Talk:Zebras (Law & Order: Special Victims Unit)
Appearance
Zebras (Law & Order: Special Victims Unit) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 8, 2009. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Law & Order: Special Victims Unit episode "Zebras" earned higher ratings than an NBC special about Barack Obama, which aired the same night? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Zebras (Law & Order: Special Victims Unit)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 02:01, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Looks interesting, but I already found some link rot. Will review shortly. MathewTownsend (talk) 02:01, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Link rot fixed. --Davejohnsan (talk) 21:49, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:
- B. Complies with manual of style guidelines for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. Prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Provides references to all sources according to the guide for layout:
- B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. Provides references to all sources according to the guide for layout:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Main aspects are addressed:
- B. Focused: (See summary style):
- A. Main aspects are addressed:
- Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- Very nice little article. Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 23:10, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Media and drama good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles
- GA-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- GA-Class Episode coverage articles
- Unknown-importance Episode coverage articles
- Episode coverage task force articles
- GA-Class Law & Order articles
- Low-importance Law & Order articles
- Law & Order task force articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- GA-Class Women writers articles
- Low-importance Women writers articles
- WikiProject Women articles
- WikiProject Women writers articles