know nominations/Big Motor. PARAKANYAA (talk) 12:26, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

  @Howard the Duck What? Who else is reviewing this? I am confused. PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:25, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

  Sorry for the confusion. If you meant to review this, this is yours. I thought no one was reviewing this. Howard the Duck (talk) 22:36, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

  @Howard the Duck I am the nominator! I was saying I had another QPQ if I needed that. No one else is reviewing it. PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:48, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

  Oh sorry. You just have 7 DYKs, so you won't need a second QPQ review in times of a backlog; on this case you are good to go. I've already reviewed two articles, but I'd review this myself later, unless someone beats me. Howard the Duck (talk) 00:04, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

• It's been a few days, so I hope it's OK if I do beat Howard the Duck to this review... my checklist is below.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: The hook immediately caught my interest, and the article is really thorough and well-written. Thanks for the compelling read! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 04:42, 27 December 2024 (UTC)