A fact from Zur Geschichte der Religion und Philosophie in Deutschland appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 31 October 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
A point of curiosity: Assuming the original pub was in French, did Heine translate it himself for Germany? Or was the French text itself a translation by Heine (or someone else?) from German? Interesting that the German pub was in 1834 and the last essay was published in France in December of that year. I have assumed that he was bilingual and capable of writing this in both languages. Jmar67 (talk) 21:11, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
According to the Heine article, "He had little interest in French literature and wrote everything in German, subsequently translating it into French with the help of a collaborator." Jmar67 (talk) 05:36, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In case of doubt, just copy from what's there, - we are supposed anyway to follow an article's standard of referencing if detectable. When I have time I put them in a separate section as templates, to not clutter the text and make their editing easy. (I hate it if I want to edit a reference, and have to search in the article where it's defined, especially when used multiple times.) When I have no time I just through in a link with title and website. - DNB has a template. If you see an article which has no {{authority control}} (ac) please add it. (It collects data from common sources.) If you see an article which has ac, but no DNB, please add it under external links, using the displayed DNB number as the only parameter value. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:22, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]