Talk:Zweibrücken
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Bibligraphy
[edit]It seems to me there is nothing wrong with the inclusion of older works in a bibliography of Zweibrücken (e.g. Lehmann). Molitor's work for instance is still a classic and is regularly quoted in the relevant literature. It just would appear important not to rely exclusively on the older works - that's why I added some more modern books to the bibliography. Josias Bunsen 9 July 2005 13:31 (UTC)