Jump to content

Talk:Zhou Houkun/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Kimikel (talk · contribs) 01:34, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Kusma (talk · contribs) 17:34, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Content and prose review

[edit]

I will comment on anything I notice, but not all of my comments will be strictly related to the GA criteria, so not everything needs to be actioned. Feel free to push back if you think I am asking too much, and please tell me when I am wrong.

  • Lead: reminder to self to comment on completeness / coverage later.
  • Name: The Chinese Wikipedia says that his courtesy name was 朋西 (Péngxī)
  • he worked as an engineer for various Chinese companies, the chief editor of the Journal of The Chinese Engineering Society, and the vice president of Shanghai Industrial Junior College better to repeat "as" here for clarity.
  • its communist revolution this is piped to the Chinese Civil War, which is not optimal.
  • Early life: bringing silkworm farming to Jiangsu source says he brought it to "the region", which isn't quite the same as the entire province. Would it be enough to say that his grandfather became wealthy by silkworm farming?
  • The section is very short; a possible (but certainly not mandatory) restructuring would be to merge with the first part of the next section to "Early life and education" (strictly speaking, studying isn't a career...)
  • Career: Zhou was selected as an Indemnity Scholar do we know by whom? And do we know whether he spoke English already?
  • BTW some interesting people were selected in the same year, for example Zhao Yuanren. I don't know whether they ever met, but Zhou and Zhao would certainly have had something to talk about :)
  • the first such degree awarded in the field Does this mean that MIT was the first university to award such degrees or that Zhou was the first recipient of an aeronautical engineering degree worldwide? (I will need to check sources carefully as these are both fairly strong claims)
    • Actually seems he was the first person to receive a degree in aeronautical engineering overall. OK.
  • Chinese typewriter: I can't see any links to Chinese typewriter in this section, but I would expect one. There seems to be more content here, so perhaps a {{main|Chinese typewriter}} is not needed.
  • More precisely, it seems the sort order was Kangxi radical + stroke count? (a popular sort order used in many dictionaries and even in Unicode).
  • Qi Xuan do we know his name in characters?
  • Return to China: the Chinese typewriter article mentions a Commercial Press employee called Shu Changyu (舒昌鈺), while the zhwiki article on Zhou mentions a Shu Zhendong (舒震東); were both of these people involved?
  • Your ref 2 mentions him in 1959 so he was probably still alive?

Source spotchecks

[edit]

Numbering from Special:PermanentLink/1260410089

  • 1 and 2: would be nice to have an author for these pages. An educated guess is Emma Teng (see her website [1]).
  • 1f: ok
  • 1l: not sure the question mark is enough for an explicit "is unknown"; just neither you nor the author of 1 knows it...
  • 1a/2a: I don't think these two sources are independent of each other, so giving both doesn't really help... and there are other opinions on the year of birth like 1889? here. Primary sources on ancestry.com (passenger lists from 1910) list him as 20 years old, which points to 1889/1890 using Western age counting and 1891 using Chinese age counting.
  • 2c: ok
  • 4: ok. and indeed Zhao Yuanren was on his boat so I am happy now :) (big fan of the guy). The book hedges the "first aeronautics degree" a bit to "first aeronautics degree in the US".
  • 9b: ok
  • 10: couldn't fully access but looks plausible
  • 22b: ok
  • 26b: ok
  • 31: ok
  • 35b: ok

Spot checks clear.

General comments and GA criteria

[edit]
  • Prose: some points see above.
  • MoS: No major issues.
  • Referencing is ok, minor comments see above. Not certain about year of birth.
  • Broadness/focus: information about his life from the 1930s onwards is very scarce, but that seems to be the same as in the sources. zhwiki has slightly more on the 1930s but the source link is permanently dead and I couldn't reproduce anything.
  • No other major article issues.
  • Images are PD and captions are OK.

A nice article, a few minor things to do but should not take long. @Kimikel, over to you. —Kusma (talk) 23:22, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the review. I've done a few quick changes; I'll get to the rest tomorrow. Kimikel (talk) 04:36, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Kusma: I have addressed all of your comments. I implemented most of the changes you suggested; where I didn't, I left a comment. Thank you again for the review and please let me know what else you need from my end. Kimikel (talk) 15:29, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed