Template:Did you know nominations/Carnufex

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 03:00, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Carnufex

(

)

... that Carnufex (pictured), means "Butcher" in Latin?

ALT1:... that Carnufex (pictured), is an extinct relative of crocodiles that lived 231 million years ago in Carolina?
Reviewed: Cottonwood Limestone

Created by IJReid (talk). Self nominated at 18:38, 20 March 2015 (UTC).

Only one source is used. I am uncertain of whether this is acceptable or not. There must be other sources out there covering this. --George Ho (talk) 03:50, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Actually no George Ho. The organism was described in October 2014 and it takes a long time for any new papers to come out. All other references at this time would be news reports and pop culture info. see this Google Scholar search for "Carnufex" [1], no results on the first page relate to the crocodylomorph. And also searching "Carnufex" in google only comes up with the original publication and news reports. IJReid ^discuss 15:00, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

I won't give a re-review (red) icon yet, but I hope someone else can refute my review. George Ho (talk) 19:15, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

I have added more references anyways now, is it acceptable? IJReid ^discuss 23:31, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

I don't know why The Guardian is used as a source, but whatever. Now that there are three, I'll let someone else review this. George Ho (talk) 23:34, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Article long enough and new enough. Well referenced to the type description (I think the new articles are superfluous to be honest). No duplication or copyviolation issues identified. Image is appropriately licensed. I prefer hook alt1. As a general note, i like to avoid the wording Carnufex carolinensis, meaning "Carolina butcher", as it gives undo weight to an usupported name (Carolina butcher), but would suggest transitioning the sentence into a break down of the etymology such as seen at Diploporus. @George Ho:, single references have always been considered acceptable for articles on biology taxons, as often the type description is the only source for its description.--Kev min § 01:47, 24 March 2015 (UTC)