Template:Did you know nominations/Coccotrypes dactyliperda
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by Launchballer talk 18:00, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Coccotrypes dactyliperda
- ... that more than three generations of the date stone beetle, up to 70 to 80 beetles, can occupy a single date seed until the seed is completely consumed?
- Reviewed:
Created by Alexiathia (talk). Self-nominated at 08:24, 1 March 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Coccotrypes dactyliperda; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Hi! Welcome to DYK, it is awesome to see more folks nominating articles and your class sounds amazing! Would love to be in it! Sadly, this article has been previously nominated for DYK, and was featured on the Main Page previously. Therefore it is not eligible for DYK inclusion despite your 5x expansion. Ornithoptera (talk) 04:11, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- The guidelines were recently changed to allow renominations after five years, and this was in 2009. This is fine.--Launchballer 15:20, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- Interesting article, on fine sources, and sufficiently expanded. I believe that refs 3 and 4 mean the same - can you please combine them, and call by name? The hook is a good idea, but I don't see the 3 generations yet, and believe the 70 to 80 beetles are interesting enough. What do you think, Alexiathia? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:14, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Alexiathia: Please respond to the above. Z1720 (talk) 15:24, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Interesting article, on fine sources, and sufficiently expanded. I believe that refs 3 and 4 mean the same - can you please combine them, and call by name? The hook is a good idea, but I don't see the 3 generations yet, and believe the 70 to 80 beetles are interesting enough. What do you think, Alexiathia? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:14, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- The guidelines were recently changed to allow renominations after five years, and this was in 2009. This is fine.--Launchballer 15:20, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Marking as rejected due to a lack of response. This can be reopened if Alexiathia returns or someone else is willing to take over this nomination. Z1720 (talk) 19:23, 31 March 2024 (UTC)