Talk:Zoroastrian calendar

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Zoroastrianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Zoroastrianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ZoroastrianismWikipedia:WikiProject ZoroastrianismTemplate:WikiProject ZoroastrianismZoroastrianism
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Time C‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Time assessment rating comment

Want to help write or improve articles about Time? Join WikiProject Time or visit the Time Portal for a list of articles that need improving.
—Yamara ✉ 16:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First paragraph

First paragraph: "... and was based systemically on the Babylonian calendar" is wrong. If any, its basis was Egypt's 12 x 30-days-calendar. Needs correction.

              García  angel.garcia2001@googlemail.com    217.226.8.17 (talk) 15:56, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Hyksos were ..Chaldean from Ur.. ?? There were no Chaldeans in Ur in the days of the Hyksos. They did not penetrate that far south until 500-600 years later... This whole story stinks. Jcwf (talk) 00:44, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where did the Chaldeans come from originally? Chaldeans are Aramaic-speaking, they invented the base 60 Mathematics that we still use today to tell and keep track time, and is the very bases of the 360 day calendar used in Egypt , they also invented Astronomy, astrology and first Concepcion of the all powerful Supreme God above in control of all the universe and duality of opposite forces expressed today in quantum mechanics , that gave birth to the first monotheistic Astrotheology based Zoroastrian religion , that was latter appropriated and used by old testament authors to reinvent monotheism in their own image . The Chaldeans greatly influenced and advanced the Egyptian and Hebrew culture by teaching them written language, and using the alphabets , base 60 Mathematics for universal cycle measurement and time keeping as we know it today , Astrology ,and Astronomy, that is in fact intertwined into the Egyptian culture and made possible the building the Pyramids which is now a major part of the Egyptian culture , and history . The Chaldeans have a history that spans more than 5,500 years, dating back to Mesopotamia, and the deluge epic, and go back much farther as recorded in the Sumerian Antediluvian kings list illustrating the personification of the cosmic kings associated with cyclical cosmic events and their durations recorded in Astrological ages , as recorded from the cradle of civilization / the Garden of Eden , located on the 33ed Parallel in present-day Iraq

.However, the post-plagued culture of Egypt rebuilt itself until Ramses in 1290 BC gathered priests who claimed that Memphis existed before the Hyksos and so claimed Hyksos to be an invasion not a merge..

What on earth does this refer to?? Memphis did exist before the Hyksos.

Jcwf (talk) 00:51, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of whether it was correct or not, it was irrelevant to the subject at hand, and is now gone. Likewise the personal essay on intercalation by 90.184.12.226; this was either off-topic (i.e. belonged at intercalation, which is linked from the article), or already discussed. -- Fullstop (talk) 18:27, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Intercalcations

Intercalations did not always follow a regular pattern, but during the reign of Artaxerxes II (circa 380 BC) astronomers utilized a 19-year cycle which required the addition of a month called Addaru II month in years 3, 6, 8, 11, 14 and 19, and the month Ululu II in year 17 of the cycle.

Does anyone have access to the cited source? Because that sounds to me like someone's confusing a lunar calendar with this one. That cycle, adding months in seven of nineteen years, works well for lunisolar calendars, but would add way too many months for a calendar in which the months are all 30 days, which would require months being added every five or six years. In fact, following that cycle with 30 day months would make it *less* accurate than not adding months at all, averaging just over 371 days per year XinaNicole (talk) 23:23, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Zoroastrian calendar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150122230410/http://parsicalendar.com/ to http://ParsiCalendar.com
Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150122230410/http://parsicalendar.com/ to http://ParsiCalendar.com

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:55, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Epoch of Zoroastrian Religious era

There seems to be an error in the epoch of the Zoroastrian Religious era, given as "the northern vernal equinox of 1737 BCE". This is most probably a misunderstanding of the "astronomical year -1737", which is equal to 1738 BCE (and not "1737 BCE"). The example given, "Hence the year 3738 ZRE began in 2000 CE." is in correspondence with an epochal date of 6 April 1738 BCE (proleptic Julian) [= 22 March 1738 BCE (proleptic Gregorian) = 1 Farvardin 2359 BPE], but not at all with an epochal date of "5 April 1737 BCE". /Erik Ljungstrand (Sweden) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.241.158.201 (talk) 13:55, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]