This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article was copy edited by Macwhiz, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on September 19, 2010.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
This phrase "The battalion was previously known to be incompetent" makes no sense, as the preceding discussion is about the 31st Infantry (which means regiment). I cannot tell if someone forgot to mention a battalion, or if someone wrote battalion when they meant regiment -- but at it stands now, it looks pretty clearly nonsensical. Harvard yarrd —The preceding signed but undated comment was added at 19:13, August 26, 2007 (UTC).
This article contains a reference that starts "Possibly Young Kim, born in Los Angeles on February 24, 1920." The word "possibly" is a red flag; the citation should be verified before it's added. Further, it seems to me that this cannot logically be the right birthdate. Reliable sources say the man died on December 29, 2005 at age 86. If so, he could not have been born February 24, 1920; if he had been born then, he would have been age 85 at his death. One source or the other must be wrong, and the "possibly" leads me to presume that the birth date citation is most likely in error. What was the reasoning behind this reference? // ⌘macwhiz (talk) 13:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
