Talk:XQD card

Electronics Mid‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force.

Photography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lexar on on board with XQD

It was just the 11th of July 2012 that Lexar plan on releasing XQD cards by the end of 2012. http://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/07/11/Lexar-announces-XQD-support-in-Q3-2012 AquaGeneral (talk) 14:27, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also Sony have just announced their line: http://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/07/02/Sony-s-series-168-mb-s-XQD AquaGeneral (talk) 14:41, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Some chart needed

Cards size comparison chart is needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.57.30.187 (talk) 12:45, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Many varieties of XQD card - S and G seem to be the fastest, H, M and N the slowest, but no one has updated the page to include the info. --52.119.115.152 (talk) 02:52, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on XQD card. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140308000937/http://presscentre.sony.co.uk/content/detail.aspx?NewsAreaId=2&ReleaseID=7201 to http://presscentre.sony.co.uk/content/detail.aspx?NewsAreaId=2&ReleaseID=7201

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:06, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on XQD card. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested edit - avoid confusing TB and TiB

Hello all: I suggest a correction: The link in "storage capabilities beyond 2 TB" points to the article on tebibyte.

It would be best to either state "storage capabilities beyond 2 TiB" and keep the link as is or keep "storage capabilities beyond 2 TB" and link to the article on terabyte. This should prevent adding more confusion between binary and decimal prefixes. I am not sure what change is best and I am not experimented enough with edits for attempting to do it myself. Could someone please take care of this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacques.999 (talk • contribs) 09:01, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]