Template:Did you know nominations/Australian angelshark
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 06:26, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Australian angelshark
[edit]... that the Australian angelshark is not easily caught because it usually lies immersed in the sediment on the seabed?
- Reviewed: Hildegard Björck
5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self nominated at 20:06, 24 September 2013 (UTC).
Article expanded 5X; hook under 200 characters; sufficiently paraphrased from sources. Both the source and the article state that the shark is not easy to catch using line-fishing or netting; the IUCN source mentions that it is vulnerable to catch by trawling, which is omitted from the article. I think the hook is not quite accurate without including the method of catching as a qualifier. Agree? Sasata (talk) 20:51, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- You just beat me to the review and I was going to state the same thing - I read it as being susceptible to being caught by trawling rather than the interpretation giving in the hook/article. violet/riga [talk] 20:58, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- I have added trawling to the article and suggest this amendment to the hook - Cwmhiraeth (talk) 04:59, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- ALT1 ... that the Australian angelshark is not easily caught by line-fishing or netting because it usually lies immersed in the sediment on the seabed?
