Talk:Writings of Cicero

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ancient philosophy

Classical Greece and Rome Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Duplicate Text

I understand the need to prevent this page from being a monolithic list of links, but I question if the introduction of the page should really be copied word-for-word from the Cicero page itself. My apologies if this is already being worked on, but seeing as how the text has been there for some time, but I felt it needed pointed out to someone more informed on the matter and the matter of Wikipedia style. --216.170.23.234 (talk) 03:08, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This link did not work:

http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Post_Reditum_in_Quirites&action=edit&redlink=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.181.193.59 (talk) 05:51, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reader’s Guide?

Following on the preceding comment: it would be nice if the page had some reader's guide. I mean, which book is the most popular, most important, most accessible, or something of that sort. Ceplm (talk) 09:27, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Academica

We have no article about Cicero's book Academica. I have created a draft article [[1]]. Improvements welcomed. Teishin (talk) 00:44, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

pro milone

why is "pro milone" listed within "political speeches"? while it was supposed to be political in impact, it was primarily concerned with milonis acquittal, the original speech having been held in a court, albeit a special one, as cic. notes in the beginning. the edited speech might have been "published" for political reasons, but that is the case for other "legal" speeches as well. granted, cic. argues on behalf of the republic etc., but the overall intention is a speech of the defense. 2001:62A:4:41D:D0CC:4F34:9E9B:7D5C (talk) 15:10, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]